Doublethink

Latest from NO2ID

2009-09-11T14:36:00.004Z

Comments made in connection with each news item are personal observations and not necessarily those of NO2ID.

Following the government’s back down on trying to foist ID cards on airport workers all eyes are now focusing on the north west, where Manchester has been targeted as the ‘beacon area’ for the roll out of the first ID cards. Anyone that volunteers to enrol in the ID card scheme should be fully aware of what they are letting themselves in for, that is paying for the privilege of being readily tracked and traced for the rest of your life, being in the highly vulnerable position of laying bare a great deal of highly personal information which could be leaked, lost and abused while being a Whitehall guinea pig. NO2ID is avidly campaigning in Manchester making people aware of the dangers of enrolling in the scheme. With reports that the take up is likely to be low, we must ensure that it turns into a veritable damp squib for the government and that the people won’t be druv!

NO2ID have produced a 24 page booklet outlining the compelling arguments against ID cards for those who either buy into the government propaganda on the subject or those who will do just whatever the government tells them. Details of how to get one of these free booklets is available from office@no2id.net

Following a large increase in the number of errors in Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) checks the Register website has received, under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) information which reveals that employers could soon be asking potential employees to give fingerprint data in order to get a job. The aim is to improve the quality of data and the FOIA disclosure says "To improve the identification process carried out by employers the CRB will research how biometric identification can be incorporated into the Disclosure process and will also work with the police service to improve the quality of data held and its availability". The CRB is also considering the use of ID card data. The Home Office has previously said ID cards will help speed up the CRB process, which has been regularly criticised by employers as too slow. In 2007 the UK Identity and Passport Service (UKIPS) and the CRB trialled a ‘joint venture’ where CRB processes were linked to ID cards.

David Davis recently raised a very appropriate question in the House "The Home Office is currently prototyping a Europe-wide project called Project Stork. How are we going to prevent a repetition of the disaster of the last few weeks [the disappearance of 25 million child benefit records] when sensitive personal data is held not by one government but by 27?" Apparently when asked, former Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, couldn’t answer the question - she didn’t know what Project Stork was!

Entitled the Independent Safeguarding Authority, this new body could soon be keeping tabs on 11 million workers who, in any way spend time in their professional or voluntary capacities with children and vulnerable adults. This would include nurses, doctors, car park attendants in hospitals, junior tennis coaches, school dinner ladies etc etc. In the light of the Soham murders where a suspected sex offender managed to get employment in a school despite the usual Criminal Records Bureau check, this may seem reasonable - although just how the CRB was so negligent begs the question, are oversights like these being used as a pretext to usher in Big Brother databases which treat us all as potential criminals? Phil Booth of NO2ID said in response to the claim that such a new database may seem warranted “That’s where you’re wrong. The only way the ISA can possibly keep tabs on 11 million people is to have the workers and volunteers fingerprinted and made to obtain a national ID card. This is entirely consistent with the various forms of coercion strategy they [the Home Office] have been working on to create so-called volunteers for ID cards.” Privacy advocates have also reacted angrily to reports that the government plans to link national identity records to criminal records for background checks on people who work with children and vulnerable people.

Postscript

This will be my last newworlddoublethink blog. It is time to move on and over the past three years or so, I feel I have outlined, sufficiently, the plight we find ourselves in vis à vis the so-called New World Order, it’s controlling élite, its puppets and a gullible public, that hitherto have too readily acquiesced to their agenda. If the government and its controlling masters are corrupt, then we only have ourselves to blame for being a complete walkover!

That now has to change and already a sense of awareness is beginning to grip people worldwide as they wake up to the fact that this monster is getting totally out of hand. One has only to look at the number of new books being published which uncover the most heinous of crimes our ‘elected’ masters have been committing for centuries, the vast amount of inside information and truth about who we are historically and how, for millennia, we have been subjugated to a controlling élite. Just this week actor Charlie Sheen is laying bare the 9/11 scam and demanding answers from the US administration. This is all positive.

I attended a seminar in Shrewsbury last weekend in which I met dozens of like-minded people who have already made that awakening transistion, making the firm declaration that we must reclaim our God-given sovereignty as individuals and thwart the global élite and their insidious control matrix.

Great changes are coming to our planet in the next couple of years in an astrological and astrophysical way and in a new blog I intend to start later this year, I will cover this new paradigm and describe how we must all revolutionise our own individual psyche to be ready to meet these changes. And this must be a concerted effort by all of us, for collectively and with a positive frame of mind lodged in higher spirituality having thrown off the vast burden of oppression and mind control that has blighted us all for so long, and we can change ourselves and the planet for the better.

THIS IS OF VITAL IMPORTANCE!!!!

2009-09-03T08:28:00.005Z

Codex Alimentarius

In less than four months time, this monstrous piece of legislation will begin to bite into our daily lives, affecting each and everyone of us with real ramifications upon our health.

For me, having turned my life around through a healthy intake of dietary supplements and healthy foods to a point where I have almost conquered my diabetes and all of the debilitating side-effects it brought with it, these measures are pure insanity, but when viewed in tandem with the fluoridation of our water supplies and the imminent planned mass vaccination for the Swine Flu virus, with all of its highly toxic ingredients, the overall picture becomes ever more clearer - the further lining of the pockets of big pharma profits. But it is also clear that those who run this planet DO NOT have our health and well-being at their hearts - quite the contrary!

For the health-conscious among you out there, if you aren’t already familiar with Codex Alimentarius, I urge you to go to the following link, the contents of which will, hopefully, spur you into action. http://www.healthforyou.org/c/codex/codex-alimentarius.htm

I'm sorry I can't establish a direct link for the above it appears Google are now blocking links to what it regards as unacceptable sites!

By way of immediate action, I also urge you to go to the following link and sign a petition to the UK government - time is short! http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Vitamins/

The swine flu madness season draws closer

2009-09-01T15:05:00.004Z

This is something we’re going to hear a lot about from this month onwards as the cabal who run this planet take a brave and desperate attempt to get us into submission mode and ready to take their specially prepared cocktail of toxic badies.

