Thursday, June 21, 2007

The Federal Reserve, Fiat Money and the Meltdown of the US Economy

This article is inspired by G. Edward Griffin’s book ‘The Creature from Jekyll Island’ which chronicles the creation of the American Federal Reserve System. I am a great admirer of Griffin’s work principally because of the highly researched and organised way in which he approaches his subject matter and the clear and concise way in which he presents his findings.





The following story I am about to tell really only acts as an overview to his book which, I suggest, should be vital reading for everyone and particularly those who want to get a true understanding of how corrupt our western banking systems are and the power that these cartels wield over our lives.


Part 1

This story reflects the vanity of human nature. It shows how the deviation from a path of self-control can lead to a situation that gets wildly out of hand, with all of the benefits falling into the hands of the wrong people, creating a system that works directly against our own interests and well-being. It also demonstrates the deceptive skills employed by the élite ‘Illuminati’ banking families, having us believe that their banking system is in our best interests when, in fact, they are deceiving us and maintaining that deception so that when we are embroiled in high interest rates or lose our standard of living through a market crash, we end up pointing the finger of accusation in the wrong direction.


Origins and types of money


Once upon a time the transaction of goods and services was conducted by barter with exchanges made by mutual agreement on their relative values. As time went by it became apparent that some goods were more essential to the daily needs of people than others - like wheat or cattle - and there was a constant demand for such items. Because these goods had an intrinsic value they could be used as commodity money.

As man came to discover and refine precious metals which had a rarity value in themselves, coins were minted and these were eventually used as a more convenient medium of exchange for goods and services. The value of these coins would be determined by weight.

The amount of actual coinage that a merchant, for instance, might possess at any one time, might well be far more than he actually needed for his immediate requirement, so a system developed whereby he would deposit some of his coinage with a goldsmith, who would hold it in his vaults and issue the owner with a written receipt, redeemable upon presentation at any time. Soon these promissory notes were circulated to third parties with whom our merchant may have had business dealings and they, themselves could, upon presentation to the goldsmith, obtain the payment due to them by the merchant. These paper receipts became our next stage of currency, receipt money.

If we suppose that the materials and labour required in building a cart are reckoned to be equal to an ounce gold coin - a price based upon the availability of the gold coin supply and availability of carts - then one cart would cost one ounce of gold. But if the amount of gold being mined and minted into coins increases, so that the available money supply increases, then the price of a cart will rise because of the greater wealth in general circulation. Clearly, supply and demand of gold and available goods maintain an equilibrium.

The common misconception that this system is limited to the amount of gold available as currency at any one time is a misnomer since any scarcity of available gold is offset by the increased value of what is in current supply. If gold coinage is plentiful the cost of the cart will rise, if gold coinage is in short supply the price will come down.

As long as this system is left alone and governments or banks don’t intervene by cutting corners or creating paper money that isn’t 100% backed to the same value by gold, then the economy will remain stable and everyone will benefit.

But man’s impatience with such well-disciplined systems and his age-old wish to make an expedient extra buck or two soon led to the imbalancing of the mechanism.


Enter fractional and fiat money

The extra bob or two for those unscrupulous abusers of the system had kept busy hands at work filing down coins - just a little - and then re-casting the accumulated filings into new coinage. Not only goldsmiths, but governments engaged in this activity on the coins received from the public as tax payments. Now there was more coinage in circulation, but its real worth had been compromised. More coinage meant higher prices because of the seeming increase in wealth, yet the wealth had not increased, hence our first acquaintance with inflation.

But worse than this was the realisation by goldsmiths that they could literally get an extra run for their money in a quite different way. Discovering that of the available gold in their vaults at any one time left in safekeeping on behalf of depositors, only a fraction (about 15%) was ever called for on any given occasion. This led unscrupulous goldsmiths’ to offer the other 85% that was unlikely to be called upon by depositors, as loans to others and charge interest for the privilege. This allowed a goldsmith to create further money out of that which was lying idle in his vaults. But wait. That money isn't rightfully his, it belongs to the depositor who has every reason to believe that his gold coins are left in safe keeping. So the depositors' gold he is issuing as loans is being used twice, creating a most devious slight of hand and once again devaluing the actual money supply in existence. The concept of fractional money, had arrived, a highly convenient and dishonest concept that has dominated the banking system up to our present day.

But still man’s insatiable desire for more money continued, especially during wars when the colossal cost of armaments had to be met at very short notice.

Fiat money first made its appearance in China during the time of Marco Polo, but was also used to disastrous ends in the American colonies. Under this system, money is conjured up out of nothing as it doesn’t have the backing of gold or anything of real tangible value. Fiat money is issued out of nothing and is declared legal tender by government, meaning that it has to be adopted as lawful tender. The flooding of a country’s economy with this worthless issuance dilutes the genuine gold-backed money in existence, so that prices inevitably rise because of the increase in money supply, but in reality everyone is worse off because their money buys less. This is inflation.

The government now has a new source of money with which to buy their armaments but it has to be paid for somehow. Whereas direct taxation would be highly unpopular with the masses, the issuance of fiat money and its devaluing effect on the money supply allows the books to be balanced through inflation - the decline of our purchasing power - the perfect hidden tax!

In colonial America this was demonstrated to disastrous effect when inflation became rampant and between 1775 and 1779 the money supply increased by 5000%! George Washington remarked in 1779 "that a wagon load of money would scarcely purchase a wagon load of provisions”.





With the drafting of the American Constitution and with the ravages of hyper-inflation fresh in the founders’ minds, it included the strong provision that the issuance of fiat money would be outlawed.

A hard lesson had been learned, but not for long.




Part 2


Modern banking comes into being

The banking business had its foundations in 14th century Europe and in many instances got off on the right foot with banks fully meeting their moral obligations by issuing paper receipts that were fully backed their by deposits. However, the craving for money among the banks’ clientele soon put pressure on them to find easier ways of creating it, rather than being tied to the value of their deposits. The long ride down the slippery slope had begun with a legacy to this day of booms and busts, bank failures and sporadic economic failures, resulting from the unbridled issuance of un-backed money, devaluing economies.

With the founding of the Bank of England in 1694, fractional-reserve banking became institutionalised. It was the world’s first central bank, introducing the partnership between bankers and politicians, a disastrous mix. This liaison would allow a revenue-hungry British government to obtain funds which were largely created out of nothing by the bank on which the government would pay interest, thus avoiding the unpopular resort of the government raising taxes. But, as we have seen, someone has to make up the financial imbalance and it is the average man and woman who ends up paying more for goods and services; the hidden tax, inflation.


Early American central banks

Even before the Constitution was drafted, America had its own central bank, the Bank of North America, taking as its lead the Bank of England practice of fractional-reserve lending; lending more money as promissory notes than it held in deposit, and its principal borrower was the government.

Predictably, America’s first venture into central banking became an exercise in fraudulence. Closing its doors in 1783, it was replaced with America’s second central bank, the First Bank of the United States. But lessons still were not being learned.

One of the most influential players in the First Bank’s operations were the Rothschilds of Europe. This infamously cunning family, whose influence has continued to covertly dominate world money and therefore world events to this day and to whom - along with the Rockerfellers, their American counterparts in crime - had devised methods which enabled them to exploit the banking system to their own ends and amass incredible fortunes. Their wealth was obtained though smuggling, urging governments to engage in wars from which they would hugely profit and - through their superior network of intelligence gathering - manipulate the stock markets to their own ends. Indeed, Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s famous saying “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws” couldn’t be more appropriate.

Their influence on the First Bank obviously showed and in the first five years of its existence, inflation - that covert tax - had devalued people’s money by 42%. Outrage in many quarters ensued and America’s second central bank closed down. But in its wake, smaller wildcat banks operating on the same flawed principals stepped in just as the 1812 war between America and Britain needed funding. Within two years the nation’s money supply had tripled, devaluing it by a further 66%!

Despite this rampant inflation, at the end of the war, rather than reign in the excesses of the wildcat banks, Congress merely sought to protect them and perpetuate the system by founding America’s third central bank, the Second Bank of the United States and it was business as usual for the fractional lending fraud. With its enhanced connections with the wildcat banks, which were situated right across America, the inflationary boom and bust cycles were now felt everywhere.

By 1820 the pendulum was beginning to sway back in favour of sound monetary control and the principal voice in this crusade was Democrat, Andrew Jackson. A period of battle between Jackson and the Second Bank’s head Norman Biddle followed, but in the end Jackson won and the Second Bank closed its doors.


Civil War and beyond

By the time the Second Bank had closed the country was entering a ‘bust’ cycle as the money supply was being limited following rapid inflation. But with now no central bank, bad old practices and some bad new ones dominated while no-one tackled the real cause of this continual financial disruption, fractional reserve banking. It was this continuing economic crisis and the weak state of the economy, making exports in the North uncompetitive, which really triggered the American Civil War and not the issue of slavery which is popularly touted as its driving force.

While the Confederate South and industrialised North enjoyed mutual trading, the South also successfully traded cotton to Europe which annoyed the North whose exports were deemed uncompetitive because of cheaper goods being imported from Europe. In order to counter this imbalance the North imposed protectionist embargoes on imported European goods which forced the southern states to have to buy from the North at higher prices. Also the North’s embargo on European imports was retaliated by Europe taking similar measures on imported cotton from the South causing outrage among the Confederates.





