When Obama and Brown engage in the tired old rhetoric of setting up a new offensive to combat and defeat the Taliban or al Qaeda, you can be sure that the opposite is true. Both groups are the raison d’être for US (and British) troops to be in Afghanistan and Iraq in the first place, not because they need to be defeated, but because they provide a ‘legitimate’ reason for continued western military occupancy in economically and geo-politically important areas.
But it’s the covert machinations employed to try to ensure that continued occupancy that is so frightful as political commentator Paul Watson and ex-US Navy senior intelligence officer Wayne Madsen, have recently pointed out. http://www.prisonplanet.com/al-qaeda-are-pawns-of-the-us-military-industrial-complex.html
The above link forms a valuable lesson in learning how governments use those who are portrayed to us as ‘the enemy’, to fight for them in order to foster the very insurgency they say must be fought, thereby prolonging the conflict in order to achieve an ongoing military and political presence by proxy on foreign soil. In Afghanistan, for instance, that continued presence protects western political and military-industrial hegemony with its interests in the oil pipelines that cross the country as well as maintaining continuing control the poppy trade, the proceeds from which go towards more black ops and illegitimate wars.
Showing posts with label Government Sponsored Terrorism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Government Sponsored Terrorism. Show all posts
Friday, July 03, 2009
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
New 9/11 Whistleblower
An ex- US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) employee and videographer, Kurt Sonnenfeld, has gone public with crucial inside information on the immediate aftermath of 9/11.
Hounded ever since by government insiders and spooks, Sonnenfeld’s life has become a misery.
He was instructed by FEMA to spend one month filming Ground Zero immediately after the 9/11 attacks to gather video evidence that could be used in a subsequent investigation into the events of that day. Of course, that investigation never took place, nor could it as the hands of inner government complicity would have become all too apparent. The 29 tapes that Sonnenfeld took during this one month period in which he was allowed unbridled access to Ground Zero, were therefore kept in his possession and, to those insiders, are walking dynamite and as Sonnenfeld describes, are full of anomalies that raise all manner of questions as to what happened on that day and immediately throw into dispute the whitewash story that emerged from the official, behind-doors enquiry.
In an interview with Voltaire.net, the now exiled Sonnenfeld tells his story and not only reveals what he exposed during that month at Ground Zero, but also blows the lid on a number of other operations he was involved in while with FEMA.
The following link http://www.prisonplanet.com/911-fema-videographer-at-ground-zero-goes-public.html gives access to the entirety of that interview which has been posted on infowars.com and provides further vital evidence to the mountain already in existence that 9/11 was an inside job.
Hounded ever since by government insiders and spooks, Sonnenfeld’s life has become a misery.
He was instructed by FEMA to spend one month filming Ground Zero immediately after the 9/11 attacks to gather video evidence that could be used in a subsequent investigation into the events of that day. Of course, that investigation never took place, nor could it as the hands of inner government complicity would have become all too apparent. The 29 tapes that Sonnenfeld took during this one month period in which he was allowed unbridled access to Ground Zero, were therefore kept in his possession and, to those insiders, are walking dynamite and as Sonnenfeld describes, are full of anomalies that raise all manner of questions as to what happened on that day and immediately throw into dispute the whitewash story that emerged from the official, behind-doors enquiry.
In an interview with Voltaire.net, the now exiled Sonnenfeld tells his story and not only reveals what he exposed during that month at Ground Zero, but also blows the lid on a number of other operations he was involved in while with FEMA.
The following link http://www.prisonplanet.com/911-fema-videographer-at-ground-zero-goes-public.html gives access to the entirety of that interview which has been posted on infowars.com and provides further vital evidence to the mountain already in existence that 9/11 was an inside job.
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
NWO machinations beginning to unravel
It’s good to know that taxpayers’ money is being wasted right, left and centre. Following a £100 million investigation into the 7/7 London bombers, senior security officials have had to concede, finally, that it is unlikely anyone will be brought to justice. The court hearing involving the alleged suspects, hasn’t convinced the jury and Waheed Ali, Mohammed Shakil, and Sadeer Saleem, following two trials, have all been acquitted.
But, of course, the whole thing was a fantasy in the first place. The official story of 7/7 is littered with inconsistencies and glaring question marks which have never been publicy addressed by an independent review panel. What is unofficially clear is that the men were used as scapegoats, set up by the intelligence services for something they hadn’t done as a cover for the real perpetrators, the back room MI5 ops working under orders from their manipulative masters.
In fact, the Met has ended up with egg on its face, again, as they fail to explain why they didn’t thwart the supposed actions of the men by interceding earlier when they say they had ‘prior knowledge’ of the attack and those supposedly involved.
It's shambolic and just goes to show the massive amounts of time and money wasted, not to mention the 52 who were needlessly killed, because of the political manipulation of a hidden group of psychopaths that want to rule the world and try to achieve that goal by creating staged terror attacks in order to further restrict on our way of life under their planned regime.
The whole thing, from the staged banking collapse, anthropomorphic global warming to the swine flu epidemic, 9/11 and 7/7, all carry with them the distinct hallmark of inside jobs each having a distinct goal of forming a new world order of control and domination. It’s become so transparent and obvious that I believe their plans in the eyes of a growing number of the population are beginning to unravel and are heading for imminent derailment. Indeed, let’s hope so!
But, of course, the whole thing was a fantasy in the first place. The official story of 7/7 is littered with inconsistencies and glaring question marks which have never been publicy addressed by an independent review panel. What is unofficially clear is that the men were used as scapegoats, set up by the intelligence services for something they hadn’t done as a cover for the real perpetrators, the back room MI5 ops working under orders from their manipulative masters.
In fact, the Met has ended up with egg on its face, again, as they fail to explain why they didn’t thwart the supposed actions of the men by interceding earlier when they say they had ‘prior knowledge’ of the attack and those supposedly involved.
It's shambolic and just goes to show the massive amounts of time and money wasted, not to mention the 52 who were needlessly killed, because of the political manipulation of a hidden group of psychopaths that want to rule the world and try to achieve that goal by creating staged terror attacks in order to further restrict on our way of life under their planned regime.
The whole thing, from the staged banking collapse, anthropomorphic global warming to the swine flu epidemic, 9/11 and 7/7, all carry with them the distinct hallmark of inside jobs each having a distinct goal of forming a new world order of control and domination. It’s become so transparent and obvious that I believe their plans in the eyes of a growing number of the population are beginning to unravel and are heading for imminent derailment. Indeed, let’s hope so!
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Another exorcism?
Just before the Easter break, Met Police Assistant Commissioner and anti-terror boss, Bob Quick, made an seeming indiscretion by openly exposing to public view a secret security document displaying details of a strategy, codenamed ‘Pathway’, for breaking an alleged terror cell, supposedly linked to al Qaeda, in Manchester.
Somehow, this has all the hallmarks of a deliberate whistleblowing exercise on the part of Quick and although the mainstream media cast it off as yet another bit of sloppiness by a senior public figure, I beg to differ. For someone like Quick, embedded in an organisation where discretion is paramount, to carry a highly restricted document in full view of journalists’ cameras is rather akin to leaving your flies open while engaging in an audience with the Queen. It just doesn’t happen.
I believe this is an exorcising of what could have been another false flag terror event and Quick’s actions, knowing that the text of the document would be caught on camera by the media and hit the headlines, would require the police to disrupt their plans, resulting in the ‘bringing forward’ of their operation to intervene in the gangs activities, by which time the deadly deed - a possible bomb attack on Manchester Airport over Easter - may have already been allowed to happen.
It has now transpired that the men involved were self-employed security delivery staff working for Newcastle-based Sky Interserve UK Limited and had occasion to make deliveries to secure areas within Manchester Airport. They had all received clearance from the Security Industry Authority, itself having recently being ridiculed for allowing 5,000 illegal immigrants working as guards. I smell a rat somewhere.
Once again, the men’s profiles make them seemingly unlikely suspects to engage in such a terror plot and although the Pakistani ISI allege that the men have links to the group, Lashkar-e-Taiba, or Army of the Righteous who were supposed to have been involved in the recent Mumbai attacks and the Lahore cricket tragedy - themselves highly suspicious and smacking of inside jobs - the whole thing seems to be highly contrived and yet just another incident of a group of rather straightforward average Joe’s being unwittingly conscripited into engaging in our security services’ politically-motivated dirty work campaign.