But they’ve got some task to perform as daily, the swine flu scam becomes ever-more transparent and increasingly takes on the look of a mass eugenics programme - albeit, perhaps, a slow-acting one.

Today’s news brings the shocking revelation of a leaked internal French government document in which plans for a compulsory swine flu vaccination programme are detailed. Medical establishments and GPs would be completely bypassed, with the government acting directly, clearly side-lining health care professionals. Despite claims given last week by French Health Minister, Roselyne Bachelot that vaccinations would be voluntary, the leaked internal document clearly prescribes forced vaccination for every French citizen complete with mobile vaccination units visiting every school in the country.

In a country whose citizens don't take government policy lying down - something we will need to do much more of in Britain - the French authorities will have a real fight on their hands. But with mandatory vaccination likely in all EU countries as well as in the US, we must all put up our hands and say HOLD ON! There is a massive amount of highly cogent information out there (not in the mainstream media, alas!) clearly showing the potential dangers of the swine flu vaccine and the highly suspect nature of its creation and it is incumbent on every single person to review this information to find out just what they are being asked to have injected into them, make an informed decision and not be cowed into accepting it willy nilly.

I urge everyone reading this blog, not already reasonably informed about swine flu and the vaccination programme, to go to the following links and pass on the information.

http://www.naturalnews.com/026955_swine_flu_vaccines_flu_vaccines.html

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/SwineFluNews/story?id=8437630

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20090825/thl-many-healthcare-workers-say-no-to-va-5effa79.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8193012.stm

http://www.smh.com.au/national/swine-flu-vaccine-plan-in-disarray-20090827-f17x.html

http://www.wddty.com/SearchResults.aspx?q=swine+flu&searchButton.x=0&searchButton.y=0

http://hsibaltimore.com/2009/08/27/rushing-h1n1/

Latest from NO2ID

2009-08-28T14:56:00.007Z

Comments made in connection with each news item are personal observations and not necessarily those of NO2ID.

Although MP Damian Green has won the legal battle to have his DNA removed from the National Database still hundreds of thousands of other subsequently proven innocent people still have theirs in place. This is only a victory for a relatively high-profile politician, leaving all others still tarred with the DNA brush. Clearly the UK government gives not a damn about the European Court of Human Rights ruling. Because of this, NO2ID has joined forces with Genewatch UK, Open Rights Group, Liberty and others to set up a website at www.ReclaimYourDNA.org to give guidance to those afflicted with this gross assault on human rights and how to take action to try and get it removed. MP Diane Abbott and lawyers from Liberty will be holding a ‘DNA clinic’ in Hackney, London to give advice. For more details visit the website above.

While Britain has the largest DNA database per capita of any other country in the world researchers at the forensic DNA technology company, Nucleix, have demonstrated that a person’s DNA can be faked by modifying a blood sample. Following such a test carried out by Nucleix in which they modified a sample and sent it to a US lab for analysis, it was declared that they failed to identify the ‘forgery’. This flies in the face of government insistence that DNA-profiling is infallible.

A video entitled ‘Politics of Identity’ by Dr Edgar Whitley of the London School of Economics has just been posted online in which he discusses the liklihood of the ID Card scheme backfiring on the government. See it at http://www2.lse.ac.uk/videoAndAudio/research/thePoliticsOfPersonalIdentity.aspx

Some domestic flight carriers are now demanding those who book their flights online to furnish passport details. Refusal to do so could mean that one may not be allowed to fly. When operators British Airways and Easy Jet were questioned why such information is necessary, they said ‘it is a government/EU requirement’. Just how long will it be before long-distance online rail bookings will also require passport details? It beggars belief!

These facts from a recent Daily Mail lead article on our surveillance state.
- More than 1,500 requests are made every day under the Regulatory and Investigatory Powers Act - an act which was orginally was set up for police and intelligence agencies to combat terrorism. It seems we are the terrorists now!

- Now there are 795 bodies, including 500 councils, often using junior staff to using the Regulatory and Investigatory Powers Act to investigate, what could often be described as, relatively petty anti-social matters.

- Britain has a DNA database which exceeds that of the US and is the largest in the world, with over 1 million innocent people included on it.

- There are now 4.2million CCTV cameras in Britain, whose purpose, in many cases, has been described as doubtful.

- Of 8 million criminal record checks conducted, 2,700 people have been wrongly classified as having a criminal conviction.

- In 5,000 schools across the country, children are now routinely required to give fingerprints to use the library, while the national ID database scheme will require that each and every one of us give our fingerprints - identity features which can be easily mis-interpreted.

The government denies that scrapping the ID card scheme will save it the estimated £3 billion to implement. Apparently, we are going to foot the bill when we compulsorily apply for one!

The Identity and Passport Service have published their latest paper on the National Identity Scheme (NIS). In it they categorically state that in able to safeguard identity “the vision for the NIS is that it will become an essential part of everyday life, uderpinning interactions and transactions between individuals, public services and government and supporting people to protect their identity". I might add that it will make an ideal instrument for gross fraud and identity theft!

A small business enterprise has been ruined by a false entry in a court database. Efforts by the owner to get compensation for the error have been turned down by Mr Justice Bill Blair QC, brother of the former PM, on the basis that the civil service cannot be found liable for any book-keeping mistakes. This could set a worrying precedent in our emerging database state, with the authorities shedding any responsibility for data errors, leaving us in the lurch. They don’t know the meaning of the word ‘justice’!

Environmentalism...Sustainable Development?

2009-08-26T13:08:00.005Z

An article in the latest edition of Namaste magazine by John Christian very succinctly illustrates the real agenda behind those oft-bandied words ‘Environmentalism’ and ‘Sustainable Development’, showing that their seemingly altruistic aims are in fact nothing but, but a direct path to a form of global Marxism.

As each day goes by, the realisation of this is becoming ever more apparent and here I précis his article, extracting the most salient points.

Fabian manipulators

In Britain there are two principal characters who occupy a central executive role in the transfer of state assets to private banks and corporations internationally, they are John Redwood MP for Wokingham and until recently head of NM Rothschild & Sons global Overseas Privatisation Unit and Sir Roger Douglas, consultant to City of London Banks, the World Bank and others in advising on national privatisation programmes. Both men are Fabianists, that elusive society whose real agenda is centralised global governance along Marxist lines, but imposing it on a ‘softly softly’ basis through gradual social submission.

