In the latest twist in the Swine Flu scam, it has been revealed that the British government has drawn up plans to create mass graves to cope with the vast amount of casualties expected from a possible autumn and winter outbreak of the H1N1 flu virus. Council officials have been warned that existing cemeteries may be inadequate to cope with the number of deceased that could ensue in a winter outbreak. The report, resulting from a contingency meeting held last month and just revealed in several British daily papers, even goes on to suggest that inflatable storage structures could be used as temporary mortuaries. It even specifies shorter funeral services in what looks increasingly like a predicted mass culling of the population on a mechanised basis.
Although one expects plans to be in place to cater for major disasters, the concerted way in which a finger is being repeatedly pointed in the direction of the Swine Flu, begs the question, just what are they planning, particularly when viewed in context with the dubious man-made origins of the flu and the imminent mass-innoculations of a barely tried and tested anti-viral vaccine. Just how much of this is scaremongering people into accepting the vaccine and how much might it be about a deadly marriage that may be in the process of being engineered through a combination of the vaccine and the virus, that would result in the need for mass graves? With only 44 deaths from the virus recorded in England so far, what prompts the authorities to believe that vast numbers may succumb during the winter months?
My advice: stay healthy, maintain a strong immune system and avoid their vaccine like the plague!
Once in a while the BBC lets out a little bit of truth. In a recent ‘Hardtalk’ programme, Stephen Sackur managed to force a revealing admission from Greenpeace Leader, Gerd Leipold over erroneous claims regarding the Arctic ice melts. In a July 15 Greenpeace press statement entitled ‘Urgent Action Needed as Arctic Ice Melts’ Leipold maintained that by 2030 global warming would render the Arctic ice-free. Sackur claimed, quite correctly, that this claim was ludicrous and was clearly ‘exaggeration and alarmism’. How could an ice sheet mass of 1.6 million square kilometres, having a thickness at its epicentre of 3 km deep, totally disappear within such a relatively short time frame?
Initially trying to avoid the question, Leipold had to eventually admit that that admission ‘may have been wrong’, although he went on to defend Greenpeace’s cause for alarm as being in order.
Greenpeace was once looked upon as a genuinely serious force in environmental activism, only to later become - as so many initially altruistic organisations find themselves - hi-jacked by our controlling world mafia by infiltration, manipulation and guided into supporting their far-less-than-altruistic agendas.
With NASA caught falsifying figures last year suggesting that October had been the hottest on record, when it was later found that they had merely carried over figures from September - a naturally hotter month and glaring facts like the recorded 30% increase in the Arctic ice sheet for the year up to August 2008, it’s pretty clear that Greenpeace is engaging in total disinformation for on behalf of its political masters.
Showing posts with label State Control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label State Control. Show all posts
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Of Swine Flu, discontent and rebellion
As the Obama scam begins to crystallise in the minds of many Americans, so do visible signs of dissent. Posters comparing him to Hitler have made their appearance at one town hall during a meeting on healthcare in Alhambra, California.
But by reading the comments to the story in the Guardian, many people in this country fail to understand the widespread opposition to Obama’s healthcare plan. They are taking it literally and aren’t aware of the totalitarian aspects embedded within the bill. Perhaps it is because we have had state healthcare for so long, they fail to make the connection that Obama’s plans - created by those behind him - are not for the wellbeing of the country’s health, but are a means of coercing state control over the masses, interferring with crucial aspects of their lives in a meddlesome and authoritarian way. Take sections 440 and 1904 of the 1,000 page bill (which Congress has been denied the time to digest - as usual) under the heading “home visitation programs for families with young children and families expecting children”, it clearly states that this would allow government agents to visit every home in the US to “provide parents with knowledge of age-appropriate child development in cognitive, language, social, emotional, and motor domains … modeling, consulting, and coaching on parenting practices,” and “skills to interact with their child to enhance age-appropriate development.” Do these Guardian resondees fully realise that? And don’t they realise that Britain’s NHS is increasingly behaving in the micro-management of our lives?
Something that people in this country do seem to be cottoning on to is the Swine Flu scam. Following an article in the Exeter Express & Echo about how the city will be a beta test site to try out the Swine Flu vaccine on children from six months old to 12 years of age, a barrage of dissent followed.
“There is no way any member of my family is having a vaccine. Less people have died from this than seasonal Flu so why push this untested vaccine? Read about the swine flu vaccinations that paralyzed around 500 in 1976. These are the same people who are pushing Tamiflu drug which has now been shown to cause all sorts of side-effects.”
“Pharmiceutical (sic) companies are immuned (sic) from prosecution for any side effects from this drug. I hope our Government are not immuned (sic).”
“NO NO NO...This is human experimentation now in the public domain and should NOT be allowed! Those children's lives will be wrecked by the rushed in and untested vaccines. We're taking about oil in water adjavants, with the vaccine grown in monkey kidney glans tissue along with aluminium oxide, insect DNA and possibly mercury here! Thats more or less the cocktail of content that were given our armed forces for the first Gulf War in the 1990's! Anyone remember that syndrome at all?? The W.H.O have rushed this in, Big Pharma is standing to make a lot of £'s on our pain and suffering from the vaccines. I will NOT be taking any of them!! Go and check the Global Death Rates on Swine Flu..Pandemic, what Pandemic! If people take this vaccine many people will be culled..do not let fear take the decisions for you.”
“I definitely will not allow an untested, mercury filled vaccine anywhere near my children. Corrupt unregulated pharmaceutical companies created this so-called "swine flu" virus, and their the very same people who are offering the so-called cure, or vaccine. If you want to save your kids - do yourselves a favour, and stay well away from this poison.”
“I don't think I will be rushing to have my children vaccinated with a new drug that has not been properly trialled. Who knows what the side effects could be?”
As the second American Revolution draws forever nearer, Gerald Celente of the Trends Research Institute lists the first three major signs that have indicated this ever-likely possibility.
First it was the ‘Tea Parties’ back in April when over 700 anti-tax rallies took place across the country.
Then on the 4th of July thousands of citizens gathered once again under the banner of ‘taxation without representation’.
Most recently the healthcare reform package has been rebuked most vociferously as outlined above.
In each case the mainstream media has either dismissed these events or passed them off as the rantings of ‘conservative fringe elements’ or as staged events. But the fact that these protests are spontaneous and come from the heart as more and more people are seeing the light and identifying the worthless rhetoric endlessly emerging from the lips of Obama, as well as losing more and more of their rights day by day, the upswell of discontent isn’t going to be brushed off for much longer.
The ‘administered’ administration may very well have to use the Swine Flu ‘pandemic’ as the cover to try and deflect or quell this dissention and bringing everyone to heel by imposing martial law upon the country in the name of controlling the dreaded flu. Forced innoculation of the vaccine may react with the airborne virus, creating something much worse, thereby neutering much of the population and knocking the ‘fight’ out of them.
At least, this might well be the currently preferred MO. That’s unless, the people declare revolution now!
But by reading the comments to the story in the Guardian, many people in this country fail to understand the widespread opposition to Obama’s healthcare plan. They are taking it literally and aren’t aware of the totalitarian aspects embedded within the bill. Perhaps it is because we have had state healthcare for so long, they fail to make the connection that Obama’s plans - created by those behind him - are not for the wellbeing of the country’s health, but are a means of coercing state control over the masses, interferring with crucial aspects of their lives in a meddlesome and authoritarian way. Take sections 440 and 1904 of the 1,000 page bill (which Congress has been denied the time to digest - as usual) under the heading “home visitation programs for families with young children and families expecting children”, it clearly states that this would allow government agents to visit every home in the US to “provide parents with knowledge of age-appropriate child development in cognitive, language, social, emotional, and motor domains … modeling, consulting, and coaching on parenting practices,” and “skills to interact with their child to enhance age-appropriate development.” Do these Guardian resondees fully realise that? And don’t they realise that Britain’s NHS is increasingly behaving in the micro-management of our lives?
Something that people in this country do seem to be cottoning on to is the Swine Flu scam. Following an article in the Exeter Express & Echo about how the city will be a beta test site to try out the Swine Flu vaccine on children from six months old to 12 years of age, a barrage of dissent followed.
“There is no way any member of my family is having a vaccine. Less people have died from this than seasonal Flu so why push this untested vaccine? Read about the swine flu vaccinations that paralyzed around 500 in 1976. These are the same people who are pushing Tamiflu drug which has now been shown to cause all sorts of side-effects.”
“Pharmiceutical (sic) companies are immuned (sic) from prosecution for any side effects from this drug. I hope our Government are not immuned (sic).”
“NO NO NO...This is human experimentation now in the public domain and should NOT be allowed! Those children's lives will be wrecked by the rushed in and untested vaccines. We're taking about oil in water adjavants, with the vaccine grown in monkey kidney glans tissue along with aluminium oxide, insect DNA and possibly mercury here! Thats more or less the cocktail of content that were given our armed forces for the first Gulf War in the 1990's! Anyone remember that syndrome at all?? The W.H.O have rushed this in, Big Pharma is standing to make a lot of £'s on our pain and suffering from the vaccines. I will NOT be taking any of them!! Go and check the Global Death Rates on Swine Flu..Pandemic, what Pandemic! If people take this vaccine many people will be culled..do not let fear take the decisions for you.”
“I definitely will not allow an untested, mercury filled vaccine anywhere near my children. Corrupt unregulated pharmaceutical companies created this so-called "swine flu" virus, and their the very same people who are offering the so-called cure, or vaccine. If you want to save your kids - do yourselves a favour, and stay well away from this poison.”
“I don't think I will be rushing to have my children vaccinated with a new drug that has not been properly trialled. Who knows what the side effects could be?”
As the second American Revolution draws forever nearer, Gerald Celente of the Trends Research Institute lists the first three major signs that have indicated this ever-likely possibility.
First it was the ‘Tea Parties’ back in April when over 700 anti-tax rallies took place across the country.
Then on the 4th of July thousands of citizens gathered once again under the banner of ‘taxation without representation’.
Most recently the healthcare reform package has been rebuked most vociferously as outlined above.
In each case the mainstream media has either dismissed these events or passed them off as the rantings of ‘conservative fringe elements’ or as staged events. But the fact that these protests are spontaneous and come from the heart as more and more people are seeing the light and identifying the worthless rhetoric endlessly emerging from the lips of Obama, as well as losing more and more of their rights day by day, the upswell of discontent isn’t going to be brushed off for much longer.
The ‘administered’ administration may very well have to use the Swine Flu ‘pandemic’ as the cover to try and deflect or quell this dissention and bringing everyone to heel by imposing martial law upon the country in the name of controlling the dreaded flu. Forced innoculation of the vaccine may react with the airborne virus, creating something much worse, thereby neutering much of the population and knocking the ‘fight’ out of them.
At least, this might well be the currently preferred MO. That’s unless, the people declare revolution now!
Tuesday, August 04, 2009
Drip by drip state intervention
State intervention into people’s lives has been ratcheted up to a new level of intrusion with Ed Balls announcing a plan to surveil problem families in their own homes.
The Family Intervention Projects will allow authorities to spy on families ensuring that their children are being raised in accordance with state dictat. 2,000 families are to initially enrolled into the scheme with a further 20,000 due to join next couple of years. Participants will be forced to sign a ‘behaviour contract’ with the government known as Home School Agreements before the start of every year. Authorities will make regular checks on these households and the installation of CCTV in each home will allow state surveillance of families 24/7 to ensure they raise their children correctly. In tandem, people regarded by government to be 'responsible' will be encouraged to spy on other such families and report any misconduct so that they can be similarly surveilled.
Regretably, the Tories, currently waiting in the wings to take over the reigns next year, say that the scheme doesn’t go far enough and is ‘too little, too late’ so it’s going to be more of the same from them.
Clearly, those considered to be ‘dysfunctional’ by government are to be placed is state custody and many may welcome the thought who regard the Jones’ at number 24 to be a bloody nuisance having their kids rake the streets all night and who habitually leave all their litter in the front garden. But many respondents to an article on this very initiative published in the Daily Express today, http://www.express.co.uk/comments/viewall/115736 see the much darker, Orwellian reality to this - and rightly so. Just where does it stop and just what might the government next deem to be socially unacceptable - sticking NO2ID stickers on the window or inviting members of action groups to meetings at your home?
Our growing totalitarian state is being enforced in a drip by drip manner, starting at the bottom of the scale with initiatives that are unlikely to create too much opposition, but as a successive generation sees state CCTV surveillance in selected people’s homes as the norm, a platform is then already established upon which a further level of state intervention in our private lives can be constructed and so on and so forth.
That is, until we say NO MORE!
The Family Intervention Projects will allow authorities to spy on families ensuring that their children are being raised in accordance with state dictat. 2,000 families are to initially enrolled into the scheme with a further 20,000 due to join next couple of years. Participants will be forced to sign a ‘behaviour contract’ with the government known as Home School Agreements before the start of every year. Authorities will make regular checks on these households and the installation of CCTV in each home will allow state surveillance of families 24/7 to ensure they raise their children correctly. In tandem, people regarded by government to be 'responsible' will be encouraged to spy on other such families and report any misconduct so that they can be similarly surveilled.
Regretably, the Tories, currently waiting in the wings to take over the reigns next year, say that the scheme doesn’t go far enough and is ‘too little, too late’ so it’s going to be more of the same from them.
Clearly, those considered to be ‘dysfunctional’ by government are to be placed is state custody and many may welcome the thought who regard the Jones’ at number 24 to be a bloody nuisance having their kids rake the streets all night and who habitually leave all their litter in the front garden. But many respondents to an article on this very initiative published in the Daily Express today, http://www.express.co.uk/comments/viewall/115736 see the much darker, Orwellian reality to this - and rightly so. Just where does it stop and just what might the government next deem to be socially unacceptable - sticking NO2ID stickers on the window or inviting members of action groups to meetings at your home?
Our growing totalitarian state is being enforced in a drip by drip manner, starting at the bottom of the scale with initiatives that are unlikely to create too much opposition, but as a successive generation sees state CCTV surveillance in selected people’s homes as the norm, a platform is then already established upon which a further level of state intervention in our private lives can be constructed and so on and so forth.
That is, until we say NO MORE!
Monday, July 27, 2009
GM, snooping and Swine Flu
The masters of genocide that run our planet have engaged scientists in Tadcaster to carry on testing GM crops following a year of inactivity after environmental protesters ripped up their experimental crops last year. This resuming of trials has been done without any public announcement in the hope that it would escape the campaigners notice, but following an article in the Daily Telegraph, the cat’s out of the bag. Although DEFRA said that the potatoes upon which GM work is to take place to make them pest-resistant, would be grown in a ‘safe environment’ and would not be used for human or animal consumption, the mere fact that this unholy manipulation is once again on the agenda, is disgusting.
At the opposite end of the spectrum, I was excited to see so many flocking to Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall’s shop in Axminster on Saturday. This is one of two - the other in Bath - which is engaging the more perceptive elements of society to the products of really good, honest, local organically-grown foodstuffs, free of any kind of harmful artificial manipulation. Not only that, but it is waking people up to the delights of those herbs, spices and vegetables that are either largely ignored or normally murdered in the cooking process. Of course it comes at a price, my River Cottage Sydling Brook organic pork liver paté with caramelised onion marmalade served with Town Mill Bakery bread and enticing salad weighed in at £8, but it was a demonstration of what a real liver paté can taste like - absolutely gorgeous! At a time when many of the lower-paid or those out of work are now going back to Asda in order to keep the food bill down, it is crucial that organic growers can multiply and help make their produce more afforable for those cash-strapped. Either that, or grow your own rather than succumb to the hellish wizardries of GM science, whose interests are more in creating mass profits and denuding our health at the same time.