European money men and governments wanted to use this split between the North and South to weaken America for their own secret expansionist policies, thus America had now become embroiled in global economic politics with the Rothschild dynasty and the London-based House of Morgan being a significant cause, but more significantly they were the financial beneficiaries of the blood spilt during the Civil War.


The Jekyll Island Meeting

America’s banking industry, following the demise of the Second Bank, was a myriad of rules and regulations, controls and privileges, none of which struck at the heart of the boom and bust cycle, namely the proliferation of marginal reserve money. Banks together with the trusts and cartels that had grown up following the loss of a central bank, could still be prone to collapse under this chaotic economic system. There was a pressing need - particularly in New York where banking had largely become consolidated into two large rivals, the Rockerfellers and the Morgans - to resolve the problem, but in a way that would suit the bankers and not the well-being of the country or its economy.

What they wanted was a system that would create a lender of last resort to supply unlimited amounts of money should any of the banks suffer insolvency from runs and currency drains. They also wanted to stifle the competition so that a closely-knit banking cartel could operate in exclusivity with its affiliates agreeing to strict controls that would keep them interlocked. It was agreed that the federal government must be part of the new set up to provide that function of control.

One winter’s night in 1910, this coterie of bankers met on the remote Jekyll Island just off the coast of Georgia. They comprised of Abraham Piatt, Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury; Frank A Vanderlip, president of the National City Bank of New York and representing William Rockerfeller; Henry P Davison, of the JP Morgan Company; Charles D Norton, president of JP Morgan’s First National Bank of New York, Benjamin Strong, head of JP Morgan’s Bankers Trust Company, Paul M Warburg, partner in Kuhn, Loeb & Company and representing the British and French Rothschild banking dynasty and Senator Nelson W Aldrich the Republican senate ’whip’, chairman of the National Monetary Commission, associate of JP Morgan and father-in-law to John D Rockerfeller, Jr. It was here that the framework of the Federal Reserve was laid out, a system that would strangulate America for the next 100 years.

The idea had to be sold to Congress without making it appear that the Federal Reserve would in reality be a cartel - which would have brought strong opposition - so this new structure would be comprised of 12 regional institutions to give it the appearance of a decentralised organisation, whereas, in reality, it was to follow the model of the Bank of England.

The rather misleading title of the Federal Reserve was adopted; ‘Federal’ implying that it was an offshoot of government, and ‘Reserve’ implying that it was backed by reserves of tangible assets, both implied definitions being completely untrue.

The cartel needed a sympathetic champion who would see this new central bank become a reality and they found it in Woodrow Wilson, whose close intellectual minder, Colonel House, had intimate ties to the cartel. Because of Wilson’s unshakable faith in House’s abilities, the Colonel was regarded as the unseen President of the United States.

After much political skulduggery, the Federal Reserve Act under its presentational title of the Glass-Owen Bill passed into law on December 23, 1913. Some ameliorating amendments had been made, but the essential framework was there. America now had a central bank to out-class the iniquities of all of the former central banks as time would soon tell.



Part 3


The Federal Reserve had been born. With its falsely-sounding government title, it was believed that it would bring about monetary reform and prevent the spates of bank failures that had been plaguing the US economy. It was expected that it would be a central regulatory, presidentially-elected and senate-controlled body in which the public would be protected through a sharing of power, melding of interests, with a system of checks and balances so that according to Woodrow Wilson “the banks may be instruments, not the masters, of business and of individual enterprise and initiative”. But, in common with many of the rest of those who were involved in the passing of the Bill, they had little or no understanding of the real modus operandi of its proposers, the bankers, or indeed how their deceitful financial mechanism was to work.

The hidden intentions behind the forming of the Federal Reserve were:
  • To stop the growing influence of the smaller banks, and concentrate the nation’s financial resources in the hands of the governing cartel by pooling their reserves into one large fund to protect themselves from currency runs and drains
  • Reverse the trend of private capital formation and gain dominance over the industrial loans market
  • Shift the liabilities of the cartel to the taxpayers.

The mechanism at work

The clearly defined, but publicly undeclared principles adopted by the Federal Reserve in practice work like this.
  • The Federal Reserve System allows commercial banks to create chequebook money out of nothing. Therefore, the US dollar bill has no real value, is not backed by an equal quantity of gold or any other tangible asset - it is pure fiat money - which is created out of debt, which you could rightly argue is less than nothing!
  • It is the lending of money which allow the banks to derive profit from the interest charged on the loan. So when a loan is granted to a borrower, it is first conjured out of nothing as a series of figures on a computer screen, then the amount of that loan is entered in the bank’s ledger as an asset as it is earning interest and should eventually be paid back.
  • To keep the bank solvent, it must ensure that its loans - especially the larger ones - are not defaulted on, so every effort is made to keep those loans on the books and, at least, receive the interest from them. The maintenance of this state of affairs is usually achieved by increasing the size of the loans to potential defaulters, allowing the borrower additional capital to spend while maintaining the flow of interest repayments. This is called ‘rolling over the debt’. This way the bank’s book assets are maintained although the problem of the borrower’s inability to repay that loan is not solved, just merely postponed.
  • Should that debt become unpayable even after the ‘rolling over’ procedure has been repeated, the Federal Reserve system comes into play. They convince Congress that to allow the borrowing company to die would not be in the national interest. Thousands of jobs might be lost and add a further burden to the economy. This action, with the sanction of Congress allows the Federal Reserve banking cartel to create fresh money out of nothing to allow the lending bank to write off the outstanding debt from its ledger, and that fresh money now flooding the economy, means higher prices because through the increased money supply, transferring the burden to the taxpayer as inflation - the result of higher prices charged for goods and services.

Examples of the Federal Reserve at work

Let’s see how this mechanism has worked in the real world and the damage it has caused to the American economy at the expense of this infamous banking cartel.

The Penn Central Railroad In 1970 it became bankrupt. The lending banks’ took over the directorship of the Penn Central while continuing to pour money into it - which in turn came from the Federal Reserve - so allowing dividends to be continued to be paid to shareholders giving them the impression that all was OK. At the same time the directors then began to offload their shares at unrealistic prices, so that when bankruptcy came, the recipients of those shares were left with nothing. As the final resort the Federal Reserve made its case to Congress that the need to keep the Penn Central alive was paramount to public interest. Congress then responded by issuing loan guarantees worth $125m, thereby underwriting the banks’ losses.

The losers were the shareholders, Joe Public because of a further influx of money supply helping up inflation, and the Railroad which eventually failed anyway, while the winners, as always, were the central banks who were laughing all the way to their collective front doors.

Lockheed The same year and the same story. This time Congress agreed to guarantee $250m in new loans and so the Fed Res banking cartel had ensured that Lockheed was now 60% deeper in debt than it had been before. But since the government was acting as guarantor, in order to ensure that Lockheed didn’t go bust, it made sure that it was granted lucrative no-bid defence contracts. The winners, once again were the banks, while the increased money supply kept the man in the street picking up the tab.

And so it went on.

New York City
Year: 1975, impending insolvency
Pretext: the curtailment of public services which would be a disgrace in the eyes of the world
Bailout: $2.3bn, doubling the size of New York City’s current debt
Beneficiaries: the banks continue to receive their interest.

Chrysler
Year: 1978, on the verge of bankruptcy
Pretext: to allow the company to fold would be a blow to the economy and reduce competition in the car industry
Bailout: $1.5bn
Beneficiaries: The banks’ previously uncollectable debt was now guaranteed by government backing ensuring the continued flow of interest.

Commonwealth Bank of Detroit
Year: 1972, insolvency, following large loans from the Chase Manhattan Bank to invest in risky high stakes ventures
Pretext: financial hardship to the public
Bailout: $60m loan from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (an insurance arm of the Fed Res), plus federal guarantees of repayment
Beneficiaries: Commonwealth saved and sold to an Arab consortium, Chase saved converting its potential loss into government-backed assets.

Chicago Continental Illinois Bank (world’s seventh largest bank)
Year: 1982, insolvency following overseas banks withdrawing their deposits creating the world’s first electronic bank run
Pretext: it would be unthinkable to have such a leading bank fail
Bailout: $4.5bn by the FDIC in return for an 80% ownership in the bank.
Beneficiaries: CCI Bank is saved although the $4.5bn collateral being in the form of government stock, effectively made the CCI Bank government-controlled!

In all of these instances and scores of others, the Federal Reserve had acted as ‘lender of last resort’ and had saved each institution from insolvency, saving the banks’ continued ability to trade and coin in interest from its loans, but placing an enormous burden upon the general public through artificial money creation with the resulting inflation and devaluation the nation’s wealth.


The game goes global


But this whole scam wasn’t just being enacted on the American stage, it was going global. This time the stated pretext wasn’t just a banking system that would protect the American people, it was to be a banking system that would save the world from poverty, through facilitating international trade and stabilising exchange rates.