Apart from the ongoing programme of having governments worldwide sell off their country’s public assets to private corporations, this process involves the dismantling of the sovereign state and its devolvement under large ‘regionalised’ areas of power. The US is being currently regionalised into NAFTA, combining Canada, the US and Mexico with the total dissolution of each country’s individual sovereign status. Britain has already been effectively ‘abolished’ and is now divided up into nine separate regions together with Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland who will all pay lip service - along with every other similarly-regionalised European country - to the EU superstate. National governments will become increasingly powerless, their assets stripped away as all common wealth is usurped by global corporations and banking cartels. (Isn't that what the current financial crisis is all about - bankrupting us and our economies so that the banks can hoover up the assets for pennies on the dollar?)

These emerging regional assemblies mirror those formerly adopted by the Soviet Union. Christian describes the establishment of this process. “Right now throughout the UK all city councils are dramatically increasing their rate demand on their constituent’s properties, while at the same time, they are quickly expanding their debt levels for unaffordable capital works programmes via loans from the City of London banks (on a national level witness the sudden flurry of new rail projects in this country and the Obama health 'reforms' in the US as just two examples at a time when public borrowing is at an all-time high) whose policies are deliberately intended to prepare for the council’s ‘privatisation’ whilst tranferring the local government in each country to ‘regional councils’. These will ultimately become controlled by ‘Regional Parliamentary Assemblies’, identical to the old structure in the Soviet Union.”

Sustainable development

In 1992 the UN unveiled a radical environmental philosophical treatise entitled Agenda 21, under the stewardship of Canadian billionaire Maurice Strong and an NM Rothschild agent, which would completely turn upside-down the old traditional values of putting man under God at the head of His creation, together with his God-given rights as expounded in the Bible, the Magna Carta and the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. Now the Earth is to take precedence over man, with animals ranking more highly than human beings who are in essence, under this philosophy, regarded as dispensible. This is an old pagan concept in which man is stripped of any democratic, sovereign or constitutional right - and treated as a potential sacrificial lamb.

Over the last year we have seen similar sentiments coming from proponents of this inverted ‘world-over-man-philosophy’ in the works and rantings of peopke like Dr Eric Pianka and Obama’s ‘science czar’ John Holdren, both of whom have called for the mass culling of the world’s population in the name of saving the planet.

In Agenda 21's wording - cloaked altruistically as the responsible environmental husbandry of this planet - many well-meaning high-profile individuals have bought into it hook, line and sinker, without realising that the real goal of sustainable development and environmentalism is the subjugation of man in every aspect of his life.

As Christian explains “..the communist goal of ‘sustainable development’ and ‘environmemtalism’ has absolutely nothing to do with protecting the environment or sustainability - it is all about the abolition of property rights, and ultimately, collectivisation of housing and farms under corporate state control”.

We are already witnessing a plethora of state legislation on everything from cutting down heritage trees to leaving rubbish in your front garden or having your dog foul the pavement. The Neighbourhood Watch Scheme - a scheme first used in Soviet Russia - has been set up by our government to create politicised state patrolling of our social behaviour, rather than leaving it in the hands of the sovereign community domain. With increasing bureaucracy being piled upon businesses to comply with environmental laws - particularly galling when large corporations can get away with gross environmental negligence and companies like Monsanto can blight the country with their GM crops, endangering us all - it all points towards increasingly prohibitive pressure and economic unviability for private businesses and enterprise, encouraging the takeover by the corporate/banking-run state.

With Obama’s new healthcare scheme we are already witnessing proposals of the micro-management of each US citizen’s life with sub-clauses in the bill - sections 440 and 1904 - under the heading “home visitation programs for families with young children and families expecting children”, that would allow government agents to visit every home in the US to would “provide parents with knowledge of age-appropriate child development in cognitive, language, social, emotional, and motor domains … modeling, consulting, and coaching on parenting practices,” and “skills to interact with their child to enhance age-appropriate development.”

From this it is only a matter of time before parents have to obtain a licence to have children, a licence to take your boat on the water, permits to travel, permits for this, permits for that. We can see this trend emerging among our midst every day, while members of Common Purpose slowly try to lever our mindsets into place to comply with this neo-Marxist nightmare.

It doesn’t have to be like this

The reduction of the world’s population and the reduction of those remaining to mere inventoried units on the state’s register is not the may it is meant to be. That is, if we wake up out of our amnesic state, ignore mass-media lies and disinformation, truly realise just what is really being planned for us and hold out our arms and say NO MORE!

We might blame the likes of John Redwood and Sir Roger Douglas, just two of the executives working under the auspices of the Rothschilds and their self-elected ‘Illuminati’ camaraderie, for enforcing this hellish nightmare of state-imposed slavery upon us with our rights stripped away, but we have to look in the mirror first, for if we let this hell come to pass we only have ourselves to blame! To extricate ourselves from this ghastly spectre is a crucial hurdle we must leap in our human spiritual development and reneging on this is not an option, for if we do, it will fatally set back the common good of humanity and our ascension as a human race.

For more insightful articles from Namaste magazine see http://www.namastepublishing.co.uk/

Fearmongering and hot air

2009-08-20T15:14:00.004Z

In the latest twist in the Swine Flu scam, it has been revealed that the British government has drawn up plans to create mass graves to cope with the vast amount of casualties expected from a possible autumn and winter outbreak of the H1N1 flu virus. Council officials have been warned that existing cemeteries may be inadequate to cope with the number of deceased that could ensue in a winter outbreak. The report, resulting from a contingency meeting held last month and just revealed in several British daily papers, even goes on to suggest that inflatable storage structures could be used as temporary mortuaries. It even specifies shorter funeral services in what looks increasingly like a predicted mass culling of the population on a mechanised basis.

