Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Keeping us under their thumb

The day when each and every one of us in this country is tracked and traced throughout every minute of the day, 24/7, 365/12 is growing ever nearer.

With RFID tagging of our purchases, tracking and tracing of our cars, eavesdropping on our conversations at home through the in-built microphones in our PCs, ID Cards etc, etc already being rolled out, - and for those who think I am exaggerating please go to - I am convinced that the end goal of the controlling elite is to be able to check up on us at will to elicit our whole lifestyle, movements, desires, conversations, in fact every aspect of our daily lives.

This is all coming into place in a drip by drip way and each day the media brings fresh news of the latest initiatives that form the building blocks of this total Big Brother surveillance society with further disciplinary initiatives for those who don’t behave in accordance with the NWO blueprint.

Today we see reports of a new police initiative to fingerprint all drivers who get stopped by them for whatever reason. Their prints, obtained by a hand-held electronic device will automatically consult with the national fingerprint database which comprises some 6.5 million prints and will enable them to confirm their identity, particularly useful if they have a criminal record.

Currently being trialled by 10 forces in England and Wales, the scheme is supposed to save time as identification can be processed within a few minutes and avoiding the need to take suspects to the police station.

The police say that these prints would not be kept if a person was not identified as having a criminal record, but are we to believe that they would not be retained on some database.

As with so many other similar Big Brother type initiatives, it’s sold to us as some innocent means of saving time and money and the public have nothing to fear if they are law-abiding citizens with no criminal record. Yet, it all smacks of being suspected as guilty until proved otherwise. The tables have turned. Whether we like it or not, in this brave new world we are all being regarded as potential criminals who have to prove our innocence. What a depressing state of affairs!

It’s happening everywhere too and seemingly with our consent as we dream walk in this surveillance state nightmare. In Dumfries and Galloway in Scotland 92% of parents agreed to a system whereby school children are to be fingerprinted to allow them to borrow books from school libraries. Again, it’s all sold on the basis of ease of operation - the kids who are fingerprinted will not require any assistance while borrowing their books. Objections to this scheme have been received from academics on civil liberties grounds, but the overwhelming agreement of the scheme by so many unthinking parents rather makes the civil liberty dissenters look rather marginal.

Currently such fingerprinting schemes, particularly those that require the transmission of the data to a central data bank, have to have the information files heavily compressed in order not to use up too much bandwidth and transmission time. It is this compression which worries the techies, as the infinitely subtle characteristics of fingerprints really require the best resolution to make accurate identifications. Clearly the economies being made could lead to false ID.

With news in the last few days of parents being subjected to ‘super nannies’ - government-sponsored adjudication of parenting for those with ASBO-potential kids, not ot mention the plethora of other initiatives that this government is rolling out by the barrel load; and whose reception is seemingly accepted by an acquiescing majority in the false belief that it is for their security or that it is for a safer society (completely bogus beliefs), I dread the thought of what kind of society we are going to end up living in in the next ten or twenty years.

But new entrants into our brave new world will see it as all being part of daily life and will have no concept of those old dearly-held values of freedom of speech and expression and the right to be regarded as innocent until proven guilty in a world where we could go about our business without state and corporate Big Brother breathing down our necks 24/7

Tuesday, October 17, 2006

The Military Commissions Act 2006 (HR6166)

A rather misleading title for a bill that has sealed the fate of America and its citizens.

The Military Commissions Act, which was passed by Congress on Thursday September 28th has now been signed by Bush, a bill which was hastily run through Congress with many members not even reading it. website encapsulates the key features of HR6166:

  • Doesn't suspend, as is accommodated for in the Constitution, but completely abolishes Habeas Corpus permanently - the right of the detainee to see the evidence against him and not be locked up for eternity based on the arbitrary will of the state.
  • Contains a definition of "wrongfully aiding the enemy" which labels all American citizens who breach their "allegiance" to President Bush and the actions of his government as terrorists subject to possible arrest, torture and conviction in front of a military tribunal.
  • The definition of torture that the legislation cites is US code title 18 section 2340. This is a broad definition of torture and completely lacks the specific clarity of the Geneva Conventions. This definition allows the use of torture that is, "incidental to lawful sanctions." In alliance with the bill's blanket authority for President Bush to define the Geneva Conventions as he sees fit, this legislates the use of torture.
  • Destruction of any property is defined as terrorism, which is deemed punishable by any means of the military tribunal's choosing.
  • Any violent activity whatsoever is defined as terrorism if it takes place near a designated protected building, such as a charity building.
  • A change of the definition of "pillaging" turns all illegal occupation of property and all theft into terrorism. This makes squatters and petty thieves enemy combatants.
  • In light of Greg Palast's recent hounding by Homeland Security, after they accused him of potentially giving terrorists key information about U.S. "critical infrastructure" when filming Exxon's Baton Rouge refinery (clear photos of which were publicly available on Google Maps), sub-section 27 of section 950v. should send chills down the spine of all investigative journalists and even news-gatherers. It defines collecting information clandestinely which is then used against the interests of the U.S. government as terrorism.
  • The bill allows hearsay evidence (obtained via phony confessions after torture) to be considered by the military tribunal and bars the suspect from even having knowledge of the charges against him - making a case for defense impossible. This is guaranteed to produce 100% conviction rates as you would expect in the dictatorships of Uzbekistan or Zimbabwe and other torture protagonists who are in many cases allied with the Bush administration and provide phony confessions obtained from torture that allow the U.S. government to scare its people with the threat of imaginary Al-Qaeda terror cells waiting to kill them.
  • All of these provisions apply to American citizens. Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman states in the L.A. Times, "The compromise legislation....authorizes the president to seize American citizens as enemy combatants, even if they have never left the United States. And once thrown into military prison, they cannot expect a trial by their peers or any other of the normal protections of the Bill of Rights." Similarly, law Professor Marty Lederman explains: "this [subsection (ii) of the definition of 'unlawful enemy combatant'] means that if the Pentagon says you're an unlawful enemy combatant -- using whatever criteria they wish -- then as far as Congress, and U.S. law, is concerned, you are one, whether or not you have had any connection to 'hostilities' at all."
  • In section 950j. the bill criminalizes any challenge to the legislation's legality by the Supreme Court or any United States court. Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales has already threatened federal judges to shut up and not question Bush's authority on the torture of detainees.
Following in the wake of Patriot Acts I and II, this latest and final dismantling of the US constitution and Bill of Rights will render America a facsist military dictatorship - a veritable Nazi-style Germany.

Yet the American press have been totally unconcerned about what is the most damning piece of legislation in America’s history. The mainstream media, as always, are deliberately set up prevent Americans from hearing the truth.

According to Reuters "He is trying to help Republicans maintain control of the U.S. Congress by contending they are stronger on national security, a stance with which Democrats vehemently disagree".

Which way will this swing the pendulum next month in the mid-term elections?