So, at Bretton Woods in New Hampshire in 1944 the International Monetary Fund (IMF) was born. Acting as a global bank, like the Federal Reserve it would conjure money out of thin air and through the creation of the World Bank transfer that fiat money, described as loans, to third world, underdeveloped countries.


The Bretton Woods Meeting

This was no altruistic move on the part of this banking cartel. It’s true goal was that the ‘loans’ would stimulate the demise of free enterprise in these third-world countries, thus tying them to the central world bank and so embroiling them in perpetual debt. In reality the money wouldn’t go to those people who needed it most, the deprived, hungry and starving, but would be handed to their governments, many of which had been established with deliberate western coercion as crooked dictatorships. Nine times out of ten, these ‘loans’ would end up being used to expand government bureaucracy and be frittered away by the governing élite and/or be used to build their military status.

Since the money for these loans originated from the industrialised countries, principally the US, this manufacture of fiat currency covertly undermined that country’s wealth, but was doing nothing to alleviate the hardships of those in third-world countries to whom popular thought supposed it was to be designated. Once, again, the banks were the prime beneficiaries.


The ulterior motive

One of the prime intellectual driving forces behind the Bretton Woods agreement was John Maynard Keynes, economist and leading member of the Fabian Society.


The Fabians and Communists both shared the notion of a classless, stateless society, devoid of private enterprise, where the state would, in essence, control all. They differed only on the way this end should be achieved. The Communists favoured force, whereas the Fabians preferred a gradual coercion of nation states into this framework by stealth.

The creation of the World Bank and IMF was, in fact, a means of achieving this goal of centralised power, but on a global scale with a view to eventually creating a one world bank with a one world currency.

Strong nation states like the US, born on the ethos of free enterprise - the reverse of what was being proposed - were to be the prime lenders to third world nations, through the World Bank, thus bleeding their economies through inflation and devaluation of their currencies. As we see today, the dollar is being deliberately stripped of its world status through the unbridled issue of fiat currency, both in military spending and international loans - most of which have no hope of being repaid, the only beneficiaries being the banking and military-industrial cartels, who are literally hi-jacking the country. As the dollar finally collapses and America is brought economically to its knees, rescue will come in the form of a new, more broadly-based currency with a subsequent loss of sovereignty.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the coin, third-world and other less well developed nations are being enticed into this global collectivist web, by hooking their respective governments and despot leaders - more often than not covertly coerced into power by the very nations who are currently bankrolling them - on loans they will never repay, because of their innate desire for money and power, ensuring those funds are wasted and not put to use in helping their countries’ citizens. The IMF and World Bank are literally buying these countries with the wealth of the American and other Western industrialised nations to eventually bring them into a world collectivist, communist-style environment.

Now that the former Soviet bloc and China have been enticed into the IMF/World Bank web, they join Latin America and Africa who are already hopelessly embroiled in indebtedness to this global juggernaut of financial oppression, beholden to the one-world doctrine of those who have devised the system which grew out of the doctrines of Jekyll Island and Bretton Woods.




The future?

Today the US national debt is quoted as $8.8 trillion. Given an estimated population in the United States of just under 302.3 million, that equates to the share of debt per citizen of just in excess of $29,000! And this national debt has been increasing at the rate of $1.05bn per day since September 29, 2006.

The federal government payroll has increased dramatically while the manufacturing industry has declined, with more people receiving government paychecks than those paying income taxes. Add to this the entitlements, such as social security and medicare which, in 1992, represented 52% of federal outlays together with the 14% being soaked up in interest payments on debt and you see a country being bled dry.

National assets such as docks, ports and other major infrastructure have been sold off to foreign interests, environmentalism has led to millions of acres of timber and farm land to be taken out of production, while mandatory legislation in the workplace has been eroding the viability of much of the private sector.

Because of constant inflation, as the money supply is constantly topped up by more fiat money, the standard of living has declined in real terms and the number of Americans who own their homes has dropped. Over 90% of all Americans are officially broke by retirement age.


All part of the plan

It seems that just about every step is being taken to kill America. Why is this reckless state of affairs allowed to continue?

It appears that this is all part of a greater stratagem formulated many decades ago. The goal is one-world government in which all former nations are coerced into a global collectivist state with one central government, central bank and army. The building blocks of this horrific end game are already in existence. The IMF and World Bank are its financial progenitors, while the United Nations army is to be its military overseer and the United Nations the global governor. In this scenario, no sovereign state remains and to achieve this goal, preeminent, strong self-contained sovereign countries like America - and particularly America - with its legacy of free-enterprise and strong economy, must cease to exist if the world is to become one large collectivist state, which is the aim.

The effect of global monetary control is the key to this end goal and the assembly of regional global economic blocs (America - the NAFTA trade agreement currently in formation, Europe - the EU already in position and expanding and Asia - far eastern countries already looking to a common currency and economic amalgamation) are already forming as initial stepping stones to this end.

Diagram: acknowledgements to David Icke


Seen in this light, the destruction of the American economy, its constitution and spirit of free-enterprise, makes sense. It is seen as vital to weaken her both militarily and financially.

The Council on Foreign Relations - the American-based executive arm of the New World Order élites, working through the back door of the US government - is the prime mover in arranging this state of affairs. Its members' aspirations aren't bound to nation-state loyalty, but to world economic and political dominance. High US government positions are totally commandeered by CFR representatives, positioned in the heart of the administration, ideally poised in the driving seat to achieve this end.


Conclusion

And so we see that that fateful meeting in 1910 at Jekyll Island, was just one initial step in the long road to world financial dominance by a group of men, whose mechanism would eventually engulf the entire globe. The Federal Reserve System together with the IMF/World Bank is the outcome. The strangulation of the American economy through social handouts, the selling off of chunks of national infrastructure, the run-down of its manufacturing industry, the expansion of a financially burdensome government bureaucracy, the set-aside of millions of acres of agricultural land (touted as environmentalism), the flooding of the US with millions of Mexican immigrants providing cheap labour and the back-door amalgamation of Mexico and Canada along with the US into one large collectivist socialist state with a new common currency - the Amero - are the tools by which this can become reality, acting as another stepping stone toward the new global reality.

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Back off Blair!

In one of Blair’s last speeches before standing down, he has dealt a parting blow at the media, branding it a “feral beast, just tearing people and reputations to bits,”.

But in addition he lambasted the alternative on-line media, blogs (such as this) and online forums saying that they "can be even more pernicious, less balanced, more intent on the latest conspiracy theory multiplied by five".

Obviously things are getting pretty hot for the likes of Blair and his minders who realise that their pernicious games are being laid fair and square for all to see by that very alternative media.

At the behest of those same minders, Blair’s ten-year stint in office has been nothing short of appalling, curbing most of our civil liberties and rights in the name of a phony international war on terror, banning public demonstrations in many areas in the capital, instigating, almost on a daily basis, more restrictions in the build-up of a police state which pokes its nose into every aspect of our lives, taking the country to war in Iraq on the back of trumped-up false evidence of WMD, getting caught with its trousers down in the cash-for-honours scam... the list goes on. And he has the arrogance to clamp down on an alternative media that is rightly bringing these gross injustices and breaches of executive power into public light!

The freely available flow of information on the web has been one of the greatest enabling tools that man has ever been given, a true democratic platform on which free debate and dissemination of un-censored news is available.

For once in the entire history of mankind can we now use this information to build up a picture of the realities of life, not the sanitised and spun versions of reality fed us by the mainstream media, who have, despite Blair's finger of accusation, been under the scrutiny of government and those who manage our government, for many a long year.

Through the Internet and web I have been able to disseminate a vast amount of alternative views on geopolitical affairs - some completely wide of the mark, but much of which helps me to identify and glean the truth behind many of the serious problems in the world today. In addition, the web’s resources have greatly helped me with my health, leading me to sources of information that the NHS would rather not inform me of, because it isn’t in the interest of those controlling elite who manage big pharma who in turn manipulate the health system.

Under Blair’s proposed media regulator, will all of this vital information simply evaporate, leading us into a new dark age?

You bet your life it will, because it’s current availability works against the interests of the global cartel of which Blair is one of its sorry scivvies, who want us to be kept uninformed, and merely their acquiescing lap dogs.

While the mainstream TV news in Britain now only concentrates on police state issues like paedophiles, ASBOs, curbs on this, that and everything else, interlaced with mindless drivel about pop superstars, and programming devoid of any serious, balanced debate about world or social affairs, concentrating instead on game shows and reality TV - all part of the deliberate dumbing-down of society to nullify brains and divert attention - the web, a few independent publishers' book titles and one or two independently produced magazines - who tell it like it really is - are all we have left to keep our minds informed and in balance.

Try to take that away Blair (or Brown) and you will have the wrath, outrage and opposition of honest and decent human beings to deal with, whose aim is to seek the truth in an attempt to make this place a better world. This is one step too far!

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Energy saving - who’s kidding who

Hot on my comments on the man-made global warming hoax last Friday, predictable sounds are emanating from the Kremlin in Whitehall. Fuehrer-to-be-Brown is already pontificating about penalising homeowners who refuse to install so-called energy-saving light bulbs in a bid to cut down on global warming. What a load of tosh!

