Thursday, May 25, 2006

Esoteric Numerology

Elsewhere in this blog I have listed some interesting numerological coincidences that can be derived from some of the most notable political and politically-forming events that have taken place over the past decades.

With another key date close upon us, notably 6th June 2006 (6-6-6), which itself will be 333 days from the 7th July London bombings (7-7-7), it’s worth spending a little time to examine the use of certain numbers that seem to pre-occupy those who orchestrate these seminal events, which upon closer examination, appear to be rooted in occultism.

With reference to web site the following facts emerge:

Number 3 is the first sacred number and represents the Pagan Trinity and spiritually, the Third Eye of Hinduism. We are told occultists use the number 3 in groups or multiples ie. 33, 333, 66, 666 etc. to achieve greater intensity in the desired effect. 666 has the connotation as being ‘The Mark of the Beast’ or, in some circles, the brand mark of an evil spirit.

Number 6 is the next sacred number, representing the soul of man.

Number 7 is also sacred and described as one of the most sacred of all numbers ‘the invisible centre, the spirit of everything’.

Number 9 is sacred as it is the cube of 3 and used in triple - 999, is utilised to represent 666 - 999 inverted.

Number 11 is considered to be a master number in astrology and can be used to represent sin, transgression and peril.

Number 13 has come to be known to us as a number of ill-omen and stands in connection with rebellion, apostasy, defection, corruption, disintegration and revolution.

Close examination of many of the most notable terrorist and political events over the last twenty years or so and also further back in time, shows that the involvement of these numbers occurs with a frequency that exceeds pure chance.

Let’s look at a few:
11/11/11 World War 1 ended
9/11/41 Groundbreaking ceremony for the Pentagon
11/22/63 President Kennedy assassinated
7/17/86 TWA 800 exploded over the sea near Long Island
9/2/88 (9 + 2 = 11) Swissair 111 crashed in flames off the coast of Nova Scotia - exactly 777 days (111 weeks) after the previous crash
12/21/88 (1 + 2 = 3 & 2 + 1 = 3) PanAm flight 103 was brought down over Scotland. The time between this and the Swissair 111 crash was 7 years and 7 months.
4/19/93 Waco Massacre
4/19/95 Oklahoma City bombing
9/11/01 World Trade Center collapse - Flight 11 was the first to crash, Flight 13 crashed into the second tower, 11 hijackers were involved
11/3/04 Madrid train bombing, 911 days after 9/11 which itself was 111 days before the end of the year
9/3/04 Beslan
9/11/04 Assassination of Yasser Arafat
11/19/00 Bush’s first election victory
4/19/04 Foiled terrorist attack on the Sears Tower in Chicago. This was timed to happen 911 hours after the Madrid train bombing
11/9/04 Bush’s second election victory
7/7/05 London bombings. These took place 444 days (11 x 4) after the foiled Sears attack.

Then let’s look at the use of these esoteric numbers in other Illuminati based institutions:
199 FBI internal national emergency code
The Bilderberger Group comprise 39 members broken down into 3 groups of 13. 13 make up the policy committee in the Bilderberger Group which answer to the Round Table of 9.
33 segments make up the UN crest
33 degrees are to be found in Freemasonry
10/13/1792 White House cornerstone laid attended by the Georgetown Masonic Lodge No 9. The White House is surrounded by 13 avenues which form L’Enfant’s plan for Washington, symbolic of the 13 stripes in the national flag. The Illuminati have divided the US into 7 geographical regions which are each have a 13 member leadership council.

And so it goes on. You can find much more evidence of the use of these numbers, often embedded in other numbers whose addition invariably arrives one at 6, 9, 11 or 13, on

Although one might argue that if you have the mind to do so you can use all manner of mathematical gymnastics to make the dates fit the sacred numbers, the numerical coincidences in the above list seem to be too consistent for these events to have happened on the dates they did by accident.

