Thursday, April 30, 2009

The swine behind the Swine Fever

The World Health Organisation has now lifted Swine Flu to level 5 on their Richter scale, one level below a full-blown pandemic. Although cases have been diagnosed in countries worldwide including the UK, where further outbreaks have been identified in the midlands and south west of England, as yet it has claimed few lives except in its place of origin, Mexico. One casualty was a small boy who died in Houston yesterday, but he had entered the US, already very ill.

The deaths it has claimed so far seem very race-specific, virtually all Hispanic.

On Monday a piece written by Kurt Nimmo back in 2007 and referencing researcher Jerome Corsi comments, had this to say and I believe it is very relevant to this current epidemic giving a broader picture of what is going on behind the scenes

“The new International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza was designed to supersede an earlier November 2005 Homeland Security report that called for a U.S. national strategy that would be coordinated by the Departments of Homeland Security, Health and Agriculture.”

In other words, any U.S. response to an avian flu pandemic would be directed under WHO, WTO, U.N. and NAFTA directives. Congress and U.S. agencies would be cut out of the picture. “The U.N.-WHO-WTO-NAFTA plan advanced by SPP features a prominent role for the U.N. system influenza coordinator as a central international director in the case of a North American avian flu or pandemic influenza outbreak,” Corsi adds.

“Dr. David Nabarro, WHO executive director of sustainable development and health environments, was appointed the first U.N. system influenza coordinator. In 2005, Nabarro said during a press conference that his number one priority was to prepare for the H5N1 virus, known as the avian flu. Nabarro played into the global fear that an epidemic was inevitable.

“I’m not, at the moment at liberty to give you a prediction on numbers, but I just want to stress, that, let’s say, the range of deaths could be anything from 5 to 150 million,” said Nabarro. On March 8, 2006, during a U.N. press conference Nabarro predicted an outbreak of the H5N1 virus would “reach the Americas within the next six to 12 months.”

On Monday, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon stoked the fear of a global flu pandemic. He said the Mexican flu outbreak is the “first test” of the “pandemic preparedness work undertaken by the international community over the past three years.” Ban Ki-moon said if “we are indeed facing a pandemic, we need to demonstrate global solidarity. In our interconnected world, no nation can deal with threats of such dimension on its own.”

For Ki-moon and the global elite, “global solidarity” in “our interconnected world” translates into yet another push for world government. Ki-moon’s dire warning falls on the heels of the G20 summit where plans were announced for implementing the creation of a new global currency to replace the U.S. dollar’s role as the world reserve currency. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and others repeatedly called for “global governance” and a “New World Order.”

The current flu pandemic hype serves as punctuation mark between the G20 held in London and the upcoming one to be held in Italy in June. “The G20 summit has agreed to try to kick start stalled Doha trade liberalization talks at the next G8 meeting,” Reuters reported on April 2. So-called “trade liberalization” is code for the neoliberal plan to “privatize” public and private industries around the world, impose “flexibilization” of labor markets (create massive unemployment), “deregulate” consumer and financial markets, and foster foreign buyouts, layoffs, wage cuts, transient employment, higher prices, and potentially destabilizing capital flows.

As noted by the Eagle Forum in October, 2007, the SPP’s North American Plan for Avian and Pandemic Influenza “is not only about combating a flu epidemic but is far-reaching in seeking control over U.S. citizens and public policy during an epidemic.” The Plan would give authority to international bureaucrats “beyond the health sector to include a coordinated approach to critical infrastructure protection,” including “border and transportation issues.”

On April 26, Infowars covered the Department of Defense’s “Implementation Plan for Pandemic Influenza” that proposes nothing less than the militarization of health care, military augmentation of civilian law enforcement, and the mass vaccination of the population as directed by the government.

Ki-moon, the United Nations, and the globalists, with the participation of the globalist-dominated corporate media and the ruling elite in Mexico, are hyping the flu outbreak as a possible pandemic in order to sell us their scheme for world government.

It is an ongoing process.