Unfortunately, there is a group in society less ethically developed in their endeavours that make me despair. In this gripe I am referring to those hapless council workers that engage in helping introduce initiatives like enticing members of the public to spy on their neighbours for financial gain. This gripe also extends to those who would take up such an offer. But that is precisely what is being instigated in town halls across the country, all under the guise of improving the local environment. Whereas anti-social behaviour is unacceptable, local social disputes must be the sovereign preserve of the local community, engaging in face to face discourse as a way to resolve their problems, and not that of an interfering state. Following an article in today’s Daily Mail listing many of the local council schemes currently being rolled out to engage parents and children as young as 11 in spying on their neighbours - a wholly anti-social and obnoxious practice in its own right - some fitting responses were aired in reply to the article.
“This sounds like East Germany during the deepest darkest days of communism. When are the forced labour camps opening?”
“12 years of labour and we are nearly there.”
“The UK is apparently determined to bring the visions of George Orwell to reality.”
“Who are these people who dream up these crazy ideas. Can't they see that this will completely break down communities and set neighbour against neighbour, may even lead to more street violence if it gets out of hand. It is the authorities job to maintain our laws and police our streets. People should be educated to respect for their home and environment, not subjected to constant monitoring.”
“I seem to recall something similar in Hong Kong in the 70s when the HK government invented Lap Sap Chung. (The rubbish man) They had to stop this eventually as the people were turning against one another rather viciously and creating more problems than the problem they were trying to control.”
Precisely, that’s what our movers and shakers want, a society constantly at war with itself, divided and hostile. With an environment like that, more state control becomes their answer until we are locked into a militaristic fascist nightmare. Among those party in making this nightmare come true are those jobsworths of council workers who wittingly or unwittingly help in rolling out these schemes ‘because it’s part of their job’, or some other yellow-bellied excuse, and those members of the public who will willingly engage in partnering in such appalling ‘initiatives’. If they haven’t the wit to see the error of their ways and the way it will impact upon them and society in general, they need to get off their butts and wake up to what is really going on around them. As I’ve said before, the only way to beat this monster is non-compliance.
Meanwhile there are others who must be aware of some covert agenda but are just complacently playing along with it. Exeter City Council have announced that some 19th century catacombs, originally used as underground burial chambers, could have their original purpose revived to house the bodies of Swine Flu victims. Why is everyone so hell-bent on assuming that there could be a mass-epidemic of a virus, which so far, has been relatively benign, claiming fewer victims than any seasonal outbreak of flu, albeit during the summer months? Just what have they been tipped off about that the unwitting among us may become victim to? Does someone out there have inside information that the virus may mutate - by design - and become ferocious, or that the hastily-tested vaccine now in preparation of being rolled out, will contain some particularly nasty ingredients - as vaccines tend to do - that will bring about millions of deaths worldwide. If you think I’m being delusional go to http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_depopu.htm and find out for yourselves the kind of things that have been going on in the field of eugenics over the past decades. We need more whistleblowers who are privy to this, the latest of so many scams sent to ensnare us, to blow this MO wide open.
At the opposite end of the spectrum, I was excited to see so many flocking to Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall’s shop in Axminster on Saturday. This is one of two - the other in Bath - which is engaging the more perceptive elements of society to the products of really good, honest, local organically-grown foodstuffs, free of any kind of harmful artificial manipulation. Not only that, but it is waking people up to the delights of those herbs, spices and vegetables that are either largely ignored or normally murdered in the cooking process. Of course it comes at a price, my River Cottage Sydling Brook organic pork liver paté with caramelised onion marmalade served with Town Mill Bakery bread and enticing salad weighed in at £8, but it was a demonstration of what a real liver paté can taste like - absolutely gorgeous! At a time when many of the lower-paid or those out of work are now going back to Asda in order to keep the food bill down, it is crucial that organic growers can multiply and help make their produce more afforable for those cash-strapped. Either that, or grow your own rather than succumb to the hellish wizardries of GM science, whose interests are more in creating mass profits and denuding our health at the same time.
Unfortunately, there is a group in society less ethically developed in their endeavours that make me despair. In this gripe I am referring to those hapless council workers that engage in helping introduce initiatives like enticing members of the public to spy on their neighbours for financial gain. This gripe also extends to those who would take up such an offer. But that is precisely what is being instigated in town halls across the country, all under the guise of improving the local environment. Whereas anti-social behaviour is unacceptable, local social disputes must be the sovereign preserve of the local community, engaging in face to face discourse as a way to resolve their problems, and not that of an interfering state. Following an article in today’s Daily Mail listing many of the local council schemes currently being rolled out to engage parents and children as young as 11 in spying on their neighbours - a wholly anti-social and obnoxious practice in its own right - some fitting responses were aired in reply to the article.
“This sounds like East Germany during the deepest darkest days of communism. When are the forced labour camps opening?”
“12 years of labour and we are nearly there.”
“The UK is apparently determined to bring the visions of George Orwell to reality.”
“Who are these people who dream up these crazy ideas. Can't they see that this will completely break down communities and set neighbour against neighbour, may even lead to more street violence if it gets out of hand. It is the authorities job to maintain our laws and police our streets. People should be educated to respect for their home and environment, not subjected to constant monitoring.”
“I seem to recall something similar in Hong Kong in the 70s when the HK government invented Lap Sap Chung. (The rubbish man) They had to stop this eventually as the people were turning against one another rather viciously and creating more problems than the problem they were trying to control.”
Precisely, that’s what our movers and shakers want, a society constantly at war with itself, divided and hostile. With an environment like that, more state control becomes their answer until we are locked into a militaristic fascist nightmare. Among those party in making this nightmare come true are those jobsworths of council workers who wittingly or unwittingly help in rolling out these schemes ‘because it’s part of their job’, or some other yellow-bellied excuse, and those members of the public who will willingly engage in partnering in such appalling ‘initiatives’. If they haven’t the wit to see the error of their ways and the way it will impact upon them and society in general, they need to get off their butts and wake up to what is really going on around them. As I’ve said before, the only way to beat this monster is non-compliance.
Meanwhile there are others who must be aware of some covert agenda but are just complacently playing along with it. Exeter City Council have announced that some 19th century catacombs, originally used as underground burial chambers, could have their original purpose revived to house the bodies of Swine Flu victims. Why is everyone so hell-bent on assuming that there could be a mass-epidemic of a virus, which so far, has been relatively benign, claiming fewer victims than any seasonal outbreak of flu, albeit during the summer months? Just what have they been tipped off about that the unwitting among us may become victim to? Does someone out there have inside information that the virus may mutate - by design - and become ferocious, or that the hastily-tested vaccine now in preparation of being rolled out, will contain some particularly nasty ingredients - as vaccines tend to do - that will bring about millions of deaths worldwide. If you think I’m being delusional go to http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_depopu.htm and find out for yourselves the kind of things that have been going on in the field of eugenics over the past decades. We need more whistleblowers who are privy to this, the latest of so many scams sent to ensnare us, to blow this MO wide open.
Wednesday, July 08, 2009
Jackson assassinated by the CIA?
FSB sources reporting to Russian President Medvedev claim that they identified an electromagnetic pulse aimed at Jackson’s house prior to his death. See http://tribes.tribe.net/2012the-end-times/thread/69693234-ed89-4405-9d93-3e3f0f97a357
Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) Weapons have long been part of the covert intelligence arsenal and I recall Dr Steven Greer of the Disclosure Project claiming that both he and his wife were targeted with this technology some years ago, his wife developing metastatic cancer from the onslaught. In both cases, Jackson and Greer were releasing (or about to release in Jackson’s case) information that would rock the hidden establishment - Jackson with the purported mass eugenics scam via the Swine Flu virus and Greer with his Disclosure Programme relating to top military sources going public about ETs.
Jackson was a long-standing supporter of Austrian investigative journalist Jane Burgermeister who has filed criminal charges with the FBI against the World Health Organisation (WHO), claiming that they were about to commit bioterrorism with the release of the new Swine Flu vaccine. She has also prepared an injunction against the programme of forced vaccination which is in the process of being instigated in the US. Entire details of this highly detailed and well-researched lawsuit can be found at NaturalNews.com see http://www.naturalnews.com/
I and many others believe that the current Swine Flu scaremongering is a preparatory step towards, what could be, a mass eugenics programme being covertly planned by that unseen hand, to use new global powers of the WHO to enforce mass innoculations using this highly doubtful vaccine.
According to David Icke’s website “the reason behind the CIA needing to assassinate Michael Jackson, these reports continue, was an out of court settlement the pop icon signed with son of the king of Bahrain, Sheikh Abdullah bin Hamad al-Khalifa, this past November in London, and which stated, in part, that in exchange for millions of dollars previously lent to Mr. Jackson by the Sheikh, Mr. Jackson would allow his sold-out United Kingdom concerts to be a “platform” for warning the World of a soon to occur mass genocide event”.
Check these links out and see what you think. None of it would surprise me!
Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) Weapons have long been part of the covert intelligence arsenal and I recall Dr Steven Greer of the Disclosure Project claiming that both he and his wife were targeted with this technology some years ago, his wife developing metastatic cancer from the onslaught. In both cases, Jackson and Greer were releasing (or about to release in Jackson’s case) information that would rock the hidden establishment - Jackson with the purported mass eugenics scam via the Swine Flu virus and Greer with his Disclosure Programme relating to top military sources going public about ETs.
Jackson was a long-standing supporter of Austrian investigative journalist Jane Burgermeister who has filed criminal charges with the FBI against the World Health Organisation (WHO), claiming that they were about to commit bioterrorism with the release of the new Swine Flu vaccine. She has also prepared an injunction against the programme of forced vaccination which is in the process of being instigated in the US. Entire details of this highly detailed and well-researched lawsuit can be found at NaturalNews.com see http://www.naturalnews.com/
I and many others believe that the current Swine Flu scaremongering is a preparatory step towards, what could be, a mass eugenics programme being covertly planned by that unseen hand, to use new global powers of the WHO to enforce mass innoculations using this highly doubtful vaccine.
According to David Icke’s website “the reason behind the CIA needing to assassinate Michael Jackson, these reports continue, was an out of court settlement the pop icon signed with son of the king of Bahrain, Sheikh Abdullah bin Hamad al-Khalifa, this past November in London, and which stated, in part, that in exchange for millions of dollars previously lent to Mr. Jackson by the Sheikh, Mr. Jackson would allow his sold-out United Kingdom concerts to be a “platform” for warning the World of a soon to occur mass genocide event”.
Check these links out and see what you think. None of it would surprise me!
Thursday, June 11, 2009
The Super Surveillance State
Yesterday’s Daily Telegraph reported on the EU plans to ‘enhance’ pan-European ‘security’. As we have come to expect by now, proposals to achieve this end would have received wholehearted support from the Nazi Party.
Under the guise of the Stockholm programme, July 15 will see the final proposals for the EU’s internal security plan. These directives will override national sovereign legislation, bringing a taste of dictatorial life under our Euro superstate. Jacques Barrot, the European justice and security commissioner has stated that the aim was to "develop a domestic security strategy for the EU", historically a role which would be left to individual nation states.
But civil rights leaders and right-minded people see this as a surveillance superstate. Tony Bunyan, of the European Civil Liberties Network (ECLN) warned that "An increasingly sophisticated internal and external security apparatus is developing under the auspices of the EU," "In five or 10 years time when we have the surveillance and database state people will look back and ask, 'what were you doing in 2009 to stop this happening?"
Precisely. While this government is behaving like the proverbial wet rag with Brown posturing for continued power, ministers disappearing right, left and centre and cabinet shuffles every other week, the media spends most of its time using the upheaval as a useful smokescreen to divert people’s attention away from the vitally crucial issues that directly threaten our futures, while a fascist surveillance state is being assembled behind closed doors, largely evading mainstream news coverage.
Law enforcement and public security agencies will be sharing DNA records and fingerprint databases, storing them for new electronic EU ID cards. Surveillance footage and that gathered from the internet will be amassed, along with satellite surveillance, automated entry/exit border biometric readers and risk profiling systems. This will be the new Europe, all built upon the phony 'war on terror'. But, of course, now we are the terrorists!
EU officials have openly admitted to the Daily Telegraph that these measures will be highly controversial, so will need to be contained (ie camouflaged) within the Lisbon Treaty, now only awaiting Ireland’s ratification in the Autumn (they should be so lucky to even get to vote!). The Treaty already has built into it a secretive new Standing Committee known internally as COSI, which is designed to co-ordinate security policy across borders involving trans-European agencies such as Europol, the Frontex borders agency, the European Gendarmerie and Brussels-based intel-sharing Joint Situation Centre or Sitcen.
Just what sort of a nightmare are we headed towards, unless we stir up total opposition to this super-Orwellian scenario. And we must!
Under the guise of the Stockholm programme, July 15 will see the final proposals for the EU’s internal security plan. These directives will override national sovereign legislation, bringing a taste of dictatorial life under our Euro superstate. Jacques Barrot, the European justice and security commissioner has stated that the aim was to "develop a domestic security strategy for the EU", historically a role which would be left to individual nation states.
But civil rights leaders and right-minded people see this as a surveillance superstate. Tony Bunyan, of the European Civil Liberties Network (ECLN) warned that "An increasingly sophisticated internal and external security apparatus is developing under the auspices of the EU," "In five or 10 years time when we have the surveillance and database state people will look back and ask, 'what were you doing in 2009 to stop this happening?"
Precisely. While this government is behaving like the proverbial wet rag with Brown posturing for continued power, ministers disappearing right, left and centre and cabinet shuffles every other week, the media spends most of its time using the upheaval as a useful smokescreen to divert people’s attention away from the vitally crucial issues that directly threaten our futures, while a fascist surveillance state is being assembled behind closed doors, largely evading mainstream news coverage.
Law enforcement and public security agencies will be sharing DNA records and fingerprint databases, storing them for new electronic EU ID cards. Surveillance footage and that gathered from the internet will be amassed, along with satellite surveillance, automated entry/exit border biometric readers and risk profiling systems. This will be the new Europe, all built upon the phony 'war on terror'. But, of course, now we are the terrorists!
EU officials have openly admitted to the Daily Telegraph that these measures will be highly controversial, so will need to be contained (ie camouflaged) within the Lisbon Treaty, now only awaiting Ireland’s ratification in the Autumn (they should be so lucky to even get to vote!). The Treaty already has built into it a secretive new Standing Committee known internally as COSI, which is designed to co-ordinate security policy across borders involving trans-European agencies such as Europol, the Frontex borders agency, the European Gendarmerie and Brussels-based intel-sharing Joint Situation Centre or Sitcen.
Just what sort of a nightmare are we headed towards, unless we stir up total opposition to this super-Orwellian scenario. And we must!
Tuesday, June 09, 2009
The Control Grid Cometh
“Awesome. I can't wait to have every move tracked like the Truman show...and beaten/arrested if i step out of line. Sweet!”
Armand Tamzarian, London,
“Who said this? ‘An evil exists that threatens every man, woman, and child of this great nation. We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland.’