Although one expects plans to be in place to cater for major disasters, the concerted way in which a finger is being repeatedly pointed in the direction of the Swine Flu, begs the question, just what are they planning, particularly when viewed in context with the dubious man-made origins of the flu and the imminent mass-innoculations of a barely tried and tested anti-viral vaccine. Just how much of this is scaremongering people into accepting the vaccine and how much might it be about a deadly marriage that may be in the process of being engineered through a combination of the vaccine and the virus, that would result in the need for mass graves? With only 44 deaths from the virus recorded in England so far, what prompts the authorities to believe that vast numbers may succumb during the winter months?

My advice: stay healthy, maintain a strong immune system and avoid their vaccine like the plague!

Once in a while the BBC lets out a little bit of truth. In a recent ‘Hardtalk’ programme, Stephen Sackur managed to force a revealing admission from Greenpeace Leader, Gerd Leipold over erroneous claims regarding the Arctic ice melts. In a July 15 Greenpeace press statement entitled ‘Urgent Action Needed as Arctic Ice Melts’ Leipold maintained that by 2030 global warming would render the Arctic ice-free. Sackur claimed, quite correctly, that this claim was ludicrous and was clearly ‘exaggeration and alarmism’. How could an ice sheet mass of 1.6 million square kilometres, having a thickness at its epicentre of 3 km deep, totally disappear within such a relatively short time frame?

Initially trying to avoid the question, Leipold had to eventually admit that that admission ‘may have been wrong’, although he went on to defend Greenpeace’s cause for alarm as being in order.

Greenpeace was once looked upon as a genuinely serious force in environmental activism, only to later become - as so many initially altruistic organisations find themselves - hi-jacked by our controlling world mafia by infiltration, manipulation and guided into supporting their far-less-than-altruistic agendas.

With NASA caught falsifying figures last year suggesting that October had been the hottest on record, when it was later found that they had merely carried over figures from September - a naturally hotter month and glaring facts like the recorded 30% increase in the Arctic ice sheet for the year up to August 2008, it’s pretty clear that Greenpeace is engaging in total disinformation for on behalf of its political masters.

Latest from NO2ID

2009-08-14T15:20:00.004Z

Comments made in connection with each news item are personal observations and not necessarily those of NO2ID.

The biometric residence visa card that foreigners in Britain are to eventually carry and which are due to be trialled in Manchester can be hacked into in 12 minutes, according to an article in this week’s Daily Mail. Not only could they be easily hacked into, but the data could be cloned and changed, leaving the original card unaltered. Of course, the Home Office dismissed fears that this could be done so easily in future because the encryption to be used on the next generation of cards - which won’t be introduced for another couple of years - can’t be hacked into. Oh yes! Where have we heard that before! As always it’s all about the authorities gaining easy access to every aspect of our lives and nothing to do with the protection of our identities.

On the back of the recently unveiled ID card is a space entitled ‘Observations’. This can be used to indicate whether the holder is a bona fide British citizen and allowed to travel freely within the European Economic Area (EEA) and therefore also act as an authority to travel within that area, or whether the holder is either Irish or of another EEA country or non-EEA resident but who has a family member who is, and is therefore not valid for travel in other EEA countries. The mere fact that this information is to be handwritten for all to see, eg. by bank staff when opening an account, has raised fears that it may also be used to openly advertise the fact that the holder may have an ASBO or some other restriction placed upon him/her, therefore acting as a ‘gatekeeper’.

The London Borough of Hillingdon has introduced smart cards for those who are local residents and therefore identifying them as eligible for certain services not available to those who are not. The council claims that the cards will only carry the holder’s name and a unique ID number, but, of course, it’s the ID number which will act as the all-important link to a back-end database that collates other information about the holder that will be stored. As a carrot, it will also act as a privilege card offering holders discounts at participating stores, working like a loyalty card. This will enable shopping profiles to be added to the back-end database, creating a cosy relationship between the council and local shop chains while prying on residents’ shopping patterns for commercial database use. What a stitch-up!

The tracking and tracing of every aspect of our lives including financial matters and where we travel is being greatly enhanced by a little-advertised and debated initiative released under the title of ‘G8 Declaration on Counter-Terrorism’. It is reported to have organised a ‘ground-breaking’ operation on bulk cash smuggling (under the title of Operation Mantis), practical guidance on cyber crime which charges it with measures to ‘identify and promote best practices for expanding biometric identity management practices for travellers and impoving security in all modes of transportation’.

Saturday 12 September will hopefully see the second International Action Day against the retention of telecommunications data and other instruments of surveillance. It is hoped, once again, that public demonstrations will take place in capital cities across the world.

The Tories, in their pre-election rhetoric, are stating that by scrapping the ID card scheme, some £3bn could be saved. In addition they are making overtures that they would scrap the adding of fingerprints to passports. Obama promised all sorts of things prior to his election that he has ‘U’-turned on. Isn’t that what politicians do all the time these days as instructed by their masters?

Of Swine Flu, discontent and rebellion

2009-08-13T15:35:00.006Z

As the Obama scam begins to crystallise in the minds of many Americans, so do visible signs of dissent. Posters comparing him to Hitler have made their appearance at one town hall during a meeting on healthcare in Alhambra, California.

But by reading the comments to the story in the Guardian, many people in this country fail to understand the widespread opposition to Obama’s healthcare plan. They are taking it literally and aren’t aware of the totalitarian aspects embedded within the bill. Perhaps it is because we have had state healthcare for so long, they fail to make the connection that Obama’s plans - created by those behind him - are not for the wellbeing of the country’s health, but are a means of coercing state control over the masses, interferring with crucial aspects of their lives in a meddlesome and authoritarian way. Take sections 440 and 1904 of the 1,000 page bill (which Congress has been denied the time to digest - as usual) under the heading “home visitation programs for families with young children and families expecting children”, it clearly states that this would allow government agents to visit every home in the US to “provide parents with knowledge of age-appropriate child development in cognitive, language, social, emotional, and motor domains … modeling, consulting, and coaching on parenting practices,” and “skills to interact with their child to enhance age-appropriate development.” Do these Guardian resondees fully realise that? And don’t they realise that Britain’s NHS is increasingly behaving in the micro-management of our lives?