It really is goodbye America.

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

The Real Modus Operandi

News reports have revealed that the British government and MI5 wanted to postpone the arrest of those involved in the proposed airliner bombings until after the dastardly deed had been done. It is believed that the bombings were to have taken place on August 16 and the fact that our government and intelligence services were prepared to wait until after an estimated 3,000 innocent passengers could have been killed, beggars belief.

The Daily Mail has revealed how MI5 had employed ‘sneak and peak’ teams to bug and follow the unfolding plot up to and beyond its enactment. These infiltration teams were composed of SAS specialists who conducted their operation in much the same way as they had with the IRA in Northern Ireland. The London Times has reported that Pakistani intelligence services believe that a British intelligence mole (or moles) had been planted in the terror cell.

It is known, thanks to whistleblower Kevin Fulton, that in the 1980s and 90s, the SAS and British military intelligence routinely embedded themselves with the violent branches of the IRA, aiding and abetting terrorist acts against Protestants in Northern Ireland in order to skew the political situation. Fulton went public over these covert activities because as an intelligence officer himself, he and his department were being given the Prime Minister’s authority to engage in terrorist acts which would cost the lives of many, such as the 1998 Omagh bombing in which 29 people including babies were killed.

This same modus operandi was used in the 7/7 bombings, with evidence, once again, showing heavy involvement by MI5. The Fact that the so-called ringleader, Mohammed Siddique Khan’s car was known to be bugged by MI5, despite Met Police denials, shows complicit knowledge, if indeed not covert involvement within the intelligence services in the 7/7 bombings killing 52 and injuring another 770 people. Former Met Police officer Charles Shoebridge has even gone on record to say that the evidence points to the shocking fact that Khan was working for MI5 as an informant.

We have now heard the opinion of former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, who believes that the proposed bombings were staged propaganda and a means for Blair and Bush to absolve themselves and regain face at a time of low ratings in the opinion polls.

Here’s is how it works.

In the ongoing bid by our globalist masters to entrap us in their control web, we are faced with potential acts of terrorism which we are told must be fought with the loss of our liberties if we are to remain ‘safe’. We are led to believe that radical Islamists are the common enemy, they hate of our ‘democratic’ way of life and are constantly planning to terrorise the west.

To make this a palpable reality, our government, on directives from globalist policy think tanks, sanctions the intelligence agencies and SAS to covertly infiltrate radical Muslim groups, aid and encourage these would-be extremists with the intellectual and physical means to carry out terrorist attacks, then engage young, naive youths from Muslim backgrounds, in activities that are explained to them as ‘training exercises’ or drills which are supposedly designed to help the security services be more effective, while in reality they are being engaged, unwittingly, in real terrorists activities.

This is why, so often, the suspects in these terror attacks, whether actual or foiled, appear to be innocent, decent law-abiding and quiet young men and very often not particularly bright. They are the ones that either get blown up or incarcerated in police swoops, while the real ring leaders - the MI5 assets - avoid recrimination by being safeguarded by those very same intelligence agencies and paymasters.

Meanwhile Joe Public loses more of his rights in order to be ‘protected’ from these terrorists.

Yesterday we saw the announcement that new airport procedures are to be introduced with particular religious and ethnic groups (Muslims) being monitored very closely. This is another desired result for the globalists who are clearly hell-bent on marginalising the whole Muslim ethic in their ‘ethnic cleansing’ of the Middle East to make way for one homogenous global ‘religion’ and world state.

Now that this globalist-inspired modus operandi is becoming more and more evident as each day passes, and today’s revelation that British security services, at the behest of our government, were quite prepared to sacrifice the lives of 3,000 innocent people before arresting the long-known ringleaders - who were in their employ anyway - it is time we and our elected MPs demanded an unbiased inquiry into the events of last week.

Any such report would very likely expose the whole rotten game play and bring the house of cards crashing down.

Growing scepticism
Over the past few days, several newspapers and commentators have been reporting a growing scepticism among the British public over the validity of the many terrorist plots that we are constantly being bombarded with in the media.

With Charles de Menezes having being wrongly targeted as a terrorist, the Forest Gate raid being proven to be a false flag, suspects from the 7/7 bombings looking unlikely candidates as suicide bombers, the initial false flag report of the neurotic woman aboard a Washington DC flight today, all set against a background of lies and mis-information given out by our government in relation to Iraq’s WMD capability, it’s no wonder that a growing air of mistrust is descending upon the British public, while the credibility of Blair and his entourage plummets even further.

Last week’s intended attack on multiple trans-Atlantic flights is rapidly joining the ranks of the plethora of other potential incidents to be tagged as another piece of fabrication. Many view it as a deliberate ploy to divert people’s attention of the Lebanese/Israeli conflict and our government’s bad posturing in favour of an aggressive Israel, while others, quite rightly, see a connection between each new terror alert and our liberties being flushed down the pan via another round of draconian legislation.

Government credibility is beginning to go through the floor and Blair and his minders from above must be getting pretty twitchy right now as Internet newsgroups, blogs and chat rooms as well as disconcerting sounds within some mainstream newspapers increasingly air sceptical views over what our governments are really up to. Conspiracy theories are rife, only the conspiracies are not the products of over-inventive members of the public, but appear to be the fruits of our government in collusion with its intelligence agencies.

Long may this metamorphosis of growing public awareness continue. What we now have to wait for is another 9/11 which I and others view as being inevitable enabling Blair and Bush to make a bid in turning the tide of public scepticism and attempting to re-inforce the view that there really are radicals out there determined to destroy our way of life. But that next 9/11 won't be a result of the actions of Muslim extremists, as with 9/11 they will be orchestrated by our own desperate governments!

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

The Nuclear Conspiracy

The Toronto Star reports that Ontario premier, Dalton McGuinty, is to announce to his government today that Ontario will get more nuclear power plants.

This followed his ‘power-broker friendly’ speech to the Bilderberger conference over the weekend, singing Ontario’s praises and revealing his nuclear power plans, truly music to the ears of those present at Bilderberg as this kind of talk supports their raison d’ĂȘtre. Their agenda is all about raping the planet in the continual quest of ‘dirty energy’ for profit and has little to do about cheap, alternative environmentally friendly energy sources which would benefit us all.

With Tony Blair also trumpeting the same nuclear tune in tandem with French President Jacques Chirac at their meeting which was concurrent with that of the Bilderbergers in Ottawa last weekend, let's dispell a few commonly bandied beliefs that originate from their quarter over the supposed benefits of nuclear energy.

The main arguments in favour of nuclear energy are that once the initial costs of plant construction have been met then the supply of nuclear energy is plentiful and cheap and that a functioning plant emits little or no greenhouse gasses unlike their coal and oil-fired counterparts. These arguments do not hold water.

Mining and milling

One area of the nuclear production process that is often conveniently disregarded is the hazardous and wasteful process of accessing the Uranium in the first place.

