THIS IS OF VITAL IMPORTANCE!!!!

Codex Alimentarius


In less than four months time, this monstrous piece of legislation will begin to bite into our daily lives, affecting each and everyone of us with real ramifications upon our health.

For me, having turned my life around through a healthy intake of dietary supplements and healthy foods to a point where I have almost conquered my diabetes and all of the debilitating side-effects it brought with it, these measures are pure insanity, but when viewed in tandem with the fluoridation of our water supplies and the imminent planned mass vaccination for the Swine Flu virus, with all of its highly toxic ingredients, the overall picture becomes ever more clearer - the further lining of the pockets of big pharma profits. But it is also clear that those who run this planet DO NOT have our health and well-being at their hearts - quite the contrary!

For the health-conscious among you out there, if you aren’t already familiar with Codex Alimentarius, I urge you to go to the following link, the contents of which will, hopefully, spur you into action. http://www.healthforyou.org/c/codex/codex-alimentarius.htm

I'm sorry I can't establish a direct link for the above it appears Google are now blocking links to what it regards as unacceptable sites!

By way of immediate action, I also urge you to go to the following link and sign a petition to the UK government - time is short! http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Vitamins/

The swine flu madness season draws closer

This is something we’re going to hear a lot about from this month onwards as the cabal who run this planet take a brave and desperate attempt to get us into submission mode and ready to take their specially prepared cocktail of toxic badies.

But they’ve got some task to perform as daily, the swine flu scam becomes ever-more transparent and increasingly takes on the look of a mass eugenics programme - albeit, perhaps, a slow-acting one.

Today’s news brings the shocking revelation of a leaked internal French government document in which plans for a compulsory swine flu vaccination programme are detailed. Medical establishments and GPs would be completely bypassed, with the government acting directly, clearly side-lining health care professionals. Despite claims given last week by French Health Minister, Roselyne Bachelot that vaccinations would be voluntary, the leaked internal document clearly prescribes forced vaccination for every French citizen complete with mobile vaccination units visiting every school in the country.

In a country whose citizens don't take government policy lying down - something we will need to do much more of in Britain - the French authorities will have a real fight on their hands. But with mandatory vaccination likely in all EU countries as well as in the US, we must all put up our hands and say HOLD ON! There is a massive amount of highly cogent information out there (not in the mainstream media, alas!) clearly showing the potential dangers of the swine flu vaccine and the highly suspect nature of its creation and it is incumbent on every single person to review this information to find out just what they are being asked to have injected into them, make an informed decision and not be cowed into accepting it willy nilly.

I urge everyone reading this blog, not already reasonably informed about swine flu and the vaccination programme, to go to the following links and pass on the information.

http://www.naturalnews.com/026955_swine_flu_vaccines_flu_vaccines.html

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/SwineFluNews/story?id=8437630

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20090825/thl-many-healthcare-workers-say-no-to-va-5effa79.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8193012.stm

http://www.smh.com.au/national/swine-flu-vaccine-plan-in-disarray-20090827-f17x.html

http://www.wddty.com/SearchResults.aspx?q=swine+flu&searchButton.x=0&searchButton.y=0

http://hsibaltimore.com/2009/08/27/rushing-h1n1/

The Tamiflu sufferers

Guess what? Tamiflu is rendering many children more unwell than if they had just let the Swine Flu take its natural course. 51% of children in a test group of 248 reported side-effects such as nausea, insomnia and nightmares. Of course that doesn’t include any more long-term ill-effects from the mercury and other junk contained within the vaccine whose effects may manifest themselves later in life.

Yet that establishment lap dog, Sir Liam Donaldson, said that Tamiflu should still be given to children if they had established symptoms and there were no existing medical reasons not to prescribe the drug. Then he goes on to admit that under-fives were suffering a greater number of hospital admissions because of these side effects. Under fives shouldn’t be innoculated at all, a young and developing body being subjected to a wholly foreign cocktail of goodness-knows-what! But what does Donaldson know, or care, about developing children, so long as he sits in his comfortable position delivering lies and false information on behalf of his corporate paymasters.

I hope these reports will help to instill some sanity into parents and adults alike and get them to say NO to Tamiflu and view the whole Swine Flu scam for what it is - an artificially-engineered virus created by ‘swine’ - not the animal kind, but the psycopathic human kind that runs this planet!

See http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=47&contentid=5934

FSA Report - another piece of disingenuity

The latest insult to our intelligence comes from another NGA arm of our bereft government, the Food Standards Agency, who declare that organic food isn’t any healthier than non-organic.

Carlo Leifert, a professor of ecological agriculture at Newcastle University, who has read the report was mystified by the agency’s conclusions, whose ballpark figures approximate those of a report Leifert co-ordinated for a major EU-funded study which looked at the nutrient levels of organic versus non-organic which clearly gave the former the lead. Why then has the FSA come to quite different conlusions?

In my view, clearly its politically (and probably commercially) driven. In a climate where GM crops are once again being toyed with (as reported on Monday) and a US Depertment of Agriculture calling for the mass-irradiation of crops on the grounds that it will kill of bacteria and make it safer for the masses to eat(!), not to mention the dangerous cocktails being used in the Swine Flu vaccine that we will all be urged to take and the imminent spectre of Codex Alimentarius, the FSA’s downbeat and dismissive missive on organically-grown and reared foodstuffs fits into place. It’s all part of the trend towards denying the population its health - a eugenics programme pure and simple.

But criticism of the FSA’s report has been widespread. Peter Melchett, policy adviser at the Soil Association said "We are disappointed in the conclusions the researchers have reached. It doesn't say organic food is not healthier, just that, according to the criteria they have adopted, there's no proof that it is."

It’s the way they spin it and the way the media follows up in unison. Last night’s BBC ‘Lies at Six’ deliberately gave two people a blind tasting of organic and non-organic fruit. Needless to say the verdict came out a draw, mirroring the conclusions of the report. No account was taken into the pesticide-free nature of organic foodstuffs which are grown to rigorous standards or the far-improved health of free-range livestock, whose happier demeanour reflects itself in the quality of its meat, free of any vile agri-waste cocktail fed to it in the name of economy and profit.

Increased cost of organic aside, thinking people will ignore this report and dismiss it for what it is worth, just another pile of worthless ‘research’ tailored to the dictates of a patsy government and an agribusiness lobby whose steered covert agenda is to lead us down the road to hell!

Here are a few of the comments in reply to the Guardian’s piece on the report.

“What a pathetic criteria for a study!
The point of eating organic food is not a higher nutritional content but avoiding pesticides and the like, DUH! Therefore, YES, it is healthier.”

“Big agribusiness has a lot to lose from people rejecting it's toxic, mono-culture, GMO, scorch the earth mentality. And what could this possibly mean!: ‘The appendix of the FSA report shows that some nutrients, such as beta-carotene, are as much as 53% higher in organic food, but such differences are not reflected in its conclusions.’ Who is paying for this study? conventional farming poisons the earth and humans and strips the land of nutrients. if there are no nutrients in the soil there won't be any in the food and you can't make up for it with fertilizers and pesticides.”