Something that people in this country do seem to be cottoning on to is the Swine Flu scam. Following an article in the Exeter Express & Echo about how the city will be a beta test site to try out the Swine Flu vaccine on children from six months old to 12 years of age, a barrage of dissent followed.

“There is no way any member of my family is having a vaccine. Less people have died from this than seasonal Flu so why push this untested vaccine? Read about the swine flu vaccinations that paralyzed around 500 in 1976. These are the same people who are pushing Tamiflu drug which has now been shown to cause all sorts of side-effects.”

“Pharmiceutical (sic) companies are immuned (sic) from prosecution for any side effects from this drug. I hope our Government are not immuned (sic).”

“NO NO NO...This is human experimentation now in the public domain and should NOT be allowed! Those children's lives will be wrecked by the rushed in and untested vaccines. We're taking about oil in water adjavants, with the vaccine grown in monkey kidney glans tissue along with aluminium oxide, insect DNA and possibly mercury here! Thats more or less the cocktail of content that were given our armed forces for the first Gulf War in the 1990's! Anyone remember that syndrome at all?? The W.H.O have rushed this in, Big Pharma is standing to make a lot of £'s on our pain and suffering from the vaccines. I will NOT be taking any of them!! Go and check the Global Death Rates on Swine Flu..Pandemic, what Pandemic! If people take this vaccine many people will be culled..do not let fear take the decisions for you.”

“I definitely will not allow an untested, mercury filled vaccine anywhere near my children. Corrupt unregulated pharmaceutical companies created this so-called "swine flu" virus, and their the very same people who are offering the so-called cure, or vaccine. If you want to save your kids - do yourselves a favour, and stay well away from this poison.”

“I don't think I will be rushing to have my children vaccinated with a new drug that has not been properly trialled. Who knows what the side effects could be?”

As the second American Revolution draws forever nearer, Gerald Celente of the Trends Research Institute lists the first three major signs that have indicated this ever-likely possibility.

First it was the ‘Tea Parties’ back in April when over 700 anti-tax rallies took place across the country.

Then on the 4th of July thousands of citizens gathered once again under the banner of ‘taxation without representation’.

Most recently the healthcare reform package has been rebuked most vociferously as outlined above.

In each case the mainstream media has either dismissed these events or passed them off as the rantings of ‘conservative fringe elements’ or as staged events. But the fact that these protests are spontaneous and come from the heart as more and more people are seeing the light and identifying the worthless rhetoric endlessly emerging from the lips of Obama, as well as losing more and more of their rights day by day, the upswell of discontent isn’t going to be brushed off for much longer.

The ‘administered’ administration may very well have to use the Swine Flu ‘pandemic’ as the cover to try and deflect or quell this dissention and bringing everyone to heel by imposing martial law upon the country in the name of controlling the dreaded flu. Forced innoculation of the vaccine may react with the airborne virus, creating something much worse, thereby neutering much of the population and knocking the ‘fight’ out of them.

At least, this might well be the currently preferred MO. That’s unless, the people declare revolution now!

Drip by drip state intervention

2009-08-04T11:40:00.005Z

State intervention into people’s lives has been ratcheted up to a new level of intrusion with Ed Balls announcing a plan to surveil problem families in their own homes.

The Family Intervention Projects will allow authorities to spy on families ensuring that their children are being raised in accordance with state dictat. 2,000 families are to initially enrolled into the scheme with a further 20,000 due to join next couple of years. Participants will be forced to sign a ‘behaviour contract’ with the government known as Home School Agreements before the start of every year. Authorities will make regular checks on these households and the installation of CCTV in each home will allow state surveillance of families 24/7 to ensure they raise their children correctly. In tandem, people regarded by government to be 'responsible' will be encouraged to spy on other such families and report any misconduct so that they can be similarly surveilled.

Regretably, the Tories, currently waiting in the wings to take over the reigns next year, say that the scheme doesn’t go far enough and is ‘too little, too late’ so it’s going to be more of the same from them.

Clearly, those considered to be ‘dysfunctional’ by government are to be placed is state custody and many may welcome the thought who regard the Jones’ at number 24 to be a bloody nuisance having their kids rake the streets all night and who habitually leave all their litter in the front garden. But many respondents to an article on this very initiative published in the Daily Express today, http://www.express.co.uk/comments/viewall/115736 see the much darker, Orwellian reality to this - and rightly so. Just where does it stop and just what might the government next deem to be socially unacceptable - sticking NO2ID stickers on the window or inviting members of action groups to meetings at your home?

Our growing totalitarian state is being enforced in a drip by drip manner, starting at the bottom of the scale with initiatives that are unlikely to create too much opposition, but as a successive generation sees state CCTV surveillance in selected people’s homes as the norm, a platform is then already established upon which a further level of state intervention in our private lives can be constructed and so on and so forth.

That is, until we say NO MORE!

Latest from NO2ID

2009-08-03T13:28:00.003Z

Comments made in connection with each news item are personal observations and not necessarily those of NO2ID.

In what appears to be the fourth launch of ID cards this year, Home Secretary, Alan Johnson, described ID Cards as a ‘no-brainer’ in the fight against fraud. I think Mr Johnson is the ‘no-brainer’ believing that a card which carries all of our vital statistics won’t also be open to fraud and will carry with it far, far greater consequences than that of a stolen or hacked bank card. And that’s before you consider the state's abilities to pore over every facet of our entire lives and track our every move. But, of course, Johnson won’t divulge that part of the story or the fact that you will have to provide 49 vital pieces of personal information and that if any one of those is incorrect you will face a stiff fine!

It seems that the ever increasing cost of implementing the ID Card scheme (215m to date) is impounding on the cost of a new passport. In October the cost of a British passport will rise to £72, the third price rise in less than two years. We are having to pay through the nose for the privilege of allowing the state and all its offshoots be aware of every aspect of our lives. It beggars belief!