Apart from the points I raised in last Friday’s blog that man’s contribution to global warming through carbon emissions is miniscule in relation to that naturally created by mother earth, the UN’s own documents readily admit that man-made emissions only contribute a total of 6%.

So what’s this all about? Well, it’s the same old agenda. Invent a scenario of some impending catastrophe and get everybody to pay for it both financially and socially, thereby keeping them pinned down and firmly under your thumb.

As Christopher Booker pointed out in the Daily Mail yesterday, the government’s plans to force everyone to adopt energy-saving light bulbs is going to do little or nothing to curb energy use - the generation of which is supposed to be playing havoc with our planet (clearly untrue), and is going to do everything for the political/industrial control complex to be both quids in and increase their stranglehold upon we the witless.

Booker makes the following points on ‘energy-saving’ light bulbs:
  • Although energy-saving or compact florescent bulbs (CFLs) are supposed to only consume a fifth of the energy consumed by equivalent tungsten filament bulbs and save between 5m and 8m euros a year in fuel bills, the cost to our government alone of implementing their use would be £3 billion (great for the manufacturers and their shareholders).
  • The quality of illumination is inferior to the standard tungsten light bulb and like strip lights, require several minutes to achieve their full intensity - hardly saving on usage time.
  • Because the light emitted from CFLs fluctuates at 50 cycles per second and is not the steady form of illumination you get from filament bulbs, the flicker, especially when used in reading lamps, has been quoted as being conducive to headaches.
  • They are heavier and often more uglier than traditional tungsten bulbs and are 20 times more expensive.
  • The light they give off is said to be harsher and less pleasant.
  • Because they are more complex to make than tungsten lamps, their production entails ten times more energy - like those who support nuclear power generation whose manufacture entails a much greater degree of energy when viewed holistically, they conveniently overlook this counter-productive fact.
  • CFLs do not work with dimmer switches.
  • About 50% of UK light fittings won’t take them, but guess who will likely have to stump up the cost of installing new fittings?
  • Because they will not function in temperatures above 60C, or lower than -20C, they cannot be used in microwaves cookers or fridge freezers.
  • Their technology employs toxic chemicals including mercury vapour and their disposal in landfill sites has been banned anyway.
  • They must be kept on for long periods of time if they are to reveal their energy-saving benefits - a piece of doublespeak logic if ever I heard it - and the more they are switched on and off the less their life span.
But never mind, this is just another example of idiotic fascist-like lunacy to emanate from a feckless government that wears the little mental capacity it possesses in its collective balls and is pushed around by a bunch of dangerous criminals who are covertly running this planet.

So if the inspector from the your local council comes round demanding that you downgrade to this politically correct means of lighting, all on the back of a man-made global warming myth, tell him - or her - to get sxxxxxd!

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Controlling your mind

Former Chief Medical Officer for Northern Finland, Dr Rauni Kilde was a well respected individual. She has held the highest medical positions in Lapland specialising in public health, health administration and tropical diseases, is listed in Who’s Who’s for the World, Medicine & Engineering and Science & Engineering and is a retired president of the Nursing College of Lapland. She has been regularly attending the lecture circuits of the world that deal with neuroscience and has acted as Finland’s representative to the World Health Organisation.

But what has consumed Dr Kilde’s attention is the growing use of mind control technologies by many world governments and their military. Her well-researched and produced TV documentary on this very subject only received one airing and was then withdrawn from the airwaves. Indeed her involvement in this dangerous subject has brought her a life of hell. The very mind controlling techniques that she has for so long tried to bring to public attention are now being used against her along with a programme of directed sabotage and theft of her property and her computer which has become unusable because of constant hacking.


The warning

In an article in the Canadian newspaper yesterday, reporter Lucien Desjardins conveyed her shocking warning to the world of advanced plans by certain governments in the US and Europe, to microchip all newborns.

"Implanted human beings can be followed anywhere. Their brain functions can be remotely monitored by supercomputers and even altered through the changing of frequencies," wrote Dr Kilde. "Guinea pigs in secret experiments have included prisoners, soldiers, mental patients, handicapped children, deaf and blind people, homosexuals, single women, the elderly, school children, and any group of people considered "marginal" by the elite experimenters. The published experiences of prisoners in Utah State Prison, for example, are shocking to the conscience.

"Today's microchips operate by means of low-frequency radio waves that target them. With the help of satellites, the implanted person can be tracked anywhere on the globe. Such a technique was among a number tested in the Iraq war, according to Dr. Carl Sanders, who invented the intelligence-manned interface (IMI) biotic, which is injected into people. (Earlier during the Vietnam War, soldiers were injected with the Rambo chip, designed to increase adrenaline flow into the bloodstream.) The 20-billion-bit/second supercomputers at the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) could now "see and hear" what soldiers experience in the battlefield with a remote monitoring system (RMS).


"When a 5-micromillimeter microchip (the diameter of a strand of hair is 50 micromillimeters) is placed into optical nerve of the eye,"
, Dr. Kilde indicates "it draws neuro-impulses from the brain that embody the experiences, smells, sights, and voice of the implanted person. Once transferred and stored in a computer, these neuro-impulses can be projected back to the person's brain via the microchip to be re-experienced. Using a RMS, a land-based computer operator can send electromagnetic messages (encoded as signals) to the nervous system, affecting the target's performance. With RMS, healthy persons can be induced to see hallucinations and to hear voices in their heads. "

"Every thought, reaction, hearing, and visual observation causes a certain neurological potential, spikes, and patterns in the brain and its electromagnetic fields, which can now be decoded into thoughts, pictures, and voices, " Dr. Kilde added. "Electromagnetic stimulation can therefore change a person's brainwaves and affect muscular activity, causing painful muscular cramps experienced as torture."

Scary! It sounds like the stuff of science fiction. But is it?


Background

According to Ken Adachi http://educate-yourself.org/mc/ and a wealth of supporting literature on the subject, plans to create a mind controlled workers society have been on the books for some time. Fritz Lang’s ‘Metropolis’ and George Orwell’s ‘1984’ are just two powerful portrayals of such a world and to many seem rather fantastic and removed, yet that reality could be closer than we think if one follows the train of development of mind control technologies that have been quietly forming in the deepest shadows of equally shady government programmes and willed by a new world order hell bent on engaging in tight control of our lives for their own ends.

The current technology arose out of experiments staged by the Nazis before and during World War II. The incarceration of the Jews in concentration camps during the war provided a wealth of experimental material which included testing mind control technologies both trauma and electronic-based. Under the auspices of ‘Project Paperclip’ at the end of the war, thousands of Nazis were secretly moved to the US where the technologies that had been developed in Germany both before and during the war encompassing rocket science and, more worryingly, psychological and mind control techniques, were further developed. At this time thousands of children, often dispossessed, were snatched off the streets and used as guinea pigs in mind control experiments staged in covert underground facilities developed by the ever powerful military industrial complex in league with rogue elements of government.

Governments had also been experimenting with mind control using methods that had grown out of old occult techniques where victims were subject to a massive psychological and physical trauma at an early age. This which would then create a form of schizophrenia, or multiple ‘personalities’, and some of these ‘personalities’ could then be programmed without the awareness of parallel ‘personalities’, to undertake a specific task, for instance, murder. To unlock the particular personality which would have been programmed to carry out such a frightful task without remorse, a ‘trigger’ would be sent to the brain, often in the form of a sound, word or particular impulse.


The Montauk Boys

Experiments with Extra Low Frequency (ELF) techniques were conducted from an underground facility at the old USAF base at Fort Hero at Montauk on Long Island, New York in the 70s. In his book ‘The Montauk Project’, Preston B Nichols, claims that he was employed at this facility, to work on a clandestine project. That project involved the use of ELF waves, or ‘telepathic waves’ to effect the brain. His discovery came when examining the abilities of psychics, Nicholls found that at a certain time each day their minds would become ‘jammed’ and would be unable to think effectively. To locate the source of this ‘jamming’ which Nichols suspected was some sort of radio interference, he found that emissions in the 410-430MHz region were routinely being transmitted from a radar array on the old base at the same time as these ‘jamming’ experiences were taking place in the psychics’ minds and it is these precise frequencies that resonate with an adult’s head. By modulating a pulsed ELF signal onto a 410-430MHz carrier wave of around 16Hz - a frequency the brain is highly sensitive to - serious manipulation of brain functions can occur.

The radar array was, in fact, part of a covert government programme into the mind controlling effects of ELF waves and on several occasions when the array was transmitting, strange and bizarre things would happen in the nearby town of Montauk. These would manifest themselves as a sudden spike in crime which would suddenly stop after two hours, animals would come out of the surrounding woods into the town en masse and sometimes would crash though windows and behave in erratic ways. Freak storms would also occur. Subsequent investigations by Nichols revealed that these behaviour patterns and meteorological phenomena could be directly traced to the ELF transmission times from the radar array.