“You only have to ask yourself, do I want foods intensively produced, often tasteless, inhumanely reared, potentially contaminated by pesticides, fungicides, growth hormones, genetic modification and other allied, often untested, modifications? Or would I prefer food free from interference by food scientists, chemists and the associated denizens of increased profitability.
I don't need a meta-analysis to answer that question wooly minded though I undoubtedly am.”

“It strikes me that the FSA have some agenda with regards this report, it blatantly omits any factor other than the basic nutritional values. Yet it still carries the headline 'no health benefits of organic food' on most media outlets. Looking at their website, they clearly have a biased attitude against organic, Im guessing since the popularity of organic rose out of the GM scepticism that there lies the actual reason behind the report. Look at their website page on GM food, and its an almost entirely positive account...Knowing that Gordon Brown has reopened the debate on GM crops, Im guessing that rubbishing organic farming is the first step in the propaganda initiative to warm mainstream public opinion towards more profitable GM agriculture.”

In other words is the FSA, in this report, also being influenced by the agribusiness cartel - I would say very likely.

PS To partly confirm my suspicions it turns out that one member of the research group at the University of London who were instrumental in the compilation of the FSA report, is one Dr Uauy. According to the Integrity in Science Database, Dr. Uauy has been a paid advisor to Unilever, Wyeth, Danone, DSM, Kellogg, Knowles and Bolton, Roche Vitamins Europe Ltd., and the International Copper Association. Well, what do you know!

Also read this http://www.prisonplanet.com/organic-food-is-all-that-and-more-just-eat-it.html

Stick the needles where the sun don't shine!

I have never had any intention of lining up for, what may well become, a compulsory vaccination against swine flu. I routinely reject the annual flu jab that my GP advises me to take as well as the statin drugs he would also have me take on an ongoing basis. Both offer far greater health risks than they are purported to offer, the only benefits they dispense are profits to the drug companies.

With the ludicrously inflated hype surrounding the swine flu epidemic, with its generally mild symptoms and very low mortality rate - compared to many normal winter flu epidemics which go largely unreported, I immediately become suspicious, particularly when the manufacturers of Tamiflu - Baxter International - have been caught releasing contaminated flu virus material from their plant in Austria.

The fact is that there is a larger eugenics agenda at work here and if you value your wellbeing, you'll make sure that you keep your natural immune system robust by keeping healthy and stay clear of the ruinous cocktail contained within the swine flu vaccine.

Take heed of what David Icke has to say in this short video clip.

The swine behind the Swine Fever

The World Health Organisation has now lifted Swine Flu to level 5 on their Richter scale, one level below a full-blown pandemic. Although cases have been diagnosed in countries worldwide including the UK, where further outbreaks have been identified in the midlands and south west of England, as yet it has claimed few lives except in its place of origin, Mexico. One casualty was a small boy who died in Houston yesterday, but he had entered the US, already very ill.

The deaths it has claimed so far seem very race-specific, virtually all Hispanic.

On Monday a piece written by Kurt Nimmo back in 2007 and referencing researcher Jerome Corsi comments, had this to say and I believe it is very relevant to this current epidemic giving a broader picture of what is going on behind the scenes

“The new International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza was designed to supersede an earlier November 2005 Homeland Security report that called for a U.S. national strategy that would be coordinated by the Departments of Homeland Security, Health and Agriculture.”

In other words, any U.S. response to an avian flu pandemic would be directed under WHO, WTO, U.N. and NAFTA directives. Congress and U.S. agencies would be cut out of the picture. “The U.N.-WHO-WTO-NAFTA plan advanced by SPP features a prominent role for the U.N. system influenza coordinator as a central international director in the case of a North American avian flu or pandemic influenza outbreak,” Corsi adds.

“Dr. David Nabarro, WHO executive director of sustainable development and health environments, was appointed the first U.N. system influenza coordinator. In 2005, Nabarro said during a press conference that his number one priority was to prepare for the H5N1 virus, known as the avian flu. Nabarro played into the global fear that an epidemic was inevitable.

“I’m not, at the moment at liberty to give you a prediction on numbers, but I just want to stress, that, let’s say, the range of deaths could be anything from 5 to 150 million,” said Nabarro. On March 8, 2006, during a U.N. press conference Nabarro predicted an outbreak of the H5N1 virus would “reach the Americas within the next six to 12 months.”

On Monday, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon stoked the fear of a global flu pandemic. He said the Mexican flu outbreak is the “first test” of the “pandemic preparedness work undertaken by the international community over the past three years.” Ban Ki-moon said if “we are indeed facing a pandemic, we need to demonstrate global solidarity. In our interconnected world, no nation can deal with threats of such dimension on its own.”

For Ki-moon and the global elite, “global solidarity” in “our interconnected world” translates into yet another push for world government. Ki-moon’s dire warning falls on the heels of the G20 summit where plans were announced for implementing the creation of a new global currency to replace the U.S. dollar’s role as the world reserve currency. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and others repeatedly called for “global governance” and a “New World Order.”

The current flu pandemic hype serves as punctuation mark between the G20 held in London and the upcoming one to be held in Italy in June. “The G20 summit has agreed to try to kick start stalled Doha trade liberalization talks at the next G8 meeting,” Reuters reported on April 2. So-called “trade liberalization” is code for the neoliberal plan to “privatize” public and private industries around the world, impose “flexibilization” of labor markets (create massive unemployment), “deregulate” consumer and financial markets, and foster foreign buyouts, layoffs, wage cuts, transient employment, higher prices, and potentially destabilizing capital flows.

As noted by the Eagle Forum in October, 2007, the SPP’s North American Plan for Avian and Pandemic Influenza “is not only about combating a flu epidemic but is far-reaching in seeking control over U.S. citizens and public policy during an epidemic.” The Plan would give authority to international bureaucrats “beyond the health sector to include a coordinated approach to critical infrastructure protection,” including “border and transportation issues.”

On April 26, Infowars covered the Department of Defense’s “Implementation Plan for Pandemic Influenza” that proposes nothing less than the militarization of health care, military augmentation of civilian law enforcement, and the mass vaccination of the population as directed by the government.

Ki-moon, the United Nations, and the globalists, with the participation of the globalist-dominated corporate media and the ruling elite in Mexico, are hyping the flu outbreak as a possible pandemic in order to sell us their scheme for world government.
It is an ongoing process.

Attention by astute observers is turning to the fact as to whether or not the virus intended as such. “Advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool,” states the PNAC document, ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses’ of September 2000, the same document that stated “...The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor?” and what followed was 9/11, the Patriot Acts and everything else that went with it to change, entirely, the lives of Americans.

Race or genetically-specific viruses are nothing new and have now reached a high level of sophistication. In 2006, Armed Forces Journal, a mouthpiece for the military-industrial complex, carried a military strategy plan written by retired Major Ralph Peters which called for “ethnic cleansing” to be instituted in the Middle East so that the region could easily be dominated by the joint interests of Israel and the United States.

So, given Corsi’s view that one of the reasons for the epidemic origins being Mexico could be that this is also intended as a dry run under the new Security and Prosperity Partnership which will completely sideline the US government and Congress by mobilising a response to the epidemic under the new trans-continental SPP and world organisations such as the WHO - another step towards regional and global governance.

Another interesting fact emerged in today’s ‘What Doctor’s Don’t Tell You’ (WDDTY) bulletin which runs as follows.