Was it Barack Obama? Gordon Brown? George W Bush? No. It was Adolf Hitler, when proposing the Gestapo to the German people.”
Bob, Burnley, United Kingdom
“Forget 1984. The truth is more like V For Vendetta, an underrated example of a totalitarian police state. The police are fast becoming a law unto themselves.”
Lauren, Chester, Cheshire
“George Orwell was a bloody Optimist!”
Ken Bardell, Doncaster, United Kingdom
“And still you don't believe that we live in a Police State in all but name? Do you seriously think that the next government will repeal any of Zanu-NuLabour's legislation?”
Adrian Ryan, Donegal, Ireland
“Just goes to show that if we are fooled into giving the police state a free hand then absolute power will corrupt absolutely.”
Pontus, San Jose, USA
“How silly of me! I thought I lived in a democracy and not a police state. Obviously I'm wrong.”
Rowan, London,
“Are there no limits to the fantasies these people indulge in? Next they'll be wanting micro chips implanted into newborn babies to monitor everybodys' movements from cradle to the grave. Not only utterly disgusting, but utterly horrific!”
Ian Dickson, Brighton, UK
“What was the point of winning WWII if we are going to live in a police state anyways?”
Keith S, Winnipeg, Canada
“Utterly disgusting. The police have lost all respect of the British public and are in grave danger of provoking a serious backlash.”
HC, Kabul,
“What is the difference between the British government and a communist government?”
Phil, Nottingham,
“I credit this government with many failures, amongst them is the proliferation of a surveillance society. My advice to those who think this is a good idea, read George Orwell's "1984", then comment.”
Phil, Epsom, England
Some of the replies to an article in the Sunday Times regarding a British police force study of Chinese-style surveillance tactics which they believe would come in useful for the 2012 London Olympics. Goodies included in their ‘security’ considerations are miniature microphones installed in taxis to monitor passengers’ conversations, and athletes, visitors and journalists to have tiny microchips carried in their tickets.
A 44-page report compiled by the police states that there are “lessons to be learnt” from China’s use of digital surveillance, but then goes on to warn that “The fine balance between the use of technology to support security requirements and individual rights to privacy will be an open debate in the UK for 2012.” I suggest that that open debate should have taken place a long time ago and that with suggestions like these being openly considered that fine balance has already been breached.
If the Olympics are such a threat to national security, then why hold them at all? The whole event has become so politicised that it goes entirely against the true spirit of sport. But, of course, it doesn’t pose a real threat at all. It is a perceived one. One that has been manufactured by a group of people whose real intention behind all of these intrusive security measures is not to anticipate an al Qaeda strike, but to incarcerate us, for we are the perceived enemy now, the thronging masses that must be controlled. You’ve only got to read their policy documents to know that that is their real modus operandi.
But it’s good to see people waking up to this nightmare and so many replies calling in unison for a stop to this dangerous nonsense. Many people’s perception of this country these days has gone beyond the title of ‘nanny state’ to that of ‘fascist state’. I believe that a large part of Labour’s defeat in the recent elections is not so much about the expenses scandal, which the mainstream media would have you believe, but as much, if not more, based on a collective unease in the country in the way this government has, during its term of office, increasingly turned Britain into a police state, rubbishing our rights, privacy and freedoms. That’s not to say that the Conservatives will be any better. Our governments are controlled from above, and their entrance into office, either this year or next, will only signify a handing over of the baton in the ongoing race to set up a total control grid in which we will find ourselves entrapped. That's if we don’t take action to expose the real game play and try to stop such a likely probability.
Armand Tamzarian, London,
“Who said this? ‘An evil exists that threatens every man, woman, and child of this great nation. We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland.’
Was it Barack Obama? Gordon Brown? George W Bush? No. It was Adolf Hitler, when proposing the Gestapo to the German people.”
Bob, Burnley, United Kingdom
“Forget 1984. The truth is more like V For Vendetta, an underrated example of a totalitarian police state. The police are fast becoming a law unto themselves.”
Lauren, Chester, Cheshire
“George Orwell was a bloody Optimist!”
Ken Bardell, Doncaster, United Kingdom
“And still you don't believe that we live in a Police State in all but name? Do you seriously think that the next government will repeal any of Zanu-NuLabour's legislation?”
Adrian Ryan, Donegal, Ireland
“Just goes to show that if we are fooled into giving the police state a free hand then absolute power will corrupt absolutely.”
Pontus, San Jose, USA
“How silly of me! I thought I lived in a democracy and not a police state. Obviously I'm wrong.”
Rowan, London,
“Are there no limits to the fantasies these people indulge in? Next they'll be wanting micro chips implanted into newborn babies to monitor everybodys' movements from cradle to the grave. Not only utterly disgusting, but utterly horrific!”
Ian Dickson, Brighton, UK
“What was the point of winning WWII if we are going to live in a police state anyways?”
Keith S, Winnipeg, Canada
“Utterly disgusting. The police have lost all respect of the British public and are in grave danger of provoking a serious backlash.”
HC, Kabul,
“What is the difference between the British government and a communist government?”
Phil, Nottingham,
“I credit this government with many failures, amongst them is the proliferation of a surveillance society. My advice to those who think this is a good idea, read George Orwell's "1984", then comment.”
Phil, Epsom, England
Some of the replies to an article in the Sunday Times regarding a British police force study of Chinese-style surveillance tactics which they believe would come in useful for the 2012 London Olympics. Goodies included in their ‘security’ considerations are miniature microphones installed in taxis to monitor passengers’ conversations, and athletes, visitors and journalists to have tiny microchips carried in their tickets.
A 44-page report compiled by the police states that there are “lessons to be learnt” from China’s use of digital surveillance, but then goes on to warn that “The fine balance between the use of technology to support security requirements and individual rights to privacy will be an open debate in the UK for 2012.” I suggest that that open debate should have taken place a long time ago and that with suggestions like these being openly considered that fine balance has already been breached.
If the Olympics are such a threat to national security, then why hold them at all? The whole event has become so politicised that it goes entirely against the true spirit of sport. But, of course, it doesn’t pose a real threat at all. It is a perceived one. One that has been manufactured by a group of people whose real intention behind all of these intrusive security measures is not to anticipate an al Qaeda strike, but to incarcerate us, for we are the perceived enemy now, the thronging masses that must be controlled. You’ve only got to read their policy documents to know that that is their real modus operandi.
But it’s good to see people waking up to this nightmare and so many replies calling in unison for a stop to this dangerous nonsense. Many people’s perception of this country these days has gone beyond the title of ‘nanny state’ to that of ‘fascist state’. I believe that a large part of Labour’s defeat in the recent elections is not so much about the expenses scandal, which the mainstream media would have you believe, but as much, if not more, based on a collective unease in the country in the way this government has, during its term of office, increasingly turned Britain into a police state, rubbishing our rights, privacy and freedoms. That’s not to say that the Conservatives will be any better. Our governments are controlled from above, and their entrance into office, either this year or next, will only signify a handing over of the baton in the ongoing race to set up a total control grid in which we will find ourselves entrapped. That's if we don’t take action to expose the real game play and try to stop such a likely probability.
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Britain approaches top spot in the Orwellian League
In a study undertaken by CryptoHippie, compiling information from different organizations such as the Electronic Privacy Information Center, Reporters Without Borders, Freedom House, the Ludwig von Mises Institute and The Heritage Foundation, Britain was ranked 5th out of a total of 52 countries in its adoption of police state measures to track and trace its citizens. The US was close behind in 6th place.
“In an Electronic Police State, every surveillance camera recording, every e-mail you send, every Internet site you surf, every post you make, every check you write, every credit card swipe, every cell phone ping… are all criminal evidence, and they are held in searchable databases, for a long, long time,” the report states. “Whoever holds this evidence can make you look very, very bad whenever they care enough to do so. You can be prosecuted whenever they feel like it – the evidence is already in their database,” the report continues. “Perhaps you trust that your ruler will only use his evidence archives to hurt bad people. Will you also trust his successor? Do you also trust all of his subordinates, every government worker and every policeman?”
“If some leader behaves badly, will you really stand up to oppose him or her? Would you still do it if he had all the e-mails you sent when you were depressed? Or if she has records of every porn site you’ve ever surfed? Or if he knows every phone call you’ve ever made? Or if she knows everyone you’ve ever sent money to?” the report asks.
“This system hasn’t yet reached its full shape, but all of the basics are in place and it is not far from complete in some places,”.
The seventeen factors we included in these rankings are:
Daily Documents
Requirement of state-issued identity documents and registration.
Border Issues
Inspections at borders, searching computers, demanding decryption of data.
Financial Tracking
State’s ability to search and record all financial transactions: Checks, credit card use, wires, etc.
Gag Orders
Criminal penalties if you tell someone the state is searching their records.
Anti-Crypto Laws
Outlawing or restricting cryptography.
Constitutional Protection
A lack of constitutional protections for the individual, or the overriding of such protections.
Data Storage Ability
The ability of the state to store the data they gather.
Data Search Ability
The ability to search the data they gather.
ISP Data Retention
States forcing Internet Service Providers to save detailed records of all their customers’ Internet usage
Telephone Data Retention
States forcing telephone companies to record and save records of all their customers’ telephone usage.
Cell Phone Records
States forcing cellular telephone companies to record and save records of all their customers’ usage.
Medical records
States demanding records from all medical service providers and retaining the same.
Enforcement Ability
The state’s ability to use overwhelming force (exemplified by SWAT Teams) to seize anyone they want, whenever they want.
Habeus Corpus
Lack of habeus corpus – the right not to be held in jail without prompt due process. Or, the overriding of such protections.
Police-Intel Barrier
The lack of a barrier between police organizations and intelligence organizations. Or, the overriding of such barriers.
Covert Hacking
State operatives removing – or adding! – digital evidence to/from private computers covertly. Covert hacking can make anyone appear as any kind of criminal desired.
Loose Warrants
Warrants issued without careful examination of police statements and other justifications
by a truly independent judge.
Top of the list comes China - the great example upon which our movers and shakers model their plans for this country, the US and elsewhere - followed by North Korea, Belarus and Russia with Britain and the US next in line. The Philippines was the least engaged in this Orwellian nightmare, while other European countries enjoy lesser state prying.
“In an Electronic Police State, every surveillance camera recording, every e-mail you send, every Internet site you surf, every post you make, every check you write, every credit card swipe, every cell phone ping… are all criminal evidence, and they are held in searchable databases, for a long, long time,” the report states. “Whoever holds this evidence can make you look very, very bad whenever they care enough to do so. You can be prosecuted whenever they feel like it – the evidence is already in their database,” the report continues. “Perhaps you trust that your ruler will only use his evidence archives to hurt bad people. Will you also trust his successor? Do you also trust all of his subordinates, every government worker and every policeman?”
“If some leader behaves badly, will you really stand up to oppose him or her? Would you still do it if he had all the e-mails you sent when you were depressed? Or if she has records of every porn site you’ve ever surfed? Or if he knows every phone call you’ve ever made? Or if she knows everyone you’ve ever sent money to?” the report asks.
“This system hasn’t yet reached its full shape, but all of the basics are in place and it is not far from complete in some places,”.
The seventeen factors we included in these rankings are:
Daily Documents
Requirement of state-issued identity documents and registration.
Border Issues
Inspections at borders, searching computers, demanding decryption of data.
Financial Tracking
State’s ability to search and record all financial transactions: Checks, credit card use, wires, etc.
Gag Orders
Criminal penalties if you tell someone the state is searching their records.
Anti-Crypto Laws
Outlawing or restricting cryptography.
Constitutional Protection
A lack of constitutional protections for the individual, or the overriding of such protections.
Data Storage Ability
The ability of the state to store the data they gather.
Data Search Ability
The ability to search the data they gather.
ISP Data Retention
States forcing Internet Service Providers to save detailed records of all their customers’ Internet usage
Telephone Data Retention
States forcing telephone companies to record and save records of all their customers’ telephone usage.
Cell Phone Records
States forcing cellular telephone companies to record and save records of all their customers’ usage.
Medical records
States demanding records from all medical service providers and retaining the same.
Enforcement Ability
The state’s ability to use overwhelming force (exemplified by SWAT Teams) to seize anyone they want, whenever they want.
Habeus Corpus
Lack of habeus corpus – the right not to be held in jail without prompt due process. Or, the overriding of such protections.
Police-Intel Barrier
The lack of a barrier between police organizations and intelligence organizations. Or, the overriding of such barriers.
Covert Hacking
State operatives removing – or adding! – digital evidence to/from private computers covertly. Covert hacking can make anyone appear as any kind of criminal desired.
Loose Warrants
Warrants issued without careful examination of police statements and other justifications
by a truly independent judge.
Top of the list comes China - the great example upon which our movers and shakers model their plans for this country, the US and elsewhere - followed by North Korea, Belarus and Russia with Britain and the US next in line. The Philippines was the least engaged in this Orwellian nightmare, while other European countries enjoy lesser state prying.
Wednesday, May 06, 2009
High Street biometrics
Becoming increasingly embarassed by the mounting costs of implementing the ID card scheme, that pathetically useless Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith - whose only credentials are the ability to mindlessly invoke repressive legislation at the behest of her controlling masters with unremitting efficiency - is to announce today the passing of the responsibilty for the gathering of biometrics from a national network of public enrolment centres to the private sector.
Now chemists, post offices and photographic shops are to undertake the government’s dirty business with Smith lacing her words in such a way as to imply it as a commercially attractive proposition for such high street chains because of the need for anyone wishing to update their passport being forced to visit them in order to get their necessary biometric data recorded. "While private companies will clearly benefit from the increased footfall from offering this service, their customers will benefit from being able to quickly provide their biometrics while they are out doing their shopping," said Smith.
Just how low can they go!
Having put American radio host Michael Savage on the list of those banned from entering the UK which was published by the Home Office yesterday, Smith may get her come-uppance as Savage is considering taking legal action against her for placing him on a no-entry list along with known terrorists, racist groups and ‘violent skinheads’. In Smith’s words - or those of her puppeteer - “someone who has fallen into the category of fomenting hatred, of such extreme views and expressing them in such a way that it is actually likely to cause inter-community tension or even violence if that person were allowed into the country.”
Savage’s claim to notoriety is his fervent advocacy of patriotic traditional values - borders, language and culture. Although I have never listened to his show as it is not even syndicated in this country - which is hardly surprising as our national radio is largely deplorable, controlled by government dictat disallowing any real alternative debate - the banning of free speech, whether or not it might upset certain people, is the mark of political control akin to that of a Soviet Commissar which rather nicely sums up my impression of Mrs Smith.
Now chemists, post offices and photographic shops are to undertake the government’s dirty business with Smith lacing her words in such a way as to imply it as a commercially attractive proposition for such high street chains because of the need for anyone wishing to update their passport being forced to visit them in order to get their necessary biometric data recorded. "While private companies will clearly benefit from the increased footfall from offering this service, their customers will benefit from being able to quickly provide their biometrics while they are out doing their shopping," said Smith.
Just how low can they go!
Having put American radio host Michael Savage on the list of those banned from entering the UK which was published by the Home Office yesterday, Smith may get her come-uppance as Savage is considering taking legal action against her for placing him on a no-entry list along with known terrorists, racist groups and ‘violent skinheads’. In Smith’s words - or those of her puppeteer - “someone who has fallen into the category of fomenting hatred, of such extreme views and expressing them in such a way that it is actually likely to cause inter-community tension or even violence if that person were allowed into the country.”