The Vetting and Barring Scheme (VBS) is the next piece of totalitarian state obscenity to grace our lives. Yet another database will provide a list of those who are regarded as being a risk to vulnerable groups and thus barred from working with them. The scheme will be administered by the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA) and those who work with children, prisoners etc will be encouraged to register (in reality have to, if they wish to keep their jobs fully intact). This not only includes full-time workers like teachers, but anyone who may routinely come in contact with them. Leading authors who often visit schools including Michael Morpurgo, Quentin Blake, Philip Pullman, former children’s laureate Anne Fine and Anthony Horowitz have all hit out at the scheme saying that they wouldn’t be attending school visits any more. "All of us are constantly invited to do tours of schools abroad. If we can no longer enthuse British children about reading then I'm happy to go to more sensible places like Australia, New Zealand, America, France and Italy," said Fine last month.

A good illustration of just how vulnerable our personal data could be once held on the National Identity Register (NIR) is portrayed in a short film released by Liberty. Liberty rightly points out that over the last few years the Government has mislaid an enormous amount of our personal data one way or another and the NIR will house even more of it. This adds even greater relevance to this film. See it at http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/issues/3-privacy/film-where-do-they-go-.shtml

The growing scepticism and opposition to ID Cards has manifested itself again in a YouGov/Sunday People poll of 1765 adults. 79% of respondents think that they are a waste of money. This comes as the truth about them is being made more evident through the likes of information awareness groups like NO2ID who paint the full picture of a life with them, not the rose-tinted dis-information put out by Government.

The Tamiflu sufferers

2009-07-31T12:27:00.002Z

Guess what? Tamiflu is rendering many children more unwell than if they had just let the Swine Flu take its natural course. 51% of children in a test group of 248 reported side-effects such as nausea, insomnia and nightmares. Of course that doesn’t include any more long-term ill-effects from the mercury and other junk contained within the vaccine whose effects may manifest themselves later in life.

Yet that establishment lap dog, Sir Liam Donaldson, said that Tamiflu should still be given to children if they had established symptoms and there were no existing medical reasons not to prescribe the drug. Then he goes on to admit that under-fives were suffering a greater number of hospital admissions because of these side effects. Under fives shouldn’t be innoculated at all, a young and developing body being subjected to a wholly foreign cocktail of goodness-knows-what! But what does Donaldson know, or care, about developing children, so long as he sits in his comfortable position delivering lies and false information on behalf of his corporate paymasters.

I hope these reports will help to instill some sanity into parents and adults alike and get them to say NO to Tamiflu and view the whole Swine Flu scam for what it is - an artificially-engineered virus created by ‘swine’ - not the animal kind, but the psycopathic human kind that runs this planet!

See http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=47&contentid=5934

FSA Report - another piece of disingenuity

2009-07-30T15:10:00.007Z

The latest insult to our intelligence comes from another NGA arm of our bereft government, the Food Standards Agency, who declare that organic food isn’t any healthier than non-organic.

Carlo Leifert, a professor of ecological agriculture at Newcastle University, who has read the report was mystified by the agency’s conclusions, whose ballpark figures approximate those of a report Leifert co-ordinated for a major EU-funded study which looked at the nutrient levels of organic versus non-organic which clearly gave the former the lead. Why then has the FSA come to quite different conlusions?

In my view, clearly its politically (and probably commercially) driven. In a climate where GM crops are once again being toyed with (as reported on Monday) and a US Depertment of Agriculture calling for the mass-irradiation of crops on the grounds that it will kill of bacteria and make it safer for the masses to eat(!), not to mention the dangerous cocktails being used in the Swine Flu vaccine that we will all be urged to take and the imminent spectre of Codex Alimentarius, the FSA’s downbeat and dismissive missive on organically-grown and reared foodstuffs fits into place. It’s all part of the trend towards denying the population its health - a eugenics programme pure and simple.

But criticism of the FSA’s report has been widespread. Peter Melchett, policy adviser at the Soil Association said "We are disappointed in the conclusions the researchers have reached. It doesn't say organic food is not healthier, just that, according to the criteria they have adopted, there's no proof that it is."

It’s the way they spin it and the way the media follows up in unison. Last night’s BBC ‘Lies at Six’ deliberately gave two people a blind tasting of organic and non-organic fruit. Needless to say the verdict came out a draw, mirroring the conclusions of the report. No account was taken into the pesticide-free nature of organic foodstuffs which are grown to rigorous standards or the far-improved health of free-range livestock, whose happier demeanour reflects itself in the quality of its meat, free of any vile agri-waste cocktail fed to it in the name of economy and profit.

Increased cost of organic aside, thinking people will ignore this report and dismiss it for what it is worth, just another pile of worthless ‘research’ tailored to the dictates of a patsy government and an agribusiness lobby whose steered covert agenda is to lead us down the road to hell!

Here are a few of the comments in reply to the Guardian’s piece on the report.

“What a pathetic criteria for a study!
The point of eating organic food is not a higher nutritional content but avoiding pesticides and the like, DUH! Therefore, YES, it is healthier.”

“Big agribusiness has a lot to lose from people rejecting it's toxic, mono-culture, GMO, scorch the earth mentality. And what could this possibly mean!: ‘The appendix of the FSA report shows that some nutrients, such as beta-carotene, are as much as 53% higher in organic food, but such differences are not reflected in its conclusions.’ Who is paying for this study? conventional farming poisons the earth and humans and strips the land of nutrients. if there are no nutrients in the soil there won't be any in the food and you can't make up for it with fertilizers and pesticides.”

“You only have to ask yourself, do I want foods intensively produced, often tasteless, inhumanely reared, potentially contaminated by pesticides, fungicides, growth hormones, genetic modification and other allied, often untested, modifications? Or would I prefer food free from interference by food scientists, chemists and the associated denizens of increased profitability.
I don't need a meta-analysis to answer that question wooly minded though I undoubtedly am.”

“It strikes me that the FSA have some agenda with regards this report, it blatantly omits any factor other than the basic nutritional values. Yet it still carries the headline 'no health benefits of organic food' on most media outlets. Looking at their website, they clearly have a biased attitude against organic, Im guessing since the popularity of organic rose out of the GM scepticism that there lies the actual reason behind the report. Look at their website page on GM food, and its an almost entirely positive account...Knowing that Gordon Brown has reopened the debate on GM crops, Im guessing that rubbishing organic farming is the first step in the propaganda initiative to warm mainstream public opinion towards more profitable GM agriculture.”