“It is almost three years since we faced the hysteria of an avian flu epidemic, when governments bought billions of dollars of Tamiflu – the same anti-viral now being promoted to combat a supposed swine flu pandemic. The shelf life of Tamiflu also happens to be three years.

“The World Health Organization has, at the time of writing, increased its threat level to five, which means governments can activate their pandemic plans – and start handing out Tamiflu drugs. (But just how effective will this be in combatting this new strain of virus?)

“This is extremely convenient for governments that would have very soon have to dispose of billions of dollars of Tamiflu stock, which they bought to counter avian flu, or H5N1.  The US government ordered 20 million doses, costing $2bn, in October, 2005, and around that time the UK government ordered 14.6 million doses. Tamiflu’s manufacturer, Roche, has confirmed that the shelf life of its anti-viral is three years.

"England’s chief medical officer Sir Liam Donaldson has said that the UK is “well prepared” to counter swine flu – but only because it was well prepared to counter an avian flu pandemic that never happened.

“The other worry is when, or if, medicine comes up with a specific anti-viral for swine flu.  The last time they did – when we had the last swine flu scare in 1976 - health officials rushed through a vaccination programme that resulted in 1 out of 100,000 vaccinated Americans developing Guillain-Barre paralysis. The US government paid out $93 million in compensation.

“Those of us who quaked in fear from the expected SARS epidemic and shook from the anticipated avian flu pandemic may feel they’ve been here before. Despite the dire warnings, at the time of writing just 2,600 cases of swine flu have been confirmed or suspected around the world , and there have been 160 deaths, (and mostly Hispanic) and not all of these may turn out to be caused by swine flu. More people die on UK roads every month.”

One thing seems sure though, this is a designer virus, most likely originating from a DoD lab somewhere and it is aptly named ‘Swine Flu’ for the true orchestrators of its being are, no doubt, none other than the real swine out there, the movers and shaker Illuminati who never desist from crushing humanity at every turn.

A eugenics programme in all but name

If the financial meltdown in the US - as well as the rest of the globe - wasn’t bad enough, that other arm of the ‘cabal’s’ enslavement juggernaut, the covert eugenics programme, is well under way with the Feds now intent on criminalising organic farming and denying Americans a healthy diet.

Using the same MO as Codex Alimentarius, the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 is being introduced for ‘safety reasons’. The bill’s preface reads: “To establish the Food Safety Administration within the Department of Health and Human Services to protect the public health by preventing food-borne illness, ensuring the safety of food, improving research on contaminants leading to food-borne illness, and improving security of food from intentional contamination, and for other purposes”. Total deceit!

This is a major step forward in having the ‘cabal’ control what US citizens eat, namely mass produced, lifeless, irradiated, GM-infested crap. The absence of essential minerals and vitamins in the mass-produced, irradiated rubbish being lined up as the legal diet for Americans, will further denigrate their largely less than healthy state of being, by not providing people with the essential ingredients they require to maintain a robust immune system. The inevitable increase (not decrease as the bill would posit) of resulting illnesses will only lead to everyone being drawn onboard the drug cartel’s allopathic ‘remedies’ band-wagon which in turn will only hasten degenerative health, increasing the mortality rate among younger people and fulfilling the covert eugenics programme.

The essence of the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 (HR875, S425) which is massive in content (they’re always big and convoluted so that no-one gets time to read them, but will, like the bailout bill, be forced through congress under the duress), is as follows.

It:

- Legally binds state agriculture depts to enforcing federal guidelines effectively taking away the states power to do anything other than being food police for the federal dept.

- Effectively criminalizes organic farming but doesn’t actually use the word organic.

- Effects anyone growing food even if they are not selling it but consuming it.

- Effects anyone producing meat of any kind including wild game.

- Legislation is so broad based that every aspect of growing or producing food can be made illegal. There are no specifics which is bizarre considering how long the legislation is.

- Section 103 is almost entirely about the administrative aspect of the legislation. It will allow the appointing of officials from the factory farming corporations and lobbyists and classify them as experts and allow them to determine and interpret the legislation. Who do you think they are going to side with?

- Section 206 defines what will be considered a food production facility and what will be enforced up all food production facilities. The wording is so broad based that a backyard gardener could be fined and more.

- Section 207 requires that the state’s agriculture dept act as the food police and enforce the federal requirements. This takes away the states power and is in violation of the 10th amendment.

Non-compliance in this murderous plot is essential!

Your life in their hands?

My suspicions of the NHS grow daily in respect of their ‘care and maintenance’ of our general health. Called in for my annual diabetes check up, I was informed by the doctor that since the last one my HbA1C level had risen slightly. That measurement taken from a blood sample detemines what the average glucose level in the blood stream has been over the last 8-12 weeks, the average life span of a red blood cell. Red blood cells are made of the molecule haemoglobin. Glucose will adhere to the haemoglobin to make glycosylated haemoglobin called haemoglobin A1C - or HbA1C and the more glucose in the blood the higher the HbA1C count.

When I tried to explain that I regularly make blood sugar tests the doctor’s retort was that they are largely worthless and really aren’t worth bothering with suggesting that I forget them. I found this new piece of ‘advice’ astonishing and contrary to that which has been given me in the past. The regular readings I have obtained over the last six months actually concur with the HbA1C reading he gave me, a bit higher than a year ago. I would have thought that continuing to monitor my blood sugar levels on a regular, every-other-day basis was helpful in gaining an overall picture of my glucose levels albeit done on a hand-held monitor and not in a lab with more hi-tech equipment. His remark gave me the impression that patient participation in determining their health monitoring seems to be rather frowned upon, the implication given that it should be the sole responsibility of a state physician.

Once again, slightly higher than recommended (by whom I wonder - drug company-funded research?) cholesterol levels were cited with a recommendation that I revert to the intake of statin drugs in order to lower them, not to mention getting a flu jab and another innoculation which would mitigate against bacterial growth in the gut (whatever’s wrong with Aloe Vera? It’s done miracles for me!).

What actually goes into vaccines is highly questionable and countless independent research articles have found toxic elements which are not in the patients best interests. With a good immune system - which I currently enjoy to which a prolonged illness-free period over the last year seem to be testament to - why should I compromise that good health with some vaccine containing toxins and which will, in time, only compromise my body’s natural defences?

As of present I have managed to escape these three ‘recommendations’ as a patient’s right to have some say in his personal well-being, after all, I don’t have a personal death wish!
It seems, though, that that choice is soon going to be taken away from us, especially with the tightening grip of Codex Alimentarius and a physician’s approval for every useful dosage of a natural vitamin pill we might wish to take.

I am aware that my HbA1C level needs to be reduced a bit and I will aim to do that largely through natural homeopathic means supported with a slightly higher dosage of the prescribed allopathic drug, Metformin, along with the continuance of a healthy diet - which I admit I sometimes deviate very slightly from - and plenty of exercise.

It is my body, of which the maintenance of its good health is in my best interests, and does not form part of a state-owned inventory, wholly under its dictate.