Attention by astute observers is turning to the fact as to whether or not the virus intended as such. “Advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool,” states the PNAC document, ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses’ of September 2000, the same document that stated “...The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor?” and what followed was 9/11, the Patriot Acts and everything else that went with it to change, entirely, the lives of Americans.

Race or genetically-specific viruses are nothing new and have now reached a high level of sophistication. In 2006, Armed Forces Journal, a mouthpiece for the military-industrial complex, carried a military strategy plan written by retired Major Ralph Peters which called for “ethnic cleansing” to be instituted in the Middle East so that the region could easily be dominated by the joint interests of Israel and the United States.

So, given Corsi’s view that one of the reasons for the epidemic origins being Mexico could be that this is also intended as a dry run under the new Security and Prosperity Partnership which will completely sideline the US government and Congress by mobilising a response to the epidemic under the new trans-continental SPP and world organisations such as the WHO - another step towards regional and global governance.

Another interesting fact emerged in today’s ‘What Doctor’s Don’t Tell You’ (WDDTY) bulletin which runs as follows.

“It is almost three years since we faced the hysteria of an avian flu epidemic, when governments bought billions of dollars of Tamiflu – the same anti-viral now being promoted to combat a supposed swine flu pandemic. The shelf life of Tamiflu also happens to be three years.

“The World Health Organization has, at the time of writing, increased its threat level to five, which means governments can activate their pandemic plans – and start handing out Tamiflu drugs. (But just how effective will this be in combatting this new strain of virus?)

“This is extremely convenient for governments that would have very soon have to dispose of billions of dollars of Tamiflu stock, which they bought to counter avian flu, or H5N1.  The US government ordered 20 million doses, costing $2bn, in October, 2005, and around that time the UK government ordered 14.6 million doses. Tamiflu’s manufacturer, Roche, has confirmed that the shelf life of its anti-viral is three years.

"England’s chief medical officer Sir Liam Donaldson has said that the UK is “well prepared” to counter swine flu – but only because it was well prepared to counter an avian flu pandemic that never happened.

“The other worry is when, or if, medicine comes up with a specific anti-viral for swine flu.  The last time they did – when we had the last swine flu scare in 1976 - health officials rushed through a vaccination programme that resulted in 1 out of 100,000 vaccinated Americans developing Guillain-Barre paralysis. The US government paid out $93 million in compensation.

“Those of us who quaked in fear from the expected SARS epidemic and shook from the anticipated avian flu pandemic may feel they’ve been here before. Despite the dire warnings, at the time of writing just 2,600 cases of swine flu have been confirmed or suspected around the world , and there have been 160 deaths,
(and mostly Hispanic) and not all of these may turn out to be caused by swine flu. More people die on UK roads every month.”

One thing seems sure though, this is a designer virus, most likely originating from a DoD lab somewhere and it is aptly named ‘Swine Flu’ for the true orchestrators of its being are, no doubt, none other than the real swine out there, the movers and shaker Illuminati who never desist from crushing humanity at every turn.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

NWO machinations beginning to unravel

It’s good to know that taxpayers’ money is being wasted right, left and centre. Following a £100 million investigation into the 7/7 London bombers, senior security officials have had to concede, finally, that it is unlikely anyone will be brought to justice. The court hearing involving the alleged suspects, hasn’t convinced the jury and Waheed Ali, Mohammed Shakil, and Sadeer Saleem, following two trials, have all been acquitted.

But, of course, the whole thing was a fantasy in the first place. The official story of 7/7 is littered with inconsistencies and glaring question marks which have never been publicy addressed by an independent review panel. What is unofficially clear is that the men were used as scapegoats, set up by the intelligence services for something they hadn’t done as a cover for the real perpetrators, the back room MI5 ops working under orders from their manipulative masters.

In fact, the Met has ended up with egg on its face, again, as they fail to explain why they didn’t thwart the supposed actions of the men by interceding earlier when they say they had ‘prior knowledge’ of the attack and those supposedly involved.

It's shambolic and just goes to show the massive amounts of time and money wasted, not to mention the 52 who were needlessly killed, because of the political manipulation of a hidden group of psychopaths that want to rule the world and try to achieve that goal by creating staged terror attacks in order to further restrict on our way of life under their planned regime.