In other words is the FSA, in this report, also being influenced by the agribusiness cartel - I would say very likely.

PS To partly confirm my suspicions it turns out that one member of the research group at the University of London who were instrumental in the compilation of the FSA report, is one Dr Uauy. According to the Integrity in Science Database, Dr. Uauy has been a paid advisor to Unilever, Wyeth, Danone, DSM, Kellogg, Knowles and Bolton, Roche Vitamins Europe Ltd., and the International Copper Association. Well, what do you know!

Also read this http://www.prisonplanet.com/organic-food-is-all-that-and-more-just-eat-it.html

GM, snooping and Swine Flu

2009-07-27T17:37:00.003Z

The masters of genocide that run our planet have engaged scientists in Tadcaster to carry on testing GM crops following a year of inactivity after environmental protesters ripped up their experimental crops last year. This resuming of trials has been done without any public announcement in the hope that it would escape the campaigners notice, but following an article in the Daily Telegraph, the cat’s out of the bag. Although DEFRA said that the potatoes upon which GM work is to take place to make them pest-resistant, would be grown in a ‘safe environment’ and would not be used for human or animal consumption, the mere fact that this unholy manipulation is once again on the agenda, is disgusting.

At the opposite end of the spectrum, I was excited to see so many flocking to Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall’s shop in Axminster on Saturday. This is one of two - the other in Bath - which is engaging the more perceptive elements of society to the products of really good, honest, local organically-grown foodstuffs, free of any kind of harmful artificial manipulation. Not only that, but it is waking people up to the delights of those herbs, spices and vegetables that are either largely ignored or normally murdered in the cooking process. Of course it comes at a price, my River Cottage Sydling Brook organic pork liver paté with caramelised onion marmalade served with Town Mill Bakery bread and enticing salad weighed in at £8, but it was a demonstration of what a real liver paté can taste like - absolutely gorgeous! At a time when many of the lower-paid or those out of work are now going back to Asda in order to keep the food bill down, it is crucial that organic growers can multiply and help make their produce more afforable for those cash-strapped. Either that, or grow your own rather than succumb to the hellish wizardries of GM science, whose interests are more in creating mass profits and denuding our health at the same time.

Unfortunately, there is a group in society less ethically developed in their endeavours that make me despair. In this gripe I am referring to those hapless council workers that engage in helping introduce initiatives like enticing members of the public to spy on their neighbours for financial gain. This gripe also extends to those who would take up such an offer. But that is precisely what is being instigated in town halls across the country, all under the guise of improving the local environment. Whereas anti-social behaviour is unacceptable, local social disputes must be the sovereign preserve of the local community, engaging in face to face discourse as a way to resolve their problems, and not that of an interfering state. Following an article in today’s Daily Mail listing many of the local council schemes currently being rolled out to engage parents and children as young as 11 in spying on their neighbours - a wholly anti-social and obnoxious practice in its own right - some fitting responses were aired in reply to the article.

“This sounds like East Germany during the deepest darkest days of communism. When are the forced labour camps opening?”

“12 years of labour and we are nearly there.”

“The UK is apparently determined to bring the visions of George Orwell to reality.”

“Who are these people who dream up these crazy ideas. Can't they see that this will completely break down communities and set neighbour against neighbour, may even lead to more street violence if it gets out of hand. It is the authorities job to maintain our laws and police our streets. People should be educated to respect for their home and environment, not subjected to constant monitoring.”

“I seem to recall something similar in Hong Kong in the 70s when the HK government invented Lap Sap Chung. (The rubbish man) They had to stop this eventually as the people were turning against one another rather viciously and creating more problems than the problem they were trying to control.”

Precisely, that’s what our movers and shakers want, a society constantly at war with itself, divided and hostile. With an environment like that, more state control becomes their answer until we are locked into a militaristic fascist nightmare. Among those party in making this nightmare come true are those jobsworths of council workers who wittingly or unwittingly help in rolling out these schemes ‘because it’s part of their job’, or some other yellow-bellied excuse, and those members of the public who will willingly engage in partnering in such appalling ‘initiatives’. If they haven’t the wit to see the error of their ways and the way it will impact upon them and society in general, they need to get off their butts and wake up to what is really going on around them. As I’ve said before, the only way to beat this monster is non-compliance.

Meanwhile there are others who must be aware of some covert agenda but are just complacently playing along with it. Exeter City Council have announced that some 19th century catacombs, originally used as underground burial chambers, could have their original purpose revived to house the bodies of Swine Flu victims. Why is everyone so hell-bent on assuming that there could be a mass-epidemic of a virus, which so far, has been relatively benign, claiming fewer victims than any seasonal outbreak of flu, albeit during the summer months? Just what have they been tipped off about that the unwitting among us may become victim to? Does someone out there have inside information that the virus may mutate - by design - and become ferocious, or that the hastily-tested vaccine now in preparation of being rolled out, will contain some particularly nasty ingredients - as vaccines tend to do - that will bring about millions of deaths worldwide. If you think I’m being delusional go to http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_depopu.htm and find out for yourselves the kind of things that have been going on in the field of eugenics over the past decades. We need more whistleblowers who are privy to this, the latest of so many scams sent to ensnare us, to blow this MO wide open.

Latest from NO2ID

2009-07-23T14:29:00.002Z

Comments made in connection with each news item are personal observations and not necessarily those of NO2ID.

While the government presses ahead, relentlessly with the ID card scheme with the passing of more statutory instruments relating to the ID Card Act, opposition from the general public continues to grow as more and more people become aware of the true enormity of what is planned. But beware of Conservative party front bench opposition. While some of it may well be genuinely held, such sentiments are highly convenient vote-winners. You can be sure that once elected, the Tories will only end up continuing the same current agenda, using spin to explain their about-turn. Remember all of the promises that came from the lips of Obama before he stepped up to the plate. Those have virtually all proved to be false, and this is what politics is about these days, winning people’s confidence by telling them what they want to hear, then picking up the baton from their out-voted predecessors only to continue the same agenda on behalf of their controlling masters. Politicians don’t run the show, the corporate oligarchs do. Politicians are merely their servants and salesmen. I fear that NO2ID will find few true allies in the political spectrum until there is a wholesale revolt en-masse against this new world order and it’s with we the people where the responsibility really lies.