Most people bow before the altar of their local GP viewing him as some sort of sage who will fix things. I think rather differently. Although probably well-meaning in pursuing their life’s ambition, GPs are nevertheless largely tools of a state run by an élite who regard us as cattle and an NHS system that props up that élite-owned multi-billion dollar industry, big pharma. Hardly an impartial environment in which to work, especially as many of the guidelines followed by GPs are authored by scientists funded by those very same allopathic drug cartels. Rarely, do I ever see, in a doctor’s waiting room, posters displaying the virtues of a healthy diet or the advantages of natural products like Hemp or Aloe Vera, just some of the vital ingredients that might reduce the number of incumbents in those waiting rooms. Instead you find scare posters showing viruses as man-eating monsters and instructions to ‘get the jab’, and while the queues in the chemists seem to get longer and longer, people don’t look any healthier, in fact quite the reverse. they are becoming increasingly obese and sluggish.

So I will continue to take my GPs advice with a pinch of salt and research everything he tells me in order to get a second opinion from someone outside of the ‘industry’. Question everything, don’t believe ‘officialdom’ willy-nilly, do your homework and your own research, forming an opinion over a broad concensus and, above all, live a healthy lifestyle, something which I have not always done in the past but through experience would now strongly recommend to everyone.

The War on Health

The evidence of covert mass genocide, particularly in the US is becoming more and more plainer by the day. I reported on New York State passing legislation that imposes the mandatory vaccination of all children just the other day, but that is just the tip of the iceberg. It’s not just forced vaccines, 96% of which are known to be manufactured with all manner of toxins see: http://www.rense.com/general32/thru.htm but a whole assault arsenal including chemtrails, GM foods, cancer-inducing agents etc. all of which are being waged against vast numbers of the population worldwide with one end result in mind - drastic population reduction.

On the Alex Jones Show yesterday, astounding revelations of the degree to which this genocide is being waged was made plain by former commanding general of the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command, Major General Albert Stubblebine III and his wife, psychiatrist and founder of the Natural Solutions Foundation, Rima E. Laibow. http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/ What they had to say made very uncomfortable listening.

Part of their website - connecting the dots - illustrates the various fronts on which a concerted assault on our health and lives is being made.

Deadly vaccines We are constantly urged to be vaccinated against all sorts of terrors. Britain’s NHS displays posters of flu bugs as flesh eating monsters with headlines such as ‘if you knew about the flu virus, you’d take the jab’. If you knew what was in the vaccines - aluminium hydroxide, monosodium glutamate as well as mercury and a whole cocktail of other stuff - you would soon come to a more informed conclusion as to which was the greater evil. After all, our immune system is nature’s way of combating flu and a host of other viruses and one of the best ways to maintain an effective immune system is through healthy living and a healthy diet. Taking vaccines not only puts your health at risk, but compromises the immune system. And by being vaccinated on an annual basis - as your GP is always ready to insist - you just increase the likelihood of suffering the consequences of those toxic additives which accumulate in the body resulting in disabling diseases such as Alzheimers and all manner of cancers.

Crop spraying In California, the Environmental Protection Agency (which is anything but) have decided to spray a cancer-inducing chemical across the San Francisco Bay Area to combat a so-called pest, the threat from which is not even confirmed to exist. That pest is supposed to be the Light Brown Apple Moth, yet no evidence exists to suggest that this moth threatens crops or plant species. But it is the portrayed spectre of such menaces on our livelihoods - real or imagined - that acts as the excuse for governments to impose their deadly will on us. Elsewhere in the world crop spraying is a common practice, but little or no account is taken of the collateral effects on we humans who may be in its vicinity.

Drugs It is well documented that iatrogenic diseases - those which are caused by medical treatment - and allopathic medicines, or prescription drugs, are the number one killers in the US and many other parts of the western world. Many people find themselves prescribed manufactured drugs for all sorts of ailments - very often petty or contrived - many of which are of little or no benefit and very often of serious dis-benefit to the patient. Many are inadequately tested and the side effects from the various combinations of drug cocktails prescribed is hardly researched. Psychiatric drugs are known to have profound effects upon a person’s personality and many become addicted to them. In most cases their use is wholly unnecessary while the symptoms prompting their prescription are better treated homeopathically or by other non-harmful and natural ways. Yet the more drugs that are prescribed, the richer the drug companies become and pressure is constantly brought to bear on health authorities and doctors to reach for the prescription pad at the earliest opportunity. Often illnesses themselves are caused by our being goaded into unhealthy lifestyles by large sister corporations, and this in turn engenders the dispensation of more allopathic treatment, further funding the drug business in a vile and vicious cycle of cause and effect.

GMOs A further assault on our well-being comes from genetically modified organisms. In the US the labelling of GM foods is outlawed, carefully covering up any links which may lead back to their effects on the population. Drugs produced through recombitant DNA techniques, GM foods which have an unknown long-term effect upon those that continually eat them, hormones given to animals and people which have been made by shooting high energy ‘bullets’ into DNA to make it better serve commercial purposes which make the recipients sick, the effects of the transfer of genetically modified DNA in foods we eat and their effect on modifying our own DNA and producing proteins that have never existed on this planet before, are all frightful examples of what is tantamount to covert genocide. The amazing upsurge of obesity in the population may well be a result of such activities. Yet GM crops are promoted as one of the panaceas to the world’s food shortage, yet research has shown that GM crops very often provide lower crop yields than conventional crops.

Poisoned food As well as the effects of GM ingredients in our food, come the plethora of artificially-produced additives, colourants and preservatives that may give products a longer shelf life, a more appealing look or provide the food with addictive properties, yet all of this impresses upon our wellbeing in a grossly negative way. Our water is being contaminated with fluoride, a known toxin, which finds its way into most of our foodstuffs that come into contact with it. Toothpaste tubes carry messages extolling the virtues of added fluoride as a means to combat tooth decay, yet this message is a proven lie.

Codex Alimentarius Despite it being sold to us as ‘consumer protection’ and it being voluntary in nature, it is anything but. Codex is a blueprint for drug company dominance in health care. By effectively criminalising the use of thousands of natural health remedies whose benefits have been known for centuries by branding them as dangerous, they are forcing us into dependence on allopathic medicines whose virtues, as we have seen, are largely non-existent and most often dangerous.

Chemtrails For decades this phenomenon has been creating debate as to it ulterior motive. Large trails literally littering the skies, particularly in the US, had been dismissed by the authorities as vapour trails, yet their characteristics seem anything but. Just what form of covert bio-warfare might be going on here?

Forbidden cancer treatments Cancer is big business. Over the past few decades we have seen, what was once a rare disease, sky rocket where we expect to see one child in every two born after 2000 to get cancer, with one in every 3 adults becoming similarly afflicted. Largely the result of environmental factors: pesticides, fungicides, injected viruses like the MKV 40 virus in Polio and other vaccines, synthetic additives, mould contamination, industrial toxins, synthetic hormones in food or as medicine, heavy metals, etc. Proven cures for cancer have been known for the last century or more but the safe and effective therapies offered by people such as Royal Raymond Rife and Dr Max Gerson have been rubbished by conventional medicine and the drug companies that wag their tails. Simply put, the cancer industry is a mega-earner for the drug companies, making vast amounts of money out of treatments that do more to exacerbate the cancer and weaken the immune system thereby leading to more money-making drug treatment. Money laundering cancer research institutes that pretend to do research on the disease, while emotively fleecing the general public for donations towards their disingenuous programmes also make mega bucks out of the condition. It’s also a useful killer and covert form of genocide.