Although history may never reveal the real truth, I maintain that we may have to be eternally grateful to Bob Quick’s ‘indiscretion’ as not being indiscrete at all, but helping to keep us on the right side of a very thin and dangerous line by obliquely exposing inside plans to unleash more false flag terror on our society upon which our government and their ruling masters can use to enforce more restrictions on our lives and expand their surveillance state.
Somehow, this has all the hallmarks of a deliberate whistleblowing exercise on the part of Quick and although the mainstream media cast it off as yet another bit of sloppiness by a senior public figure, I beg to differ. For someone like Quick, embedded in an organisation where discretion is paramount, to carry a highly restricted document in full view of journalists’ cameras is rather akin to leaving your flies open while engaging in an audience with the Queen. It just doesn’t happen.
I believe this is an exorcising of what could have been another false flag terror event and Quick’s actions, knowing that the text of the document would be caught on camera by the media and hit the headlines, would require the police to disrupt their plans, resulting in the ‘bringing forward’ of their operation to intervene in the gangs activities, by which time the deadly deed - a possible bomb attack on Manchester Airport over Easter - may have already been allowed to happen.
It has now transpired that the men involved were self-employed security delivery staff working for Newcastle-based Sky Interserve UK Limited and had occasion to make deliveries to secure areas within Manchester Airport. They had all received clearance from the Security Industry Authority, itself having recently being ridiculed for allowing 5,000 illegal immigrants working as guards. I smell a rat somewhere.
Once again, the men’s profiles make them seemingly unlikely suspects to engage in such a terror plot and although the Pakistani ISI allege that the men have links to the group, Lashkar-e-Taiba, or Army of the Righteous who were supposed to have been involved in the recent Mumbai attacks and the Lahore cricket tragedy - themselves highly suspicious and smacking of inside jobs - the whole thing seems to be highly contrived and yet just another incident of a group of rather straightforward average Joe’s being unwittingly conscripited into engaging in our security services’ politically-motivated dirty work campaign.
Although history may never reveal the real truth, I maintain that we may have to be eternally grateful to Bob Quick’s ‘indiscretion’ as not being indiscrete at all, but helping to keep us on the right side of a very thin and dangerous line by obliquely exposing inside plans to unleash more false flag terror on our society upon which our government and their ruling masters can use to enforce more restrictions on our lives and expand their surveillance state.
Tuesday, April 07, 2009
Clutching at straws
Those in control are clearly getting edgy over the emerging awareness among the general public that 7/7 had all the hallmarks of an inside job. Don’t forget that most of the legislation being rolled out by the Home Office involving our being tracked and traced everywhere we go, rests upon the supposed events of that day and it is paramount in the eyes of our controllers that the those events remain, in our minds, as genuine terrorist attacks.
The day after 7/7, Peter Power of Visor Consultants shocked us all in his declaration to the BBC that his company had been engaged in an identical attack scenario concurrent and identical to the targets used by the bombers which seemed to verify the fact, when taken with all of the other highly questionable evidence over the events of that day, that 7/7, like 9/11, was staged under the cloak of an ‘exercise'.
Now, three-and-a-half years later, Power - no doubt under duress by the authorities - has come forward to make a formal detraction of any link between his company’s engagement in the drill and the actual events of the day.
The statement, reproduced in its entirety below, strikes anyone who has studied 7/7 and has estimated the unbelievably incredible co-incidence of the the drill scenario and the actual events of the day - calculated at something like 10 with 41 zeroes after it - as wholly disingenuous and because of its ‘clutching at straws’ nature, only seems to add support that the two were linked, one being the cover for the other - one of the oldest ruses used in false flag terror.
Judge for yourselves.
Here is Peter Power’s statement in full:
“There has been much nonsense written about why my company ran an exercise on 7 July 2005 that had very close parallels to the real thing that day. Since then I have made several attempts to add my own comments to numerous sites that seem to get increasingly excited about their own conspiracy theories and in the process exclude any rational debate. It seems those who occupy the world of finding conspiracy theories to replace just about any coincidence, do not want to have any dialogue with those offering a different view, but I have not yet given up hope. I am therefore hoping, perhaps naively, that someone might like to read an honest and factual account about a particular exercise my company ran in London three years ago.
Unfortunately, the BBC had postponed in 2008 a programme in their ‘conspiracy files’ series that would have done this. Our client three years ago agreed to be named in the BBC programme since the attitude of the producer and his team was very balanced (several conspiracy theorists were also invited to take part). We even allowed our complete exercise material to be made available to the BBC. Regrettably broadcasting in 2008 might have jeopardised an ongoing court case, so they had little choice about postponing it to 2009.
Early in 2005 Reed Elsevier, an organisation specialising in information and publishing that employs 1,000 people in and around London, asked us to help them prepare an effective crisis management plan and rehearse it before sign-off. Several draft scenarios were drawn up and the crisis team themselves set the exercise date and time: 9.00am on 7 July.
The test was planned as a table-top walk through for about six people (the CM team) in a lecture room with all injects simulated. Everything was on MS PowerPoint. The location of their Central London office near to Chancery Lane was chosen as one test site. With many staff travelling to work via the London underground system, the chosen exercise simulated incendiary devices on three trains, very similar to a real IRA attack in 1992, as well as other events.
As there had been eighteen terrorist bomb attacks on tube trains prior to 2005, choosing the London Underground was logical rather than just prescient. With this in mind it was hardly surprising that Deutsche Bank had run a similar exercise a few days before and, prior to that, a multi-agency (and much publicised) exercise code-named Osiris II had simulated a terrorist attack at Bank tube station. Moreover, I had also taken part in a BBC Panorama programme in 2004 as a panellist alongside Michael Portillo MP et al, in an unscripted debate (we had no idea at all what the scenario was to be?) on how London might once again, deal with terrorist attacks, only this time it was fictional (created entirely by the BBC).
In short, some of the research for our exercise had already been done. The scenario developed for our client even started by using fictitious news items from the Panorama programme then, as with any walk through exercise, events unfolded solely on a screen as dictated by the facilitator without any external injects or actions beyond the exercise room. Also factored into the scenario was to be an above ground fictitious bomb exploding not far from the head office of the protected Jewish Chronicle magazine where for exercise purposes, our imagined terrorists would have been aware that commuters would now be walking to work (past a building already considered a target) as some tube stations would have been closed.
Of just eight nearby tube stations that fell within possible exercise scope, three were chosen that, by coincidence, were involved in the awful drama that actually took place on 7 July 2005. A level of scenario validation that on this occasion, we could have done without.
An exercise that turns into the real thing is not that unusual. For example, in January 2003, thirty people were injured when a tube train derailed and hit a wall at speed. At the same time, the City of London Police were running an exercise for their central casualty bureau where the team quickly abandoned their plans and swung into action to cope with the real thing.
For a surprising number of people such coincidents cannot be accepted as such. There just has to be a conspiracy behind them, despite the obvious point that painstaking research will always identify probable above possible scenarios. By the way, the only reason I was asked to speak on TV news that day, when there was still much confusion about the real tragedies, was to encourage more organisations to thoroughly plan their own exercises knowing the threat of terrorism is and remains, very real. One tragic consequence being Islam, a great Abrahamic, monotheistic faith (along with Judaism and Christianity), has undeservedly become vilified by some people”.
Peter Power
Visor Consultants
The day after 7/7, Peter Power of Visor Consultants shocked us all in his declaration to the BBC that his company had been engaged in an identical attack scenario concurrent and identical to the targets used by the bombers which seemed to verify the fact, when taken with all of the other highly questionable evidence over the events of that day, that 7/7, like 9/11, was staged under the cloak of an ‘exercise'.
Now, three-and-a-half years later, Power - no doubt under duress by the authorities - has come forward to make a formal detraction of any link between his company’s engagement in the drill and the actual events of the day.