The whole thing, from the staged banking collapse, anthropomorphic global warming to the swine flu epidemic, 9/11 and 7/7, all carry with them the distinct hallmark of inside jobs each having a distinct goal of forming a new world order of control and domination. It’s become so transparent and obvious that I believe their plans in the eyes of a growing number of the population are beginning to unravel and are heading for imminent derailment. Indeed, let’s hope so!

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Latest from NO2ID

A recent survey has found that 37% of the British population feel more frightened than they used to. ‘Institutionally-driven fear’ is believed to be responsible for 1 in 7 people’s anxiety disorders. Everything from the global, artificially-produced, banking collapse to global warming scares, swine fever, fears of unemployment and terrorism to being visibly reminded that you are being watched by CCTV cameras while surveillance monitors are now being introduced on buses (a whole new fleet of them on the Isle of Wight, repeatedly flashing up your face among the passengers) are all creating anxiety. Of course, this is what the globalists want - fearful cowering masses that will acquiesce to their wishes through that fear. It’s also good for their drug companies who make mountains out of sedatives. But to those in the know, it’s water off a ducks back as an increasingly large number of people can see the gameplay. It’s far more reassuring to see the enemy in full face than be left in the dark, confused and ignorant.

The retention of communication data such as emails that was to be introduced into the Data Retention (EC Directive) Regulations 2009 as a primary piece of legislation, has now been sneaked into the bill as secondary legislation. This leaves things in rather a grey state of affairs and hasn’t eradicated this totally unecessary intrusion into our personal affairs.

A NO2ID lawyer, Paul Kauffman has published a letter in the Law Society’s weekly journal, the Law Gazette in response to an article which claimed that lawyers are going to be first in adopting the ID infrastructure. Kauffman says in his letter that because of the concerns and unpopularity of ID card legislation, lawyers should also be in the front line in resisting it and are ideally placed to do so. A plea is going out to those in the legal profession to join forces with NO2ID to do just that.

Schoolchildren travelling by bus to school will now be tracked by GPS technology. Denbighshire County Council, authors of the scheme say “the system is actually secure. There’s no information on the cards that the pupils will be given themselves”, but then goes on to say “that it is all held on a database and it’s governed by data protection”. Little assurance there then having only narrowly staved off an attempt to circumnavigate the Data Protection Act by proposed measures in the Coroner’s and Justice Bill recently. It just means that the state can track and trace your child at will.

Lord West, the Security Minister has confirmed to officials that they are considering installing technology enabling on-demand wiretapping of all communications for the benefit of security services.

The Audit Commission has criticised the poor level of data quality in the NHS. Their recently-published report ‘Figures You Can Trust: Data Quality in the NHS’ states that there has been little improvement since their last report in 2004.

The UK Border Agency is to start sharing fingerprint data with the US, Canada and Australia. In addition the UKBA also expects to be able to track 95% of all airline passengers movements by the end of next year. Their e-borders system has already produced 920 arrests, but that’s out of a total of 10,000 innocent people who must have been harassed by the process.

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

More police heavy-handedness

While I’m still hot under the collar over the conduct of our police and the ever-more fascist-like behaviour that they are adopting - or have been told to adopt - more news of police misconduct comes our way. A park society chairman has been charged under the UK Counter Terrorism Act of 2008 for filming a police SUV driving erractically down a north London park footpath, despite the fact that, by law, police should proceed on foot in such territory. Mr Sleath, the unfortunate park warden, wanted to record the breach of conduct as evidence which could be presented to senior officers. But, it seems, the police can do what they like, flaunting the established law while behaving wildly under the one-legislation-fits-all guise of the Counter Terrorism Act. The language of the Act seems to be deliberately ambiguous so that photographing police officers could be interpreted as being illegal full stop if the police want to put a certain slant on it, despite reassurances from PC Alan Cousins of the Metropolitan Police Film Unit that journalists taking photographs of officers would not be impeded by this legislation.