Conclusion Clearly such abuse and disregard for our health suggests an ulterior motive. Profit is high on the agenda, but not the only reason. These strategies and policies are consistent with Henry Kissinger’s now public 1972 secret assessment for President Nixon that the first consideration of America’s foreign policy needs to be depopulation. In fact this policy extends right across the world and is the stated claim of many of the Illuminati, with needless and avoidable famine in third world countries and the covert introduction immune system debilitators such as AIDS where clear evidence exists that such viruses have been developed knowingly by government military laboratories for introduction into vaccination programmes. Again, all part of a concerted genocide programme aimed at culling large numbers of the world’s population. It seems now, however, that that programme is gathering apace and becoming a threat to first world countries. We must be aware of what is in store for us and do everything we can to safeguard our health and well-being so that we can remain alive, stand up to these criminals and save our species from a vast culling.

Monday 28 April 2008

A postscript - at least for the time being - to my ongoing correspondence with Alex Demetris at the Department of Health over the fluoridation of our water supplies, his last brief letter appears to show that the government is treading a little more carefully in this matter, entertaining other research opinions in open forum debates on a local level where further fluoridation may be considered.

But we must never become complacent and watch the DoH like hawks.

Thursday 27 March 2008

Knocking your head against a brick wall

I received a predictable reply to my last letter from the Department of Health regarding water fluoridation.




My reply:

Dear Mr Demitris

Fluoridation of Water Supplies

Thank you for your further reply to my concerns over the fluoridation of our water supplies dated 14 March.

It appears from the tenor of your reply that the Government has for some time, set its mind upon a continued course of water fluoridation and is making the evidence fit that initiative. The last two sentences of the fourth paragraph of your letter, quote “It is true that the Government recognises the need to conduct further research into fluoridation’s health effects. However, this is to strengthen the evidence base on the effect of fluoridation on health, which the Government already believes to be safe” more or less confirms that impression.

I find this reminiscent of the way pharmaceutical companies boast the benefits of their drugs, making the results of research and tests fit those claims, while ignoring or marginalising any ill-effects that they may promote, examples of which have been legion over recent years.

You continue to cite the University of York’s findings upon which your Department and the Government put its faith, yet you have not addressed the critique of that research which I enclosed with my last letter, which highlighted the less than comprehensive nature of that research.

Clearly, the Government and Department of Health is locked in a rigid stance on this subject and doesn’t seemed prepared to, at least, consider the enormous amount of evidence that the fluoridation of our mains water appears contrary to our best interests, only a small amount of which I included with my previous letters.
Even the American Dental Association issued an emailed statement to its members last November that fluoridated water should not be mixed into formula or foods intended for babies aged 1 and younger and research by the Centers for Disease Control has shown that fluoride absorbs into tooth enamel topically, but its ingestion can cause adverse reactions. Also, the CDC has now admitted that enamel fluoride concentration is not inversely related to cavities.

Surely these admissions should cause your department to re-evaluate this subject in a more holistic manner.

As long as your position continues, I will continue to campaign against this adulteration of our drinking water and will fight tooth and nail against any change of policy my water provider, Southern Water, may make in deciding to fluoridate its water supplies and hope to see an end to this unnecessary and highly doubtful practice.

Yours sincerely

The ongoing fluoridation saga

I have received a reply - if a rather predictable one - from the Department of Health in response to my letter to Alan Johnson on the 5th of February on the fluoridation of public water supplies in England, reproduced below.





Here is my response. The link to the critique mentioned in the letter can be found at http://www.fluoridealert.org/york-critique.htm

Alex Demitris
Customer Service Directorate
The Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
LONDON
SW1A 2NS

21 February 2008

Dear Mr Demitris

Fluoridation of water supplies

Many thanks for your reply to my letter dated 5 February in which you state your department’s position regarding the fluoridation of water in England.

Unfortunately, your comments in no way ameliorate my concerns regarding this initiative.

Although you say that no ill-effects of water fluoridation have been identified in the UK, using the University of York’s review to substantiate that assertion, I would like to draw your attention to the enclosed critique of that review by Paul Connett, PhD which highlights that review's many shortfalls and its exclusion of animal and toxicological studies in its compilation of evidence. (See item 2.8 in that critique).

It is the wider implications and dangers of water fluoridation that concerns me most and appears to be largely absent from the York review. Although the maintenance of 1ppm of fluoride in our drinking water is to be the applied benchmark, its introduction and maintenance at that level will filter through into all our beverages and processed foodstuffs and it is this multiplier effect that is most worrying. 1ppm may not effect those who drink little but will have a much greater effect on those who habitually drink more - tea (which already includes natural levels of fluoride) and beer drinkers for example, or those in heavy manual jobs that need to re-hydrate themselves on a regular basis. Why should they necessarily have to incur the cost of buying bottled water to avoid running the risk of imbibing higher amounts of fluoride?

Since your department’s whole premise for the introduction of fluoride in water supplies is to combat the reduction in tooth decay, then why, as suggested by Nobel Laureate, Dr. Arvid Carlsson, cannot topical treatment be provided. Teeth are easily accessible to such treatment.

I also find it quite amazing that you are pressing ahead with such an initiative when your department admits that it is still instigating further research into the effects of fluoridation. Surely this is the wrong way round. (See 2.5 - 2.7 in critique).

Let me conclude by listing just a few of the scientific developments that have been noted in 2007 regarding concerns over the collateral damage that water fluoridation may and is believed to be responsible for.

1. Impairment of brain development
In 2007 research was conducted in Brazil, China, India, Italy, Mexico and the US all of which strengthened concern previously raised by the US National Research Council the previous year. According to the authors “We found that exposure to F (fluoride) in urine was associated with reduced Performance, Verbal, and Full IQ scores before and after adjusting for confounders. The same pattern was observed for models with F in water as the exposure variable.... The individual effect of F in urine indicated that for each mg increase of F in urine a decrease of 1.7 points in Full IQ might be expected”.

2. Links to skeletal fluorosis
Since the 1930s, the link between too much fluoride intake and stiff and painful joints has been known. Although the symptoms can mimic other forms of arthritis more research is required to establish the true source of such complaints in the knowledge that excess fluoride can be a cause. A lifetime’s intake of fluoridated water and other beverages could be problematic, particularly in the elderly. As one ages the ability of the liver to discharge toxins becomes impaired, thus their greater retention having an increasingly deleterious effect on bones.

3. Silicofluorides may increase lead exposure
Last year, scientists at the University of North Carolina demonstrated that when brass water pipes containing lead were submerged in water simultaneously containing chlorine and fluoride, the leeching effect of the pipe’s lead content was increased causing increased toxification of the water supply. Although the tests were conducted with fluoride added at 2ppm, even at 1ppm - the recommended level - the leeching effect would still be tangible.

4. Fluoridation linked to sperm damage
Subjecting rats to fluoride concentrations of 10ppm have shown to seriously effect their sperm levels. Since rats are particularly resilient to fluoride it is thought that an equivalent human concentration - 2ppm - may affect humans similarly.