The statement, reproduced in its entirety below, strikes anyone who has studied 7/7 and has estimated the unbelievably incredible co-incidence of the the drill scenario and the actual events of the day - calculated at something like 10 with 41 zeroes after it - as wholly disingenuous and because of its ‘clutching at straws’ nature, only seems to add support that the two were linked, one being the cover for the other - one of the oldest ruses used in false flag terror.
Judge for yourselves.
Here is Peter Power’s statement in full:
“There has been much nonsense written about why my company ran an exercise on 7 July 2005 that had very close parallels to the real thing that day. Since then I have made several attempts to add my own comments to numerous sites that seem to get increasingly excited about their own conspiracy theories and in the process exclude any rational debate. It seems those who occupy the world of finding conspiracy theories to replace just about any coincidence, do not want to have any dialogue with those offering a different view, but I have not yet given up hope. I am therefore hoping, perhaps naively, that someone might like to read an honest and factual account about a particular exercise my company ran in London three years ago.
Unfortunately, the BBC had postponed in 2008 a programme in their ‘conspiracy files’ series that would have done this. Our client three years ago agreed to be named in the BBC programme since the attitude of the producer and his team was very balanced (several conspiracy theorists were also invited to take part). We even allowed our complete exercise material to be made available to the BBC. Regrettably broadcasting in 2008 might have jeopardised an ongoing court case, so they had little choice about postponing it to 2009.
Early in 2005 Reed Elsevier, an organisation specialising in information and publishing that employs 1,000 people in and around London, asked us to help them prepare an effective crisis management plan and rehearse it before sign-off. Several draft scenarios were drawn up and the crisis team themselves set the exercise date and time: 9.00am on 7 July.
The test was planned as a table-top walk through for about six people (the CM team) in a lecture room with all injects simulated. Everything was on MS PowerPoint. The location of their Central London office near to Chancery Lane was chosen as one test site. With many staff travelling to work via the London underground system, the chosen exercise simulated incendiary devices on three trains, very similar to a real IRA attack in 1992, as well as other events.
As there had been eighteen terrorist bomb attacks on tube trains prior to 2005, choosing the London Underground was logical rather than just prescient. With this in mind it was hardly surprising that Deutsche Bank had run a similar exercise a few days before and, prior to that, a multi-agency (and much publicised) exercise code-named Osiris II had simulated a terrorist attack at Bank tube station. Moreover, I had also taken part in a BBC Panorama programme in 2004 as a panellist alongside Michael Portillo MP et al, in an unscripted debate (we had no idea at all what the scenario was to be?) on how London might once again, deal with terrorist attacks, only this time it was fictional (created entirely by the BBC).
In short, some of the research for our exercise had already been done. The scenario developed for our client even started by using fictitious news items from the Panorama programme then, as with any walk through exercise, events unfolded solely on a screen as dictated by the facilitator without any external injects or actions beyond the exercise room. Also factored into the scenario was to be an above ground fictitious bomb exploding not far from the head office of the protected Jewish Chronicle magazine where for exercise purposes, our imagined terrorists would have been aware that commuters would now be walking to work (past a building already considered a target) as some tube stations would have been closed.
Of just eight nearby tube stations that fell within possible exercise scope, three were chosen that, by coincidence, were involved in the awful drama that actually took place on 7 July 2005. A level of scenario validation that on this occasion, we could have done without.
An exercise that turns into the real thing is not that unusual. For example, in January 2003, thirty people were injured when a tube train derailed and hit a wall at speed. At the same time, the City of London Police were running an exercise for their central casualty bureau where the team quickly abandoned their plans and swung into action to cope with the real thing.
For a surprising number of people such coincidents cannot be accepted as such. There just has to be a conspiracy behind them, despite the obvious point that painstaking research will always identify probable above possible scenarios. By the way, the only reason I was asked to speak on TV news that day, when there was still much confusion about the real tragedies, was to encourage more organisations to thoroughly plan their own exercises knowing the threat of terrorism is and remains, very real. One tragic consequence being Islam, a great Abrahamic, monotheistic faith (along with Judaism and Christianity), has undeservedly become vilified by some people”.
Peter Power
Visor Consultants
Thursday, February 05, 2009
What Cheney really meant in his statement the other day.
“The ultimate threat to the country” is “a 9/11-type event where we are armed with something much more dangerous than an airline ticket, a box cutter, the support of NORAD, the Pentagon and al CIAda - a nuclear weapon or a biological agent of some kind (we have a number of options on the table) that is deployed in the middle of an American city.
“That’s the one that would involve the deaths of perhaps hundreds of thousands of people, the one that the Pentagon and intelligence agencies would have to take much time planning and keep under wraps, and the ones you have to spend a hell of a lot of time guarding against,” he said.
“I think there’s a high probability that we’ll stage such a strike. Whether or not we’ll need to pull it off depends whether or not Obama - under our direction - can keep the American people under continual surveillance and control through increasingly tough legislation, suspension of the Bill of Rights (whatever those were) and all liberties and by keeping these policies in place we might just get to suspending all government-sponsored, mass-casualty false flag ops like 9/11 in the future. But then we’ll probably stage them anyway."
“That’s the one that would involve the deaths of perhaps hundreds of thousands of people, the one that the Pentagon and intelligence agencies would have to take much time planning and keep under wraps, and the ones you have to spend a hell of a lot of time guarding against,” he said.
“I think there’s a high probability that we’ll stage such a strike. Whether or not we’ll need to pull it off depends whether or not Obama - under our direction - can keep the American people under continual surveillance and control through increasingly tough legislation, suspension of the Bill of Rights (whatever those were) and all liberties and by keeping these policies in place we might just get to suspending all government-sponsored, mass-casualty false flag ops like 9/11 in the future. But then we’ll probably stage them anyway."
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
7/7 What really happened?
As we will never receive a true, official statement or expect a transparent investigation into what happened on the 7th of July 2005 and the London bombings, the onus has to be on those who make a rigorous and honest effort to piece the evidence together and draw considered conclusions.
Courtesy of Muab 'Dib, I received this morning a link to this well documented and concise compilation of all the existing and substantiated evidence of the events leading up to and on the day of 7 July 2005.
I suggest that Muab's account of events on this video come closer to the truth of what really happened on that fateful day than any official account from government sources will ever provide.
Consider the evidence presented in this documentary and I think you will agree that this seminal event, along with 9/11, clearly shows that the 'terrorist threat', to which we are daily reminded and warned to be vigilant of, is a giant hoax perpetrated by government for the real purpose of introducing draconian legislation that restrict our freedoms of speech and are used as excuses to incarcerate us in a surveillance society in 'our own interests of security'.
It seems that the true terrorists are not Muslim extremists but our own governments.
Courtesy of Muab 'Dib, I received this morning a link to this well documented and concise compilation of all the existing and substantiated evidence of the events leading up to and on the day of 7 July 2005.
I suggest that Muab's account of events on this video come closer to the truth of what really happened on that fateful day than any official account from government sources will ever provide.
Consider the evidence presented in this documentary and I think you will agree that this seminal event, along with 9/11, clearly shows that the 'terrorist threat', to which we are daily reminded and warned to be vigilant of, is a giant hoax perpetrated by government for the real purpose of introducing draconian legislation that restrict our freedoms of speech and are used as excuses to incarcerate us in a surveillance society in 'our own interests of security'.
It seems that the true terrorists are not Muslim extremists but our own governments.
Monday, November 12, 2007
BBC in for more flak over 9/11 ‘documentary’
As the 9/11 Truth Movement’s message on both sides of the Atlantic gathers apace, news comes today of a British physicist and mechanical engineer, John A Blacker, who is calling the BBC to account for its shameful display of ‘yellow journalism’ in the form of the Conspiracy Files on 9/11 which was aired last February.
In a letter to the BBC, he cites a whole catalogue of distortions, omissions and bias in the hour-long documentary, which, to any conscientious 9/11 researcher, was a gross insult. I posted a blog shortly after its airing outlining my objections, relaying them by email to the BBC and was not alone as it enraged many.
Blacker has raised a pre-action protocol with the BBC in an attempt to settle out of court and at the same time get an assurance from the corporation that the programme will never be aired again and that the BBC might produce a redactive account of the documentary in which due creedance is paid to the whole gamut of inconsistencies in the 9/11 Commission’s report and the irrefutable evidence which exists that the buildings underwent pre-planned demolition with government knowledge and - indeed - involvement.