Uranium is widely distributed in the earth’s crust but there are few places on earth where its concentrations are rich enough for it to be used as an ore. Even where those concentrations do exist, a ratio of ore to usable uranium is typically 0.01 to 0.2 per cent. Therefore a great deal of material has to be extracted through mining to obtain enough raw uranium, unlike coal mining where a high proportion of what is extracted is usable.

This not only makes the extraction process costly but environmentally unfriendly as 1,000 tonnes of rock will have to be extracted to provide just one tonne of ‘yellowcake’, or usuable bright yellow uranium oxide, while the ‘tailings’, or 999 tonnes of waste, which has been disturbed and is also radioactive, is left in the open, to be washed and blown into the environment by the rain and wind. These tailings remain radioactive indefinitely and in the instance of Uranium 238, contain all thirteen of its radioactive decay products forming a cascade of heavy metals with a wide varietyof decay lives:

The decay sequence of uranium-238

The sequence starts with uranium-238. Half of it decays in 4.5 billion years, turning as it does so into thorium-234 (24 days), protactinium-234 (one minute), uranium-234 (245,000 years), thorium-230 (76,000 years), radium-226 (1,600 years), radon-222 (3.8 days), polonium-218 (3 minutes), lead-214 (27 minutes), bismuth-214 (20 minutes), polonium-214 (180 microseconds), lead-210 (22 years), bismuth-210 (5 days), polonium-210 (138 days) and, at the end of the line, lead-206 (non-radioactive).

An ‘in-situ leaching’ process is used for extracting uranium from deeper deposits and this involves the use a large quantities of sulphuric and nitric acid as well as ammonia which is left in situ only to be pumped back to the surface some five to twenty five years later to reveal about a quarter of the uranium from the saturated rocks. One can imagine the massive amount of disturbed radioactive material left behind in the ground, not to mention the acids and toxic materials which will manifest themselves in the local environment and aquifers.


The extracted uranium oxide has then to be enriched as the usable uranium 235, that which provides the fission chain reaction necessary in nuclear power plants, and only accounts for about 0.7 per cent of the ‘yellowcake’, 3.5 per cent being the required concentration. During this process of enrichment the yellowcake is treated with fluorine to form uranium hexafluoride with 85 per cent of it coming out as waste in the form of depleted uranium hexafluoride which can then be made into depleted uranium (DU) metal for use in armour-piercing shells. DU weapons, as we know, have wreaked havoc among those who have been subjected to their effects in Iraq. But it does provide a handy little income for the processing industries.

What is Depleted Uranium?

The misnamed 'Depleted' Uranium is left after enriched uranium is separated from natural uranium in order to produce fuel for nuclear reactors. During this process, the fissionable isotope Uranium 235 is separated from uranium. The remaining uranium, which is 99.8% uranium 238 is misleadingly called 'depleted uranium'. While the term 'depleted' implies it isn't particularly dangerous, in fact, this waste product of the nuclear industry is 'conveniently' disposed of by producing deadly weapons.
Depleted uranium is chemically toxic. It is an extremely dense, hard metal, and can cause chemical poisoning to the body in the same way as can lead or any other heavy metal. However, depleted uranium is also radiologically hazardous, as it spontaneously burns on impact, creating tiny aerosolised glass particles which are small enough to be inhaled. These uranium oxide particles emit all types of radiation, alpha, beta and gamma, and can be carried in the air over long distances. Depleted uranium has a half life of 4.5 billion years, and the presence of depleted uranium ceramic aerosols can pose a long term threat to human health and the environment.
Campaign against Depleted Uranium.

But the vast amount of DU is kept as solid state uranium hexafluoride and rather than being stored in sealed containers for final disposal in an underground location, cost considerations have caused it to be dumped willy-nilly in ‘temporary’ cool storage.

It is only after this enrichment process that we see the final fissionable ceramic pellets of uranium dioxide which are then displayed for our visual consumption as the ‘neat’ energy solution. No mention is ever given of the wholly costly, wasteful and dangerous road that has led to their creation.


But the trail of environmental hazards is not yet over. Once these fuel pellets have been eventually spent in the production of providing power for steam-raising in the power station, they have to be disposed of, but only after they have cooled off, allowing the various isotopes present to decay in water for between 10 and 100 years, 60 being the norm.

After this ‘cooling-off’ period, official policy is currently undecided as to their final fate. But whatever solution is adopted, we are left with an almost infinite legacy of lingering danger. One option is to pack them using robotic control into containers lined with lead, steel and pure electrolytic copper and then bury the containers for millions of years. Whichever secure method of disposal is considered, the amount of energy and cost required to produce such impregnable containers is roughly equivalent to the cost of building the reactor in the first place.

This cost is conveniently overlooked by politicians while selling their masters desire for their revenue earning pet projects, while we, the consumer will pick up the tab.

Accidental emissions

Of course none of this so far includes the possibility of yet another potential hazard; the Chernobyl effect.

Although safety is generally of a high order in the nuclear industry, the rather boring and routine nature of safety procedures has been described as being conducive to working ‘asleep at the wheel’. With governments keen to commission nuclear plants for political reasons and to make up for oil and gas, too much haste could lead to insufficient training and safety measures being implemented. The outcome of any major nuclear disaster could be incalculable both in environmental and financial terms and it has been accepted that a catastrophe could be so great to be beyond the capacity of the world’s insurance companies.

The Nuclear Installations Act of 1965 required that a plant's operator must pay a maximum of £150 million in the ten years after the incident. The government would cover any excess and pay for any damage that arose between ten and thirty years afterwards. Under international conventions, the government would also cover any cross-border liabilities up to a maximum of about £300 million. Although these figures reflect the monetary values of the 60s, even adjusted to today’s figures they are a gross under-estimate of the kind of compensation required. If an easterly wind were to blow radioactive material towards London from a destroyed Bradwell nuclear power station in Essex, it is estimated that the bill would more likely top £300 trillion rather than £300 million!


What we have gleaned so far paints an entirely different picture to that coming from the insincere pronouncements from Blair, Bush and other proponents for nuclear energy.