5. Effects of fluoride on the pineal gland
Dr Jennifer Luke of the University of Surrey has discovered that the pineal gland is the primary target of fluoride accumulation. "In conclusion, the human pineal gland contains the highest concentration of fluoride in the body. Fluoride is associated with depressed pineal melatonin synthesis by prepubertal gerbils and an accelerated onset of sexual maturation in the female gerbil. The results strengthen the hypothesis that the pineal has a role in the timing of the onset of puberty. Whether or not fluoride interferes with pineal function in humans requires further investigation."

These are just some of the many areas in which further research is needed. Is it worth subjecting whole populations to these possible, and in some cases, very likely ill-effects for the sake of a small minority of society who cannot, or will not, engage in basic human hygiene?

I believe that it should be the responsibility of parents to ensure that their children look after their teeth without resorting to a state recommendation that everyone should have their water fluoridated.

Until there is a sound and honest verdict given, based on rational and scientific evaluation of the benefits and dis-benefits of fluoride in our water supplies, I believe that any further moves to fluoridate them should be suspended.

Yours sincerely

Medicine - the number one killer?

In the current issue of Nexus magazine is a revealing article by biochemist and toxicologist, Walter Last. He shows how iatrogenic diseases (diseases caused by medical treatment) are the leading cause of death in the West. With an annual fatality rate in the US of 783,936 in 2001, caused by fatal drug reactions, medical errors or unnecessary medical and surgical procedures, this outstripped the death rate caused from heart disease and cancer in the same year.
Ironically, when doctors went on strike in Los Angeles county in 1976, the death rate fell by 18% and in 1973 in Israel a similar strike saw the number of deaths during that period reduce by a staggering 50%!

Last discusses the pioneering work done by Dr Orian Truss in the early 50s in which he saw a direct correlation between candisiasis - a fungal over-growth in the intestines that can cause food allergies, muscle aches and many other eventually fatal complications - and antibiotics.

Antibiotics are widely prescribed among the medical profession and aren’t the only ones to cause such problems. Drugs used in chemotherapy, anti-inflammatory steroidal and other long-term drug therapies can have an equally debilitating effect on patients which can also eventually result in death.

Last explains that under normal conditions the body produces natural amounts of intestinal flora, mainly based on lactobacteria, which helps in the digestion of food and at the same time protects the body from harmful bacteria, such as salmonella. This ability is severely compromised when these drugs are continually administered and candida establishes itself as a result. This process is known as dysbiosis. “With chronic dysbiosis, the intestinal wall becomes inflamed, causing ulcers, appendicitis, malabsorption and Crohn’s disease and as the intestinal membrane erodes, the patient develops multiple food allergies, arthritis and autoimmune diseases”, Last adds. The vicious cycle is exacerbated by the medical profession’s preference to administer more antibiotics in an erroneous attempt to treat these conditions.


The good old days

Although, back in the early 1900s, diets were often high in saturated fats, heart attacks were rare, contrary to present-day philosophy. The ascent of heart attacks and cardiovascular disease began with the pasteurisation of milk and the use of chlorine in water supplies to kill bacteria. It seems that these preventative measures to kill off natural bacteria in both milk and water had prevented a natural line of defence in our bodies derived from such bacteria. In countries such as Africa, China, Japan and other parts of Asia where the chlorination of water and pasteurising of milk were not introduced, heart attacks and cardiovascular diseases were unknown.

Also back in the last half of the nineteenth century, scarlet fever, diptheria, whooping cough and measles had declined by 90% following improvements in public health and before the introduction of vaccines. These very vaccines have, however, brought with them an increase in the death rate from the targeted diseases as well as some cot deaths with immunised babies. The presence of toxic heavy metals in vaccines have also been connected to the rise in autism and Attention Deficiency Disorders. The Amish in America, who refuse vaccinations, suffer from none of these.



Until 1980, the rates of type 2 diabetes and obesity were fairly uncommon and stable. But when health authorities started to advise against eating foods containing fats and cholesterol, recommending instead, a higher intake of carbohydrates - exacerbated by a food industry peddling such badies - obesity and associated type 2 diabetes increased from just 15% among the US population in 1980 to a chronically obese rate of 31% today, and if one adds the marginally obese, that figure rises to almost 65%.


Chemical cocktails

One of the main problems with the introduction of new drugs is that they are not tested for long enough. With continual administering the accumulative effect of many drugs can be devastating whereas their short-term use may be acceptable. Many people can find themselves prescribed a whole plethora of different drugs for different complaints and it is the mixing of such medications which is rarely, if ever, examined. Several years on a cocktail of drugs can create an entanglement of effects, almost impossible to unravel.


Natural is best

Many proven natural cancer treatments have been traditionally shunned by conventional medical science and alternative health practitioners who offer such remedies have often being brought before the courts and imprisoned.

The driving force behind this rejection of natural health remedies, not just with cancer but with many other diseases, is the drug cartel lobby that virtually runs our health services in the West. Not only do they have a strong influence in directing doctor’s to prescribe their, at best doubtful and at worst harmful wares but also direct and fund clinical research, whose reports weigh heavily in favour of their products while rubbishing the claims of alternative natural practitioners products and claims. This big pharma influence also begins in the medical schools whose students are unknowingly influenced with biased teaching.

The message one gleans from Last’s evidence is clear. Eat and live healthily, sourcing natural remedies wherever possible, rendering your GP and hospital as a last resort.

Further reading: ‘Heal Yourself and Healing Foods’ by Walter Last (Penguin Books)

Letter to Alan Johnson

Alan Johnson
The Health Secretary
The House of Commons
LONDON
SW1A 0AA

5 February 2008

Dear Sir

Fluoridation of water supplies

It is with regret that I read in the press this week of the renewed intiative from your department to fluoridate mains water supplies in areas in England with the highest rates of tooth decay.

The reason given - that it would help safeguard the teeth of children who do not regularly brush their teeth - is the most disingenuous argument I have heard on any subject for many years and its naivety beggars belief. For decades now, a mass of evidence has existed in the public domain of the dangers of fluoridating water and the highly negative effects on the body that this poisonous toxin has when imbibed constantly over many years.

Must we all be subjected to its ill-effects on the basis that certain parents are incapable of ensuring that their children clean their teeth or that they cannot afford the price of a tooth brush! Extensive and proven research has shown that dental decay is more a matter of bad diet and fluoridating water supplies does nothing in arresting decay and in the long term poses far greater dangers to the well-being of those that are constantly subject to it.

I enclose just a mere fraction of the evidence posted on the Internet and also draw your attention to Christopher Bryson’s well-researched book on the subject ‘The Fluoride Deception’ published by the Seven Stories Press.

Such niave reasoning behind introducing fluoridation into England’s water supplies, only leads me to believe that there is another agenda at work here, either generated by the industries who benefit from the disposal of this toxic waste, or something more fearful. Was not the fluoridation of water first introduced to the inmates of Auschwitz by IG Farben. I’m sure that wasn’t for altruistic reasons!

WARNING: vitamins could endanger your health...

... or so EU food supplementation legislation suggests.

There is a growing amount of evidence to show that vitamin and mineral deficiency is a growing problem among the population of the EU. In the UK alone, 3.6 million people are now clinically described as suffering from malnutrition, a condition which costs the NHS £7.3 billion annually. With further estimates suggesting that up to 6% of the population in Britain now suffer from serious vitamin and mineral deficiencies, it comes as something of an absurdity that the EU has, since the turn of this century, made a distinct move to make those badly-needed vitamins and minerals more difficult to acquire.