Having refused to set a date to meet with Mr Blacker to discuss the issue, a date has now been set by the BBC for a dialogue later this month. We await to see if the BBC issues an apology.
Given the high political importance that 9/11 had and continues to have on geopolitical decision making, resulting in our loss of freedoms, the Iraq and Afghan wars and the smoking gun of government collusion and outright lying that followed this seminal event, it is hardly likely that a straight-jacketed state-controlled BBC will do much more than grudgingly apologise.
To see the correspondence which Blacker sent to the BBC go to http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/911-truth-we%E2%80%99ve-got-the-bbc-on-the-run/1706/
In a letter to the BBC, he cites a whole catalogue of distortions, omissions and bias in the hour-long documentary, which, to any conscientious 9/11 researcher, was a gross insult. I posted a blog shortly after its airing outlining my objections, relaying them by email to the BBC and was not alone as it enraged many.
Blacker has raised a pre-action protocol with the BBC in an attempt to settle out of court and at the same time get an assurance from the corporation that the programme will never be aired again and that the BBC might produce a redactive account of the documentary in which due creedance is paid to the whole gamut of inconsistencies in the 9/11 Commission’s report and the irrefutable evidence which exists that the buildings underwent pre-planned demolition with government knowledge and - indeed - involvement.
Having refused to set a date to meet with Mr Blacker to discuss the issue, a date has now been set by the BBC for a dialogue later this month. We await to see if the BBC issues an apology.
Given the high political importance that 9/11 had and continues to have on geopolitical decision making, resulting in our loss of freedoms, the Iraq and Afghan wars and the smoking gun of government collusion and outright lying that followed this seminal event, it is hardly likely that a straight-jacketed state-controlled BBC will do much more than grudgingly apologise.
To see the correspondence which Blacker sent to the BBC go to http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/911-truth-we%E2%80%99ve-got-the-bbc-on-the-run/1706/
Tuesday, October 09, 2007
A letter to Gordon Brown
Dear Prime Minister
Airport Security Checks
On a recent flight from London Heathrow to Oslo, I and many others were forcibly reminded of the swingeing measures and procedures undertaken by security personnel at airports.
Our group consisted of many elderly people including ex-servicemen who were joining a coastal voyage at Bergen and wished to visit towns and villages on the Norwegian coast their naval units had helped liberate from the Germans at the end of WW2.
Under the current regime - which appears to be permanently in place - everyone seems to be regarded as a potential terrorist, even our group of frail 80-year-old’s, many of whom, after being put through the ordeal of intense searches, removal of belts and shoes and a bewildering procedure of half-undressing, were left physically shaken. One member of our party who was suffering from a liver condition requiring him to take regular doses of water was denied the bottle of mineral water he was visibly carrying in his regulation clear plastic bag. The 100ml allowance was hardly sufficient and liquids were only available for purchase from the in-flight staff some way into the flight.
Flying, in itself, can be a nerve-racking experience for the elderly and de-hydration becomes a natural effect of that worry. With the whole procedure repeated at Oslo for our onward transfer flight to Bergen, our colleague was visibly ill by the time we reached our destination.
I have personally heard of numerous instances of people being humiliated in public by having their trousers fall down in full view of other passengers after being told to remove their belts, while others have been treated by security staff like common criminals because they inadvertently happened to carry a tube of toothpaste in their night bag.
But what distresses me most is the reasoning upon which these unprecedented security measures have been based.
We are told that following the attacks of 9/11 in the US and the subsequent bombings in London on 7/7 that the world is a less safe place and a constant terrorist threat exists requiring high security measures to remain in place.
Are we expected to take your government’s word for that?
In depth analysis of those two seminal events by myself and thousands of others reveal countless unanswered questions and inconsistencies between the official version of events and what has been actually witnessed at first hand. The 9/11 Commission Report answers none of these glaring inconsistencies and we are left with the preposterous scenario of a group of Islamic terrorists, whose inabilities to even fly a Cessna let alone large commercial aircraft, being capable of penetrating NORAD defence systems (which were coincidentally engaged in an drill in which a similar scenario was being enacted) to pinpoint specific targets - particularly in the case of the Pentagon - with unbelievable dexterity, defying aeronautical science. Taken in tandem with the mountains of evidence which clearly identify fore-knowledge of an attack on 9/11 and the official version of events becomes a sham.
Likewise the official version of events regarding the London bombings is riddled with inconsistencies - let alone another identical drill simultaneously undertaken by Visor Consultants which focused on the exact same locations as those targeted by the supposed bombers - and any honest scrutiny based on media reports and personal eyewitness accounts makes one come to the considered conclusion that the suspects were unwittingly aided and abetted in their activities by British intelligence agencies. Where does leave your government?
Indeed, the restrictions on carrying liquids on board flights has stemmed from the equally questionable events of 10 August 2006 in which, you may recall, a supposed terrorist was to have mixed either triacetone triperoxide, diacetone diperoxide or hexamethylene tripeoxide diamine with a sports drink in an aircraft toilet, an impossible feat according to
Lieutenant-Colonel (ret) Nigel Wylde a former British Army Intelligence Officer, who declared that the volatility of the substances would make the whole process of creating a bomb from these materials wholly impossible.
Are these events real or concocted?
Before we start to humiliate swathes of the general public, including the elderly, having each and every one of us treated as a potential terrorist, should we not have a fair and transparent inquest into what really happened on 9/11, 7/7 and the many other so-called terrorist threats that have followed to see if there is any real justification for the continuation of these draconian security measures. Or is it - as I currently believe - little to do with a perceived terrorist threat and more to do with keeping the public under a firm state of control, as yet another means of reducing our rights as citizens in which the Labour government has played a monumental role during its reign.
Yours respectfully
Airport Security Checks
On a recent flight from London Heathrow to Oslo, I and many others were forcibly reminded of the swingeing measures and procedures undertaken by security personnel at airports.
Our group consisted of many elderly people including ex-servicemen who were joining a coastal voyage at Bergen and wished to visit towns and villages on the Norwegian coast their naval units had helped liberate from the Germans at the end of WW2.
Under the current regime - which appears to be permanently in place - everyone seems to be regarded as a potential terrorist, even our group of frail 80-year-old’s, many of whom, after being put through the ordeal of intense searches, removal of belts and shoes and a bewildering procedure of half-undressing, were left physically shaken. One member of our party who was suffering from a liver condition requiring him to take regular doses of water was denied the bottle of mineral water he was visibly carrying in his regulation clear plastic bag. The 100ml allowance was hardly sufficient and liquids were only available for purchase from the in-flight staff some way into the flight.
Flying, in itself, can be a nerve-racking experience for the elderly and de-hydration becomes a natural effect of that worry. With the whole procedure repeated at Oslo for our onward transfer flight to Bergen, our colleague was visibly ill by the time we reached our destination.
I have personally heard of numerous instances of people being humiliated in public by having their trousers fall down in full view of other passengers after being told to remove their belts, while others have been treated by security staff like common criminals because they inadvertently happened to carry a tube of toothpaste in their night bag.
But what distresses me most is the reasoning upon which these unprecedented security measures have been based.
We are told that following the attacks of 9/11 in the US and the subsequent bombings in London on 7/7 that the world is a less safe place and a constant terrorist threat exists requiring high security measures to remain in place.
Are we expected to take your government’s word for that?
In depth analysis of those two seminal events by myself and thousands of others reveal countless unanswered questions and inconsistencies between the official version of events and what has been actually witnessed at first hand. The 9/11 Commission Report answers none of these glaring inconsistencies and we are left with the preposterous scenario of a group of Islamic terrorists, whose inabilities to even fly a Cessna let alone large commercial aircraft, being capable of penetrating NORAD defence systems (which were coincidentally engaged in an drill in which a similar scenario was being enacted) to pinpoint specific targets - particularly in the case of the Pentagon - with unbelievable dexterity, defying aeronautical science. Taken in tandem with the mountains of evidence which clearly identify fore-knowledge of an attack on 9/11 and the official version of events becomes a sham.