Savage’s claim to notoriety is his fervent advocacy of patriotic traditional values - borders, language and culture. Although I have never listened to his show as it is not even syndicated in this country - which is hardly surprising as our national radio is largely deplorable, controlled by government dictat disallowing any real alternative debate - the banning of free speech, whether or not it might upset certain people, is the mark of political control akin to that of a Soviet Commissar which rather nicely sums up my impression of Mrs Smith.
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
More police heavy-handedness
While I’m still hot under the collar over the conduct of our police and the ever-more fascist-like behaviour that they are adopting - or have been told to adopt - more news of police misconduct comes our way. A park society chairman has been charged under the UK Counter Terrorism Act of 2008 for filming a police SUV driving erractically down a north London park footpath, despite the fact that, by law, police should proceed on foot in such territory. Mr Sleath, the unfortunate park warden, wanted to record the breach of conduct as evidence which could be presented to senior officers. But, it seems, the police can do what they like, flaunting the established law while behaving wildly under the one-legislation-fits-all guise of the Counter Terrorism Act. The language of the Act seems to be deliberately ambiguous so that photographing police officers could be interpreted as being illegal full stop if the police want to put a certain slant on it, despite reassurances from PC Alan Cousins of the Metropolitan Police Film Unit that journalists taking photographs of officers would not be impeded by this legislation.
This is plainly disgusting. Law-enforcement in this country is placing itself within a legalistic, hermetically-sealed safe house where, as a result of wholly concocted theories about potential terrorism, the police can seemingly do what they like and behave like a bunch of Rambos. Of course our pathetic and spiritually-bereft little jobsworth of a Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, just hides within this fantasy land carrying out orders as she is told and will do nothing to curb these excesses which effect each and every one of us.
This is plainly disgusting. Law-enforcement in this country is placing itself within a legalistic, hermetically-sealed safe house where, as a result of wholly concocted theories about potential terrorism, the police can seemingly do what they like and behave like a bunch of Rambos. Of course our pathetic and spiritually-bereft little jobsworth of a Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, just hides within this fantasy land carrying out orders as she is told and will do nothing to curb these excesses which effect each and every one of us.
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
A Common Purpose?
In a recent Edge TV exposé, retired naval commander, Brian Gerrish spoke of the insidious infiltration of Common Purpose (CP) into nearly all avenues of government and industry. I reported on CP some time ago and since then its tentacles of power have been extending. Cloaked in the altruistic clothing of a charity ‘empowering people and communities’, it is really anything but. In reality CP is an elitist pro-EU political organisation which is usurping the democratic framework and sovereignty of this country while at the same time threatening personal free will.
To save you time digging back through my archives, I have brought my original 2007 blog forward and included some further comments on this secretive 'charity', which are ever more relevant to current political trends in this country.
I was originally alerted to Common Purpose, back in 2007, by an article written by David Icke, but before reading his article in full, I first went to Common Purposes' website to get my own first impression on what it was all about. I was confronted by a lot of convoluted prose, but the best I could ascertain from their mission statement was that they run courses for various age groups and people of varying degrees of managerial responsibilty to help them understand the world in which they live and help make society and/or their organisation more efficient. Good aims you might suppose on the surface of it, but very light on specifics the way most advertising is. That begs the question - just how do they intend participants to achieve these goals and ultimately, whose goals are they?
The title ‘Common Purpose’ may sound altruistic - conjuring up a structured way of bettering society, working together as communities or within organisations with more transparency, honesty and accountability all for a common good. And it is this altruistic message that will appeal to many ambitious younger people in junior management with their lifetime stretching in front of them. They feel they can be part of a team that can improve our lot in a world distraught with famine, war, duplicity and evil. So far so good, or is it?
But dig deeper, as Icke did, and you will find out something that is not stated on their website. Common Purpose’s Chief Executive is Julia Middleton who just happens to be Head of Personnel Selection in the office of the Deputy Prime Minister! We are also told that DEMOS, the political think tank that strongly influenced Tony Blair during his administration and is now advising parties across the political spectrum, is closely involved with Common Purpose. This then provides an immediate link between political direction and the appointing and grooming of those who are considered to be specially selected and 'politically correct' future leaders, hardly the work of a 'charity' I would have thought! Given this no small coincidence that a direct conduit runs from central government to CP and the real nature of the beast comes sharply into focus. Any altruism must surely be heavily tainted by government and the puppeteers that run it.
It is clear that CP is aimed at people in senior positions in politics, education, policing, local government, business, health and the media - it is estimated that possibly 1,000 senior employees in the BBC are members - and because of this it immediately becomes apparent that any 'common purpose' is the reserve of those in these senior decision-making positions. All members of CP, the 'Inner Party' members to take an Orwellian parallel, are given a politically-charged set of values which they must adhere to in the execution of their work and those values and directives are then passed down to us, the 'Outer Party' members who are clearly meant to comply.
Given this government’s long legacy of depriving us of our liberties, building up the police state and control grid, then CP appears to be just another part of that armoury but with its connections to government policy covertly hidden as a semi-secretive 'charity', it is not immediately obvious that this is intended as another tool in achieving a state-sponsored control down through the ranks. Indeed, according to DEMOS, charities in future, are to become politicised and act as maid servants to government doctrine.
Common Purpose seems to adopting all of the hallmarks of Illuminati's Tavistock Institute modus operandi that other manipulator of social behaviour.
Consider this. John Rawlings Rees, one of Tavistock's founders once said this: 'Public life, politics and industry should all ... be within our sphere of influence (the Institute's and the Illuminati they represent)... If we are to infiltrate the professional and social activities of other people I think we must imitate the Totalitarians and organize some kind of fifth column activity!'
'We must aim to make it permeate every educational activity in our national life ... We have made a useful attack upon a number of professions. The two easiest of them naturally are the teaching profession and the Church: the two most difficult are law and medicine.'
As if to underline CP's hidden agenda, here's one experience (with acknowledgement to David Icke's newsletter.
Brian Gerrish at http://www.eutruth.org.uk discovered Common Purpose when he was involved with a group in Plymouth in the west of England helping people find jobs and one of their projects was repairing wooden boats. He said they had lots of public support and backing from the local authorities and everything was going fine. But then it suddenly changed and the council support was withdrawn. When they tried to continue alone, he said that within a short time key people were being threatened:
'When we started to explore why we were being threatened we were absolutely staggered to find a very strange organisation called Common Purpose operating in the city. And we were absolutely amazed that there were so many people involved but they were not declaring themselves ...
'[Common Purpose] was operating throughout the structure of the city, in the city council, in the government offices, in the police, in the judiciary. Essentially we discovered what is effectively, at best, a quasi secret society which doesn't declare itself to ordinary people.'
Further research has led Gerrish to establish that Common Purpose is recruiting and training leaders to be loyal to the objectives of the organisation and the European Union and preparing the governing structure for what it calls the 'post-democratic society' after nations are replaced by regions in the European Union. 'They are learning to rule without regard to democracy, and will bring the EU police state home to every one of us', Gerrish says. Common Purpose 'graduates' are increasingly everywhere.
When the organisation was given an award in 2005 by one of it clients, Newcastle University in the North East of England, it was revealed that among its graduates in that area were: Michael Craik, Northumbria Police Chief Constable; Andrew Dixon, Executive Director of the Arts Council England, North East; Glyn Evans, City Centre Chaplain; Chris Francis, Centre Manager of the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust; Anne Marshall, Chief Officer of Age Concern; Anthony Sargent, General Director of The Sage Gateshead; Miriam Harte, Director of Beamish Museum; and Sue Underwood, Chief Executive of NEMLAC (the North East Museums, Libraries and Archives Council). Brian Gerrish has found them to be throughout the government structure with more than £100 million of taxpayers money spent on Common Purpose courses for state employees. It has members in the National Health Service, BBC, police, legal profession, religion, local councils, the Civil Service, government ministries,! Parliament and Regional Development Agencies.'
With a network of CP members occupying a large cross section of senior positions in every town and city in Britain, we now see, in place, a control grid of un-elected intermediaries who are acting as a conduit for the flow of state dictat to we, the common people, while our role, at the bottom of the pile, is to snoop on our fellow citizens' dustbins or pry on them to see if they acting suspiciously and not in accordance with that received dictat.
To view Edge TV's Interview with Gerrish go to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtzhMvutuvU
To save you time digging back through my archives, I have brought my original 2007 blog forward and included some further comments on this secretive 'charity', which are ever more relevant to current political trends in this country.
I was originally alerted to Common Purpose, back in 2007, by an article written by David Icke, but before reading his article in full, I first went to Common Purposes' website to get my own first impression on what it was all about. I was confronted by a lot of convoluted prose, but the best I could ascertain from their mission statement was that they run courses for various age groups and people of varying degrees of managerial responsibilty to help them understand the world in which they live and help make society and/or their organisation more efficient. Good aims you might suppose on the surface of it, but very light on specifics the way most advertising is. That begs the question - just how do they intend participants to achieve these goals and ultimately, whose goals are they?
The title ‘Common Purpose’ may sound altruistic - conjuring up a structured way of bettering society, working together as communities or within organisations with more transparency, honesty and accountability all for a common good. And it is this altruistic message that will appeal to many ambitious younger people in junior management with their lifetime stretching in front of them. They feel they can be part of a team that can improve our lot in a world distraught with famine, war, duplicity and evil. So far so good, or is it?
But dig deeper, as Icke did, and you will find out something that is not stated on their website. Common Purpose’s Chief Executive is Julia Middleton who just happens to be Head of Personnel Selection in the office of the Deputy Prime Minister! We are also told that DEMOS, the political think tank that strongly influenced Tony Blair during his administration and is now advising parties across the political spectrum, is closely involved with Common Purpose. This then provides an immediate link between political direction and the appointing and grooming of those who are considered to be specially selected and 'politically correct' future leaders, hardly the work of a 'charity' I would have thought! Given this no small coincidence that a direct conduit runs from central government to CP and the real nature of the beast comes sharply into focus. Any altruism must surely be heavily tainted by government and the puppeteers that run it.
It is clear that CP is aimed at people in senior positions in politics, education, policing, local government, business, health and the media - it is estimated that possibly 1,000 senior employees in the BBC are members - and because of this it immediately becomes apparent that any 'common purpose' is the reserve of those in these senior decision-making positions. All members of CP, the 'Inner Party' members to take an Orwellian parallel, are given a politically-charged set of values which they must adhere to in the execution of their work and those values and directives are then passed down to us, the 'Outer Party' members who are clearly meant to comply.
Given this government’s long legacy of depriving us of our liberties, building up the police state and control grid, then CP appears to be just another part of that armoury but with its connections to government policy covertly hidden as a semi-secretive 'charity', it is not immediately obvious that this is intended as another tool in achieving a state-sponsored control down through the ranks. Indeed, according to DEMOS, charities in future, are to become politicised and act as maid servants to government doctrine.
Common Purpose seems to adopting all of the hallmarks of Illuminati's Tavistock Institute modus operandi that other manipulator of social behaviour.
Consider this. John Rawlings Rees, one of Tavistock's founders once said this: 'Public life, politics and industry should all ... be within our sphere of influence (the Institute's and the Illuminati they represent)... If we are to infiltrate the professional and social activities of other people I think we must imitate the Totalitarians and organize some kind of fifth column activity!'
'We must aim to make it permeate every educational activity in our national life ... We have made a useful attack upon a number of professions. The two easiest of them naturally are the teaching profession and the Church: the two most difficult are law and medicine.'
As if to underline CP's hidden agenda, here's one experience (with acknowledgement to David Icke's newsletter.
Brian Gerrish at http://www.eutruth.org.uk discovered Common Purpose when he was involved with a group in Plymouth in the west of England helping people find jobs and one of their projects was repairing wooden boats. He said they had lots of public support and backing from the local authorities and everything was going fine. But then it suddenly changed and the council support was withdrawn. When they tried to continue alone, he said that within a short time key people were being threatened:
'When we started to explore why we were being threatened we were absolutely staggered to find a very strange organisation called Common Purpose operating in the city. And we were absolutely amazed that there were so many people involved but they were not declaring themselves ...
'[Common Purpose] was operating throughout the structure of the city, in the city council, in the government offices, in the police, in the judiciary. Essentially we discovered what is effectively, at best, a quasi secret society which doesn't declare itself to ordinary people.'
Further research has led Gerrish to establish that Common Purpose is recruiting and training leaders to be loyal to the objectives of the organisation and the European Union and preparing the governing structure for what it calls the 'post-democratic society' after nations are replaced by regions in the European Union. 'They are learning to rule without regard to democracy, and will bring the EU police state home to every one of us', Gerrish says. Common Purpose 'graduates' are increasingly everywhere.
When the organisation was given an award in 2005 by one of it clients, Newcastle University in the North East of England, it was revealed that among its graduates in that area were: Michael Craik, Northumbria Police Chief Constable; Andrew Dixon, Executive Director of the Arts Council England, North East; Glyn Evans, City Centre Chaplain; Chris Francis, Centre Manager of the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust; Anne Marshall, Chief Officer of Age Concern; Anthony Sargent, General Director of The Sage Gateshead; Miriam Harte, Director of Beamish Museum; and Sue Underwood, Chief Executive of NEMLAC (the North East Museums, Libraries and Archives Council). Brian Gerrish has found them to be throughout the government structure with more than £100 million of taxpayers money spent on Common Purpose courses for state employees. It has members in the National Health Service, BBC, police, legal profession, religion, local councils, the Civil Service, government ministries,! Parliament and Regional Development Agencies.'
With a network of CP members occupying a large cross section of senior positions in every town and city in Britain, we now see, in place, a control grid of un-elected intermediaries who are acting as a conduit for the flow of state dictat to we, the common people, while our role, at the bottom of the pile, is to snoop on our fellow citizens' dustbins or pry on them to see if they acting suspiciously and not in accordance with that received dictat.
To view Edge TV's Interview with Gerrish go to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtzhMvutuvU
Monday, March 02, 2009
Disregard can work both ways
In today’s Guardian, Charlie Brooker, in a rightfully pissed-off mood, bares his dismay over our politicians and their seeming dismissal of us, their electorate. Following last week’s declaration by Man-of-Straw Jack, that no release would be made of records pertaining to cabinet discussions over the decision to send our troops into Iraq, Brooker says he reached his snapping point declaring “Straw and his pals figured they knew best, even though it turned out they didn't and - oops! - hundreds of thousands of lives were lost as a result. Remember the footage of that screaming little boy with his limbs blown off? Maybe not. Maybe you felt a shiver of guilt when you saw that; guilt that you hadn't personally done enough to prevent it; should've shouted louder, marched further. Or maybe it stunned you into numbness. Because what was the point in protesting any more? These people do what they want.
“They do what they want, these people, and you and I are cut out of the conversation. I'm sure they're dimly aware we still exist. They must spot us occasionally, through the window, jumping up and down in the cold with our funny placards . . . although come to think of it, they can't even see us through the window, since they banned peaceful protest within a mile of Parliament.”
Very true. The words from the lips of cabinet ministers, more often than not, are laced with double-speak, spin and complete disingenuity. What they promise today, they make a ‘U’-turn on tomorrow and then feebly attempt to appease us, amidst the financial turmoil, with postures like the mock disgust from Brown and Prescott last week that ‘Fred the Shred’ Goodwin should not retain his grossly obscene pension in light of the devastation he brought upon RBS, when the top echelons of government have been privy to this banking scam all the time.