So 333 days after the London bombings brings us very conveniently to one of the most revered numbers in this catalogue of numerolgical horrors - 6th June 2006 or 6/6/6.

With the neo-cons, that bunch of perverted people, many of whom are known to involve themselves in such bizarre events as Bohemian Grove and many of whom are products of ‘Skull and Bones’ both institutions that are riddled with occultism, chomping at the bit for an excuse to invade Iran, and looking for every excuse to ratchet up the police state, could June 6th be another seminal date in this litany of infamy?

I will be returning from my holiday in Nova Scotia on that particular day expecting to catch a flight from Halifax to London Gatwick. Will my journey be inconvenienced as a knock-on effect of some big ‘terrorist’ attack?

Maybe, maybe not, but one thing is for sure, according to the figures there would seem to be a heightened chance of some manufactured event taking place on that day.

With the Sears Tower in Chicago bearing a ZIP code of 606060, who knows?

Friday, May 05, 2006

The death of the Internet?

For how much longer you will be able to read this blog and how much longer will it be before I receive a knock on the door from the thought police a told to shut up or be locked up, is rapidly becoming a serious matter of debate as Internet censorship begins to bite.

In more repressive regimes around the world, this has been a reality for some time. China has already imprisoned 62 online ‘dissidents’ and in Iran, Mojtaba Saminejad has been in jail since last February for posting material regarded as offensive to Islam. Users have also been jailed in in Egypt, Iran, Libya, the Maldives, Syria, Tunisia and Vietnam with Burma, Cuba, Iran, Libya, Nepal, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkmenistan, and Vietnam all using Internet censorship. You may say that this is pretty much par for the course for countries such as those who are largely religious and political dictatorships, but this trend is to spread and sooner or later we can be all be expected to have our views censored.

The popularity of the Internet as a vital organ in the transmission of real news, not the often spun disinformation that appears in the corporate controlled media, and is becoming an embarrassment to the movers and shakers who want to rule our lives. The traditional press cannot keep up with the vast amount of information posted daily on the web, updated in real time unlike a newspaper feature writer’s column which may only appear once a week, or, at best, once a day. Online commentators can update hourly if they wish and are not subject to editorial control to be politically correct.

These last few years have witnessed a serious decline in newspaper readership and even their online editions receive less attention as more and more people question the veracity of what is written when they can get alternative views of the news from fully qualified, un-embedded, independent journalists and political commentators online.

The elite are getting nervous over our greatly expanding knowledge of what is really going on in the world and as I reported yesterday, Universal Studios had to pull their ‘United 93’ online forum, with several newspapers withdrawing stories in retaliation of public comment over the film as that comment clearly showed a far greater awareness of the true reality of the events of 9/11 among the public than the conventional media is politically bound to portray. And only two months ago MySpace closed down several blogs which they regarded as politically unacceptable.

Already legislation is being drawn up in western countries under the dictate of the elite to put an end to this free exchange of free speech. With Internet 2 taking shape, the traditional Internet will become a shade of its present self being slow and wholly unreliable, outlawing audio and video streaming, making users forced to upgrade to the streamlined Internet 2 if they wish to preserve and enhance the facilities which we now take for granted.

But, there will be a big price to pay. Each Internet 2 user will have to pay a premium rate, sign up to a contract which will specifically ban dissident political comment, enforcing strict rules of use, with websites vetted on their content and strict penalties for non-observance of the guidelines. In addition a tax on sending emails will put many organisations that email political newsletters out of business, thus depriving subscribers of a valuable source of alternative information. These operations would be viewed as dissident or a 'security threat' and be forced off the Internet super highway.

As I have reported before, providers like AOL have, for some time now, being engaged in polling their users with questionnaires whose tenor implies hidden dangers in the Internet with everyone from paedophiles to terrorists using it to disrupt society. With this falsely spun message, an acquiescing public may just vote in favour of the censored world wide web, but in doing so cut off the genuine wealth of vital discussion and open speech which should be the cornerstone of a free and healthy society.