Starting in 1976 and throughout the 1980’s, Al Bielek, a participant who was involved in many aspects of this mind control programme at Montauk, estimates that at least 250,000 kidnapped teenage children were ‘programmed’, not only at Montauk but at 25 other clandestine facilities, to go into action at some later time of life at the behest of black government to undertake - on the receipt of the ‘trigger’ - some destructive or disruptive conduct. Other boys grew up to enter mainstream American life in influential positions in the media, business, medical and legal professions, law enforcement and the military. They would do their master’s bidding, acting from the warped perspective of their pre-programmed minds.

When one considers the almost pathological support given by many people from news anchors, research scientists to politicians over matters that balanced minds would question, on a whole number of subjects from the use of toxic elements in drugs and vaccines to the outragreous and continued presence of the US in Iraq, which by any humane criterion would be viewed as insane, then one can add credence to the claims of Bielek.


Advanced psychological weaponry


However, the day is fast approaching when not just hand-picked individuals will be subject to these enormities, but all of us.

In reality, the arsenal of psychotronic and electromagnetic weapons now available to organisations such as the CIA is way ahead of our common conception. In his recent book ‘Hidden Truth, Forbidden Knowledge’, Disclosure Project brainchild, Dr Steven Greer MD, tells of his chilling experiences with such clandestine might. Dr Greer’s lifelong attempts to make public the knowledge by high ranking officials from government and the military that extraterrestrials are, and have been present upon our planet for some time and that a clandestine element of the US government is using the Star Wars project as a military affront to these benign extraterrestrial intelligences, whose technological ability and intellect is far superior to ours: http://www.disclosureproject.org/ has been hounded by the very black government-sponsored intelligence agencies to whom his criticism is directed.

Dr Greer, from an early age, developed a psychic ability that enabled him to communicate with these extraterrestrial intelligences to the point that he gleaned an enormous amount of information both about their concern for our worldly sanity and lack of it and the human rogue element who are determined to eradicate them from the skies using advanced weaponry, much of it developed from captured alien craft. Failing to pay Greer off through promises of wealth and power, these clandestine elements of government - who even the then CIA Director, James Woolsey, was even unaware - and the military industrial complex staged psychotronic warfare with Greer, whose heightened psychic abilities enabled him to confirm its source, but often paralysing him with severe cramps in bed and even simultaneously inducing metastatic cancer in both he and Shari Adamiak, his colleague, Shari later dying from it in 1998.

So the technology available to these covert elements of government and their agencies is awesome.


The emerging control grid

As well as the threat of obligatory micro chipping all newborns, is the growing microwave grid.

Everywhere antennae towers are being erected, in some places far more than would seem plausible for mere mobile phone transmissions. Unless a company tries to erect one just outside your back garden evoking the wrath of its neighbours, their appearance is largely taken for granted as the spectre of these arrays falls into the human subconcious and becomes part of the largely accepted environment.

As Ken Adachi comments: “It's not an accident that the frequency band chosen for cell phone use just happens to match the second order waves that Wilhelm Reich discovered in the late 1940's to effect thought transmission and allow the mind to be manipulated without the victim realizing it”. Although today the sheer unwieldiness of low frequency antennae makes them impracticable, microwave and UHF frequencies have been utilised to carry low frequency, pulsed signals which can seriously interfere with human brain functions. Therefore it comes as disturbing news that the new TETRA system utilised by the UKs emergency and police services uses a 350-400MHz carrier signal to carry 17.6MHz pulsed signals, precisely those frequencies that effect the human brain and can cause fits and epilectic reactions.

According to a document criticising TETRA http://www.hippy.freeserve.co.uk/tetra.htm Sir William Stewart, former chair of the Microbiological Research Authority when asked to comment on the chosen frequency usage of TETRA commented: “It appears that the government officials who provided input to the Stewart Report were well aware of the Airwave specifications at the time, but chose not to inform the Independent Expert Group about the TETRA technology, and remained quiet when it came to the issues of low frequency effects”.

In an article by Tim Rifat, the owner of Psi-Ops Management http://www.whale.to/b/rifat6.html he claims that “the British government is in the process of mind controlling the entire UK population using CIA research from the Pandora Project and the so-called TETRA system which costs £2.5 billion will place 30,000 transmitters in every urban conurbation in the UK. Further to this, the British Army has long experience of using microwaves for murder and mind control in Northern Ireland. In 1977, the CIA contacted Margaret Thatcher and gave her all the details, ELF frequencies, to induce cancer, paranoia (4.5 Hz), depression (6.66 Hz), manic rage (11.3 Hz) --- To support this assertion that the British Army have been targeting Catholic areas with high-power microwaves, Dr Damien Burn - 38 years General Practitioner in the Falls Road, West Belfast - and Mary Allen, South Armagh Cross Maglen - have protested vehemently that British Army bases are broadcasting high-power microwaves, causing massive cancer deaths among the Catholics.

“Strange cancers which never would occur are being found in many Catholics and the largest cause of death in Catholics now is cancer. Whole street-fulls of Catholics next to army bases are dying of cancer. This was reported by Amanda Doherty in the Sunday Mirror, 12.07.98, in the Features Eire edition: Living in Fear, the Cancer that Stalks our Streets.


“The microwaving of peace protesters in Greenham Common, a US airbase in Britain, is common knowledge. The murder and mind control by the British Army of the entire Catholic community of Northern Ireland is not. Taking this into account with the TETRA system that seeks to turn British police and the public into zombies using microwave and ELF, the deployment of microwave transmitters in Cyprus has a more covertly nasty raison d'etre than simply extending NATO's communication network”
.

With these illustrations of past use, to what emergency capability might TETRA be put? In what circumstances might government feel it is fit to utilise this grid as a means of control over its citizens?


Conclusion

Is our government, the military and police really going to engage a mind control war upon its citizens? You may consider this all really too far-fetched, yet the evidence and historical precedent is in the public domain to support such contentions.

Don’t forget that this world is run by a mere handful - relatively speaking - of highly influential, control maniacs with no respect for you and I and have gained the upper hand with regard to our destiny, whether it be the control of banks, governments, industry, the pharmaceutical and health industries, the mass media etc. etc. in tandem with the most awesome advanced technologies we can only guess at.

With careful manipulation - and yes, mind control - of those beneath them in the cascading hierarchy of pyramidal control, where each individual, or set of individuals, is only aware on a need to know basis, very often fed ‘spun’ truths and misinformation about what it is that he or she is undertaking, this whole Big Brother nightmare scenario could and is emerging. Half the battle is to find out what is going on, then at least you can identify the global enemy and try to prepare yourself.

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Keeping us under their thumb

The day when each and every one of us in this country is tracked and traced throughout every minute of the day, 24/7, 365/12 is growing ever nearer.

With RFID tagging of our purchases, tracking and tracing of our cars, eavesdropping on our conversations at home through the in-built microphones in our PCs, ID Cards etc, etc already being rolled out, - and for those who think I am exaggerating please go to http://www.prisonplanet.com/archive_big_brother.html - I am convinced that the end goal of the controlling elite is to be able to check up on us at will to elicit our whole lifestyle, movements, desires, conversations, in fact every aspect of our daily lives.

This is all coming into place in a drip by drip way and each day the media brings fresh news of the latest initiatives that form the building blocks of this total Big Brother surveillance society with further disciplinary initiatives for those who don’t behave in accordance with the NWO blueprint.

Today we see reports of a new police initiative to fingerprint all drivers who get stopped by them for whatever reason. Their prints, obtained by a hand-held electronic device will automatically consult with the national fingerprint database which comprises some 6.5 million prints and will enable them to confirm their identity, particularly useful if they have a criminal record.

Currently being trialled by 10 forces in England and Wales, the scheme is supposed to save time as identification can be processed within a few minutes and avoiding the need to take suspects to the police station.

The police say that these prints would not be kept if a person was not identified as having a criminal record, but are we to believe that they would not be retained on some database.

As with so many other similar Big Brother type initiatives, it’s sold to us as some innocent means of saving time and money and the public have nothing to fear if they are law-abiding citizens with no criminal record. Yet, it all smacks of being suspected as guilty until proved otherwise. The tables have turned. Whether we like it or not, in this brave new world we are all being regarded as potential criminals who have to prove our innocence. What a depressing state of affairs!

It’s happening everywhere too and seemingly with our consent as we dream walk in this surveillance state nightmare. In Dumfries and Galloway in Scotland 92% of parents agreed to a system whereby school children are to be fingerprinted to allow them to borrow books from school libraries. Again, it’s all sold on the basis of ease of operation - the kids who are fingerprinted will not require any assistance while borrowing their books. Objections to this scheme have been received from academics on civil liberties grounds, but the overwhelming agreement of the scheme by so many unthinking parents rather makes the civil liberty dissenters look rather marginal.

Currently such fingerprinting schemes, particularly those that require the transmission of the data to a central data bank, have to have the information files heavily compressed in order not to use up too much bandwidth and transmission time. It is this compression which worries the techies, as the infinitely subtle characteristics of fingerprints really require the best resolution to make accurate identifications. Clearly the economies being made could lead to false ID.

With news in the last few days of parents being subjected to ‘super nannies’ - government-sponsored adjudication of parenting for those with ASBO-potential kids, not ot mention the plethora of other initiatives that this government is rolling out by the barrel load; and whose reception is seemingly accepted by an acquiescing majority in the false belief that it is for their security or that it is for a safer society (completely bogus beliefs), I dread the thought of what kind of society we are going to end up living in in the next ten or twenty years.