This is plainly disgusting. Law-enforcement in this country is placing itself within a legalistic, hermetically-sealed safe house where, as a result of wholly concocted theories about potential terrorism, the police can seemingly do what they like and behave like a bunch of Rambos. Of course our pathetic and spiritually-bereft little jobsworth of a Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, just hides within this fantasy land carrying out orders as she is told and will do nothing to curb these excesses which effect each and every one of us.

Friday, April 17, 2009

My name's Al Kayda, I'm just a Tourist!

“During a recent visit to London I had a nasty incident, which killed interest in any further trips to this city. As I was taking pictures of double-decker buses with my son, we were approached by two policemen. First, we were told that it is forbidden to take pictures of anything in conjunction with transport. Then our names, passport numbers and London hotel address were noted. After that we were forced to delete all pictures that included any transport - even pictures of the new underground station in Vauxhall, which is a modern sculpture! These deletions were not only enforced destruction of private property, but an infringement of our privacy.

I understand the need for some sensitivity in an era of terrorism, but isn’t it naive to think terrorism can be prevented by terrorising tourists?

Klaus Matzka

Vienna, Austria”

A letter to the Guardian newspaper from a rightfully disgruntled tourist after a recent visit to London, a place he will never visit again.

This just goes to show the frightening face of fascism at work in this country and is particularly evident in London the capital of world infamy and a city I have little or no desire to visit again either. The police have been set up to act like an armed mafia, whose activities wholly discredit their rank. It is about time those among their ranks stopped behaving like programmed robots and question the why’s and wherefore’s of what they are being asked to do. Either that or leave the force and get a more sane job somewhere else. After all, the police are only undertaking their master’s bidding and although some of their ranks engaged in this type of work - making ridiculous demands of innocent people under the guise of a phony terrorism ruse - may feel themselves to be superior in some obscene way, they are as much a victim of this outrageous inquisition as the rest of us.

The sooner they realise that the better.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Another exorcism?

Just before the Easter break, Met Police Assistant Commissioner and anti-terror boss, Bob Quick, made an seeming indiscretion by openly exposing to public view a secret security document displaying details of a strategy, codenamed ‘Pathway’, for breaking an alleged terror cell, supposedly linked to al Qaeda, in Manchester.

Somehow, this has all the hallmarks of a deliberate whistleblowing exercise on the part of Quick and although the mainstream media cast it off as yet another bit of sloppiness by a senior public figure, I beg to differ. For someone like Quick, embedded in an organisation where discretion is paramount, to carry a highly restricted document in full view of journalists’ cameras is rather akin to leaving your flies open while engaging in an audience with the Queen. It just doesn’t happen.

I believe this is an exorcising of what could have been another false flag terror event and Quick’s actions, knowing that the text of the document would be caught on camera by the media and hit the headlines, would require the police to disrupt their plans, resulting in the ‘bringing forward’ of their operation to intervene in the gangs activities, by which time the deadly deed - a possible bomb attack on Manchester Airport over Easter - may have already been allowed to happen.

It has now transpired that the men involved were self-employed security delivery staff working for Newcastle-based Sky Interserve UK Limited and had occasion to make deliveries to secure areas within Manchester Airport. They had all received clearance from the Security Industry Authority, itself having recently being ridiculed for allowing 5,000 illegal immigrants working as guards. I smell a rat somewhere.

Once again, the men’s profiles make them seemingly unlikely suspects to engage in such a terror plot and although the Pakistani ISI allege that the men have links to the group, Lashkar-e-Taiba, or Army of the Righteous who were supposed to have been involved in the recent Mumbai attacks and the Lahore cricket tragedy - themselves highly suspicious and smacking of inside jobs - the whole thing seems to be highly contrived and yet just another incident of a group of rather straightforward average Joe’s being unwittingly conscripited into engaging in our security services’ politically-motivated dirty work campaign.

Although history may never reveal the real truth, I maintain that we may have to be eternally grateful to Bob Quick’s ‘indiscretion’ as not being indiscrete at all, but helping to keep us on the right side of a very thin and dangerous line by obliquely exposing inside plans to unleash more false flag terror on our society upon which our government and their ruling masters can use to enforce more restrictions on our lives and expand their surveillance state.

