Fearmongering and hot air

In the latest twist in the Swine Flu scam, it has been revealed that the British government has drawn up plans to create mass graves to cope with the vast amount of casualties expected from a possible autumn and winter outbreak of the H1N1 flu virus. Council officials have been warned that existing cemeteries may be inadequate to cope with the number of deceased that could ensue in a winter outbreak. The report, resulting from a contingency meeting held last month and just revealed in several British daily papers, even goes on to suggest that inflatable storage structures could be used as temporary mortuaries. It even specifies shorter funeral services in what looks increasingly like a predicted mass culling of the population on a mechanised basis.

Although one expects plans to be in place to cater for major disasters, the concerted way in which a finger is being repeatedly pointed in the direction of the Swine Flu, begs the question, just what are they planning, particularly when viewed in context with the dubious man-made origins of the flu and the imminent mass-innoculations of a barely tried and tested anti-viral vaccine. Just how much of this is scaremongering people into accepting the vaccine and how much might it be about a deadly marriage that may be in the process of being engineered through a combination of the vaccine and the virus, that would result in the need for mass graves? With only 44 deaths from the virus recorded in England so far, what prompts the authorities to believe that vast numbers may succumb during the winter months?

My advice: stay healthy, maintain a strong immune system and avoid their vaccine like the plague!


Once in a while the BBC lets out a little bit of truth. In a recent ‘Hardtalk’ programme, Stephen Sackur managed to force a revealing admission from Greenpeace Leader, Gerd Leipold over erroneous claims regarding the Arctic ice melts. In a July 15 Greenpeace press statement entitled ‘Urgent Action Needed as Arctic Ice Melts’ Leipold maintained that by 2030 global warming would render the Arctic ice-free. Sackur claimed, quite correctly, that this claim was ludicrous and was clearly ‘exaggeration and alarmism’. How could an ice sheet mass of 1.6 million square kilometres, having a thickness at its epicentre of 3 km deep, totally disappear within such a relatively short time frame?

Initially trying to avoid the question, Leipold had to eventually admit that that admission ‘may have been wrong’, although he went on to defend Greenpeace’s cause for alarm as being in order.

Greenpeace was once looked upon as a genuinely serious force in environmental activism, only to later become - as so many initially altruistic organisations find themselves - hi-jacked by our controlling world mafia by infiltration, manipulation and guided into supporting their far-less-than-altruistic agendas.

With NASA caught falsifying figures last year suggesting that October had been the hottest on record, when it was later found that they had merely carried over figures from September - a naturally hotter month and glaring facts like the recorded 30% increase in the Arctic ice sheet for the year up to August 2008, it’s pretty clear that Greenpeace is engaging in total disinformation for on behalf of its political masters.