Likewise the official version of events regarding the London bombings is riddled with inconsistencies - let alone another identical drill simultaneously undertaken by Visor Consultants which focused on the exact same locations as those targeted by the supposed bombers - and any honest scrutiny based on media reports and personal eyewitness accounts makes one come to the considered conclusion that the suspects were unwittingly aided and abetted in their activities by British intelligence agencies. Where does leave your government?
Indeed, the restrictions on carrying liquids on board flights has stemmed from the equally questionable events of 10 August 2006 in which, you may recall, a supposed terrorist was to have mixed either triacetone triperoxide, diacetone diperoxide or hexamethylene tripeoxide diamine with a sports drink in an aircraft toilet, an impossible feat according to
Lieutenant-Colonel (ret) Nigel Wylde a former British Army Intelligence Officer, who declared that the volatility of the substances would make the whole process of creating a bomb from these materials wholly impossible.
Are these events real or concocted?
Before we start to humiliate swathes of the general public, including the elderly, having each and every one of us treated as a potential terrorist, should we not have a fair and transparent inquest into what really happened on 9/11, 7/7 and the many other so-called terrorist threats that have followed to see if there is any real justification for the continuation of these draconian security measures. Or is it - as I currently believe - little to do with a perceived terrorist threat and more to do with keeping the public under a firm state of control, as yet another means of reducing our rights as citizens in which the Labour government has played a monumental role during its reign.
Yours respectfully
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
The Osama bin Goldstein Show takes to the air - again!
On a day when thousands are thronging the streets of New York to remember the many who died six years ago in what is, so far, the biggest scam of the 21st century - there will no doubt be bigger ones to follow - Osama bin Goldstein has taken to the airwaves at this most fitting moment, lest we forget. How could we?
The endless disengenuous rhetoric from the US government’s IntelCenter is wearing exceedingly thin. In today’s show, we have bin Laden, three years on from his last series, looking no older, sitting at the same desk with the same stacks of papers in front of him, wearing the same white hat and shirt and yellow sweater. The only thing that has changed is his beard, which looks to have been dyed - a wholly uncommon practice for Muslims. But then, these so-called ‘radical Islamists’ are usually anything but, especially if they’re working for the CIA. Remember Mohammed Atta who had a penchant for pork chops, booze and women - a different sort of fundamentalism I would have thought!
In the show, Bin Laden introduces the pre-recorded martyrdom video of one of the 9/11 hijackers, Waleed al Shehri, who was supposedly one of the hijackers on American Airlines flight 11 that crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center. Are we are supposed to believe all this bunk, when al Shehri, at this moment, is protesting his innocence in a jail in Casablanca!
I sense, though that the US Intelligence producers of the bin Goldstein Show, are getting lazy. Although 3.5 minutes of the show is a straight repeat, the rest is boringly still frame and its that frozen visage of bin Goldstein that accompanies all of the new rhetoric. Despite the vast fund of the latest hi-tech televisual gizmos at the disposal of the US government intelligence (propaganda) machine, they couldn’t be bothered to synch the new bits of his speech to his adjusted facial movements. But then bin Laden’s been dead for years - hasn’t he?
If it wasn’t so serious, it would be laughable.
For a full and blow-by-blow account of the 9/11 anniversary and the incisive truths behind what really happened six years ago today, as always go to www.prisonplanet.com/
The endless disengenuous rhetoric from the US government’s IntelCenter is wearing exceedingly thin. In today’s show, we have bin Laden, three years on from his last series, looking no older, sitting at the same desk with the same stacks of papers in front of him, wearing the same white hat and shirt and yellow sweater. The only thing that has changed is his beard, which looks to have been dyed - a wholly uncommon practice for Muslims. But then, these so-called ‘radical Islamists’ are usually anything but, especially if they’re working for the CIA. Remember Mohammed Atta who had a penchant for pork chops, booze and women - a different sort of fundamentalism I would have thought!
In the show, Bin Laden introduces the pre-recorded martyrdom video of one of the 9/11 hijackers, Waleed al Shehri, who was supposedly one of the hijackers on American Airlines flight 11 that crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center. Are we are supposed to believe all this bunk, when al Shehri, at this moment, is protesting his innocence in a jail in Casablanca!
I sense, though that the US Intelligence producers of the bin Goldstein Show, are getting lazy. Although 3.5 minutes of the show is a straight repeat, the rest is boringly still frame and its that frozen visage of bin Goldstein that accompanies all of the new rhetoric. Despite the vast fund of the latest hi-tech televisual gizmos at the disposal of the US government intelligence (propaganda) machine, they couldn’t be bothered to synch the new bits of his speech to his adjusted facial movements. But then bin Laden’s been dead for years - hasn’t he?
If it wasn’t so serious, it would be laughable.
For a full and blow-by-blow account of the 9/11 anniversary and the incisive truths behind what really happened six years ago today, as always go to www.prisonplanet.com/
Wednesday, August 08, 2007
Government Agroterrorism?
On hearing the first reports of the return of foot and mouth disease (FMD) to this country last week, I got that old feeling of deja vu.
We’ve been here before and it reminded me of those unanswered questions that surfaced during the last epidemic back in 2001 which finally resulted in thousands of cattle being slaughtered at a total cost to the economy of £9bn.
Those questions remain unanswered to this day:
Well, isn’t that a co-incidence. A drill was also being staged just prior to the 2001 epidemic and don’t these drills always pop up at the same time as the real life event?
Remember the 7/7 London bombings when Visor Consultants were carrying out an identical scenario at the same time as the so-called London Bombers were supposedly doing it for real, and 9/11 when an identical drill of airliners crashing into buildings was being staged. It sounds like it’s all staged to me.
If it was staged, who stands to gain?
Well certainly not the farmers, who, having just emerged from a dreadful summer of very high rainfall, have the prospect of facing a freeze on all movements of their livestock, not to mention a cull, and the loss of their overseas markets.
But Merial would have a lot to gain. Orders of the vaccine have already been placed and if the epidemic escalates it could turn out to be a very lucrative bit of business. Remember Tamiflu, that worthless vaccine developed by Gilead Sciences Inc, doled out in vast quantities in answer to the Bird Flu scam - the firm that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had a financial interest in?
Of course, in order to place a liability smokescreen over any direct involvement, Merial, with the help of chief government paint and plastering agent, Lord Stevens, will no doubt put the blame on the virus escaping from their overflowing drains during the recent wet weather.
But when one looks at the ongoing antipathy of this government towards the very powerful countryside lobby - the Countryside Alliance - whose voice was loudly heard in London during 2002, there is most likely a vested interest by government to send another crippling blow to the agricultural industry, hoping that more farmers will be put out of business and others will throw in the towel. Government attempts to outlaw shooting and hunting are well known and this is just another weapon in their armoury.
In fact, it is just another blow for country dwellers generally as Simon Heffer so clearly pointed out in his piece in the London Telegraph today:
“It was a Leitmotif of the Blair government that it hated the countryside. There could be no other explanation for much of its behaviour. John Prescott, when he still held office, saw power as a vehicle for the propagation of class hatred: and, in his profound ignorance, he saw rural England especially as a place populated and exploited solely by his class enemies.
No road-building scheme could be too destructive, no housing development too massive, ugly or intrusive, that it would not serve right the supposedly Tory-voting middle classes whose own properties stood to be blighted by them.
He was not, of course, the only offender. The growing appetite to punish the motorist as a revenue-raising operation hit country people harder than most: not merely because we live in comparative isolation in many cases, but because the Government feels that public transport is a service fit to be provided only to those in urban areas. A similar view is taken of the need for post offices, so that businesses that have for years been a focus of rural life are now, in many cases, about to be obliterated.
An earlier attempt, not so far entirely successful, to wreck the rural economy was a consequence of the supremely ignorant campaign against foxhunting. And as for those other two staples of village life: the pub may be one of the 15 a week that closed permanently in 2005, despite planning regulations making it hard to use such buildings for residential purposes; and if the church is not redundant (as about 10 per cent of those built for the Church of England now are), it may share its incumbent with 10 or 15 other parishes.