But new entrants into our brave new world will see it as all being part of daily life and will have no concept of those old dearly-held values of freedom of speech and expression and the right to be regarded as innocent until proven guilty in a world where we could go about our business without state and corporate Big Brother breathing down our necks 24/7

Tuesday, October 17, 2006

The Military Commissions Act 2006 (HR6166)

A rather misleading title for a bill that has sealed the fate of America and its citizens.

The Military Commissions Act, which was passed by Congress on Thursday September 28th has now been signed by Bush, a bill which was hastily run through Congress with many members not even reading it.

Infowars.com website encapsulates the key features of HR6166:

  • Doesn't suspend, as is accommodated for in the Constitution, but completely abolishes Habeas Corpus permanently - the right of the detainee to see the evidence against him and not be locked up for eternity based on the arbitrary will of the state.
  • Contains a definition of "wrongfully aiding the enemy" which labels all American citizens who breach their "allegiance" to President Bush and the actions of his government as terrorists subject to possible arrest, torture and conviction in front of a military tribunal.
  • The definition of torture that the legislation cites is US code title 18 section 2340. This is a broad definition of torture and completely lacks the specific clarity of the Geneva Conventions. This definition allows the use of torture that is, "incidental to lawful sanctions." In alliance with the bill's blanket authority for President Bush to define the Geneva Conventions as he sees fit, this legislates the use of torture.
  • Destruction of any property is defined as terrorism, which is deemed punishable by any means of the military tribunal's choosing.
  • Any violent activity whatsoever is defined as terrorism if it takes place near a designated protected building, such as a charity building.
  • A change of the definition of "pillaging" turns all illegal occupation of property and all theft into terrorism. This makes squatters and petty thieves enemy combatants.
  • In light of Greg Palast's recent hounding by Homeland Security, after they accused him of potentially giving terrorists key information about U.S. "critical infrastructure" when filming Exxon's Baton Rouge refinery (clear photos of which were publicly available on Google Maps), sub-section 27 of section 950v. should send chills down the spine of all investigative journalists and even news-gatherers. It defines collecting information clandestinely which is then used against the interests of the U.S. government as terrorism.
  • The bill allows hearsay evidence (obtained via phony confessions after torture) to be considered by the military tribunal and bars the suspect from even having knowledge of the charges against him - making a case for defense impossible. This is guaranteed to produce 100% conviction rates as you would expect in the dictatorships of Uzbekistan or Zimbabwe and other torture protagonists who are in many cases allied with the Bush administration and provide phony confessions obtained from torture that allow the U.S. government to scare its people with the threat of imaginary Al-Qaeda terror cells waiting to kill them.
  • All of these provisions apply to American citizens. Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman states in the L.A. Times, "The compromise legislation....authorizes the president to seize American citizens as enemy combatants, even if they have never left the United States. And once thrown into military prison, they cannot expect a trial by their peers or any other of the normal protections of the Bill of Rights." Similarly, law Professor Marty Lederman explains: "this [subsection (ii) of the definition of 'unlawful enemy combatant'] means that if the Pentagon says you're an unlawful enemy combatant -- using whatever criteria they wish -- then as far as Congress, and U.S. law, is concerned, you are one, whether or not you have had any connection to 'hostilities' at all."
  • In section 950j. the bill criminalizes any challenge to the legislation's legality by the Supreme Court or any United States court. Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales has already threatened federal judges to shut up and not question Bush's authority on the torture of detainees.
Following in the wake of Patriot Acts I and II, this latest and final dismantling of the US constitution and Bill of Rights will render America a facsist military dictatorship - a veritable Nazi-style Germany.

Yet the American press have been totally unconcerned about what is the most damning piece of legislation in America’s history. The mainstream media, as always, are deliberately set up prevent Americans from hearing the truth.

According to Reuters "He is trying to help Republicans maintain control of the U.S. Congress by contending they are stronger on national security, a stance with which Democrats vehemently disagree".

Which way will this swing the pendulum next month in the mid-term elections?

It really is goodbye America.

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

The Real Modus Operandi

News reports have revealed that the British government and MI5 wanted to postpone the arrest of those involved in the proposed airliner bombings until after the dastardly deed had been done. It is believed that the bombings were to have taken place on August 16 and the fact that our government and intelligence services were prepared to wait until after an estimated 3,000 innocent passengers could have been killed, beggars belief.

The Daily Mail has revealed how MI5 had employed ‘sneak and peak’ teams to bug and follow the unfolding plot up to and beyond its enactment. These infiltration teams were composed of SAS specialists who conducted their operation in much the same way as they had with the IRA in Northern Ireland. The London Times has reported that Pakistani intelligence services believe that a British intelligence mole (or moles) had been planted in the terror cell.

It is known, thanks to whistleblower Kevin Fulton, that in the 1980s and 90s, the SAS and British military intelligence routinely embedded themselves with the violent branches of the IRA, aiding and abetting terrorist acts against Protestants in Northern Ireland in order to skew the political situation. Fulton went public over these covert activities because as an intelligence officer himself, he and his department were being given the Prime Minister’s authority to engage in terrorist acts which would cost the lives of many, such as the 1998 Omagh bombing in which 29 people including babies were killed.

This same modus operandi was used in the 7/7 bombings, with evidence, once again, showing heavy involvement by MI5. The Fact that the so-called ringleader, Mohammed Siddique Khan’s car was known to be bugged by MI5, despite Met Police denials, shows complicit knowledge, if indeed not covert involvement within the intelligence services in the 7/7 bombings killing 52 and injuring another 770 people. Former Met Police officer Charles Shoebridge has even gone on record to say that the evidence points to the shocking fact that Khan was working for MI5 as an informant.

We have now heard the opinion of former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, who believes that the proposed bombings were staged propaganda and a means for Blair and Bush to absolve themselves and regain face at a time of low ratings in the opinion polls.


Here’s is how it works.

In the ongoing bid by our globalist masters to entrap us in their control web, we are faced with potential acts of terrorism which we are told must be fought with the loss of our liberties if we are to remain ‘safe’. We are led to believe that radical Islamists are the common enemy, they hate of our ‘democratic’ way of life and are constantly planning to terrorise the west.

To make this a palpable reality, our government, on directives from globalist policy think tanks, sanctions the intelligence agencies and SAS to covertly infiltrate radical Muslim groups, aid and encourage these would-be extremists with the intellectual and physical means to carry out terrorist attacks, then engage young, naive youths from Muslim backgrounds, in activities that are explained to them as ‘training exercises’ or drills which are supposedly designed to help the security services be more effective, while in reality they are being engaged, unwittingly, in real terrorists activities.

This is why, so often, the suspects in these terror attacks, whether actual or foiled, appear to be innocent, decent law-abiding and quiet young men and very often not particularly bright. They are the ones that either get blown up or incarcerated in police swoops, while the real ring leaders - the MI5 assets - avoid recrimination by being safeguarded by those very same intelligence agencies and paymasters.

Meanwhile Joe Public loses more of his rights in order to be ‘protected’ from these terrorists.

Yesterday we saw the announcement that new airport procedures are to be introduced with particular religious and ethnic groups (Muslims) being monitored very closely. This is another desired result for the globalists who are clearly hell-bent on marginalising the whole Muslim ethic in their ‘ethnic cleansing’ of the Middle East to make way for one homogenous global ‘religion’ and world state.

Now that this globalist-inspired modus operandi is becoming more and more evident as each day passes, and today’s revelation that British security services, at the behest of our government, were quite prepared to sacrifice the lives of 3,000 innocent people before arresting the long-known ringleaders - who were in their employ anyway - it is time we and our elected MPs demanded an unbiased inquiry into the events of last week.

Any such report would very likely expose the whole rotten game play and bring the house of cards crashing down.


Growing scepticism
Over the past few days, several newspapers and commentators have been reporting a growing scepticism among the British public over the validity of the many terrorist plots that we are constantly being bombarded with in the media.

With Charles de Menezes having being wrongly targeted as a terrorist, the Forest Gate raid being proven to be a false flag, suspects from the 7/7 bombings looking unlikely candidates as suicide bombers, the initial false flag report of the neurotic woman aboard a Washington DC flight today, all set against a background of lies and mis-information given out by our government in relation to Iraq’s WMD capability, it’s no wonder that a growing air of mistrust is descending upon the British public, while the credibility of Blair and his entourage plummets even further.

Last week’s intended attack on multiple trans-Atlantic flights is rapidly joining the ranks of the plethora of other potential incidents to be tagged as another piece of fabrication. Many view it as a deliberate ploy to divert people’s attention of the Lebanese/Israeli conflict and our government’s bad posturing in favour of an aggressive Israel, while others, quite rightly, see a connection between each new terror alert and our liberties being flushed down the pan via another round of draconian legislation.

Government credibility is beginning to go through the floor and Blair and his minders from above must be getting pretty twitchy right now as Internet newsgroups, blogs and chat rooms as well as disconcerting sounds within some mainstream newspapers increasingly air sceptical views over what our governments are really up to. Conspiracy theories are rife, only the conspiracies are not the products of over-inventive members of the public, but appear to be the fruits of our government in collusion with its intelligence agencies.