In conclusion we can summarise:
  • Extraction of uranium is uneconomic and leaves in its wake ‘tailings’ that leave exposed, large amounts of radioactive and toxic material that adversely affect the environment.
  • The enrichment process further lays waste more radioactive and pollutant material, some of which for the sake of commercial expediency is put to wrongful use in the deployment of DU weapons
  • The spent fuel provides a million-year disposal headache as well as using as much energy to create facilities to store it safely as it does to build the reactor it fuelled
  • Human husbandry of nuclear facilities is not fool-proof and any disaster from a nuclear facility would far exceed that from any other alternative energy-generating plant
  • In addition:
  • Rich uranium sources are limited. The poorer grades would require much greater processing to achieve the required purity which means more energy expense and resultant pollution in their preparation
  • Reactors can have a full power lifetime of 24 years, but many never reach that age. During that life span they require regular maintenance and the intense corrosion from the radioactive contents makes maintenance during their final years impossible.
  • The de-commissioning process, particularly of large reactors, is at present, a grey area. The amount of Corrosion Residuals and Unidentified Deposits (aptly named CRUD) can produce about 1,000sq.m. of dangerous radioactive and toxic waste, all to be disposed of as well as the reactor itself which must be cut into small pieces and placed in those lead/steel/copper lined containers. The total cost in financial and energy terms of this is estimated to double that of the costs and energy required to build the plant in the first place.
  • Nuclear power production is, at every stage, either directly or indirectly a large user of fossil fuels and therefore a large contributor to greenhouse gasses, the very pollutant that nuclear energy is designed to cull, producing at least a third of the greenhouse gasses for the equivalent power output from a conventional gas or coal-fired power plant.
Yet Blair, Bush, Chirac et al pursue this Illuminati prompted course.

During the last century Nicola Tesla conjectured that it was possible to ‘pluck’ electrical energy from the vacuum of space and today the theoretical basis for that conjecture is an established part of the physics literature. On that basis it would seem that our efforts should be concentrated on harnessing this and other more well-known, relatively free sources of abundant energy rather than threatening mother earth with the enormous risks involved in producing it from nuclear fission and in the process leaving the land a radioactive cesspool.

Tesla’s papers were consficated by the FBI as there can be no measure of control, manipulation and financial gain for those who run our lives if they were to allow us to adopt low-cost environmentally-friendly energy resources.

But just to demonstrate how desperate Blair is in ensuring the proliferation of nuclear power stations in this country, he has stated that the licensing and planning regime will be streamlined to cut upfront investment costs and accelerate building. With these new powers up the government's sleeve, you might have grave difficulty in staving off the planners should you find that a nuclear power plant is to be built on your doorstep.

Thursday, May 25, 2006

Esoteric Numerology

Elsewhere in this blog I have listed some interesting numerological coincidences that can be derived from some of the most notable political and politically-forming events that have taken place over the past decades.

With another key date close upon us, notably 6th June 2006 (6-6-6), which itself will be 333 days from the 7th July London bombings (7-7-7), it’s worth spending a little time to examine the use of certain numbers that seem to pre-occupy those who orchestrate these seminal events, which upon closer examination, appear to be rooted in occultism.

With reference to web site the following facts emerge:

Number 3 is the first sacred number and represents the Pagan Trinity and spiritually, the Third Eye of Hinduism. We are told occultists use the number 3 in groups or multiples ie. 33, 333, 66, 666 etc. to achieve greater intensity in the desired effect. 666 has the connotation as being ‘The Mark of the Beast’ or, in some circles, the brand mark of an evil spirit.

Number 6 is the next sacred number, representing the soul of man.

Number 7 is also sacred and described as one of the most sacred of all numbers ‘the invisible centre, the spirit of everything’.

Number 9 is sacred as it is the cube of 3 and used in triple - 999, is utilised to represent 666 - 999 inverted.

Number 11 is considered to be a master number in astrology and can be used to represent sin, transgression and peril.

Number 13 has come to be known to us as a number of ill-omen and stands in connection with rebellion, apostasy, defection, corruption, disintegration and revolution.

Close examination of many of the most notable terrorist and political events over the last twenty years or so and also further back in time, shows that the involvement of these numbers occurs with a frequency that exceeds pure chance.

Let’s look at a few:
11/11/11 World War 1 ended
9/11/41 Groundbreaking ceremony for the Pentagon
11/22/63 President Kennedy assassinated
7/17/86 TWA 800 exploded over the sea near Long Island
9/2/88 (9 + 2 = 11) Swissair 111 crashed in flames off the coast of Nova Scotia - exactly 777 days (111 weeks) after the previous crash
12/21/88 (1 + 2 = 3 & 2 + 1 = 3) PanAm flight 103 was brought down over Scotland. The time between this and the Swissair 111 crash was 7 years and 7 months.
4/19/93 Waco Massacre
4/19/95 Oklahoma City bombing
9/11/01 World Trade Center collapse - Flight 11 was the first to crash, Flight 13 crashed into the second tower, 11 hijackers were involved
11/3/04 Madrid train bombing, 911 days after 9/11 which itself was 111 days before the end of the year
9/3/04 Beslan
9/11/04 Assassination of Yasser Arafat
11/19/00 Bush’s first election victory
4/19/04 Foiled terrorist attack on the Sears Tower in Chicago. This was timed to happen 911 hours after the Madrid train bombing
11/9/04 Bush’s second election victory
7/7/05 London bombings. These took place 444 days (11 x 4) after the foiled Sears attack.

Then let’s look at the use of these esoteric numbers in other Illuminati based institutions:
199 FBI internal national emergency code
The Bilderberger Group comprise 39 members broken down into 3 groups of 13. 13 make up the policy committee in the Bilderberger Group which answer to the Round Table of 9.
33 segments make up the UN crest
33 degrees are to be found in Freemasonry
10/13/1792 White House cornerstone laid attended by the Georgetown Masonic Lodge No 9. The White House is surrounded by 13 avenues which form L’Enfant’s plan for Washington, symbolic of the 13 stripes in the national flag. The Illuminati have divided the US into 7 geographical regions which are each have a 13 member leadership council.

And so it goes on. You can find much more evidence of the use of these numbers, often embedded in other numbers whose addition invariably arrives one at 6, 9, 11 or 13, on

Although one might argue that if you have the mind to do so you can use all manner of mathematical gymnastics to make the dates fit the sacred numbers, the numerical coincidences in the above list seem to be too consistent for these events to have happened on the dates they did by accident.

So 333 days after the London bombings brings us very conveniently to one of the most revered numbers in this catalogue of numerolgical horrors - 6th June 2006 or 6/6/6.

With the neo-cons, that bunch of perverted people, many of whom are known to involve themselves in such bizarre events as Bohemian Grove and many of whom are products of ‘Skull and Bones’ both institutions that are riddled with occultism, chomping at the bit for an excuse to invade Iran, and looking for every excuse to ratchet up the police state, could June 6th be another seminal date in this litany of infamy?

I will be returning from my holiday in Nova Scotia on that particular day expecting to catch a flight from Halifax to London Gatwick. Will my journey be inconvenienced as a knock-on effect of some big ‘terrorist’ attack?

Maybe, maybe not, but one thing is for sure, according to the figures there would seem to be a heightened chance of some manufactured event taking place on that day.

With the Sears Tower in Chicago bearing a ZIP code of 606060, who knows?

Friday, May 05, 2006

The death of the Internet?

For how much longer you will be able to read this blog and how much longer will it be before I receive a knock on the door from the thought police a told to shut up or be locked up, is rapidly becoming a serious matter of debate as Internet censorship begins to bite.