Thursday, April 09, 2009

Bail-out or lock-out?

We are daily reminded by the Obama administration of the vast sums of money that are being concocted to ‘stimulate’ the American economy and at the same time be used to invest in social programmes, education, housing, health and social security.

But the reality is going to be quite different. The way in which the bail-out moneys are being deployed spells large not the stimulation of the economy but the total stultification of it.

Warning signs soon emerged after Obama’s election as president when he immediately took steps to surround himself with Wall Street cronies. Clearly, representatives for the leading financial institutions are ultimately in control in the White House and that bodes ill for the American people.

In this month’s Nexus magazine, Michel Chossudovsky of the Centre for Globalization in Montreal, Canada, clearly and precisely illustrates the stark truth of the intended game play and how the current financial crisis has been carefully designed so that the sole benefactors are the central banks, defence contractors and oil conglomerates, in other words the controlling élite.

In the final days of the Bush administration the full, and publicly undisclosed cost of the bank rescue programme was estimated at a colossal $8.5 trillion or just about 60% of the gross federal debt of $14.078 trillion. Since then Obama has added another $750 billion.

That $8.5 trillion has come from the Federal Reserve, the Treasury, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Federal Housing Authority. The Treasury’s contribution is classed as government expenditure and must be met through taxation and the shedding of its public debt. But can the US government achieve this?

The current budget deficit is the highest in US history, while interest rates are at their lowest. This means that US-denominated government bonds and Treasury bills are stymied. Who in their right mind would now want to invest in US government debt, itself enormous and offering barely any interest?

Without income from US denominated debt instruments, how does the Obama administration hope to combat the budget deficit and therefore roll out a public spending programme? It can’t. The only way the budget deficit can be met is by drastically reducing public services and selling them off to the private sector - that’s those same organisations that have been the favoured beneficiaries of the bail-out money! This is nothing other than a corporate takeover, or privatisation of the US by stealth, a puppet government manipulated by banks and corporations - corporate fascism.


Chossudovsky points out that the bitter irony of the whole scam is that “the recipients of the bailout under Bush and Obama’s $750 billion aid to financial institutions are the creditors of the federal government. The Wall Street banks are the brokers and underwriters of the US public debt; although they only hold a portion of the debt, they nevertheless trade in US dollar denominated public debt instruments worldwide. They act as creditors of the US state. They evaluate the creditworthiness of the US government. They rank the public debt through Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s. They control the US Treasury, the Federal Reserve Board (wholly owned by the banks and as much federal as Federal Express) and the US Congress. They oversee and dictate fiscal and monetary policy, ensuring that the state acts in their interest”.

The US puppet government is not governing for the benefit of the people but for that of the banks by the banks. The government is in part financing its own indebtedness, the money granted to the banks is financed by those very same banks in a vicious cycle and is forever beholden to them, much in the same way as so many third world countries are beholden to those same banks through IMF loans.

With that power, the banks can dictate the terms. They can, as they do all the time in those same third world countries, dictate the privatisation of public services and take over of public infrastructure - roads, sewerage, water facilities etc etc, and impose the fiscal responsibility of the ‘government’. Obama can talk all he likes about the appropriation of funds into public services, the truth is the federal government does not control monetary policy. Period!

The black hole

Of the trillions sanctioned in bail-outs at the banks’ behest, following the deliberately engineered implosion of the financial system principally through the derivatives scam, little or none will find its way back to the hard-pressed ordinary working man and woman. The money is being accumulated by the banks and transfered into hedge funds which in turn are channelled into the acquisition of real assets, infrastructure, other financial institutions - in fact a gradual accumulation of not only the US’s assets but those of the world - while robbing individual's wealth through a plethora of new planned taxes like the global carbon tax, the stealing of pension funds etc etc.

This is nothing more than outright financial theft on a grand and global scale and the implications for Americans and those around the world are terrifying. Mass bankruptcies, wholesale unemployment, food shortages and deprivation on a massive scale as the common wealth is hoovered up by these iniquitous banking institutions, themselves run by the élite.