As part of a legal harmonisation across our growing European ‘superstate’, the nutritional content of our foods, mineral and vitamin supplements are now controlled by a plethora of legislation.

In 2005 the British government forced through parliament the EU’s Food Supplements Directive outlawing an estimated 5,000 vitamin and mineral supplements and making it illegal for any shopkeeper to stock them.


The EU Food Supplements Directive

Although the Food Supplements Directive (FSD) could be seen as an attempt to draw a clear line between what should be considered as natural sources of nutrients and that which should be considered to be pharmaceutical in nature, it effectively bans the use of a great number of proven natural vitamins and minerals while ‘dumbing down’ others.

Currently the FSD relies on a ‘positive list’ of supplements that it has drawn up which largely comprise of synthetic vitamins and inorganic minerals, and anything not on that list is effectively banned. While there does exist a derogated list of more natural vitamins and minerals which are in the ‘pending tray’ so to speak, it is feared that many of these may be outlawed and end up on the banned list by 2009.

These are just a very few of the large number of vitamins and minerals excluded from the FSD ‘positive list’.
Boron - all forms - required for absorbtion of calcium
Vitamin E - the naturally occurring tocopherols and tocotrienols - these are antioxidants which protect against damage by free radicals associated with cancer and other degenerative diseases
Calcium - in 23 food forms - good for bones, teeth and cell function
Chromium - in 17 forms - for balancing blood sugar levels in diabetics
Magnesium - in 30 forms - for healthy bones and teeth
Potassium - in 21 forms - good for maintaining healthy blood pressure and heart beat
Silica - all forms - working in conjunction with boron, calcium and other minerals it maintains the wellbeing of bones, arteries, connective tissue, hair, skin and nails
Selenium - in 14 forms - an antioxidant which is important for heart function and a health immune response

The FSD not only dictates what nutrients can be added into food supplements, but it also dictates the maximum allowable dosages. It is these Maximum Permitted Levels (MPLs) that have been arrived at on a risk assessment basis that is unnecessarily restrictive, drawing a line that is too low and only allowing dosages which are very often too small to be of any real benefit to the recipient. For instance, the MPL for beta-carotene is being set so low that it is less than you would consume in two carrots! If the authorities believe that dosages higher than this are harmful then should there not be a limit on the number of carrots we eat (ie two) or any other food in which these ‘capped’ supplements are naturally found in abundance? Since when has taking vitamins and nutrients in doses large or small been harmful to man? Below is a diagram showing relative mortality risks. As you can see death by nutrients is virtually nil.




A partial answer to the seeming irrationality of the FSD provisions appears to come from the...


The Nutrition and Health Claims Regulation

This piece of legislation in its most positive light, appears to straighten out the business of erroneous medicinal claims made by manufacturers of supplements. Subtending from this will be two types of claim which can be made: generic claims and disease reduction (and childrens’ health) claims. These claims have to be approved by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and in the case of the disease reduction claims, very expensive and onerous data requirements are required making the granting of a claim out of reach for many small to medium-sized manufacturers which would include very many of the pioneering natural health businesses. It is feared that these key producers of highly beneficial alternative and effective homeopathic products would be put out of business, clearing the way for the large multi-nationals and drug cartels to further dominate while producing dumbed down supplements, no doubt at maximum profit for what will be ineffectual products. And, of course, if you decide to double or triple the dosage in order to get some benefit from their low-strength concoctions you only end up giving them more profit!

When one looks at this side of the legislation the contradictions of what has been stated above take on a rather unsavoury nature and in my view clarify a lot of what the EU is really all about - centralised control by mega-corporations under the auspices of a totalitarian regime!


The Alliance for Natural Health (ANH)

The ANH which represents these smaller and alternative producers of natural health foods and supplements has been lobbying the European authorities on this very issue for several years. It is currently urging the EU to reconsider key elements of this legislation and the EU's trend to allow centuries-old natural remedies in effective dosages to become only available through a doctor's prescription. This will only allow further concentration the monopoly of big pharma and state regulate people's rights to choose nutrients that will keep them healthy.

I urge you to support ANHs work and also by writing to your MEP expressing your concern over the diminishing ability of our choice to live a healthy life.

For more information go to: http://www.alliance-natural-health.org/

and watch the presentation below by Dr Robert Verkerk, Executive Director of the Alliance for Natural Health.

Gardasil - beware!

Our wordly masters have a whole arsenal aimed against our well-being and the latest comes with the news tonight that schoolgirls between 12 and 13 will be urged to be vaccinated against the human papillomavirus (HPV) that causes cervical cancer from next year onwards. This is to be followed by another campaign to vaccinate girls aged up to 18. The primary vaccine employed in this programme is to be Gardasil produced by Merck laboratories.

Leaving aside the common criticism that providing a vaccine that is supposed to combat a sexually transmitted infection may lead to more promiscuity among young girls and the knee-jerk reaction from health campaigners who don’t do their homework, that this vaccination programme will help reduce the current death rate can only be good news, I have some news that may make prospective vaccinees think again.

80% of all cases of cervical cancer occur in low-income countries , so the number of cases in Britain is very small with an annual death rate of just over 1,000, compared to fatalities from heart disease which amount to 300,000 deaths per annum. As regrettable as those 1,000+ fatalities are, it is hardly of epidemic proportions.

So, why the need to engage in a mass-vaccination programme such as this?

Persuading government to give the green light to such a programme provides a massive financial boon to companies such as Merck who peddle their wares like pushers dole out cocaine among the drug-dependent, while creating many lures for those who prescribe them.

Cynthia A Janak of Renew America - in which country cervical cancer rates only account for 1.5% in women but where similar vaccination programmes are under way - quotes an article by Dr Jerome Kassirer, a professor at Tufts University School of Medicine in the US, on his experiences of the ways in which big pharma pushes its wares. “In the United States, 90,000 pharmaceutical representatives ply doctors with gifts and junkets. The US $2 billion spent annually just on free meals and other hospitality events would dwarf many health budgets in African countries.

Kassirer also pointed to a famous decision by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to keep the drugs Vioxx and Bextra on the market after concerns were raised over cardiovascular risks. Most of the panelists on the FDA committee, it later emerged, had financial ties to the manufacturers. If these panelists had declared a conflict of interest and refrained from voting, the decisions would have gone the other way.

But what those hapless vaccinees who believe that Gardasil will guard against cervical cancer are not told is that it contains 225mcg of aluminium (as amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulphate adjuvant), a toxic element that has known links to both Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases as well as causing inflammation at the injection site which can lead to chronic joint and muscle pain and fatigue. And the vaccine hasn’t been proven safe in clinical trials despite the intention to roll out this vaccination programme using Gardasil, nationwide.

According to the US-based The Alliance for Human Research Protection “Around 60 percent of those who got Gardasil or the aluminum placebo suffered side effects such as headache, fever, nausea, dizziness, vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia and the Gardasil recipients had more serious adverse events such as headache, gastroenteritis, appendicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, asthma, bronchospasm and arthritis”.