In more repressive regimes around the world, this has been a reality for some time. China has already imprisoned 62 online ‘dissidents’ and in Iran, Mojtaba Saminejad has been in jail since last February for posting material regarded as offensive to Islam. Users have also been jailed in in Egypt, Iran, Libya, the Maldives, Syria, Tunisia and Vietnam with Burma, Cuba, Iran, Libya, Nepal, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkmenistan, and Vietnam all using Internet censorship. You may say that this is pretty much par for the course for countries such as those who are largely religious and political dictatorships, but this trend is to spread and sooner or later we can be all be expected to have our views censored.

The popularity of the Internet as a vital organ in the transmission of real news, not the often spun disinformation that appears in the corporate controlled media, and is becoming an embarrassment to the movers and shakers who want to rule our lives. The traditional press cannot keep up with the vast amount of information posted daily on the web, updated in real time unlike a newspaper feature writer’s column which may only appear once a week, or, at best, once a day. Online commentators can update hourly if they wish and are not subject to editorial control to be politically correct.

These last few years have witnessed a serious decline in newspaper readership and even their online editions receive less attention as more and more people question the veracity of what is written when they can get alternative views of the news from fully qualified, un-embedded, independent journalists and political commentators online.

The elite are getting nervous over our greatly expanding knowledge of what is really going on in the world and as I reported yesterday, Universal Studios had to pull their ‘United 93’ online forum, with several newspapers withdrawing stories in retaliation of public comment over the film as that comment clearly showed a far greater awareness of the true reality of the events of 9/11 among the public than the conventional media is politically bound to portray. And only two months ago MySpace closed down several blogs which they regarded as politically unacceptable.

Already legislation is being drawn up in western countries under the dictate of the elite to put an end to this free exchange of free speech. With Internet 2 taking shape, the traditional Internet will become a shade of its present self being slow and wholly unreliable, outlawing audio and video streaming, making users forced to upgrade to the streamlined Internet 2 if they wish to preserve and enhance the facilities which we now take for granted.

But, there will be a big price to pay. Each Internet 2 user will have to pay a premium rate, sign up to a contract which will specifically ban dissident political comment, enforcing strict rules of use, with websites vetted on their content and strict penalties for non-observance of the guidelines. In addition a tax on sending emails will put many organisations that email political newsletters out of business, thus depriving subscribers of a valuable source of alternative information. These operations would be viewed as dissident or a 'security threat' and be forced off the Internet super highway.

As I have reported before, providers like AOL have, for some time now, being engaged in polling their users with questionnaires whose tenor implies hidden dangers in the Internet with everyone from paedophiles to terrorists using it to disrupt society. With this falsely spun message, an acquiescing public may just vote in favour of the censored world wide web, but in doing so cut off the genuine wealth of vital discussion and open speech which should be the cornerstone of a free and healthy society.

Thursday, April 27, 2006

A super size threat

Last night I watched a free CD, courtesy of the Guardian newspaper, entitled ‘Supersize Me’. It follows the misfortunes of Morgan Spurlock who sets out to find just what effect spending a whole month eating only from the menu at MacDonalds will have on his health.

His quest had been prompted by the ballooning number of overweight people in the US and the plethora of diseases that this obesity has triggered among the country’s population.

Prior to his one month MacBinge, Spurlock checks out with a number of medical specialists together with his GP to assess his current state of health which will act as a benchmark, and receives good results; he starts out as a healthy man.

But after only ten days of this self-imposed experiment, in which he sets himself the task of eating only from the MacDonalds menu, including several supersize portions, his health begins to suffer. His principal symptoms at first are headaches which can only be assuaged by another helping from the MacRange after which he feels temporarily fine again. This alone suggests some sort of addictive additive in the food and leads him to discover that this addiction leads many habituĂ©s of Mac’s to get hooked on their products.

His first medical check-in after only ten days show increased levels of cholesterol in his bloodstream and increased body weight. Another fortnight on the stuff and his medical advisors are suggesting he quits the experiment as Spurlock’s health begins to plummet. By the end of the month he finds himself barely able to climb the stairs to his apartment and only an eight week crash course on a healthy diet restores his health and weight to what had been before he began the experiment, although speculation remains over what permanent damage may have been done to his constitution.

Although few, if anyone, gorges on MacDonalds three times a day, many people do eat in their premises upward of six times a week, every week of the year with the same effect on their health.

But the most insidious side to the MacDonalds spectre is its ability to hook yougsters into its grasp through the icon of the happy clown, the addictive and superficially appealing contents of its food high in sugar and fat, the play facilities they provide for kids and the way their restaurants lay on extravagant spreads for children’s birthdays, a winner for unwitting parents.

And this really gets to the crux of the matter. It isn’t just a case of a vast conglomerate doling out unhealthy food, it’s the psychology behind their operation which is so sinister, using ingredients, like drugs to hook its adictees giving them a craving to come back for more and in the process ruin their health.

There’s a covert operation working here. The movers and shakers behind these monolithic fast food giants seem to have a remit to lure us into bad health deliberately with their habitual customers putting on weight, damaging their health and mental capability. But in an effort to reduce their weight the sharks from pharma take over by enticing these poor unwitting folk with all manner of quack pills that claim to reduce that weight without having to exercise. Big pharma also scores once again as the medical profession doles out all manner of medications to supposedly address the symptoms of obesity. So once MacDonalds have made a mighty profit out of their customers, the baton is handed over to the pharamceutical companies who then make vast profits out of remedial medicines. The whole thing is one giant con.

Spurlock’s film also highlighted in no uncertain terms, the dumbed down image of the average American. They appear as casualties of the relentless forays by the large media and food corporations who have systematically robbed much of the population of its cognitive ability. Couple this with the dumbing down of education in the US over many decades where children aren’t even taught the constitution anymore, and where big fast food giants dominate the daily dietary intake of the kids with their sugar-laden drinks filled with caffeine and aspartame and fatty re-constituted foods, it’s no wonder that America seems to be a country of zombies, idle Joe six-packs and pizza guzzling nerds. And that’s just the way the elite run corporations want them, an acquiescing bunch of jelly fish.

Furthermore, add to that the strong and persistant lobbying by the food industry in all departments of government where corrupt congressmen take bribes to ensure the contuinuance of the status quo and they’ve pretty well got it stitched up.

Let this be a lesson in life. After we are born life becomes rather like a walk down a vast high street in which the most prominent choices are the big glitzy stores enticing us in to buy designer clothes, fast cars, fast food all to immediately gratify our basic inbred instincts and provide vast profits for their perpetrators. The designer clothes are made in third world countries where the workforce lives on a dollar a day, the cars come from former third world countries that also employ labour at a fraction of the price that their western equivalents would have earned on the production line, the fast food is expediently made out of animals reared in vile mechanised factories and comprise of all sorts of additives and adjuncts which eventually fry your mind and incapacitate your body.