Long may this metamorphosis of growing public awareness continue. What we now have to wait for is another 9/11 which I and others view as being inevitable enabling Blair and Bush to make a bid in turning the tide of public scepticism and attempting to re-inforce the view that there really are radicals out there determined to destroy our way of life. But that next 9/11 won't be a result of the actions of Muslim extremists, as with 9/11 they will be orchestrated by our own desperate governments!

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

The Nuclear Conspiracy

The Toronto Star reports that Ontario premier, Dalton McGuinty, is to announce to his government today that Ontario will get more nuclear power plants.

This followed his ‘power-broker friendly’ speech to the Bilderberger conference over the weekend, singing Ontario’s praises and revealing his nuclear power plans, truly music to the ears of those present at Bilderberg as this kind of talk supports their raison d’être. Their agenda is all about raping the planet in the continual quest of ‘dirty energy’ for profit and has little to do about cheap, alternative environmentally friendly energy sources which would benefit us all.

With Tony Blair also trumpeting the same nuclear tune in tandem with French President Jacques Chirac at their meeting which was concurrent with that of the Bilderbergers in Ottawa last weekend, let's dispell a few commonly bandied beliefs that originate from their quarter over the supposed benefits of nuclear energy.

The main arguments in favour of nuclear energy are that once the initial costs of plant construction have been met then the supply of nuclear energy is plentiful and cheap and that a functioning plant emits little or no greenhouse gasses unlike their coal and oil-fired counterparts. These arguments do not hold water.


Mining and milling


One area of the nuclear production process that is often conveniently disregarded is the hazardous and wasteful process of accessing the Uranium in the first place.

Uranium is widely distributed in the earth’s crust but there are few places on earth where its concentrations are rich enough for it to be used as an ore. Even where those concentrations do exist, a ratio of ore to usable uranium is typically 0.01 to 0.2 per cent. Therefore a great deal of material has to be extracted through mining to obtain enough raw uranium, unlike coal mining where a high proportion of what is extracted is usable.

This not only makes the extraction process costly but environmentally unfriendly as 1,000 tonnes of rock will have to be extracted to provide just one tonne of ‘yellowcake’, or usuable bright yellow uranium oxide, while the ‘tailings’, or 999 tonnes of waste, which has been disturbed and is also radioactive, is left in the open, to be washed and blown into the environment by the rain and wind. These tailings remain radioactive indefinitely and in the instance of Uranium 238, contain all thirteen of its radioactive decay products forming a cascade of heavy metals with a wide varietyof decay lives:

The decay sequence of uranium-238

The sequence starts with uranium-238. Half of it decays in 4.5 billion years, turning as it does so into thorium-234 (24 days), protactinium-234 (one minute), uranium-234 (245,000 years), thorium-230 (76,000 years), radium-226 (1,600 years), radon-222 (3.8 days), polonium-218 (3 minutes), lead-214 (27 minutes), bismuth-214 (20 minutes), polonium-214 (180 microseconds), lead-210 (22 years), bismuth-210 (5 days), polonium-210 (138 days) and, at the end of the line, lead-206 (non-radioactive).

An ‘in-situ leaching’ process is used for extracting uranium from deeper deposits and this involves the use a large quantities of sulphuric and nitric acid as well as ammonia which is left in situ only to be pumped back to the surface some five to twenty five years later to reveal about a quarter of the uranium from the saturated rocks. One can imagine the massive amount of disturbed radioactive material left behind in the ground, not to mention the acids and toxic materials which will manifest themselves in the local environment and aquifers.


Preparation

The extracted uranium oxide has then to be enriched as the usable uranium 235, that which provides the fission chain reaction necessary in nuclear power plants, and only accounts for about 0.7 per cent of the ‘yellowcake’, 3.5 per cent being the required concentration. During this process of enrichment the yellowcake is treated with fluorine to form uranium hexafluoride with 85 per cent of it coming out as waste in the form of depleted uranium hexafluoride which can then be made into depleted uranium (DU) metal for use in armour-piercing shells. DU weapons, as we know, have wreaked havoc among those who have been subjected to their effects in Iraq. But it does provide a handy little income for the processing industries.

What is Depleted Uranium?

The misnamed 'Depleted' Uranium is left after enriched uranium is separated from natural uranium in order to produce fuel for nuclear reactors. During this process, the fissionable isotope Uranium 235 is separated from uranium. The remaining uranium, which is 99.8% uranium 238 is misleadingly called 'depleted uranium'. While the term 'depleted' implies it isn't particularly dangerous, in fact, this waste product of the nuclear industry is 'conveniently' disposed of by producing deadly weapons.
Depleted uranium is chemically toxic. It is an extremely dense, hard metal, and can cause chemical poisoning to the body in the same way as can lead or any other heavy metal. However, depleted uranium is also radiologically hazardous, as it spontaneously burns on impact, creating tiny aerosolised glass particles which are small enough to be inhaled. These uranium oxide particles emit all types of radiation, alpha, beta and gamma, and can be carried in the air over long distances. Depleted uranium has a half life of 4.5 billion years, and the presence of depleted uranium ceramic aerosols can pose a long term threat to human health and the environment.
Campaign against Depleted Uranium.

But the vast amount of DU is kept as solid state uranium hexafluoride and rather than being stored in sealed containers for final disposal in an underground location, cost considerations have caused it to be dumped willy-nilly in ‘temporary’ cool storage.

It is only after this enrichment process that we see the final fissionable ceramic pellets of uranium dioxide which are then displayed for our visual consumption as the ‘neat’ energy solution. No mention is ever given of the wholly costly, wasteful and dangerous road that has led to their creation.


Generation

But the trail of environmental hazards is not yet over. Once these fuel pellets have been eventually spent in the production of providing power for steam-raising in the power station, they have to be disposed of, but only after they have cooled off, allowing the various isotopes present to decay in water for between 10 and 100 years, 60 being the norm.

After this ‘cooling-off’ period, official policy is currently undecided as to their final fate. But whatever solution is adopted, we are left with an almost infinite legacy of lingering danger. One option is to pack them using robotic control into containers lined with lead, steel and pure electrolytic copper and then bury the containers for millions of years. Whichever secure method of disposal is considered, the amount of energy and cost required to produce such impregnable containers is roughly equivalent to the cost of building the reactor in the first place.

This cost is conveniently overlooked by politicians while selling their masters desire for their revenue earning pet projects, while we, the consumer will pick up the tab.


Accidental emissions

Of course none of this so far includes the possibility of yet another potential hazard; the Chernobyl effect.

Although safety is generally of a high order in the nuclear industry, the rather boring and routine nature of safety procedures has been described as being conducive to working ‘asleep at the wheel’. With governments keen to commission nuclear plants for political reasons and to make up for oil and gas, too much haste could lead to insufficient training and safety measures being implemented. The outcome of any major nuclear disaster could be incalculable both in environmental and financial terms and it has been accepted that a catastrophe could be so great to be beyond the capacity of the world’s insurance companies.

The Nuclear Installations Act of 1965 required that a plant's operator must pay a maximum of £150 million in the ten years after the incident. The government would cover any excess and pay for any damage that arose between ten and thirty years afterwards. Under international conventions, the government would also cover any cross-border liabilities up to a maximum of about £300 million. Although these figures reflect the monetary values of the 60s, even adjusted to today’s figures they are a gross under-estimate of the kind of compensation required. If an easterly wind were to blow radioactive material towards London from a destroyed Bradwell nuclear power station in Essex, it is estimated that the bill would more likely top £300 trillion rather than £300 million!


Conclusions

What we have gleaned so far paints an entirely different picture to that coming from the insincere pronouncements from Blair, Bush and other proponents for nuclear energy.

In conclusion we can summarise:
  • Extraction of uranium is uneconomic and leaves in its wake ‘tailings’ that leave exposed, large amounts of radioactive and toxic material that adversely affect the environment.
  • The enrichment process further lays waste more radioactive and pollutant material, some of which for the sake of commercial expediency is put to wrongful use in the deployment of DU weapons
  • The spent fuel provides a million-year disposal headache as well as using as much energy to create facilities to store it safely as it does to build the reactor it fuelled
  • Human husbandry of nuclear facilities is not fool-proof and any disaster from a nuclear facility would far exceed that from any other alternative energy-generating plant
  • In addition:
  • Rich uranium sources are limited. The poorer grades would require much greater processing to achieve the required purity which means more energy expense and resultant pollution in their preparation
  • Reactors can have a full power lifetime of 24 years, but many never reach that age. During that life span they require regular maintenance and the intense corrosion from the radioactive contents makes maintenance during their final years impossible.
  • The de-commissioning process, particularly of large reactors, is at present, a grey area. The amount of Corrosion Residuals and Unidentified Deposits (aptly named CRUD) can produce about 1,000sq.m. of dangerous radioactive and toxic waste, all to be disposed of as well as the reactor itself which must be cut into small pieces and placed in those lead/steel/copper lined containers. The total cost in financial and energy terms of this is estimated to double that of the costs and energy required to build the plant in the first place.
  • Nuclear power production is, at every stage, either directly or indirectly a large user of fossil fuels and therefore a large contributor to greenhouse gasses, the very pollutant that nuclear energy is designed to cull, producing at least a third of the greenhouse gasses for the equivalent power output from a conventional gas or coal-fired power plant.
Yet Blair, Bush, Chirac et al pursue this Illuminati prompted course.