But as Brooker suggests in the title of his piece “To politicians, we're little more than meaningless blobs on a monitor”, the same could be said of our politicians - when viewed from the next tier up in the grand control pyramid - by the controlling élite.
Politicians come and go, they’re dispensible, just another level of pawns in the game, so in a way Brown et al are just passing on that total lack of regard that is endemic in the higher orders of the grand pile. The contempt and indifference originates with that controlling cabal and permeates downwards, eventually dehumanising us all. Their preferred interface with us mere mortals is via CCTV cameras and electronic databases, we are little more than chips on a circuit board, a means to an end and when that end is achieved, also dispensible.
This cold and total disregard, treating us little better than tagged sheep, while leading us into total financial collapse, dispossession of our rights and our property in many cases, will inevitably lead to backlash. That final straw is only around the corner and with its arrival the wrath of UK and that of many other nations worldwide will erupt and that’s precisely what the controlling élite want and something their dutiful law-enforcement agencies have been preparing for, the ability to incarcerate us all, locking us into a global police state then allowing those at the top of the pile to practice their disregard for us all on a grand scale.
However, our most effective response to that final straw must not be through violence, but through peaceful non-compliance. In that way we are not playing into their hands but forming a cordon of co-ordinated resistance and a determination not to be treated like trash. Non-violent ingenuity and resourcefulness are what is needed - not brute force - in the coming crisis and that Dunkirk spirit of human interdependence, sharing and co-ordinated mutual support and the adoption of a higher spiritually, will deny them their game plan.
If our politicians and their masters regard us all as little more than blobs on a monitor, we too can quite rightly adopt a similar attitude in reverse and quietly resist their attempts to deny us our rights as human beings and treating us like cattle to the slaughter.
“They do what they want, these people, and you and I are cut out of the conversation. I'm sure they're dimly aware we still exist. They must spot us occasionally, through the window, jumping up and down in the cold with our funny placards . . . although come to think of it, they can't even see us through the window, since they banned peaceful protest within a mile of Parliament.”
Very true. The words from the lips of cabinet ministers, more often than not, are laced with double-speak, spin and complete disingenuity. What they promise today, they make a ‘U’-turn on tomorrow and then feebly attempt to appease us, amidst the financial turmoil, with postures like the mock disgust from Brown and Prescott last week that ‘Fred the Shred’ Goodwin should not retain his grossly obscene pension in light of the devastation he brought upon RBS, when the top echelons of government have been privy to this banking scam all the time.
But as Brooker suggests in the title of his piece “To politicians, we're little more than meaningless blobs on a monitor”, the same could be said of our politicians - when viewed from the next tier up in the grand control pyramid - by the controlling élite.
Politicians come and go, they’re dispensible, just another level of pawns in the game, so in a way Brown et al are just passing on that total lack of regard that is endemic in the higher orders of the grand pile. The contempt and indifference originates with that controlling cabal and permeates downwards, eventually dehumanising us all. Their preferred interface with us mere mortals is via CCTV cameras and electronic databases, we are little more than chips on a circuit board, a means to an end and when that end is achieved, also dispensible.
This cold and total disregard, treating us little better than tagged sheep, while leading us into total financial collapse, dispossession of our rights and our property in many cases, will inevitably lead to backlash. That final straw is only around the corner and with its arrival the wrath of UK and that of many other nations worldwide will erupt and that’s precisely what the controlling élite want and something their dutiful law-enforcement agencies have been preparing for, the ability to incarcerate us all, locking us into a global police state then allowing those at the top of the pile to practice their disregard for us all on a grand scale.
However, our most effective response to that final straw must not be through violence, but through peaceful non-compliance. In that way we are not playing into their hands but forming a cordon of co-ordinated resistance and a determination not to be treated like trash. Non-violent ingenuity and resourcefulness are what is needed - not brute force - in the coming crisis and that Dunkirk spirit of human interdependence, sharing and co-ordinated mutual support and the adoption of a higher spiritually, will deny them their game plan.
If our politicians and their masters regard us all as little more than blobs on a monitor, we too can quite rightly adopt a similar attitude in reverse and quietly resist their attempts to deny us our rights as human beings and treating us like cattle to the slaughter.
Tuesday, February 03, 2009
Snowed in?
Snow continues to dominate the headlines making a welcome diversion from Obama and the global financial crisis. Best to take our crises in order!
The widespread disruption caused, what by any measure, would have been pretty typical winter conditions a few decades ago, demonstrates the rather spineless state in which our society finds itself today.
No buses in London yesterday, schools closed across the country, no bin collections etc etc, as officials agree that snow on the roads could cause buses to slide into gutters and endanger lives. The country seems to be full of hi-vi-vested individuals standing around shying away from potential dangers as HSE rule books advise against taking risk, suggesting that to stay indoors is the safer option.
Clearly the world is becoming to scary a place as social psychologists have, through the media, made us fearful of it and the consequences. I see this as just part of a conditioning process to have us all live in a state of fearfulness. ‘Stay at home’, ‘Don’t travel unless it’s absolutely necessary’, ‘Don’t send the kids to school as they might not be able to get home again’.
During the winter of 1963 in the uplands of north west County Durham, the conditions we are witnessing now would have been regarded as an average winter day, while school buses would have run, albeit a bit delayed, despite the conditions with us ‘scholars’ helping to push the them out of snow drifts when necessary. I clearly recall all the boys in my year having to dig a trench just to the physics building at the bottom of the playground for our 'physie' lessons where the there was no heating. We sat there in heavy overcoats and scarves and just got on with things. At lunchtime we would go the local railway station and see heavy steam-hauled freight trains battle through the snow amid driving winds and blizzards. It was a challenge and we were all exhilarated by it. I remember my feet being continuously numb from cold from seven in the morning to the early hours of the following morning when the warmth of the bedclothes finally thawed them out. No central heating then just draughty coal fires.
Only when the drifts reached impossible heights did the buses stop running and then it was a case of bed down in the school gym, or for us more hardy souls, make the seven mile journey home on foot clambering over abandoned vehicles buried beneath the drifts and having the unique enjoyment of seeing the surrounding landscape from a newly elevated vantage point.
Such individualism and resourcefulness would be frowned upon today and actively discouraged as we are all expected to follow HSE’s guidelines and state ‘advice’ by remaining ‘safe’ in our homes.
And this is the way the state wants you, a dutiful ‘citizen’ following rules and regulations like watching the gap between the train and the platform edge or nor forgetting to take your luggage with you when leave it. Self-expression and initiative are not encouraged, only obedience to state dictat and political correctness.
So when the credit crunch turns into empty supermarket shelves, widespread poverty and deprivation, our movers and shakers having worn our nerves to be bone with stress and anxiety and deprived us of our spirit of self-sufficiency and survival, will we be expected, like sheep, to welcome with open arms their new world order, that dark prison they’ve got planned for our ‘own good and well-being’.
Or we will awake from this robotic mind-controlled state and start to think again for ourselves and cast aside the obstacles and those politically correct direction signs which are leading us completely down the wrong road.
The widespread disruption caused, what by any measure, would have been pretty typical winter conditions a few decades ago, demonstrates the rather spineless state in which our society finds itself today.
No buses in London yesterday, schools closed across the country, no bin collections etc etc, as officials agree that snow on the roads could cause buses to slide into gutters and endanger lives. The country seems to be full of hi-vi-vested individuals standing around shying away from potential dangers as HSE rule books advise against taking risk, suggesting that to stay indoors is the safer option.
Clearly the world is becoming to scary a place as social psychologists have, through the media, made us fearful of it and the consequences. I see this as just part of a conditioning process to have us all live in a state of fearfulness. ‘Stay at home’, ‘Don’t travel unless it’s absolutely necessary’, ‘Don’t send the kids to school as they might not be able to get home again’.
During the winter of 1963 in the uplands of north west County Durham, the conditions we are witnessing now would have been regarded as an average winter day, while school buses would have run, albeit a bit delayed, despite the conditions with us ‘scholars’ helping to push the them out of snow drifts when necessary. I clearly recall all the boys in my year having to dig a trench just to the physics building at the bottom of the playground for our 'physie' lessons where the there was no heating. We sat there in heavy overcoats and scarves and just got on with things. At lunchtime we would go the local railway station and see heavy steam-hauled freight trains battle through the snow amid driving winds and blizzards. It was a challenge and we were all exhilarated by it. I remember my feet being continuously numb from cold from seven in the morning to the early hours of the following morning when the warmth of the bedclothes finally thawed them out. No central heating then just draughty coal fires.
Only when the drifts reached impossible heights did the buses stop running and then it was a case of bed down in the school gym, or for us more hardy souls, make the seven mile journey home on foot clambering over abandoned vehicles buried beneath the drifts and having the unique enjoyment of seeing the surrounding landscape from a newly elevated vantage point.
Such individualism and resourcefulness would be frowned upon today and actively discouraged as we are all expected to follow HSE’s guidelines and state ‘advice’ by remaining ‘safe’ in our homes.
And this is the way the state wants you, a dutiful ‘citizen’ following rules and regulations like watching the gap between the train and the platform edge or nor forgetting to take your luggage with you when leave it. Self-expression and initiative are not encouraged, only obedience to state dictat and political correctness.
So when the credit crunch turns into empty supermarket shelves, widespread poverty and deprivation, our movers and shakers having worn our nerves to be bone with stress and anxiety and deprived us of our spirit of self-sufficiency and survival, will we be expected, like sheep, to welcome with open arms their new world order, that dark prison they’ve got planned for our ‘own good and well-being’.
Or we will awake from this robotic mind-controlled state and start to think again for ourselves and cast aside the obstacles and those politically correct direction signs which are leading us completely down the wrong road.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Blair out, Stephenson in
They eat ’em up and spit ’em out. That’s senior civil servants, politicians and high profile police commissioners who are on the front line in the service of the ultimate controlling cabal. Following the departure of Sir Ian Blair, whose reputation was severly tarnished in the public eye and that of the Met itself, because of the duplicitous things that had been asked of him, particularly in reference to the phony war on terror - Charles de Menezes and all that - his replacement, Sir Paul Stephenson, the officer responsible for the recent arrest of Damian Green, will no doubt become the new punch bag. His appointment has been greeted with mixed emotions, the official Met Police blog site viewing it with apprehension. No doubt his appointment will bring more government micro-management of the force. It’s pretty plain to see that there’s growing dissatisfaction within the police force and particularly the Met, in the way that real issues seems to be brushed under the carpet and politicised regulation becomes more and more evident.
When we are fast approaching a time when the police force are going to be in the front line against Disgruntled UK plc as financial chaos strikes, I hope that many in the ranks of the force get up and walk out, particularly if they are asked to perform unpleasant duties in controlling a pissed-off duped general public that has been sold down the river by the central banking cabal.
In the States, I get the impression that law enforcement today has more in common with the Wild West. Recruits for the burgeoning ranks of the police force seem to be elected on their lower-than-average IQ and former criminal credentials and well they might in a country that has built hundreds of FEMA camps whose future inmates look like being average American citizens.
The National Emergency Centers Act or HR 645, a new bill just introduced to Congress, mandates the establishment of “national emergency centers” to be located on military installations for the purpose of to providing “temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster,” according to the bill.
There is every prospect that these powers will be put into use as I can clearly see a day, not far from now, when the current financial crisis finally causes the complete collapse of the American economy - not to mention our own and many others - and when mass riots on US streets will make those already witnessed in Iceland and Greece, look like a tea party.
With the US military to help them, many batallions already in position and waiting, I just wonder how many of their ranks might abandon their official duties and join the rebels. It’s that kind of commitment and protest we need if we are to fight this monster.
Put that camera down!
To support the notion that the police are to be given sweeping powers over us in future, the news today tells us that photographing the police in Britain is to become illegal.
Just what might this immunity from the photographic forays by the general public provide? An attempt to avoid accountability should a member of the public see an officer behaving outside the law; have the police now risen to such an ascendant position that they cannot be convicted of any wrong-doing and are entirely above any law?
Only recently, as Paul Watson at infowars.com reminds us, “film-maker Darren Pollard was clearing up flood debris from his front garden when he noticed the police harassing a youth opposite his house. Darren retrieved his camera and began filming the officers. After noticing Pollard, the officers approached and then tried to claim that it was illegal to film them. After being informed by their superior that it was not illegal to film police, the officers left the scene”.
According to the British Journal of Photography, the Counter-Terrorism Act, due to become law on February 16 and in which this directive is embedded, says that this legislation “allows for the arrest and imprisonment of anyone who takes pictures of officers ‘likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism’.”
Who decides what constitutes an act of pre-meditated terrorism? Anything might on the whim of the officer in the viewfinder. Police are now to become immune to photographic accountability while we, the general public, are endlessly photographed by CCTV and other types of surveillance cameras, dozens, if not hundreds, of times every day. The state is becoming omnipresent, we are merely the guilty-until-proven-innocent-immediately-to-be-potentially-guilty-again serfs of that state. Already press photographers have been approached and often detained for photographing police officers.
And what about plain clothes officers or those that are covertly employed in dressing up as protestors to initiate unrest in otherwise peaceful public demonstrations as has been uncovered on many occasions in the past? Where is public redress if using photographic or video evidence in the event of such an instance, withdrawn.
Once the police existed to serve and protect us. Like everything else these days morals and social decency are being deliberately turned on their head and now it is we who must serve the police state without any argument.
When we are fast approaching a time when the police force are going to be in the front line against Disgruntled UK plc as financial chaos strikes, I hope that many in the ranks of the force get up and walk out, particularly if they are asked to perform unpleasant duties in controlling a pissed-off duped general public that has been sold down the river by the central banking cabal.
In the States, I get the impression that law enforcement today has more in common with the Wild West. Recruits for the burgeoning ranks of the police force seem to be elected on their lower-than-average IQ and former criminal credentials and well they might in a country that has built hundreds of FEMA camps whose future inmates look like being average American citizens.
The National Emergency Centers Act or HR 645, a new bill just introduced to Congress, mandates the establishment of “national emergency centers” to be located on military installations for the purpose of to providing “temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster,” according to the bill.
There is every prospect that these powers will be put into use as I can clearly see a day, not far from now, when the current financial crisis finally causes the complete collapse of the American economy - not to mention our own and many others - and when mass riots on US streets will make those already witnessed in Iceland and Greece, look like a tea party.
With the US military to help them, many batallions already in position and waiting, I just wonder how many of their ranks might abandon their official duties and join the rebels. It’s that kind of commitment and protest we need if we are to fight this monster.
Put that camera down!
To support the notion that the police are to be given sweeping powers over us in future, the news today tells us that photographing the police in Britain is to become illegal.
Just what might this immunity from the photographic forays by the general public provide? An attempt to avoid accountability should a member of the public see an officer behaving outside the law; have the police now risen to such an ascendant position that they cannot be convicted of any wrong-doing and are entirely above any law?
Only recently, as Paul Watson at infowars.com reminds us, “film-maker Darren Pollard was clearing up flood debris from his front garden when he noticed the police harassing a youth opposite his house. Darren retrieved his camera and began filming the officers. After noticing Pollard, the officers approached and then tried to claim that it was illegal to film them. After being informed by their superior that it was not illegal to film police, the officers left the scene”.