Yes we’ve all been there and done it. But once you free yourself from the peer pressure of the touting big combines and wander off down the side streets, you become aware that the inbred need for these diversions is uneccessary and a world of healthier choice exists. Unglamorous but nutritious food, fresh fruit drinks without additives and all manner of healthy alternatives.

But for the majority, their unquestioning robot-like attitude alludes them of these snares and by the time they are forty their lives have been irreversably destroyed in this covert programme by oligarchical corporations to capture us in their relentless grasp and lead us to our early demise.

Following the release of Spurlock’s film, MacDonalds changed their menu policy, providing more salads and laying off the heavy promotion of their super size range. But in true arrogant corporate mafia style they refused to accept that the policy change was a result Spurlock’s findings. We are the ones who can destroy the likes of the big corporations like MacDonalds by shunning their hype and products and pursue healthy, alert lives instead. Do it!

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

The View from Sphereland

As is the norm these days, the media continually bombards us with scare stories. BBC’s News at Six recently provided a typical line up.

First a shock-horror report on bullying in schools.

Then a piece about tracking terror suspects on the railways with new technology to pick up on ‘unusual’ behaviour patterns among passengers with more footage from 7/7 .

An item on a foiled terrorist attempt on a nuclear facility in Australia.

Then our daily scare about Bird Flu with poultry farmers expressing their concern that because of restrictions on the movement of poultry, they are unable to go to market and their ageing birds are rapidly becoming unsaleable. Pigeon fanciers too express their dismay that their birds are grounded.

Lots to worry about and little to provide solace.

In refecting on what I had just witnessed on the news but put into the context of my understanding of the overriding political agenda, I was reminded of the world of the Flatlanders.

First published in 1884 by an English clergyman and headmaster Edwin A. Abbott, Flatland is a story of a mythical world in which its inhabitants, the Flatlanders, can only perceive the world in two dimensions. In this world lives Mr. A. Square, a two dimensional being who is transported to The Land of Three Dimensions, an experience that completely changes his worldview.

I feel that so many people, albeit bestowed with the ability to experience in three dimensions, perceive rather like our Mr. A. Square, but if were subjected to a similar paradigm shift, would see the world quite differently.

Let’s put the analogy of Mr. Albert Square (my choice of surname and not to be confused with the Eastenders!) into a graphical format.

From Albert’s old worldview a passing sphereoid would initially manifest itself as a point in space and stretch into a line of increasing width, only to contract to a point in space then disappear. But as an inhabitant of The World of Three Dimensions, a Spherelander, that passing sphereoid looks very different.

We, the Flatlanders

Many of us are rather like poor old Albert, taking those news headlines at surface value when we need to change our perspectives in order to get a better grasp on what is really happening.

To do this requires some hard work and a mindset that can dare itself to look over the parapet, discard conventional views and teaching and prepare itself for some mental gymnastics. Life is rather like ascending a ladder propped up against a wall. Many never reach the top, preferring to stop and permanently rest halfway up becoming ingrained in the idea that the view of the wall is the sum total of our world. Yet others may press on one rung at a time believing that there must be more to the world than just the wall. Those that pursue their quest will eventually reach the top and realise that there is indeed more, finding another world beyond and so setting the wall and those still stuck behind it, part way up the ladder, in context.

Once we’ve made this journey through reading, learning, forever asking ‘why’, and being prepared to constantly change our world view, will we get to a stage where we can interpret those news headlines to find out what message is really concealed behind them.

The News seen from Sphereland

Let’s just review those headlines again and see them in the context of our new world view borne from the what has been gleaned in the light of the New World Order agenda and control mechanisms being pursued by those behind our government in order to prepare us for the brave new world.

Bullying in schools
Although no-one would really condone bullying at school, or anywhere else for that matter, it has always been an inevitable and natural product of the raw emotions of growing up, and although distressing, (I have personal experience from my school days) a part of the growing and learning process of human relationships. What once was a phenomenon that could be dealt with between parents and teachers now becomes politicised so that government can sieze on this emotive subject and use it to have children singled out who do not conform to their social rules in their envisaged new social order.

Security measures on the railways
The mixed message that comes out of this news item leaves us up in the air. The government wants to introduce technology to provide adequate surveillance of would-be terror suspects on our railways but knowing full well that the task is impossible without grinding the whole transport system to a halt. Therefore we are left with the worrying prospect that terrorists will still be able to get away with their deeds. But since so much evidence exists that the Madrid and London bombings were sponsored by elements within our respective goverments and aided by the very security services that are supposed to be combatting these attacks under an agenda from above, the spectre of Big Brother attempting to watch our every move and control our lives, once again becomes evident.

Foiled attack on Australian nuclear facility
Just another, almost daily, occurence that terror attacks are constantly just around the corner, not just in the UK but on a global scale. This is another reinforcing message that we need constant police and military protection and control to counter such threats.

Bird Flu
Once again, keeping up the scare tactics globally. Poultry farmers and pigeon fanciers alike are being put in their place by government control over a virus which, we are told, might at any time cause a pandemic, despite the fact that flu epidemics among poultry in China are virtually an annual event, borne from the lack of hygiene exercised by local communities who let their poultry and beasts’ excrement intermingle. But that is irrelevant to those who wish us to be cowed by this threat and queue up for our worthless Tamiflu jab, the proceeds from which line the pockets of Donald Rumsfeld, major shareholder in the company which manufactures the vaccine.

So suddenly, the evening news takes on quite a different appearance.

An ongoing quest
But even with this new world view, don’t believe for one moment that that’s the end of it. There will be more ladders to climb and more new vistas to discover which will require you to re-write your current understanding as each level of reality is set in context by those behind it. It’s just too easy, and indeed a human trait, to want to stop, take stock and set your world view in stone taking it with you to the grave. We build our little fortress of belief systems around us making us feel secure, whereas we should be constantly asking questions, dismantling or modifying their construction if we are to keep up with and fight the agenda that is being set for us.

The Unseen Enemy

As a first step it is essential to understand the aims of those unseen people who ultimately control world affairs in order to fully appreciate the real truth behind the news and why we live in a world continually torn with strife. With this secret agenda constantly in mind, it will hopefully shed light upon world events and form a background to each of those articles that appear on Doublethink.

I do not wish to dwell on examining the historical context in which the world’s most powerful families have continued to dominate world affairs throughout history, nor name names, David Icke’s books cover this subject admirably. I just want to start by stating that a relatively small number of very influential people control virtually every aspect of our daily lives in some way or another. They control banking, finance, the media, health, education, consumerism, entertainment and even what we eat and drink. Employing unseen think-tanks and gurus, they even manipulate our social patterns to suit their own ends.