So the foot and mouth outbreak, coming on top of all this decline and the recent savage losses caused by the floods, is a blow that many communities will find hard to bear. Just after the last outbreak, when the Government was trying (in another helpful pro-countryside measure) to limit the legal use of shotguns for sporting purposes, an MP asked how many fatalities or woundings had been caused by legally held weapons. The answer was that all, or almost all, such incidents appeared to have been farmers shooting themselves amid the wreckage of their livelihoods. Who is to say that there will not be such a toll this time?”
So will government doctrine eventually see the eradication of the land-owning Country Alliance lobby, turning their land over to big corporations intent on harvesting acres of GM crops and make vast profits while forcing country-folk out of their rural habitat into urban ghettos where they can be tracked and traced more easily?
I wouldn’t put it past them and their globalist minders!
We’ve been here before and it reminded me of those unanswered questions that surfaced during the last epidemic back in 2001 which finally resulted in thousands of cattle being slaughtered at a total cost to the economy of £9bn.
Those questions remain unanswered to this day:
- Why did a phial of the virus disappear from the government’s Porton Down laboratory just prior to the outbreak?
- Why was no action taken following the discovery of the disease in some sheep in Wales almost a month before the outbreak was officially acknowledged?
- Why were timber merchants approached by the then Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food to supply timber for pyres in early February, long before the true nature of the epidemic had become evident? A government spokesman said that this was only a contingency plan, yet why did it envisage mass slaughter - even including healthy beasts - at such an early stage?
Well, isn’t that a co-incidence. A drill was also being staged just prior to the 2001 epidemic and don’t these drills always pop up at the same time as the real life event?
Remember the 7/7 London bombings when Visor Consultants were carrying out an identical scenario at the same time as the so-called London Bombers were supposedly doing it for real, and 9/11 when an identical drill of airliners crashing into buildings was being staged. It sounds like it’s all staged to me.
If it was staged, who stands to gain?
Well certainly not the farmers, who, having just emerged from a dreadful summer of very high rainfall, have the prospect of facing a freeze on all movements of their livestock, not to mention a cull, and the loss of their overseas markets.
But Merial would have a lot to gain. Orders of the vaccine have already been placed and if the epidemic escalates it could turn out to be a very lucrative bit of business. Remember Tamiflu, that worthless vaccine developed by Gilead Sciences Inc, doled out in vast quantities in answer to the Bird Flu scam - the firm that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had a financial interest in?
Of course, in order to place a liability smokescreen over any direct involvement, Merial, with the help of chief government paint and plastering agent, Lord Stevens, will no doubt put the blame on the virus escaping from their overflowing drains during the recent wet weather.
But when one looks at the ongoing antipathy of this government towards the very powerful countryside lobby - the Countryside Alliance - whose voice was loudly heard in London during 2002, there is most likely a vested interest by government to send another crippling blow to the agricultural industry, hoping that more farmers will be put out of business and others will throw in the towel. Government attempts to outlaw shooting and hunting are well known and this is just another weapon in their armoury.
In fact, it is just another blow for country dwellers generally as Simon Heffer so clearly pointed out in his piece in the London Telegraph today:
“It was a Leitmotif of the Blair government that it hated the countryside. There could be no other explanation for much of its behaviour. John Prescott, when he still held office, saw power as a vehicle for the propagation of class hatred: and, in his profound ignorance, he saw rural England especially as a place populated and exploited solely by his class enemies.
No road-building scheme could be too destructive, no housing development too massive, ugly or intrusive, that it would not serve right the supposedly Tory-voting middle classes whose own properties stood to be blighted by them.
He was not, of course, the only offender. The growing appetite to punish the motorist as a revenue-raising operation hit country people harder than most: not merely because we live in comparative isolation in many cases, but because the Government feels that public transport is a service fit to be provided only to those in urban areas. A similar view is taken of the need for post offices, so that businesses that have for years been a focus of rural life are now, in many cases, about to be obliterated.
An earlier attempt, not so far entirely successful, to wreck the rural economy was a consequence of the supremely ignorant campaign against foxhunting. And as for those other two staples of village life: the pub may be one of the 15 a week that closed permanently in 2005, despite planning regulations making it hard to use such buildings for residential purposes; and if the church is not redundant (as about 10 per cent of those built for the Church of England now are), it may share its incumbent with 10 or 15 other parishes.
So the foot and mouth outbreak, coming on top of all this decline and the recent savage losses caused by the floods, is a blow that many communities will find hard to bear. Just after the last outbreak, when the Government was trying (in another helpful pro-countryside measure) to limit the legal use of shotguns for sporting purposes, an MP asked how many fatalities or woundings had been caused by legally held weapons. The answer was that all, or almost all, such incidents appeared to have been farmers shooting themselves amid the wreckage of their livelihoods. Who is to say that there will not be such a toll this time?”
So will government doctrine eventually see the eradication of the land-owning Country Alliance lobby, turning their land over to big corporations intent on harvesting acres of GM crops and make vast profits while forcing country-folk out of their rural habitat into urban ghettos where they can be tracked and traced more easily?
I wouldn’t put it past them and their globalist minders!
Monday, July 02, 2007
More staged terror?
Over the last weekend we have seen a resurgence of potential terror attacks on British soil.
First it was a smoking Mercedes in London’s Haymarket early on Saturday morning and shortly afterwards another Mercedes in nearby Cockspur Street. Both were said to contain patio-gas cannisters and a quantity of petrol and nails. Then, at Glasgow Airport on Saturday afternoon, a Cherokee Jeep bizarely crashed into a terminal building while one Asian man, ablaze, jumped out of the vehicle to the astonishment of holidaymakers.
The media immediately went to town, impressing readers and viewers of the potentially serious damage the two London cars could have caused, with Fox News exclaiming that “Had either device gone off it would have generated a huge fireball and a shockwave spreading over 400 yards in all directions”.
But not so, according to ex-CIA explosives expert, Larry Johnson, interviewed on MSNBC. When asked to evaluate the potential damage caused by the cars, should their contents have been detonated, he explained that although the cars themselves would have been seriously damaged, the collateral damage to the immediate environment would have been minimal, extending to within only a few feet of each Mercedes. The contents bore no relationship to the high explosives used in similar car bomb attacks in Iraq which currently occur on a daily basis and are far more powerful. In Johnson’s view the media were hyping these events in order to scare the public.
The suspected ringleader of these attacks has been named and is a brilliant neurologist, currently working at Paisley General Hospital in Scotland. It is believed that others involved in the attacks were also doctors and some have linked the timing of these attacks to the inauguration of Gordon Brown as Prime Minister last Friday. It is believed that these doctors could be linked to al Qaeda. Shock, horror, al Qaeda at large in the NHS!
How timely. As Paul Watson on infowars.com commented “Gordon Brown has swept into Downing Street with the aid of a new injection of the strategy of tension”.
If we were really at war with Islamic terrorists then surely the government would impose strict controls on their passage in and out of the country. But no, in fact quite the opposite, suspects seem to have the right to come and go freely.
It begs the question, were these just more government intelligence staged events involving unwitting patsies all destined to impart a message?
We have to remember the distinctions between the various types of ‘staged’ terrorism but in each we can pin a large measure of involvement both upon government whether directly or as a result of its actions.
1 Direct covert involvement by governments as in 9/11 and 7/7 where overwhelming evidence exists in the public domain of covert ‘inside’ participation from elements within government executed through the higher levels of its intelligence departments’ command, with the outcome from these events being used to set a political agenda.
2 Indirect covert involvement by governments as in many IRA attacks, both in mainland Britain and Northern Ireland, and confirmed by the confessions of Kevin Fulton, third parties are infiltrated into the higher ranks of the militant group by government intelligence agencies, directly offering technical assistance in bombings, again, the outcomes from which go to support that same government’s political agenda.
3. Backlash from government policies Terrorism caused directly by militant groups resulting from their disgust toward government policy as it affects them.
In all these instances, it is government which is ultimately to blame and it is they who are using the terrorism, however caused, to further their agendas.
In the wake of this current round of ‘staged’ or ‘real’ events - whether the perpetrators were consciously or unwittingly involved as useful stooges, one can bet that it will all be used to further restrict our freedoms and herald in ever more draconian legislation to keep us all incarcerated in Big Brother's Brave New World Order.