The only solution to stop this wholesale looting in its tracks is the need for a rapid awareness among all as to what is going on, then holding to account and bringing to justice these ‘élite’ robber barons and their vile scheme, the complete disestablishment of banks’ powers over governments and the re-establishment of government by the people for the people, with a banking system based on tangible assets - not a fiat system - for the benefit of re-building vibrant economies to the common good.

Until that goal is acheived we will all fall into penury with the global banking élite offering us their one and only solution, acquiescence to their corporate, fascist agenda and the new dark age that will follow under their dictatorship.

Tuesday, April 07, 2009

Clutching at straws

Those in control are clearly getting edgy over the emerging awareness among the general public that 7/7 had all the hallmarks of an inside job. Don’t forget that most of the legislation being rolled out by the Home Office involving our being tracked and traced everywhere we go, rests upon the supposed events of that day and it is paramount in the eyes of our controllers that the those events remain, in our minds, as genuine terrorist attacks.

The day after 7/7, Peter Power of Visor Consultants shocked us all in his declaration to the BBC that his company had been engaged in an identical attack scenario concurrent and identical to the targets used by the bombers which seemed to verify the fact, when taken with all of the other highly questionable evidence over the events of that day, that 7/7, like 9/11, was staged under the cloak of an ‘exercise'.

Now, three-and-a-half years later, Power - no doubt under duress by the authorities - has come forward to make a formal detraction of any link between his company’s engagement in the drill and the actual events of the day.

The statement, reproduced in its entirety below, strikes anyone who has studied 7/7 and has estimated the unbelievably incredible co-incidence of the the drill scenario and the actual events of the day - calculated at something like 10 with 41 zeroes after it - as wholly disingenuous and because of its ‘clutching at straws’ nature, only seems to add support that the two were linked, one being the cover for the other - one of the oldest ruses used in false flag terror.

Judge for yourselves.

Here is Peter Power’s statement in full:

“There has been much nonsense written about why my company ran an exercise on 7 July 2005 that had very close parallels to the real thing that day. Since then I have made several attempts to add my own comments to numerous sites that seem to get increasingly excited about their own conspiracy theories and in the process exclude any rational debate. It seems those who occupy the world of finding conspiracy theories to replace just about any coincidence, do not want to have any dialogue with those offering a different view, but I have not yet given up hope. I am therefore hoping, perhaps naively, that someone might like to read an honest and factual account about a particular exercise my company ran in London three years ago.

Unfortunately, the BBC had postponed in 2008 a programme in their ‘conspiracy files’ series that would have done this. Our client three years ago agreed to be named in the BBC programme since the attitude of the producer and his team was very balanced (several conspiracy theorists were also invited to take part). We even allowed our complete exercise material to be made available to the BBC. Regrettably broadcasting in 2008 might have jeopardised an ongoing court case, so they had little choice about postponing it to 2009.

Early in 2005 Reed Elsevier, an organisation specialising in information and publishing that employs 1,000 people in and around London, asked us to help them prepare an effective crisis management plan and rehearse it before sign-off. Several draft scenarios were drawn up and the crisis team themselves set the exercise date and time: 9.00am on 7 July.

The test was planned as a table-top walk through for about six people (the CM team) in a lecture room with all injects simulated. Everything was on MS PowerPoint. The location of their Central London office near to Chancery Lane was chosen as one test site. With many staff travelling to work via the London underground system, the chosen exercise simulated incendiary devices on three trains, very similar to a real IRA attack in 1992, as well as other events.

As there had been eighteen terrorist bomb attacks on tube trains prior to 2005, choosing the London Underground was logical rather than just prescient. With this in mind it was hardly surprising that Deutsche Bank had run a similar exercise a few days before and, prior to that, a multi-agency (and much publicised) exercise code-named Osiris II had simulated a terrorist attack at Bank tube station. Moreover, I had also taken part in a BBC Panorama programme in 2004 as a panellist alongside Michael Portillo MP et al, in an unscripted debate (we had no idea at all what the scenario was to be?) on how London might once again, deal with terrorist attacks, only this time it was fictional (created entirely by the BBC).