Web of influence
Collectively, these ‘elite’ influence our lives on a daily basis either directly through our intercourse with the multi-national corporations they control or influence and the products they produce, or indirectly from the effect of their wishes that trickle down the pyramidal heirarchy and are eventually translated into legislation that our governments enact. Never revealed in the mainstream media, it is these ‘elite’ through a hierarchical executive system of institutions, committees and clubs, that covertly manipulate governments, corporations, health, education and opinion-forming organisations throughout the world. It is organisations such as the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Tavistock Institute, the Council of Foreign Relations, the dubbed ‘Bilderbergers’ and the Club of Rome to name just a few, that are the real movers and shakers in this world. Their influence on world affairs is profound.
The chain of command works on a need-to-know basis, so that no subservient layer may be fully aware of the real agenda of its superior. They are most likely kept under the illusion that their orders are to be carried out for honest and altruistic reasons.

The enemy in action
Let’s take an example, the war on Iraq.

We, the lowly, are told that Saddam Hussein is a menace and with 9/11 fresh on our minds is a threat to the West. We are reminded of the atrocities he committed to those who would not support his regime and told that we must get rid of him. The US and UK governments are told by those in the executive chain of command above them that they must build a case that they can sell to their electorate that Saddam has WMD so they can invade the country and take him out.

So off go Blair and Bush and concoct phoney evidence to that end which they ‘sell’ to us. When the UN weapons inspectors, who go through the fair process of assessing that risk, find no tangible evidence of WMD and submit a report to the UN to that effect, the US administration deliberately destroys the counter evidence to remain allegiant to the wishes of their masters and invade the country anyway, telling us that it will bring democracy to Iraq and we the sheep largely acquiesce to that sentiment and let them get on with it. Anyone who may spill the beans that Iraq was not a military threat to the west, like UK weapons inspector the late David Kelly, are covertly got rid of, explaining it as suicide (which it most clearly wasn’t). So each layer in the lower part of the hierarchical executive system from government minister and MP through to the soldier on the ground believes that what he or she is doing is for altruistic reasons and will make a difference.

But back at the top of the pyramid, the view is quite different. To these ‘elite’ the end goal is not democracy for Iraq, but a means to gain control of its oil. They don’t want democracy at all as a continuing state of disruption in the country, whipped up by ‘insurgents’ who are trained by the British and US military to prolong unrest will secure a long term tenure within the country and ongoing control of that oil. With Saddam planning to opt out of OPEC, set his own, cheaper prices for oil in euros, not dollars, the controlling ‘elite’ have to take him out.
And so to achieve that end, the ‘elite’ resorted to their favourite, tried and trusted game play:

Problem, Reaction, Solution

Manufactured problem: Saddam’s WMD. Reaction: Take him out. Solution: Control of the country’s oil.

We will encounter this Hegelian philosophy time and time again in each of the topics covered in Doublespeak.

Here’s just three the ‘elite’ have lined up for us all of which have a common end result for them, increased control of our lives so they can gradually introduce a centralised world government in which we will just acquiesce to their wishes.

Bird Flu
Manufactured problem: The threat of a flu pandemic (based on a virus passed only among poultry and having only claimed a few dozen deaths in the past year or so). Reaction: Forced vaccinations, military control (particularly in the US), a ban on large gatherings and meetings, restrictions on travel. Solution: Getting us more used to centralised control by the use of fear of being infected and in the process getting us acclimatised to military and police control.

Terrorist Attacks
Manufactured problem: Terror bombings in public places (based on Islamic extremists displeasure at our continued presence in Iraq). Reaction: Anti Terror legislation, curtailments on freedom of speech, imprisonment without charge for 60 days, ID cards etc. Solution: Getting us more used to centralised control by the use of fear of being blown up and in the process getting us acclimatised to para-military police control.

Natural Disasters
Problem (possibly partly exacerbated by weather modification technology exploited by the ‘elite’): Floods, hurricanes. Reaction: The military and para-military organisations such as the US Federal Management Agency exercising martial law among the disposessed, obstructing the supply of aid and consficating firearms as a pretext to stop looting and social disorder. Solution: More control of a disarmed, frightened and submissive public and in the process getting us acclimatised to military and para-military control.

And finally...

Have you ever despaired at the increasing amount of meddling our governments exercise in our daily lives. The so-called Nanny State. Anti-social Behaviour Orders, directives about what we eat, anti-smoking legislation, anti-fox hunting, exhaustive health and safety controls etc etc. You could say this is over-governance. Most of these social issues should be the preserve of our own social judgement and control not the meddling concern of central government.
Well, I’m afraid, once again, it’s the effects of those ‘elite’ who want us brought to heel, passing on their desires to government. Today’s Nanny State is tomorrow’s Facsist State.

Further reading:

Tales from the Time Loop David Icke
Children of the Matrix David Icke
Behind the War on Terror Naffeez Mossadeq Ahmed
The War on Freedom Naffeez Mossadeq Ahmed
Conspirators’ Hierarchy Dr John Coleman

20 Questions about 9/11

  • Why did Pentagon officials cancel flying plans on 9/11?
  • Why did a US Intelligence agency plan an exercise for 9/11 which was identical to the actual events?
  • Why were several middle-easteners told not to go to downtown Manhattan that day?
  • Why were there numerous insider trading deals mysteriously transacted on the Stock Exchange just prior to the event?
  • Why were an unusual number of ‘put’ options placed, on the basis that the share prices of the airlines involved would slump, just prior to 9/11?
  • Why where standard operating procedures of sending intercepting fighters in response to the deviant flight path of the airliners not carried out?
  • Why were many reliable intelligence reports to the FBI that an attack on a prominent target in New York ignored?
  • Why are at least seven of the 19 claimed hijackers still alive?
  • Why is it that so many witnesses who were in the twin towers at the time report explosions going off in various parts of the buildings just prior to their collapse?
  • Why is it that we are told that it was the melting of the steel structure of the twin towers that brought them down when a fire raged in a tower block in Madrid for over 17 hours without affecting its steel structure in any way?
  • How come numerous construction experts claim that the towers were designed to withstand the impact of several 707 collisions and the temperatures that would result from burning aviation fuel?
  • And if the temperatures were that great, how come fire service personnel and civilians, who were unprotected from the heat, managed to walk around the building just prior to its collapse.
  • Why did building 7, which was some distance away from the twin towers and had only one smallish reported fire, collapse?
  • Why did Larry Silverstein, the WTC leaseholder, take out a massive insurance policy on the buildings some weeks prior to the event?
  • Why were large siesmic readings recorded just prior to the buildings collapse? Might these be a result of explosives used to cause them to fall in a controlled manner?
  • Why was there a total ‘power down’ on the weekend prior to the attack? Without power none of the CCTV cameras would be working. Would this be an opportunity to place explosives?
  • Why was the sudden bright flash from flight 11 just prior to its impacting the North Tower on the original video release strangely omitted from the officially broadcast version?
  • Was this flash a missile which was fired ahead of impact?
  • Why did Bush do nothing after having being advised of the second impact, but carry on listening to pupils read in the Emma T. Booker Elementary School?
  • Why were the Federal Emergency Management Agency already in place in New York the day before the event, had they prior knowledge?