First it was a smoking Mercedes in London’s Haymarket early on Saturday morning and shortly afterwards another Mercedes in nearby Cockspur Street. Both were said to contain patio-gas cannisters and a quantity of petrol and nails. Then, at Glasgow Airport on Saturday afternoon, a Cherokee Jeep bizarely crashed into a terminal building while one Asian man, ablaze, jumped out of the vehicle to the astonishment of holidaymakers.
The media immediately went to town, impressing readers and viewers of the potentially serious damage the two London cars could have caused, with Fox News exclaiming that “Had either device gone off it would have generated a huge fireball and a shockwave spreading over 400 yards in all directions”.
But not so, according to ex-CIA explosives expert, Larry Johnson, interviewed on MSNBC. When asked to evaluate the potential damage caused by the cars, should their contents have been detonated, he explained that although the cars themselves would have been seriously damaged, the collateral damage to the immediate environment would have been minimal, extending to within only a few feet of each Mercedes. The contents bore no relationship to the high explosives used in similar car bomb attacks in Iraq which currently occur on a daily basis and are far more powerful. In Johnson’s view the media were hyping these events in order to scare the public.
The suspected ringleader of these attacks has been named and is a brilliant neurologist, currently working at Paisley General Hospital in Scotland. It is believed that others involved in the attacks were also doctors and some have linked the timing of these attacks to the inauguration of Gordon Brown as Prime Minister last Friday. It is believed that these doctors could be linked to al Qaeda. Shock, horror, al Qaeda at large in the NHS!
How timely. As Paul Watson on infowars.com commented “Gordon Brown has swept into Downing Street with the aid of a new injection of the strategy of tension”.
If we were really at war with Islamic terrorists then surely the government would impose strict controls on their passage in and out of the country. But no, in fact quite the opposite, suspects seem to have the right to come and go freely.
It begs the question, were these just more government intelligence staged events involving unwitting patsies all destined to impart a message?
We have to remember the distinctions between the various types of ‘staged’ terrorism but in each we can pin a large measure of involvement both upon government whether directly or as a result of its actions.
1 Direct covert involvement by governments as in 9/11 and 7/7 where overwhelming evidence exists in the public domain of covert ‘inside’ participation from elements within government executed through the higher levels of its intelligence departments’ command, with the outcome from these events being used to set a political agenda.
2 Indirect covert involvement by governments as in many IRA attacks, both in mainland Britain and Northern Ireland, and confirmed by the confessions of Kevin Fulton, third parties are infiltrated into the higher ranks of the militant group by government intelligence agencies, directly offering technical assistance in bombings, again, the outcomes from which go to support that same government’s political agenda.
3. Backlash from government policies Terrorism caused directly by militant groups resulting from their disgust toward government policy as it affects them.
In all these instances, it is government which is ultimately to blame and it is they who are using the terrorism, however caused, to further their agendas.
In the wake of this current round of ‘staged’ or ‘real’ events - whether the perpetrators were consciously or unwittingly involved as useful stooges, one can bet that it will all be used to further restrict our freedoms and herald in ever more draconian legislation to keep us all incarcerated in Big Brother's Brave New World Order.
Tuesday, August 15, 2006
The Real Modus Operandi
News reports have revealed that the British government and MI5 wanted to postpone the arrest of those involved in the proposed airliner bombings until after the dastardly deed had been done. It is believed that the bombings were to have taken place on August 16 and the fact that our government and intelligence services were prepared to wait until after an estimated 3,000 innocent passengers could have been killed, beggars belief.
The Daily Mail has revealed how MI5 had employed ‘sneak and peak’ teams to bug and follow the unfolding plot up to and beyond its enactment. These infiltration teams were composed of SAS specialists who conducted their operation in much the same way as they had with the IRA in Northern Ireland. The London Times has reported that Pakistani intelligence services believe that a British intelligence mole (or moles) had been planted in the terror cell.
It is known, thanks to whistleblower Kevin Fulton, that in the 1980s and 90s, the SAS and British military intelligence routinely embedded themselves with the violent branches of the IRA, aiding and abetting terrorist acts against Protestants in Northern Ireland in order to skew the political situation. Fulton went public over these covert activities because as an intelligence officer himself, he and his department were being given the Prime Minister’s authority to engage in terrorist acts which would cost the lives of many, such as the 1998 Omagh bombing in which 29 people including babies were killed.
This same modus operandi was used in the 7/7 bombings, with evidence, once again, showing heavy involvement by MI5. The Fact that the so-called ringleader, Mohammed Siddique Khan’s car was known to be bugged by MI5, despite Met Police denials, shows complicit knowledge, if indeed not covert involvement within the intelligence services in the 7/7 bombings killing 52 and injuring another 770 people. Former Met Police officer Charles Shoebridge has even gone on record to say that the evidence points to the shocking fact that Khan was working for MI5 as an informant.
We have now heard the opinion of former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, who believes that the proposed bombings were staged propaganda and a means for Blair and Bush to absolve themselves and regain face at a time of low ratings in the opinion polls.
Here’s is how it works.
In the ongoing bid by our globalist masters to entrap us in their control web, we are faced with potential acts of terrorism which we are told must be fought with the loss of our liberties if we are to remain ‘safe’. We are led to believe that radical Islamists are the common enemy, they hate of our ‘democratic’ way of life and are constantly planning to terrorise the west.
To make this a palpable reality, our government, on directives from globalist policy think tanks, sanctions the intelligence agencies and SAS to covertly infiltrate radical Muslim groups, aid and encourage these would-be extremists with the intellectual and physical means to carry out terrorist attacks, then engage young, naive youths from Muslim backgrounds, in activities that are explained to them as ‘training exercises’ or drills which are supposedly designed to help the security services be more effective, while in reality they are being engaged, unwittingly, in real terrorists activities.
This is why, so often, the suspects in these terror attacks, whether actual or foiled, appear to be innocent, decent law-abiding and quiet young men and very often not particularly bright. They are the ones that either get blown up or incarcerated in police swoops, while the real ring leaders - the MI5 assets - avoid recrimination by being safeguarded by those very same intelligence agencies and paymasters.
Meanwhile Joe Public loses more of his rights in order to be ‘protected’ from these terrorists.
Yesterday we saw the announcement that new airport procedures are to be introduced with particular religious and ethnic groups (Muslims) being monitored very closely. This is another desired result for the globalists who are clearly hell-bent on marginalising the whole Muslim ethic in their ‘ethnic cleansing’ of the Middle East to make way for one homogenous global ‘religion’ and world state.
Now that this globalist-inspired modus operandi is becoming more and more evident as each day passes, and today’s revelation that British security services, at the behest of our government, were quite prepared to sacrifice the lives of 3,000 innocent people before arresting the long-known ringleaders - who were in their employ anyway - it is time we and our elected MPs demanded an unbiased inquiry into the events of last week.
Any such report would very likely expose the whole rotten game play and bring the house of cards crashing down.
Growing scepticism
Over the past few days, several newspapers and commentators have been reporting a growing scepticism among the British public over the validity of the many terrorist plots that we are constantly being bombarded with in the media.
With Charles de Menezes having being wrongly targeted as a terrorist, the Forest Gate raid being proven to be a false flag, suspects from the 7/7 bombings looking unlikely candidates as suicide bombers, the initial false flag report of the neurotic woman aboard a Washington DC flight today, all set against a background of lies and mis-information given out by our government in relation to Iraq’s WMD capability, it’s no wonder that a growing air of mistrust is descending upon the British public, while the credibility of Blair and his entourage plummets even further.
Last week’s intended attack on multiple trans-Atlantic flights is rapidly joining the ranks of the plethora of other potential incidents to be tagged as another piece of fabrication. Many view it as a deliberate ploy to divert people’s attention of the Lebanese/Israeli conflict and our government’s bad posturing in favour of an aggressive Israel, while others, quite rightly, see a connection between each new terror alert and our liberties being flushed down the pan via another round of draconian legislation.
Government credibility is beginning to go through the floor and Blair and his minders from above must be getting pretty twitchy right now as Internet newsgroups, blogs and chat rooms as well as disconcerting sounds within some mainstream newspapers increasingly air sceptical views over what our governments are really up to. Conspiracy theories are rife, only the conspiracies are not the products of over-inventive members of the public, but appear to be the fruits of our government in collusion with its intelligence agencies.