In short, some of the research for our exercise had already been done. The scenario developed for our client even started by using fictitious news items from the Panorama programme then, as with any walk through exercise, events unfolded solely on a screen as dictated by the facilitator without any external injects or actions beyond the exercise room. Also factored into the scenario was to be an above ground fictitious bomb exploding not far from the head office of the protected Jewish Chronicle magazine where for exercise purposes, our imagined terrorists would have been aware that commuters would now be walking to work (past a building already considered a target) as some tube stations would have been closed.

Of just eight nearby tube stations that fell within possible exercise scope, three were chosen that, by coincidence, were involved in the awful drama that actually took place on 7 July 2005. A level of scenario validation that on this occasion, we could have done without.

An exercise that turns into the real thing is not that unusual. For example, in January 2003, thirty people were injured when a tube train derailed and hit a wall at speed. At the same time, the City of London Police were running an exercise for their central casualty bureau where the team quickly abandoned their plans and swung into action to cope with the real thing.

For a surprising number of people such coincidents cannot be accepted as such. There just has to be a conspiracy behind them, despite the obvious point that painstaking research will always identify probable above possible scenarios. By the way, the only reason I was asked to speak on TV news that day, when there was still much confusion about the real tragedies, was to encourage more organisations to thoroughly plan their own exercises knowing the threat of terrorism is and remains, very real. One tragic consequence being Islam, a great Abrahamic, monotheistic faith (along with Judaism and Christianity), has undeservedly become vilified by some people”.

Peter Power

Visor Consultants

Friday, April 03, 2009

Latest from NO2ID

Although clause 152 of the Coroner’s & Justice Bill has been put behind bars for the time being, continual vigilance is paramount in trying to head off any legislation that further erodes our privacy and rights to freedom of speech from becoming established on the statute books. NO2ID highlight the current campaigns we must concentrate on:

Taking the NO2ID pledge not to comply in disclosing any personal information in relation to the National Identity Register and ID Cards.

Informing our GPs that we do not wish them to participate in ‘the spine’ or Summary Care Record (SCR) scheme which could breach patient confidentiality and allow personal data to be leaked to other organisations outside the NHS or the National Database.

Urging parents to ensure that their children’s personal details are ‘shielded’ on the ContactPoint database.

Ensuring those who have been charged but not convicted of a crime to contact their chief constable to ensure that their DNA, fingerprints and police records be destroyed citing the European Court of Human Rights recent ruling in the Marper case that retention was unlawful.

Constant resistance to these measures is absolutely essential, otherwise they will form a permanent part of the architecture of our incarceration within a police state.

Another piece of semi-transparent legislation has been defeated in the House of Lords. Clause 48 of the Border Citizenship and Immigration Bill would have removed our passport-free zone. If the legislation were to be passed it would require citizens of England, Scotland and Wales to carry passports with them when visiting the Republic of Ireland, the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man.

In Germany opposition has come to the fore over ‘disproportionate’ proposals to record the country’s entire, telephone, mobile, email and Internet usage. The ruling stated that “The court is of the opinion that data retention violates the fundamental right to privacy. It is not necessary in a democratic society. The individual does not provoke the interference but can be intimidated by the risks of abuse and the feeling of being under surveillance [...] The directive [on data retention] does not respect the principle of proportionality guaranteed in Article 8 ECHR, which is why it is invalid."

But knowing the ardent desire for a total database world that our collective governments are being engaged to set up by their ‘élite’ handlers, continual opposition to their plans to implement such legislation might always bring with it the spectre of another false flag event on such a devasting scale (al Qaeda being the excuse again) that they could then use it as a means of forcing these initiatives through on the usual basis of ‘keeping us safe in future’. Don't fall for that one!

PS. My prediction of a possible false flag episode taking place in the cloak of the partial surveillance blackout in the City of Westminster didn’t happen, although the intent of that mysterious armoured vehicle containing police uniforms has never been declared. Yet to identify and broadcast on the web such possible scenarios in which such an inside ‘terror attack’ could take place helps to keep people alert to the kinds of things our masters stage and our very declaration may, in some ‘butterfly effect’ way, help to exorcise such plans.