These questions merely form the tip of the iceberg. Evidence that 9/11 was staged by powers within the government is legion, visit and go to the 9/11 archive to see that evidence.

Is it the End of Free Speech as we Knew It?

Does a heightened police presence on our streets provide you with peace of mind or does it give you a feeling of uneasiness? One thing is for sure, it isn’t going to go away in a hurry.

Given that the goal of the New World Order is tight control of you and I, a perceived threat must remain in place as long as is thought necessary and one of those current threats is terror.

As we journey to and fro on public transport we are constantly reminded to be vigilant. Being told not to leave our luggage unattended in stations or on trains.

I often wonder the response I would receive if I kept my havosack with me and took it to the on-train toilet. I’ve seen security men leap into action when back-packed individuals do just that! Litter bins are still provided on trains and the opportunities to plant explosive devices in no end of nooks and crannies are legion. It just doesn’t make sense.

Yet the government’s legislation set up to combat terrorism might well take me to task for that last remark as inciting a terrorist act. Just where is it to start and finish?

Tony Blair explains that the provisions of the new security laws are being put in place to ‘defend our way of life’, yet their curtailment of free speech and the suspension of long held provisions in the Human Rights Act will do precisely the opposite. Making it an offence to ‘justify’ terrorism could have bearing on the kind of books bookshops stock, newsletters such as this and free and open debate on what might be causing this terrorism in the first place.

Of course the savvy among you will realise that most terrorism is probably government sponsored in the first place and that the events of 9/11 and 7/7 bear the strong hallmark of government involvement. This makes it all the more depressing, for if it were caused purely by dissent among extremist groups then one might accept a degree of curtailment of one’s freedom until the problem is eradicated. But since it seems to come from the horse’s mouth of government, the cards are firmly on the table. We are witnessing an Orwellian form of state control driven by a long-term agenda based on a one world totalitarian regime and this current phase is just one stepping stone in that direction.

Unfortunately, few of our political leaders are making any effort to haul in the seemingly unbridled reins of a government hell bent on playing its part on achieving that goal, with the notable exception of statesmen like George Galloway who clearly see the ruse at play (look where that's getting him).

Only by waking up to this incidious game and creating a united front against it can we hope to escape the worst fears for ourselves and our children. It is the drip by drip enactment of these legislative powers that gradually eat away at our liberties until such time as our children will regard a police state, surveilling a hapless population 24/7 who have little or no voice or the will ro respond, as the norm.

9/11, the War in Iraq, the London Bombings, Terrorism... what do you make of it all?

Are you the sort of person that views it all as just part of the background noise of life, something you feel obliged to acknowledge as the evening news disgorges the latest round of shock horror events before the more relevant sports news or celebrity scandal? As long as it doesn’t personally affect me, I’m all right Jack.

Or are you the type of person that deep down feels all is not well, but that this is just something we have to put up with in a world of division and unrest, hasn’t it always been like this? Do you resign yourself to it, or try to justify it all in accordance with your world view?

The problem is that your world view will most likely be based upon what you read in newspapers, watch on TV or read in books, the conventional wisdom which from our earliest years through our ongoing education, we believe to be true. After all, news reporters and television presenters don’t lie, do they? Our politicians don’t exactly provide us with what they promise, they are known to be economical with the truth, but when Mr Blair gets up in the House and tells us that we must fight the War on Terror, surely he’s right isn’t he?

I used to think this way. But in fact I wasn’t really thinking at all, just following mainstream opinion. But I have to admit, world events didn’t seem to make much sense if just taken at surface value. So like many other people I would push it all into a corner and devote my attention to more tangible things like campaigning for real ale in pubs or the protection of our architectural heritage.

A web of deception
Then came my voyage of discovery. It wasn’t one of those blinding flashes of spiritual inspiration that some people claim come and change their lives. No, it all started from my long term interest in scientific issues. I was browsing the titles in a bookshop about ten years ago, when I bought, principally out of curiosity, a book on UFO’s by a very well respected researcher, Timothy Good.

What I learned from that seminal volume intrigued me. Not just the UFO phenomenon, but the level to which governments were obviously hiding the truth about well documented and witnessed events involving unidentified craft. Subsequent reading on the subject threw up all manner of governmental intrigue. How the US government, following the discovery of alien craft in the New Mexico desert in 1947, had created a special department to arrange the back engineering of the exotic technology that powered and provided navigation mechanisms for these craft and ‘fed’ the concepts to US corporations (no questions asked) to turn into such technologies as fibre optics, solid state circuitry, night vision, lasers etc. This seemed to provide part of the answer to one of those many questions that I had brushed under the carpet for years, why had there been a sudden leap in technological development during the fifties and sixties?

How much of this you may be prepared to believe is true does not detract from the hard evidence that clandestine operations were afoot within government circles.

From this I read incessantly. The shady history of the CIA, FBI, NSA and how government intelligence agencies have been highly instrumental in shaping the history of events to the wishes of governments and their controlling elite. For make no mistake, history teaches us time and time again of hidden agendas from the burning of the Reichstag to aid Hitler’s rise to power by blaming the conflagration on the Communists when the Nazis had engineered it themselves, to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor which was deliberately allowed to happen as a means of turning a reluctant American public to agree to America entering WWII. The list is endless.

We the sheep
This voyage of discovery has been a humbling process, for the ultimate actions of our governments, and the shadowy people who control them, clearly demonstrates our lowly perceived position in the pyramid of life. Treated as a dispensible resource used as fire fodder in wars waged by our masters for their benefit, we are lied to, bullied and scared into submission on a daily basis. Following the events of recent years as the manufactured age of terrorism gets a grip, it looks as if we are to lose yet more of our rights as anti-terror legislation and the infamous ID Card are foisted upon us by a government who claim it is for our ‘security’.

The truth is out there
But don’t take my word for any of this. There are plenty of others who are aware of this ongoing conspiracy, but for whose enlightenment you will have to search. I have found that quite often the most revealing books, like those of David Icke’s are contained within the ‘Mind, Body and Spirit’ sections in our high street bookshops and not among the political commentary or science sections, because what they reveal has to be regarded as ‘myth’, unconventional writings for ‘cooks’.

I want to use this site as a call to action, to get you into the crave for inquiry that has occupied much of my spare time over the last ten years. To help you on that voyage opposite you will find a couple of links to just two of the most informative sites on the web today, where you will find analysis of the news unhindered by the agendas of newspaper and TV corporations that have a level of control imposed upon them by those very same masters controlling our government, stifling serious in-depth questioning of daily events.

There is a growing awareness among the public that our lords and masters are certainly not behaving in our best interests. We shan’t take this lying down. Get active!