According to the British Journal of Photography, the Counter-Terrorism Act, due to become law on February 16 and in which this directive is embedded, says that this legislation “allows for the arrest and imprisonment of anyone who takes pictures of officers ‘likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism’.”
Who decides what constitutes an act of pre-meditated terrorism? Anything might on the whim of the officer in the viewfinder. Police are now to become immune to photographic accountability while we, the general public, are endlessly photographed by CCTV and other types of surveillance cameras, dozens, if not hundreds, of times every day. The state is becoming omnipresent, we are merely the guilty-until-proven-innocent-immediately-to-be-potentially-guilty-again serfs of that state. Already press photographers have been approached and often detained for photographing police officers.
And what about plain clothes officers or those that are covertly employed in dressing up as protestors to initiate unrest in otherwise peaceful public demonstrations as has been uncovered on many occasions in the past? Where is public redress if using photographic or video evidence in the event of such an instance, withdrawn.
Once the police existed to serve and protect us. Like everything else these days morals and social decency are being deliberately turned on their head and now it is we who must serve the police state without any argument.
Wednesday, November 05, 2008
Obaminess rules!
And so, predictably, amid hails of adulation from the suckered masses, Obama has become 44th US president. The usual display of American-bred hysteria was on view, some believing Obama to be to be the saviour, others the panacea to all of America’s current woes.
In some ways I can understand the euphoria and it only underlines a collective grief among Americans over White House policy and the wholly dysfunctional state of the country right now.
In a much more moderated way, I watched Tony Blair’s entrance to number 10 with hope and relief after years of Thatcherism. In Gordon Brown’s, appearance on Desert Island Discs, just before the election of New Labour, he imparted a message of justice and fairness, one which even had me posting a cheque of support to Labour Party HQ! How times change and how naievety falsely colours one’s understandings of the world. I have moved on since then, and what an eye-opener it has been. Since Blair’s inauguration, what had gone before under Thatcher seems tame in retrospect. Within the span of his premiership, great swathes of our freedoms were plunged into jeopardy, a fledgling police state established and an illegal war engaged upon, not to mention all of the lies, spin and deceit.
Similar hopes among the American electorate will soon evaporate too, as Obama’s policies (or more accurately, those policies demanded of him by those above) will appear as nothing more than a continuum of the Bush legacy. Paul Watson of infowars.com lists those policies which Obama has already publicly aired, but which seemingly missed the radar of his idolators:
- The creation of a “civilian national security force” that is “just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the U.S. military to enforce his carbon tax scheme and the total regulation and control of the American middle class.
- Intent to bomb Pakistan under the guise of pursuing terrorists, continuing a Bush administration policy of violating the sovereignty of foreign nations.
- The guarantee to “bankrupt” coal power plants, costing millions of American jobs and skyrocketing energy prices.
- Unbridled implementation and expansion of the banker bailout that is hated by the majority of American citizens yet was vigorously promoted by both Obama and McCain. Doling out taxpayer’s money to Wall Street, causing rampant inflation, a lowering in living standards and the destruction of the dollar.
- A rhetorical support of the second amendment of an individual’s right to bear arms has been contradicted through his support of local gun ban laws, including his endorsement of a state ban on the sale and possession of handguns in Illinois.
- Grandstanding on the notion that he supports environmentalism with his climate change rhetoric, but his intention to extend biofuel subsidies will only accelerate price food costs that have already risen 75 per cent since 2002, causing economic distress and rioting in such countries as Haiti, Egypt, and Somalia, as well as deforestation on a massive scale.
How many times must we go through this repetitive scenario of unfulfilled promises from the new incumbents and their ongoing continuance of the already established policy of a preceding ‘opposition’, before we realise that election manifestos are pure bull, staged to capture our attention and swing our votes to endorse the already chosen party giving the appearance that ‘democracy’ is alive and well. It doesn’t exist. America’s future has already been formulated by think-tanks and secret committees and all possible resulting scenarios run through powerful super-computers while the most desirous outcome to those in control has already been chosen, for their understanding of the collective human psyche has become a fine art.
Both here and in the US, the two party system has become a sham. It is two sides of the same coin - identical. As long as we continue to elect the wrong horse every time and make no attempt to understand the real game play at work and disenfranchise both sides of that same coin, we will continue to be led down the road that the movers and shakers what us follow into a brief twilight and then eventual oblivion, for their plans for our future - which can easily be verified from their very own policy documents - are in sharp contrast to those we would hope for.
In some ways I can understand the euphoria and it only underlines a collective grief among Americans over White House policy and the wholly dysfunctional state of the country right now.
In a much more moderated way, I watched Tony Blair’s entrance to number 10 with hope and relief after years of Thatcherism. In Gordon Brown’s, appearance on Desert Island Discs, just before the election of New Labour, he imparted a message of justice and fairness, one which even had me posting a cheque of support to Labour Party HQ! How times change and how naievety falsely colours one’s understandings of the world. I have moved on since then, and what an eye-opener it has been. Since Blair’s inauguration, what had gone before under Thatcher seems tame in retrospect. Within the span of his premiership, great swathes of our freedoms were plunged into jeopardy, a fledgling police state established and an illegal war engaged upon, not to mention all of the lies, spin and deceit.
Similar hopes among the American electorate will soon evaporate too, as Obama’s policies (or more accurately, those policies demanded of him by those above) will appear as nothing more than a continuum of the Bush legacy. Paul Watson of infowars.com lists those policies which Obama has already publicly aired, but which seemingly missed the radar of his idolators:
- The creation of a “civilian national security force” that is “just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the U.S. military to enforce his carbon tax scheme and the total regulation and control of the American middle class.
- Intent to bomb Pakistan under the guise of pursuing terrorists, continuing a Bush administration policy of violating the sovereignty of foreign nations.
- The guarantee to “bankrupt” coal power plants, costing millions of American jobs and skyrocketing energy prices.
- Unbridled implementation and expansion of the banker bailout that is hated by the majority of American citizens yet was vigorously promoted by both Obama and McCain. Doling out taxpayer’s money to Wall Street, causing rampant inflation, a lowering in living standards and the destruction of the dollar.
- A rhetorical support of the second amendment of an individual’s right to bear arms has been contradicted through his support of local gun ban laws, including his endorsement of a state ban on the sale and possession of handguns in Illinois.
- Grandstanding on the notion that he supports environmentalism with his climate change rhetoric, but his intention to extend biofuel subsidies will only accelerate price food costs that have already risen 75 per cent since 2002, causing economic distress and rioting in such countries as Haiti, Egypt, and Somalia, as well as deforestation on a massive scale.
How many times must we go through this repetitive scenario of unfulfilled promises from the new incumbents and their ongoing continuance of the already established policy of a preceding ‘opposition’, before we realise that election manifestos are pure bull, staged to capture our attention and swing our votes to endorse the already chosen party giving the appearance that ‘democracy’ is alive and well. It doesn’t exist. America’s future has already been formulated by think-tanks and secret committees and all possible resulting scenarios run through powerful super-computers while the most desirous outcome to those in control has already been chosen, for their understanding of the collective human psyche has become a fine art.
Both here and in the US, the two party system has become a sham. It is two sides of the same coin - identical. As long as we continue to elect the wrong horse every time and make no attempt to understand the real game play at work and disenfranchise both sides of that same coin, we will continue to be led down the road that the movers and shakers what us follow into a brief twilight and then eventual oblivion, for their plans for our future - which can easily be verified from their very own policy documents - are in sharp contrast to those we would hope for.
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Tuesday 12 February 2008
Reactionary police state news continues to roll in. The latest ‘initiative’ is the ‘mosquito’, a high-frequency sound device that creates discomfort to under 25s when used.
The idea is to use the device to break up anti-social behaviour, but, as always, when dealing with social disbehaviour, reactionary measures always predominate and no thought is given to attempting to solve the root of the problem. This indiscriminating device, although, I would suspect is highly directional, would, nevertheless unnecessarily cause discomfort to innocent children in the vicinity and I would also guess that its medical effects, especially if repeatedly used, just haven’t been considered.
Of course, it doesn’t take a PhD to realise that reactionary measures such as these only further alienate those who are targeted and drive larger wedges between elements of society instead of creating co-operation - more draconian doctrine from the divide and rule camp.
The Children's Commissioner for England and the civil liberties group Liberty, are calling for them to be scrapped. They are rightfully concerned that there is an increasingly negative attitude being adopted by authorities in dealing with social problems.
Michigan State Police have just released a preposterous video entitled ‘7 Signs of Terrorism’ to encourage ‘snitching’ upon those who may seems to be indulging in terrorist acts. This has all of the Orwellian hallmarks of the ‘Youth League’ doctrine of spying on those who don’t fall into line, and owes nothing to those who commit genuine terrorism like the CIA or FBI who stage such terrorist activities usually designed as a prelude to eventually usher in this very same Orwellian dictat. If taken seriously it could just about incriminate everyone. When I take my camera to the States in a few weeks time and decide to take a few photos in public places I may well be setting myself up for a bit of trouble!
The idea is to use the device to break up anti-social behaviour, but, as always, when dealing with social disbehaviour, reactionary measures always predominate and no thought is given to attempting to solve the root of the problem. This indiscriminating device, although, I would suspect is highly directional, would, nevertheless unnecessarily cause discomfort to innocent children in the vicinity and I would also guess that its medical effects, especially if repeatedly used, just haven’t been considered.
Of course, it doesn’t take a PhD to realise that reactionary measures such as these only further alienate those who are targeted and drive larger wedges between elements of society instead of creating co-operation - more draconian doctrine from the divide and rule camp.
The Children's Commissioner for England and the civil liberties group Liberty, are calling for them to be scrapped. They are rightfully concerned that there is an increasingly negative attitude being adopted by authorities in dealing with social problems.
Michigan State Police have just released a preposterous video entitled ‘7 Signs of Terrorism’ to encourage ‘snitching’ upon those who may seems to be indulging in terrorist acts. This has all of the Orwellian hallmarks of the ‘Youth League’ doctrine of spying on those who don’t fall into line, and owes nothing to those who commit genuine terrorism like the CIA or FBI who stage such terrorist activities usually designed as a prelude to eventually usher in this very same Orwellian dictat. If taken seriously it could just about incriminate everyone. When I take my camera to the States in a few weeks time and decide to take a few photos in public places I may well be setting myself up for a bit of trouble!
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
New ‘security’ measures will only achieve in our further incarceration
Today, Gordon Brown announced increased security measures in railway stations, airports and ports in the government’s continued attempts to tackle terrorist attacks.
The BBC reported that “There will be new security barriers, vehicle exclusion zones and blast resistant buildings... Rail travellers at large stations will also face having their bags screened”.
In the words of Alex Jones “Let’s stop right there”.
Firstly, is this terrorist threat real or just a ruse invented by our government? Any serious research into the events of 7/7 and 24/7 clearly indicate that the true perpetrators were our own governments, whose intelligence agencies were using ‘patsies’ to carry out their dirty deeds. Moreover, the many stories of attempted bombings and would-be bombers very often invite derision because of their implausibility. The evidence is there in plenty, just go to the link below and find out for yourselves if you have your doubts. http://www.prisonplanet.com/archives/london/index.htm
Secondly, just what are baggage scans and inconveniencing hundreds of thousands of people at our railway stations going to achieve? Gordon Brown is obviously relying upon the unquestioning acquiescence of the British public if he thinks these measures will, in any way, deter a serious terrorist attack. With only 250 stations earmarked for heightened security checks, that leaves several thousand unchecked for the would-be terrorist to choose from. Are they going to check all those arriving at mainline stations by train? Are they going to police the thousands of miles of trackside throughout Britain or monitor provincial bus stations or, indeed, every square inch of the country? Of course not. The whole thing is totally preposterous, disingenuous and a gross insult to the British public.
Railway security spends more of its time harassing enthusiasts for taking photographs of trains than ever discovering terrorist plots. Airport security staff spend all of their time inconveniencing passengers by seizing their belongings and embarrassing them by having the old and infirm half undress in public as if they were enemies of the state.
We are denied transparent and fair inquiries into the seminal events of 9/11 and 7/7 and fobbed off with incredulous ‘official’ reports which gloss over the whole plethora of unanswered questions of what was supposed to have happened on those fateful days and are expected to then to believe that we are living in times of great danger from terrorism. Do we just take the government’s word for that?
Of course it has little or nothing to do with terrorism but everything to do with incarcerating us in a police state where we have to conform to these gross intrusions of our privacy, rights and mobility purely because Brown’s fascist government is carrying out the orders of a bunch of crazed and murderous New World Order élite.
Complain unceasingly to your MPs and don’t put up with it!
The BBC reported that “There will be new security barriers, vehicle exclusion zones and blast resistant buildings... Rail travellers at large stations will also face having their bags screened”.
In the words of Alex Jones “Let’s stop right there”.
Firstly, is this terrorist threat real or just a ruse invented by our government? Any serious research into the events of 7/7 and 24/7 clearly indicate that the true perpetrators were our own governments, whose intelligence agencies were using ‘patsies’ to carry out their dirty deeds. Moreover, the many stories of attempted bombings and would-be bombers very often invite derision because of their implausibility. The evidence is there in plenty, just go to the link below and find out for yourselves if you have your doubts. http://www.prisonplanet.com/archives/london/index.htm
Secondly, just what are baggage scans and inconveniencing hundreds of thousands of people at our railway stations going to achieve? Gordon Brown is obviously relying upon the unquestioning acquiescence of the British public if he thinks these measures will, in any way, deter a serious terrorist attack. With only 250 stations earmarked for heightened security checks, that leaves several thousand unchecked for the would-be terrorist to choose from. Are they going to check all those arriving at mainline stations by train? Are they going to police the thousands of miles of trackside throughout Britain or monitor provincial bus stations or, indeed, every square inch of the country? Of course not. The whole thing is totally preposterous, disingenuous and a gross insult to the British public.
Railway security spends more of its time harassing enthusiasts for taking photographs of trains than ever discovering terrorist plots. Airport security staff spend all of their time inconveniencing passengers by seizing their belongings and embarrassing them by having the old and infirm half undress in public as if they were enemies of the state.
We are denied transparent and fair inquiries into the seminal events of 9/11 and 7/7 and fobbed off with incredulous ‘official’ reports which gloss over the whole plethora of unanswered questions of what was supposed to have happened on those fateful days and are expected to then to believe that we are living in times of great danger from terrorism. Do we just take the government’s word for that?
Of course it has little or nothing to do with terrorism but everything to do with incarcerating us in a police state where we have to conform to these gross intrusions of our privacy, rights and mobility purely because Brown’s fascist government is carrying out the orders of a bunch of crazed and murderous New World Order élite.
Complain unceasingly to your MPs and don’t put up with it!
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Naomi Wolf and The End of America
In a lecture given at the University of Washington at Seattle earlier this month, author Naomi Wolf discusses her recent book 'The End of America" in which she draws frightening parallels between the America of today and Germany's decline from democracy into fascism in the 1930s.
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
Controlling your mind
Former Chief Medical Officer for Northern Finland, Dr Rauni Kilde was a well respected individual. She has held the highest medical positions in Lapland specialising in public health, health administration and tropical diseases, is listed in Who’s Who’s for the World, Medicine & Engineering and Science & Engineering and is a retired president of the Nursing College of Lapland. She has been regularly attending the lecture circuits of the world that deal with neuroscience and has acted as Finland’s representative to the World Health Organisation.