During the last century Nicola Tesla conjectured that it was possible to ‘pluck’ electrical energy from the vacuum of space and today the theoretical basis for that conjecture is an established part of the physics literature. On that basis it would seem that our efforts should be concentrated on harnessing this and other more well-known, relatively free sources of abundant energy rather than threatening mother earth with the enormous risks involved in producing it from nuclear fission and in the process leaving the land a radioactive cesspool.

Tesla’s papers were consficated by the FBI as there can be no measure of control, manipulation and financial gain for those who run our lives if they were to allow us to adopt low-cost environmentally-friendly energy resources.

But just to demonstrate how desperate Blair is in ensuring the proliferation of nuclear power stations in this country, he has stated that the licensing and planning regime will be streamlined to cut upfront investment costs and accelerate building. With these new powers up the government's sleeve, you might have grave difficulty in staving off the planners should you find that a nuclear power plant is to be built on your doorstep.

Thursday, May 25, 2006

Esoteric Numerology

Elsewhere in this blog I have listed some interesting numerological coincidences that can be derived from some of the most notable political and politically-forming events that have taken place over the past decades.

With another key date close upon us, notably 6th June 2006 (6-6-6), which itself will be 333 days from the 7th July London bombings (7-7-7), it’s worth spending a little time to examine the use of certain numbers that seem to pre-occupy those who orchestrate these seminal events, which upon closer examination, appear to be rooted in occultism.

With reference to www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/911 web site the following facts emerge:

Number 3 is the first sacred number and represents the Pagan Trinity and spiritually, the Third Eye of Hinduism. We are told occultists use the number 3 in groups or multiples ie. 33, 333, 66, 666 etc. to achieve greater intensity in the desired effect. 666 has the connotation as being ‘The Mark of the Beast’ or, in some circles, the brand mark of an evil spirit.

Number 6 is the next sacred number, representing the soul of man.

Number 7 is also sacred and described as one of the most sacred of all numbers ‘the invisible centre, the spirit of everything’.

Number 9 is sacred as it is the cube of 3 and used in triple - 999, is utilised to represent 666 - 999 inverted.

Number 11 is considered to be a master number in astrology and can be used to represent sin, transgression and peril.

Number 13 has come to be known to us as a number of ill-omen and stands in connection with rebellion, apostasy, defection, corruption, disintegration and revolution.

Close examination of many of the most notable terrorist and political events over the last twenty years or so and also further back in time, shows that the involvement of these numbers occurs with a frequency that exceeds pure chance.

Let’s look at a few:
11/11/11 World War 1 ended
9/11/41 Groundbreaking ceremony for the Pentagon
11/22/63 President Kennedy assassinated
7/17/86 TWA 800 exploded over the sea near Long Island
9/2/88 (9 + 2 = 11) Swissair 111 crashed in flames off the coast of Nova Scotia - exactly 777 days (111 weeks) after the previous crash
12/21/88 (1 + 2 = 3 & 2 + 1 = 3) PanAm flight 103 was brought down over Scotland. The time between this and the Swissair 111 crash was 7 years and 7 months.
4/19/93 Waco Massacre
4/19/95 Oklahoma City bombing
9/11/01 World Trade Center collapse - Flight 11 was the first to crash, Flight 13 crashed into the second tower, 11 hijackers were involved
11/3/04 Madrid train bombing, 911 days after 9/11 which itself was 111 days before the end of the year
9/3/04 Beslan
9/11/04 Assassination of Yasser Arafat
11/19/00 Bush’s first election victory
4/19/04 Foiled terrorist attack on the Sears Tower in Chicago. This was timed to happen 911 hours after the Madrid train bombing
11/9/04 Bush’s second election victory
7/7/05 London bombings. These took place 444 days (11 x 4) after the foiled Sears attack.

Then let’s look at the use of these esoteric numbers in other Illuminati based institutions:
199 FBI internal national emergency code
The Bilderberger Group comprise 39 members broken down into 3 groups of 13. 13 make up the policy committee in the Bilderberger Group which answer to the Round Table of 9.
33 segments make up the UN crest
33 degrees are to be found in Freemasonry
10/13/1792 White House cornerstone laid attended by the Georgetown Masonic Lodge No 9. The White House is surrounded by 13 avenues which form L’Enfant’s plan for Washington, symbolic of the 13 stripes in the national flag. The Illuminati have divided the US into 7 geographical regions which are each have a 13 member leadership council.

And so it goes on. You can find much more evidence of the use of these numbers, often embedded in other numbers whose addition invariably arrives one at 6, 9, 11 or 13, on theforbiddenknowledge.com/911/Robert.htm

Although one might argue that if you have the mind to do so you can use all manner of mathematical gymnastics to make the dates fit the sacred numbers, the numerical coincidences in the above list seem to be too consistent for these events to have happened on the dates they did by accident.

So 333 days after the London bombings brings us very conveniently to one of the most revered numbers in this catalogue of numerolgical horrors - 6th June 2006 or 6/6/6.

With the neo-cons, that bunch of perverted people, many of whom are known to involve themselves in such bizarre events as Bohemian Grove and many of whom are products of ‘Skull and Bones’ both institutions that are riddled with occultism, chomping at the bit for an excuse to invade Iran, and looking for every excuse to ratchet up the police state, could June 6th be another seminal date in this litany of infamy?

I will be returning from my holiday in Nova Scotia on that particular day expecting to catch a flight from Halifax to London Gatwick. Will my journey be inconvenienced as a knock-on effect of some big ‘terrorist’ attack?

Maybe, maybe not, but one thing is for sure, according to the figures there would seem to be a heightened chance of some manufactured event taking place on that day.

With the Sears Tower in Chicago bearing a ZIP code of 606060, who knows?

Friday, May 05, 2006

The death of the Internet?

For how much longer you will be able to read this blog and how much longer will it be before I receive a knock on the door from the thought police a told to shut up or be locked up, is rapidly becoming a serious matter of debate as Internet censorship begins to bite.

In more repressive regimes around the world, this has been a reality for some time. China has already imprisoned 62 online ‘dissidents’ and in Iran, Mojtaba Saminejad has been in jail since last February for posting material regarded as offensive to Islam. Users have also been jailed in in Egypt, Iran, Libya, the Maldives, Syria, Tunisia and Vietnam with Burma, Cuba, Iran, Libya, Nepal, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkmenistan, and Vietnam all using Internet censorship. You may say that this is pretty much par for the course for countries such as those who are largely religious and political dictatorships, but this trend is to spread and sooner or later we can be all be expected to have our views censored.

The popularity of the Internet as a vital organ in the transmission of real news, not the often spun disinformation that appears in the corporate controlled media, and is becoming an embarrassment to the movers and shakers who want to rule our lives. The traditional press cannot keep up with the vast amount of information posted daily on the web, updated in real time unlike a newspaper feature writer’s column which may only appear once a week, or, at best, once a day. Online commentators can update hourly if they wish and are not subject to editorial control to be politically correct.

These last few years have witnessed a serious decline in newspaper readership and even their online editions receive less attention as more and more people question the veracity of what is written when they can get alternative views of the news from fully qualified, un-embedded, independent journalists and political commentators online.

The elite are getting nervous over our greatly expanding knowledge of what is really going on in the world and as I reported yesterday, Universal Studios had to pull their ‘United 93’ online forum, with several newspapers withdrawing stories in retaliation of public comment over the film as that comment clearly showed a far greater awareness of the true reality of the events of 9/11 among the public than the conventional media is politically bound to portray. And only two months ago MySpace closed down several blogs which they regarded as politically unacceptable.

Already legislation is being drawn up in western countries under the dictate of the elite to put an end to this free exchange of free speech. With Internet 2 taking shape, the traditional Internet will become a shade of its present self being slow and wholly unreliable, outlawing audio and video streaming, making users forced to upgrade to the streamlined Internet 2 if they wish to preserve and enhance the facilities which we now take for granted.

But, there will be a big price to pay. Each Internet 2 user will have to pay a premium rate, sign up to a contract which will specifically ban dissident political comment, enforcing strict rules of use, with websites vetted on their content and strict penalties for non-observance of the guidelines. In addition a tax on sending emails will put many organisations that email political newsletters out of business, thus depriving subscribers of a valuable source of alternative information. These operations would be viewed as dissident or a 'security threat' and be forced off the Internet super highway.

As I have reported before, providers like AOL have, for some time now, being engaged in polling their users with questionnaires whose tenor implies hidden dangers in the Internet with everyone from paedophiles to terrorists using it to disrupt society. With this falsely spun message, an acquiescing public may just vote in favour of the censored world wide web, but in doing so cut off the genuine wealth of vital discussion and open speech which should be the cornerstone of a free and healthy society.