Long may this metamorphosis of growing public awareness continue. What we now have to wait for is another 9/11 which I and others view as being inevitable enabling Blair and Bush to make a bid in turning the tide of public scepticism and attempting to re-inforce the view that there really are radicals out there determined to destroy our way of life. But that next 9/11 won't be a result of the actions of Muslim extremists, as with 9/11 they will be orchestrated by our own desperate governments!
The Daily Mail has revealed how MI5 had employed ‘sneak and peak’ teams to bug and follow the unfolding plot up to and beyond its enactment. These infiltration teams were composed of SAS specialists who conducted their operation in much the same way as they had with the IRA in Northern Ireland. The London Times has reported that Pakistani intelligence services believe that a British intelligence mole (or moles) had been planted in the terror cell.
It is known, thanks to whistleblower Kevin Fulton, that in the 1980s and 90s, the SAS and British military intelligence routinely embedded themselves with the violent branches of the IRA, aiding and abetting terrorist acts against Protestants in Northern Ireland in order to skew the political situation. Fulton went public over these covert activities because as an intelligence officer himself, he and his department were being given the Prime Minister’s authority to engage in terrorist acts which would cost the lives of many, such as the 1998 Omagh bombing in which 29 people including babies were killed.
This same modus operandi was used in the 7/7 bombings, with evidence, once again, showing heavy involvement by MI5. The Fact that the so-called ringleader, Mohammed Siddique Khan’s car was known to be bugged by MI5, despite Met Police denials, shows complicit knowledge, if indeed not covert involvement within the intelligence services in the 7/7 bombings killing 52 and injuring another 770 people. Former Met Police officer Charles Shoebridge has even gone on record to say that the evidence points to the shocking fact that Khan was working for MI5 as an informant.
We have now heard the opinion of former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, who believes that the proposed bombings were staged propaganda and a means for Blair and Bush to absolve themselves and regain face at a time of low ratings in the opinion polls.
Here’s is how it works.
In the ongoing bid by our globalist masters to entrap us in their control web, we are faced with potential acts of terrorism which we are told must be fought with the loss of our liberties if we are to remain ‘safe’. We are led to believe that radical Islamists are the common enemy, they hate of our ‘democratic’ way of life and are constantly planning to terrorise the west.
To make this a palpable reality, our government, on directives from globalist policy think tanks, sanctions the intelligence agencies and SAS to covertly infiltrate radical Muslim groups, aid and encourage these would-be extremists with the intellectual and physical means to carry out terrorist attacks, then engage young, naive youths from Muslim backgrounds, in activities that are explained to them as ‘training exercises’ or drills which are supposedly designed to help the security services be more effective, while in reality they are being engaged, unwittingly, in real terrorists activities.
This is why, so often, the suspects in these terror attacks, whether actual or foiled, appear to be innocent, decent law-abiding and quiet young men and very often not particularly bright. They are the ones that either get blown up or incarcerated in police swoops, while the real ring leaders - the MI5 assets - avoid recrimination by being safeguarded by those very same intelligence agencies and paymasters.
Meanwhile Joe Public loses more of his rights in order to be ‘protected’ from these terrorists.
Yesterday we saw the announcement that new airport procedures are to be introduced with particular religious and ethnic groups (Muslims) being monitored very closely. This is another desired result for the globalists who are clearly hell-bent on marginalising the whole Muslim ethic in their ‘ethnic cleansing’ of the Middle East to make way for one homogenous global ‘religion’ and world state.
Now that this globalist-inspired modus operandi is becoming more and more evident as each day passes, and today’s revelation that British security services, at the behest of our government, were quite prepared to sacrifice the lives of 3,000 innocent people before arresting the long-known ringleaders - who were in their employ anyway - it is time we and our elected MPs demanded an unbiased inquiry into the events of last week.
Any such report would very likely expose the whole rotten game play and bring the house of cards crashing down.
Growing scepticism
Over the past few days, several newspapers and commentators have been reporting a growing scepticism among the British public over the validity of the many terrorist plots that we are constantly being bombarded with in the media.
With Charles de Menezes having being wrongly targeted as a terrorist, the Forest Gate raid being proven to be a false flag, suspects from the 7/7 bombings looking unlikely candidates as suicide bombers, the initial false flag report of the neurotic woman aboard a Washington DC flight today, all set against a background of lies and mis-information given out by our government in relation to Iraq’s WMD capability, it’s no wonder that a growing air of mistrust is descending upon the British public, while the credibility of Blair and his entourage plummets even further.
Last week’s intended attack on multiple trans-Atlantic flights is rapidly joining the ranks of the plethora of other potential incidents to be tagged as another piece of fabrication. Many view it as a deliberate ploy to divert people’s attention of the Lebanese/Israeli conflict and our government’s bad posturing in favour of an aggressive Israel, while others, quite rightly, see a connection between each new terror alert and our liberties being flushed down the pan via another round of draconian legislation.
Government credibility is beginning to go through the floor and Blair and his minders from above must be getting pretty twitchy right now as Internet newsgroups, blogs and chat rooms as well as disconcerting sounds within some mainstream newspapers increasingly air sceptical views over what our governments are really up to. Conspiracy theories are rife, only the conspiracies are not the products of over-inventive members of the public, but appear to be the fruits of our government in collusion with its intelligence agencies.
Long may this metamorphosis of growing public awareness continue. What we now have to wait for is another 9/11 which I and others view as being inevitable enabling Blair and Bush to make a bid in turning the tide of public scepticism and attempting to re-inforce the view that there really are radicals out there determined to destroy our way of life. But that next 9/11 won't be a result of the actions of Muslim extremists, as with 9/11 they will be orchestrated by our own desperate governments!
Wednesday, January 25, 2006
20 Questions about 9/11
- Why did Pentagon officials cancel flying plans on 9/11?
- Why did a US Intelligence agency plan an exercise for 9/11 which was identical to the actual events?
- Why were several middle-easteners told not to go to downtown Manhattan that day?
- Why were there numerous insider trading deals mysteriously transacted on the Stock Exchange just prior to the event?
- Why were an unusual number of ‘put’ options placed, on the basis that the share prices of the airlines involved would slump, just prior to 9/11?
- Why where standard operating procedures of sending intercepting fighters in response to the deviant flight path of the airliners not carried out?
- Why were many reliable intelligence reports to the FBI that an attack on a prominent target in New York ignored?
- Why are at least seven of the 19 claimed hijackers still alive?
- Why is it that so many witnesses who were in the twin towers at the time report explosions going off in various parts of the buildings just prior to their collapse?
- Why is it that we are told that it was the melting of the steel structure of the twin towers that brought them down when a fire raged in a tower block in Madrid for over 17 hours without affecting its steel structure in any way?
- How come numerous construction experts claim that the towers were designed to withstand the impact of several 707 collisions and the temperatures that would result from burning aviation fuel?
- And if the temperatures were that great, how come fire service personnel and civilians, who were unprotected from the heat, managed to walk around the building just prior to its collapse.
- Why did building 7, which was some distance away from the twin towers and had only one smallish reported fire, collapse?
- Why did Larry Silverstein, the WTC leaseholder, take out a massive insurance policy on the buildings some weeks prior to the event?
- Why were large siesmic readings recorded just prior to the buildings collapse? Might these be a result of explosives used to cause them to fall in a controlled manner?
- Why was there a total ‘power down’ on the weekend prior to the attack? Without power none of the CCTV cameras would be working. Would this be an opportunity to place explosives?
- Why was the sudden bright flash from flight 11 just prior to its impacting the North Tower on the original video release strangely omitted from the officially broadcast version?
- Was this flash a missile which was fired ahead of impact?
- Why did Bush do nothing after having being advised of the second impact, but carry on listening to pupils read in the Emma T. Booker Elementary School?
- Why were the Federal Emergency Management Agency already in place in New York the day before the event, had they prior knowledge?
These questions merely form the tip of the iceberg. Evidence that 9/11 was staged by powers within the government is legion, visit infowars.com and go to the 9/11 archive to see that evidence.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