But what has consumed Dr Kilde’s attention is the growing use of mind control technologies by many world governments and their military. Her well-researched and produced TV documentary on this very subject only received one airing and was then withdrawn from the airwaves. Indeed her involvement in this dangerous subject has brought her a life of hell. The very mind controlling techniques that she has for so long tried to bring to public attention are now being used against her along with a programme of directed sabotage and theft of her property and her computer which has become unusable because of constant hacking.
The warning
In an article in the Canadian newspaper yesterday, reporter Lucien Desjardins conveyed her shocking warning to the world of advanced plans by certain governments in the US and Europe, to microchip all newborns.
"Implanted human beings can be followed anywhere. Their brain functions can be remotely monitored by supercomputers and even altered through the changing of frequencies," wrote Dr Kilde. "Guinea pigs in secret experiments have included prisoners, soldiers, mental patients, handicapped children, deaf and blind people, homosexuals, single women, the elderly, school children, and any group of people considered "marginal" by the elite experimenters. The published experiences of prisoners in Utah State Prison, for example, are shocking to the conscience.
"Today's microchips operate by means of low-frequency radio waves that target them. With the help of satellites, the implanted person can be tracked anywhere on the globe. Such a technique was among a number tested in the Iraq war, according to Dr. Carl Sanders, who invented the intelligence-manned interface (IMI) biotic, which is injected into people. (Earlier during the Vietnam War, soldiers were injected with the Rambo chip, designed to increase adrenaline flow into the bloodstream.) The 20-billion-bit/second supercomputers at the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) could now "see and hear" what soldiers experience in the battlefield with a remote monitoring system (RMS).
"When a 5-micromillimeter microchip (the diameter of a strand of hair is 50 micromillimeters) is placed into optical nerve of the eye,", Dr. Kilde indicates "it draws neuro-impulses from the brain that embody the experiences, smells, sights, and voice of the implanted person. Once transferred and stored in a computer, these neuro-impulses can be projected back to the person's brain via the microchip to be re-experienced. Using a RMS, a land-based computer operator can send electromagnetic messages (encoded as signals) to the nervous system, affecting the target's performance. With RMS, healthy persons can be induced to see hallucinations and to hear voices in their heads. "
"Every thought, reaction, hearing, and visual observation causes a certain neurological potential, spikes, and patterns in the brain and its electromagnetic fields, which can now be decoded into thoughts, pictures, and voices, " Dr. Kilde added. "Electromagnetic stimulation can therefore change a person's brainwaves and affect muscular activity, causing painful muscular cramps experienced as torture."
Scary! It sounds like the stuff of science fiction. But is it?
Background
According to Ken Adachi http://educate-yourself.org/mc/ and a wealth of supporting literature on the subject, plans to create a mind controlled workers society have been on the books for some time. Fritz Lang’s ‘Metropolis’ and George Orwell’s ‘1984’ are just two powerful portrayals of such a world and to many seem rather fantastic and removed, yet that reality could be closer than we think if one follows the train of development of mind control technologies that have been quietly forming in the deepest shadows of equally shady government programmes and willed by a new world order hell bent on engaging in tight control of our lives for their own ends.
The current technology arose out of experiments staged by the Nazis before and during World War II. The incarceration of the Jews in concentration camps during the war provided a wealth of experimental material which included testing mind control technologies both trauma and electronic-based. Under the auspices of ‘Project Paperclip’ at the end of the war, thousands of Nazis were secretly moved to the US where the technologies that had been developed in Germany both before and during the war encompassing rocket science and, more worryingly, psychological and mind control techniques, were further developed. At this time thousands of children, often dispossessed, were snatched off the streets and used as guinea pigs in mind control experiments staged in covert underground facilities developed by the ever powerful military industrial complex in league with rogue elements of government.
Governments had also been experimenting with mind control using methods that had grown out of old occult techniques where victims were subject to a massive psychological and physical trauma at an early age. This which would then create a form of schizophrenia, or multiple ‘personalities’, and some of these ‘personalities’ could then be programmed without the awareness of parallel ‘personalities’, to undertake a specific task, for instance, murder. To unlock the particular personality which would have been programmed to carry out such a frightful task without remorse, a ‘trigger’ would be sent to the brain, often in the form of a sound, word or particular impulse.
The Montauk Boys
Experiments with Extra Low Frequency (ELF) techniques were conducted from an underground facility at the old USAF base at Fort Hero at Montauk on Long Island, New York in the 70s. In his book ‘The Montauk Project’, Preston B Nichols, claims that he was employed at this facility, to work on a clandestine project. That project involved the use of ELF waves, or ‘telepathic waves’ to effect the brain. His discovery came when examining the abilities of psychics, Nicholls found that at a certain time each day their minds would become ‘jammed’ and would be unable to think effectively. To locate the source of this ‘jamming’ which Nichols suspected was some sort of radio interference, he found that emissions in the 410-430MHz region were routinely being transmitted from a radar array on the old base at the same time as these ‘jamming’ experiences were taking place in the psychics’ minds and it is these precise frequencies that resonate with an adult’s head. By modulating a pulsed ELF signal onto a 410-430MHz carrier wave of around 16Hz - a frequency the brain is highly sensitive to - serious manipulation of brain functions can occur.
The radar array was, in fact, part of a covert government programme into the mind controlling effects of ELF waves and on several occasions when the array was transmitting, strange and bizarre things would happen in the nearby town of Montauk. These would manifest themselves as a sudden spike in crime which would suddenly stop after two hours, animals would come out of the surrounding woods into the town en masse and sometimes would crash though windows and behave in erratic ways. Freak storms would also occur. Subsequent investigations by Nichols revealed that these behaviour patterns and meteorological phenomena could be directly traced to the ELF transmission times from the radar array.
Starting in 1976 and throughout the 1980’s, Al Bielek, a participant who was involved in many aspects of this mind control programme at Montauk, estimates that at least 250,000 kidnapped teenage children were ‘programmed’, not only at Montauk but at 25 other clandestine facilities, to go into action at some later time of life at the behest of black government to undertake - on the receipt of the ‘trigger’ - some destructive or disruptive conduct. Other boys grew up to enter mainstream American life in influential positions in the media, business, medical and legal professions, law enforcement and the military. They would do their master’s bidding, acting from the warped perspective of their pre-programmed minds.
When one considers the almost pathological support given by many people from news anchors, research scientists to politicians over matters that balanced minds would question, on a whole number of subjects from the use of toxic elements in drugs and vaccines to the outragreous and continued presence of the US in Iraq, which by any humane criterion would be viewed as insane, then one can add credence to the claims of Bielek.
Advanced psychological weaponry
However, the day is fast approaching when not just hand-picked individuals will be subject to these enormities, but all of us.
In reality, the arsenal of psychotronic and electromagnetic weapons now available to organisations such as the CIA is way ahead of our common conception. In his recent book ‘Hidden Truth, Forbidden Knowledge’, Disclosure Project brainchild, Dr Steven Greer MD, tells of his chilling experiences with such clandestine might. Dr Greer’s lifelong attempts to make public the knowledge by high ranking officials from government and the military that extraterrestrials are, and have been present upon our planet for some time and that a clandestine element of the US government is using the Star Wars project as a military affront to these benign extraterrestrial intelligences, whose technological ability and intellect is far superior to ours: http://www.disclosureproject.org/ has been hounded by the very black government-sponsored intelligence agencies to whom his criticism is directed.
Dr Greer, from an early age, developed a psychic ability that enabled him to communicate with these extraterrestrial intelligences to the point that he gleaned an enormous amount of information both about their concern for our worldly sanity and lack of it and the human rogue element who are determined to eradicate them from the skies using advanced weaponry, much of it developed from captured alien craft. Failing to pay Greer off through promises of wealth and power, these clandestine elements of government - who even the then CIA Director, James Woolsey, was even unaware - and the military industrial complex staged psychotronic warfare with Greer, whose heightened psychic abilities enabled him to confirm its source, but often paralysing him with severe cramps in bed and even simultaneously inducing metastatic cancer in both he and Shari Adamiak, his colleague, Shari later dying from it in 1998.
So the technology available to these covert elements of government and their agencies is awesome.
The emerging control grid
As well as the threat of obligatory micro chipping all newborns, is the growing microwave grid.
Everywhere antennae towers are being erected, in some places far more than would seem plausible for mere mobile phone transmissions. Unless a company tries to erect one just outside your back garden evoking the wrath of its neighbours, their appearance is largely taken for granted as the spectre of these arrays falls into the human subconcious and becomes part of the largely accepted environment.
As Ken Adachi comments: “It's not an accident that the frequency band chosen for cell phone use just happens to match the second order waves that Wilhelm Reich discovered in the late 1940's to effect thought transmission and allow the mind to be manipulated without the victim realizing it”. Although today the sheer unwieldiness of low frequency antennae makes them impracticable, microwave and UHF frequencies have been utilised to carry low frequency, pulsed signals which can seriously interfere with human brain functions. Therefore it comes as disturbing news that the new TETRA system utilised by the UKs emergency and police services uses a 350-400MHz carrier signal to carry 17.6MHz pulsed signals, precisely those frequencies that effect the human brain and can cause fits and epilectic reactions.
According to a document criticising TETRA http://www.hippy.freeserve.co.uk/tetra.htm Sir William Stewart, former chair of the Microbiological Research Authority when asked to comment on the chosen frequency usage of TETRA commented: “It appears that the government officials who provided input to the Stewart Report were well aware of the Airwave specifications at the time, but chose not to inform the Independent Expert Group about the TETRA technology, and remained quiet when it came to the issues of low frequency effects”.
In an article by Tim Rifat, the owner of Psi-Ops Management http://www.whale.to/b/rifat6.html he claims that “the British government is in the process of mind controlling the entire UK population using CIA research from the Pandora Project and the so-called TETRA system which costs £2.5 billion will place 30,000 transmitters in every urban conurbation in the UK. Further to this, the British Army has long experience of using microwaves for murder and mind control in Northern Ireland. In 1977, the CIA contacted Margaret Thatcher and gave her all the details, ELF frequencies, to induce cancer, paranoia (4.5 Hz), depression (6.66 Hz), manic rage (11.3 Hz) --- To support this assertion that the British Army have been targeting Catholic areas with high-power microwaves, Dr Damien Burn - 38 years General Practitioner in the Falls Road, West Belfast - and Mary Allen, South Armagh Cross Maglen - have protested vehemently that British Army bases are broadcasting high-power microwaves, causing massive cancer deaths among the Catholics.
“Strange cancers which never would occur are being found in many Catholics and the largest cause of death in Catholics now is cancer. Whole street-fulls of Catholics next to army bases are dying of cancer. This was reported by Amanda Doherty in the Sunday Mirror, 12.07.98, in the Features Eire edition: Living in Fear, the Cancer that Stalks our Streets.
“The microwaving of peace protesters in Greenham Common, a US airbase in Britain, is common knowledge. The murder and mind control by the British Army of the entire Catholic community of Northern Ireland is not. Taking this into account with the TETRA system that seeks to turn British police and the public into zombies using microwave and ELF, the deployment of microwave transmitters in Cyprus has a more covertly nasty raison d'etre than simply extending NATO's communication network”.
With these illustrations of past use, to what emergency capability might TETRA be put? In what circumstances might government feel it is fit to utilise this grid as a means of control over its citizens?
Conclusion
Is our government, the military and police really going to engage a mind control war upon its citizens? You may consider this all really too far-fetched, yet the evidence and historical precedent is in the public domain to support such contentions.
Don’t forget that this world is run by a mere handful - relatively speaking - of highly influential, control maniacs with no respect for you and I and have gained the upper hand with regard to our destiny, whether it be the control of banks, governments, industry, the pharmaceutical and health industries, the mass media etc. etc. in tandem with the most awesome advanced technologies we can only guess at.
With careful manipulation - and yes, mind control - of those beneath them in the cascading hierarchy of pyramidal control, where each individual, or set of individuals, is only aware on a need to know basis, very often fed ‘spun’ truths and misinformation about what it is that he or she is undertaking, this whole Big Brother nightmare scenario could and is emerging. Half the battle is to find out what is going on, then at least you can identify the global enemy and try to prepare yourself.
But what has consumed Dr Kilde’s attention is the growing use of mind control technologies by many world governments and their military. Her well-researched and produced TV documentary on this very subject only received one airing and was then withdrawn from the airwaves. Indeed her involvement in this dangerous subject has brought her a life of hell. The very mind controlling techniques that she has for so long tried to bring to public attention are now being used against her along with a programme of directed sabotage and theft of her property and her computer which has become unusable because of constant hacking.
The warning
In an article in the Canadian newspaper yesterday, reporter Lucien Desjardins conveyed her shocking warning to the world of advanced plans by certain governments in the US and Europe, to microchip all newborns.
"Implanted human beings can be followed anywhere. Their brain functions can be remotely monitored by supercomputers and even altered through the changing of frequencies," wrote Dr Kilde. "Guinea pigs in secret experiments have included prisoners, soldiers, mental patients, handicapped children, deaf and blind people, homosexuals, single women, the elderly, school children, and any group of people considered "marginal" by the elite experimenters. The published experiences of prisoners in Utah State Prison, for example, are shocking to the conscience.
"Today's microchips operate by means of low-frequency radio waves that target them. With the help of satellites, the implanted person can be tracked anywhere on the globe. Such a technique was among a number tested in the Iraq war, according to Dr. Carl Sanders, who invented the intelligence-manned interface (IMI) biotic, which is injected into people. (Earlier during the Vietnam War, soldiers were injected with the Rambo chip, designed to increase adrenaline flow into the bloodstream.) The 20-billion-bit/second supercomputers at the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) could now "see and hear" what soldiers experience in the battlefield with a remote monitoring system (RMS).
"When a 5-micromillimeter microchip (the diameter of a strand of hair is 50 micromillimeters) is placed into optical nerve of the eye,", Dr. Kilde indicates "it draws neuro-impulses from the brain that embody the experiences, smells, sights, and voice of the implanted person. Once transferred and stored in a computer, these neuro-impulses can be projected back to the person's brain via the microchip to be re-experienced. Using a RMS, a land-based computer operator can send electromagnetic messages (encoded as signals) to the nervous system, affecting the target's performance. With RMS, healthy persons can be induced to see hallucinations and to hear voices in their heads. "
"Every thought, reaction, hearing, and visual observation causes a certain neurological potential, spikes, and patterns in the brain and its electromagnetic fields, which can now be decoded into thoughts, pictures, and voices, " Dr. Kilde added. "Electromagnetic stimulation can therefore change a person's brainwaves and affect muscular activity, causing painful muscular cramps experienced as torture."
Scary! It sounds like the stuff of science fiction. But is it?
Background
According to Ken Adachi http://educate-yourself.org/mc/ and a wealth of supporting literature on the subject, plans to create a mind controlled workers society have been on the books for some time. Fritz Lang’s ‘Metropolis’ and George Orwell’s ‘1984’ are just two powerful portrayals of such a world and to many seem rather fantastic and removed, yet that reality could be closer than we think if one follows the train of development of mind control technologies that have been quietly forming in the deepest shadows of equally shady government programmes and willed by a new world order hell bent on engaging in tight control of our lives for their own ends.