Following Merck’s outrageous track record with Voixx which was launched as a treatment for those with osteoarthritis, acute pain conditions and dysmenorrhoea, and was responsible for many deaths from which countless lawsuits have been launched against the company, I would urge all parents of who may be contemplating this vaccination for their daughter(s), to check the facts first.

One thing is for sure, big pharma’s primary goal is profit and with many leading Illuminati families ultimately at their helm, have very little interest in our well-being and probably more interest in our early demise!

For more information visit:
www.newstarget.com/Gardasil.html
www.renewamerica.us/columns/janak/070227

The Obesity Snare

As if they cared for us, the government is to send all parents of clinically obese five-year-olds a warning letter under another new initiative. They have warned that if current trends continue 50% of the population could be obese by 2050 (assuming NWO plans to wipe out 80% of the population through some engineered disaster before that date, haven’t materialised).

With the disappearance of most real physical work, through the systematic dissolution of heavy industry in Britain as we have become a service-based country engaged in physically sendentary work, the materialisation of our lives has brought unbridled heavy-sell consumerism that has coerced most people into buying cars and walking less, acquiring labour-saving must-haves and at the lower end of the social scale consuming heavily advertised unhealthy fast-foods while at the moneyed end adopting the gourmet lifestyle through the guidance of Jamie Oliver, Worrall-Thompson et al as they pile on the cream and chocolate in what may look highly desirable fayre, but may, much of the time, not be in our best interests. Over-eating is rampant, just look at the enormous portions doled out in many pubs in Britain and the increasing size of calorie-rich soft drinks served in cafés and takeaways. Marketing rubbishy food to children and creating the ‘pester factor’ is also rampant, with MacDonalds having lured youngsters into its ‘restaurants’ for years.

A truly guardian government, here to serve the people in a benevolent manner would preempt these industry trends and legislate against companies and large corporations that peddle dietary rubbish and whose message is to eat more. But, of course, that’s not how it works. The powers that be are not here to serve us, but we them. Apart from profiting enormously from us they also allow these snares to be laid so we fall into them and thus become their victims.

If we are to assert our moral standing in this world many of us have to pull up their socks, realise just what is going on and be one step ahead of our predators spiritually, morally and physically. But if we continue to acquiesce to the dumbed-down, no-brainer convenience packages luringly offered us by unscrupulous big business, refuse to become informed and improve the way we live and behave, then we’ll end up being the captive fodder for a dictatorial police state regime that will find any excuse to use our misdemeanours to incarcerate us into their totalitarian regime.

A super size threat

Last night I watched a free CD, courtesy of the Guardian newspaper, entitled ‘Supersize Me’. It follows the misfortunes of Morgan Spurlock who sets out to find just what effect spending a whole month eating only from the menu at MacDonalds will have on his health.

His quest had been prompted by the ballooning number of overweight people in the US and the plethora of diseases that this obesity has triggered among the country’s population.

Prior to his one month MacBinge, Spurlock checks out with a number of medical specialists together with his GP to assess his current state of health which will act as a benchmark, and receives good results; he starts out as a healthy man.

But after only ten days of this self-imposed experiment, in which he sets himself the task of eating only from the MacDonalds menu, including several supersize portions, his health begins to suffer. His principal symptoms at first are headaches which can only be assuaged by another helping from the MacRange after which he feels temporarily fine again. This alone suggests some sort of addictive additive in the food and leads him to discover that this addiction leads many habitués of Mac’s to get hooked on their products.

His first medical check-in after only ten days show increased levels of cholesterol in his bloodstream and increased body weight. Another fortnight on the stuff and his medical advisors are suggesting he quits the experiment as Spurlock’s health begins to plummet. By the end of the month he finds himself barely able to climb the stairs to his apartment and only an eight week crash course on a healthy diet restores his health and weight to what had been before he began the experiment, although speculation remains over what permanent damage may have been done to his constitution.

Although few, if anyone, gorges on MacDonalds three times a day, many people do eat in their premises upward of six times a week, every week of the year with the same effect on their health.

But the most insidious side to the MacDonalds spectre is its ability to hook yougsters into its grasp through the icon of the happy clown, the addictive and superficially appealing contents of its food high in sugar and fat, the play facilities they provide for kids and the way their restaurants lay on extravagant spreads for children’s birthdays, a winner for unwitting parents.

And this really gets to the crux of the matter. It isn’t just a case of a vast conglomerate doling out unhealthy food, it’s the psychology behind their operation which is so sinister, using ingredients, like drugs to hook its adictees giving them a craving to come back for more and in the process ruin their health.

There’s a covert operation working here. The movers and shakers behind these monolithic fast food giants seem to have a remit to lure us into bad health deliberately with their habitual customers putting on weight, damaging their health and mental capability. But in an effort to reduce their weight the sharks from pharma take over by enticing these poor unwitting folk with all manner of quack pills that claim to reduce that weight without having to exercise. Big pharma also scores once again as the medical profession doles out all manner of medications to supposedly address the symptoms of obesity. So once MacDonalds have made a mighty profit out of their customers, the baton is handed over to the pharamceutical companies who then make vast profits out of remedial medicines. The whole thing is one giant con.

Spurlock’s film also highlighted in no uncertain terms, the dumbed down image of the average American. They appear as casualties of the relentless forays by the large media and food corporations who have systematically robbed much of the population of its cognitive ability. Couple this with the dumbing down of education in the US over many decades where children aren’t even taught the constitution anymore, and where big fast food giants dominate the daily dietary intake of the kids with their sugar-laden drinks filled with caffeine and aspartame and fatty re-constituted foods, it’s no wonder that America seems to be a country of zombies, idle Joe six-packs and pizza guzzling nerds. And that’s just the way the elite run corporations want them, an acquiescing bunch of jelly fish.

Furthermore, add to that the strong and persistant lobbying by the food industry in all departments of government where corrupt congressmen take bribes to ensure the contuinuance of the status quo and they’ve pretty well got it stitched up.

Let this be a lesson in life. After we are born life becomes rather like a walk down a vast high street in which the most prominent choices are the big glitzy stores enticing us in to buy designer clothes, fast cars, fast food all to immediately gratify our basic inbred instincts and provide vast profits for their perpetrators. The designer clothes are made in third world countries where the workforce lives on a dollar a day, the cars come from former third world countries that also employ labour at a fraction of the price that their western equivalents would have earned on the production line, the fast food is expediently made out of animals reared in vile mechanised factories and comprise of all sorts of additives and adjuncts which eventually fry your mind and incapacitate your body.

Yes we’ve all been there and done it. But once you free yourself from the peer pressure of the touting big combines and wander off down the side streets, you become aware that the inbred need for these diversions is uneccessary and a world of healthier choice exists. Unglamorous but nutritious food, fresh fruit drinks without additives and all manner of healthy alternatives.

But for the majority, their unquestioning robot-like attitude alludes them of these snares and by the time they are forty their lives have been irreversably destroyed in this covert programme by oligarchical corporations to capture us in their relentless grasp and lead us to our early demise.

Following the release of Spurlock’s film, MacDonalds changed their menu policy, providing more salads and laying off the heavy promotion of their super size range. But in true arrogant corporate mafia style they refused to accept that the policy change was a result Spurlock’s findings. We are the ones who can destroy the likes of the big corporations like MacDonalds by shunning their hype and products and pursue healthy, alert lives instead. Do it!