The current technology arose out of experiments staged by the Nazis before and during World War II. The incarceration of the Jews in concentration camps during the war provided a wealth of experimental material which included testing mind control technologies both trauma and electronic-based. Under the auspices of ‘Project Paperclip’ at the end of the war, thousands of Nazis were secretly moved to the US where the technologies that had been developed in Germany both before and during the war encompassing rocket science and, more worryingly, psychological and mind control techniques, were further developed. At this time thousands of children, often dispossessed, were snatched off the streets and used as guinea pigs in mind control experiments staged in covert underground facilities developed by the ever powerful military industrial complex in league with rogue elements of government.
Governments had also been experimenting with mind control using methods that had grown out of old occult techniques where victims were subject to a massive psychological and physical trauma at an early age. This which would then create a form of schizophrenia, or multiple ‘personalities’, and some of these ‘personalities’ could then be programmed without the awareness of parallel ‘personalities’, to undertake a specific task, for instance, murder. To unlock the particular personality which would have been programmed to carry out such a frightful task without remorse, a ‘trigger’ would be sent to the brain, often in the form of a sound, word or particular impulse.
The Montauk Boys
Experiments with Extra Low Frequency (ELF) techniques were conducted from an underground facility at the old USAF base at Fort Hero at Montauk on Long Island, New York in the 70s. In his book ‘The Montauk Project’, Preston B Nichols, claims that he was employed at this facility, to work on a clandestine project. That project involved the use of ELF waves, or ‘telepathic waves’ to effect the brain. His discovery came when examining the abilities of psychics, Nicholls found that at a certain time each day their minds would become ‘jammed’ and would be unable to think effectively. To locate the source of this ‘jamming’ which Nichols suspected was some sort of radio interference, he found that emissions in the 410-430MHz region were routinely being transmitted from a radar array on the old base at the same time as these ‘jamming’ experiences were taking place in the psychics’ minds and it is these precise frequencies that resonate with an adult’s head. By modulating a pulsed ELF signal onto a 410-430MHz carrier wave of around 16Hz - a frequency the brain is highly sensitive to - serious manipulation of brain functions can occur.
The radar array was, in fact, part of a covert government programme into the mind controlling effects of ELF waves and on several occasions when the array was transmitting, strange and bizarre things would happen in the nearby town of Montauk. These would manifest themselves as a sudden spike in crime which would suddenly stop after two hours, animals would come out of the surrounding woods into the town en masse and sometimes would crash though windows and behave in erratic ways. Freak storms would also occur. Subsequent investigations by Nichols revealed that these behaviour patterns and meteorological phenomena could be directly traced to the ELF transmission times from the radar array.
Starting in 1976 and throughout the 1980’s, Al Bielek, a participant who was involved in many aspects of this mind control programme at Montauk, estimates that at least 250,000 kidnapped teenage children were ‘programmed’, not only at Montauk but at 25 other clandestine facilities, to go into action at some later time of life at the behest of black government to undertake - on the receipt of the ‘trigger’ - some destructive or disruptive conduct. Other boys grew up to enter mainstream American life in influential positions in the media, business, medical and legal professions, law enforcement and the military. They would do their master’s bidding, acting from the warped perspective of their pre-programmed minds.
When one considers the almost pathological support given by many people from news anchors, research scientists to politicians over matters that balanced minds would question, on a whole number of subjects from the use of toxic elements in drugs and vaccines to the outragreous and continued presence of the US in Iraq, which by any humane criterion would be viewed as insane, then one can add credence to the claims of Bielek.
Advanced psychological weaponry
However, the day is fast approaching when not just hand-picked individuals will be subject to these enormities, but all of us.
In reality, the arsenal of psychotronic and electromagnetic weapons now available to organisations such as the CIA is way ahead of our common conception. In his recent book ‘Hidden Truth, Forbidden Knowledge’, Disclosure Project brainchild, Dr Steven Greer MD, tells of his chilling experiences with such clandestine might. Dr Greer’s lifelong attempts to make public the knowledge by high ranking officials from government and the military that extraterrestrials are, and have been present upon our planet for some time and that a clandestine element of the US government is using the Star Wars project as a military affront to these benign extraterrestrial intelligences, whose technological ability and intellect is far superior to ours: http://www.disclosureproject.org/ has been hounded by the very black government-sponsored intelligence agencies to whom his criticism is directed.
Dr Greer, from an early age, developed a psychic ability that enabled him to communicate with these extraterrestrial intelligences to the point that he gleaned an enormous amount of information both about their concern for our worldly sanity and lack of it and the human rogue element who are determined to eradicate them from the skies using advanced weaponry, much of it developed from captured alien craft. Failing to pay Greer off through promises of wealth and power, these clandestine elements of government - who even the then CIA Director, James Woolsey, was even unaware - and the military industrial complex staged psychotronic warfare with Greer, whose heightened psychic abilities enabled him to confirm its source, but often paralysing him with severe cramps in bed and even simultaneously inducing metastatic cancer in both he and Shari Adamiak, his colleague, Shari later dying from it in 1998.
So the technology available to these covert elements of government and their agencies is awesome.
The emerging control grid
As well as the threat of obligatory micro chipping all newborns, is the growing microwave grid.
Everywhere antennae towers are being erected, in some places far more than would seem plausible for mere mobile phone transmissions. Unless a company tries to erect one just outside your back garden evoking the wrath of its neighbours, their appearance is largely taken for granted as the spectre of these arrays falls into the human subconcious and becomes part of the largely accepted environment.
As Ken Adachi comments: “It's not an accident that the frequency band chosen for cell phone use just happens to match the second order waves that Wilhelm Reich discovered in the late 1940's to effect thought transmission and allow the mind to be manipulated without the victim realizing it”. Although today the sheer unwieldiness of low frequency antennae makes them impracticable, microwave and UHF frequencies have been utilised to carry low frequency, pulsed signals which can seriously interfere with human brain functions. Therefore it comes as disturbing news that the new TETRA system utilised by the UKs emergency and police services uses a 350-400MHz carrier signal to carry 17.6MHz pulsed signals, precisely those frequencies that effect the human brain and can cause fits and epilectic reactions.
According to a document criticising TETRA http://www.hippy.freeserve.co.uk/tetra.htm Sir William Stewart, former chair of the Microbiological Research Authority when asked to comment on the chosen frequency usage of TETRA commented: “It appears that the government officials who provided input to the Stewart Report were well aware of the Airwave specifications at the time, but chose not to inform the Independent Expert Group about the TETRA technology, and remained quiet when it came to the issues of low frequency effects”.
In an article by Tim Rifat, the owner of Psi-Ops Management http://www.whale.to/b/rifat6.html he claims that “the British government is in the process of mind controlling the entire UK population using CIA research from the Pandora Project and the so-called TETRA system which costs £2.5 billion will place 30,000 transmitters in every urban conurbation in the UK. Further to this, the British Army has long experience of using microwaves for murder and mind control in Northern Ireland. In 1977, the CIA contacted Margaret Thatcher and gave her all the details, ELF frequencies, to induce cancer, paranoia (4.5 Hz), depression (6.66 Hz), manic rage (11.3 Hz) --- To support this assertion that the British Army have been targeting Catholic areas with high-power microwaves, Dr Damien Burn - 38 years General Practitioner in the Falls Road, West Belfast - and Mary Allen, South Armagh Cross Maglen - have protested vehemently that British Army bases are broadcasting high-power microwaves, causing massive cancer deaths among the Catholics.
“Strange cancers which never would occur are being found in many Catholics and the largest cause of death in Catholics now is cancer. Whole street-fulls of Catholics next to army bases are dying of cancer. This was reported by Amanda Doherty in the Sunday Mirror, 12.07.98, in the Features Eire edition: Living in Fear, the Cancer that Stalks our Streets.
“The microwaving of peace protesters in Greenham Common, a US airbase in Britain, is common knowledge. The murder and mind control by the British Army of the entire Catholic community of Northern Ireland is not. Taking this into account with the TETRA system that seeks to turn British police and the public into zombies using microwave and ELF, the deployment of microwave transmitters in Cyprus has a more covertly nasty raison d'etre than simply extending NATO's communication network”.
With these illustrations of past use, to what emergency capability might TETRA be put? In what circumstances might government feel it is fit to utilise this grid as a means of control over its citizens?
Conclusion
Is our government, the military and police really going to engage a mind control war upon its citizens? You may consider this all really too far-fetched, yet the evidence and historical precedent is in the public domain to support such contentions.
Don’t forget that this world is run by a mere handful - relatively speaking - of highly influential, control maniacs with no respect for you and I and have gained the upper hand with regard to our destiny, whether it be the control of banks, governments, industry, the pharmaceutical and health industries, the mass media etc. etc. in tandem with the most awesome advanced technologies we can only guess at.
With careful manipulation - and yes, mind control - of those beneath them in the cascading hierarchy of pyramidal control, where each individual, or set of individuals, is only aware on a need to know basis, very often fed ‘spun’ truths and misinformation about what it is that he or she is undertaking, this whole Big Brother nightmare scenario could and is emerging. Half the battle is to find out what is going on, then at least you can identify the global enemy and try to prepare yourself.
Wednesday, November 22, 2006
Keeping us under their thumb
The day when each and every one of us in this country is tracked and traced throughout every minute of the day, 24/7, 365/12 is growing ever nearer.
With RFID tagging of our purchases, tracking and tracing of our cars, eavesdropping on our conversations at home through the in-built microphones in our PCs, ID Cards etc, etc already being rolled out, - and for those who think I am exaggerating please go to http://www.prisonplanet.com/archive_big_brother.html - I am convinced that the end goal of the controlling elite is to be able to check up on us at will to elicit our whole lifestyle, movements, desires, conversations, in fact every aspect of our daily lives.
This is all coming into place in a drip by drip way and each day the media brings fresh news of the latest initiatives that form the building blocks of this total Big Brother surveillance society with further disciplinary initiatives for those who don’t behave in accordance with the NWO blueprint.
Today we see reports of a new police initiative to fingerprint all drivers who get stopped by them for whatever reason. Their prints, obtained by a hand-held electronic device will automatically consult with the national fingerprint database which comprises some 6.5 million prints and will enable them to confirm their identity, particularly useful if they have a criminal record.
Currently being trialled by 10 forces in England and Wales, the scheme is supposed to save time as identification can be processed within a few minutes and avoiding the need to take suspects to the police station.
The police say that these prints would not be kept if a person was not identified as having a criminal record, but are we to believe that they would not be retained on some database.
As with so many other similar Big Brother type initiatives, it’s sold to us as some innocent means of saving time and money and the public have nothing to fear if they are law-abiding citizens with no criminal record. Yet, it all smacks of being suspected as guilty until proved otherwise. The tables have turned. Whether we like it or not, in this brave new world we are all being regarded as potential criminals who have to prove our innocence. What a depressing state of affairs!
It’s happening everywhere too and seemingly with our consent as we dream walk in this surveillance state nightmare. In Dumfries and Galloway in Scotland 92% of parents agreed to a system whereby school children are to be fingerprinted to allow them to borrow books from school libraries. Again, it’s all sold on the basis of ease of operation - the kids who are fingerprinted will not require any assistance while borrowing their books. Objections to this scheme have been received from academics on civil liberties grounds, but the overwhelming agreement of the scheme by so many unthinking parents rather makes the civil liberty dissenters look rather marginal.
Currently such fingerprinting schemes, particularly those that require the transmission of the data to a central data bank, have to have the information files heavily compressed in order not to use up too much bandwidth and transmission time. It is this compression which worries the techies, as the infinitely subtle characteristics of fingerprints really require the best resolution to make accurate identifications. Clearly the economies being made could lead to false ID.
With news in the last few days of parents being subjected to ‘super nannies’ - government-sponsored adjudication of parenting for those with ASBO-potential kids, not ot mention the plethora of other initiatives that this government is rolling out by the barrel load; and whose reception is seemingly accepted by an acquiescing majority in the false belief that it is for their security or that it is for a safer society (completely bogus beliefs), I dread the thought of what kind of society we are going to end up living in in the next ten or twenty years.
But new entrants into our brave new world will see it as all being part of daily life and will have no concept of those old dearly-held values of freedom of speech and expression and the right to be regarded as innocent until proven guilty in a world where we could go about our business without state and corporate Big Brother breathing down our necks 24/7
With RFID tagging of our purchases, tracking and tracing of our cars, eavesdropping on our conversations at home through the in-built microphones in our PCs, ID Cards etc, etc already being rolled out, - and for those who think I am exaggerating please go to http://www.prisonplanet.com/archive_big_brother.html - I am convinced that the end goal of the controlling elite is to be able to check up on us at will to elicit our whole lifestyle, movements, desires, conversations, in fact every aspect of our daily lives.
This is all coming into place in a drip by drip way and each day the media brings fresh news of the latest initiatives that form the building blocks of this total Big Brother surveillance society with further disciplinary initiatives for those who don’t behave in accordance with the NWO blueprint.
Today we see reports of a new police initiative to fingerprint all drivers who get stopped by them for whatever reason. Their prints, obtained by a hand-held electronic device will automatically consult with the national fingerprint database which comprises some 6.5 million prints and will enable them to confirm their identity, particularly useful if they have a criminal record.
Currently being trialled by 10 forces in England and Wales, the scheme is supposed to save time as identification can be processed within a few minutes and avoiding the need to take suspects to the police station.
The police say that these prints would not be kept if a person was not identified as having a criminal record, but are we to believe that they would not be retained on some database.
As with so many other similar Big Brother type initiatives, it’s sold to us as some innocent means of saving time and money and the public have nothing to fear if they are law-abiding citizens with no criminal record. Yet, it all smacks of being suspected as guilty until proved otherwise. The tables have turned. Whether we like it or not, in this brave new world we are all being regarded as potential criminals who have to prove our innocence. What a depressing state of affairs!
It’s happening everywhere too and seemingly with our consent as we dream walk in this surveillance state nightmare. In Dumfries and Galloway in Scotland 92% of parents agreed to a system whereby school children are to be fingerprinted to allow them to borrow books from school libraries. Again, it’s all sold on the basis of ease of operation - the kids who are fingerprinted will not require any assistance while borrowing their books. Objections to this scheme have been received from academics on civil liberties grounds, but the overwhelming agreement of the scheme by so many unthinking parents rather makes the civil liberty dissenters look rather marginal.
Currently such fingerprinting schemes, particularly those that require the transmission of the data to a central data bank, have to have the information files heavily compressed in order not to use up too much bandwidth and transmission time. It is this compression which worries the techies, as the infinitely subtle characteristics of fingerprints really require the best resolution to make accurate identifications. Clearly the economies being made could lead to false ID.
With news in the last few days of parents being subjected to ‘super nannies’ - government-sponsored adjudication of parenting for those with ASBO-potential kids, not ot mention the plethora of other initiatives that this government is rolling out by the barrel load; and whose reception is seemingly accepted by an acquiescing majority in the false belief that it is for their security or that it is for a safer society (completely bogus beliefs), I dread the thought of what kind of society we are going to end up living in in the next ten or twenty years.
But new entrants into our brave new world will see it as all being part of daily life and will have no concept of those old dearly-held values of freedom of speech and expression and the right to be regarded as innocent until proven guilty in a world where we could go about our business without state and corporate Big Brother breathing down our necks 24/7
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