Retrospective adding of DNA records to the current DNA database is being considered for those who were convicted of serious violent or sexual abuse crimes prior to the 2004 change in the law which made such DNA collection mandatory.

The Annual Report of the National Police Improvement Agency reveals the extent to which the Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system has grown. According to the report the ANPR reads around 8 million registration plates per day and that plans are afoot to allow that information to be accessed by the Scottish police forces, British Transport Police, Serious Organised Crime Agency, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and the Security Service.

A government report has stated that the plan to have high street shops engage in ID Card enrolment would be unworkable and open to fraud. I should say so!

For more see http://www.no2id.net/

Stick the needles where the sun don't shine!

2009-07-15T15:16:00.003Z

I have never had any intention of lining up for, what may well become, a compulsory vaccination against swine flu. I routinely reject the annual flu jab that my GP advises me to take as well as the statin drugs he would also have me take on an ongoing basis. Both offer far greater health risks than they are purported to offer, the only benefits they dispense are profits to the drug companies.

With the ludicrously inflated hype surrounding the swine flu epidemic, with its generally mild symptoms and very low mortality rate - compared to many normal winter flu epidemics which go largely unreported, I immediately become suspicious, particularly when the manufacturers of Tamiflu - Baxter International - have been caught releasing contaminated flu virus material from their plant in Austria.

The fact is that there is a larger eugenics agenda at work here and if you value your wellbeing, you'll make sure that you keep your natural immune system robust by keeping healthy and stay clear of the ruinous cocktail contained within the swine flu vaccine.

Take heed of what David Icke has to say in this short video clip.

The beast is revealed

2009-07-11T07:34:00.002Z

For those sceptics that have pooh-poohed the idea that a global currency was on the cards, they may now need to think twice now as yesterday, at the finalé of the G8 summit at l’Aquila in Italy, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev produced a coin, believed to have been minted in Belgium, representing a new word currency. Now all the signs are in place that a global banking takeover is in the offing with every man, woman and child on the planet beholden to one giant banking dictatorship, ultimately transcending all governments.

‘Interdependency’ was the key word used by Medvedev - the raison d’être of the new global currency. I would rather determine it as ‘Dependency’ upon one worldwide financial oligarchy who can call the shots at will. Democratic freedoms and sovereign independence are now out of the window, room for maneuver gone.

Of course, this immediately spells the death knell for the dollar as a world reserve currency, but when asked, both Bernanke and Geithner shrugged the whole suggestion off saying such an agenda did not exist. Of course they know it exists. They are currently engaged in part of the process to enact the dollar's demise. In fact this whole trend is supported by a document released by the Bank for International Settlements, which, in 2006 called for the end of national currencies in favour of a global model of currency formats.

With almost every senior figure in world politics currently shouting from the roof tops for some form of world financial regulation, it’s pretty clear which road they are charting for our collective futures.

In all of this we must remember the words of Mayer Amschel Rothschild “Give me control of a country's money supply and I care not who makes the laws”. That control is now about to go global!

Jackson assassinated by the CIA?

2009-07-08T13:26:00.006Z

FSB sources reporting to Russian President Medvedev claim that they identified an electromagnetic pulse aimed at Jackson’s house prior to his death. See http://tribes.tribe.net/2012the-end-times/thread/69693234-ed89-4405-9d93-3e3f0f97a357

Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) Weapons have long been part of the covert intelligence arsenal and I recall Dr Steven Greer of the Disclosure Project claiming that both he and his wife were targeted with this technology some years ago, his wife developing metastatic cancer from the onslaught. In both cases, Jackson and Greer were releasing (or about to release in Jackson’s case) information that would rock the hidden establishment - Jackson with the purported mass eugenics scam via the Swine Flu virus and Greer with his Disclosure Programme relating to top military sources going public about ETs.

Jackson was a long-standing supporter of Austrian investigative journalist Jane Burgermeister who has filed criminal charges with the FBI against the World Health Organisation (WHO), claiming that they were about to commit bioterrorism with the release of the new Swine Flu vaccine. She has also prepared an injunction against the programme of forced vaccination which is in the process of being instigated in the US. Entire details of this highly detailed and well-researched lawsuit can be found at NaturalNews.com see http://www.naturalnews.com/

I and many others believe that the current Swine Flu scaremongering is a preparatory step towards, what could be, a mass eugenics programme being covertly planned by that unseen hand, to use new global powers of the WHO to enforce mass innoculations using this highly doubtful vaccine.

According to David Icke’s website “the reason behind the CIA needing to assassinate Michael Jackson, these reports continue, was an out of court settlement the pop icon signed with son of the king of Bahrain, Sheikh Abdullah bin Hamad al-Khalifa, this past November in London, and which stated, in part, that in exchange for millions of dollars previously lent to Mr. Jackson by the Sheikh, Mr. Jackson would allow his sold-out United Kingdom concerts to be a “platform” for warning the World of a soon to occur mass genocide event”.

Check these links out and see what you think. None of it would surprise me!

Latest from NO2ID

2009-07-03T10:23:00.008Z

Comments made in connection with each news item are personal observations and not necessarily those of NO2ID.

News reports have recently implied that the new home secretary, Alan Johnson, has watered down the compliancy stakes over the ID Card scheme. Not true, unless you want to become a self-sufficient hermit and live in a cave. Wednesday’s edition of the Times carried an article stating that “Alan Johnson signalled a significant reversal over the Government’s identity card policy yesterday when he ruled out making them compulsory for British citizens”. But further on it does admit that “However, the Government is to press ahead with creating a national identity register that, from 2011-12, will include the details of everyone who applies for a passport”. Passports happen to be vital things to the vast majority of people and sometimes are asked for domestically as ID if you don’t - like me - possess a driving licence. In fact the Home Office line has not changed one iota. As the latest NO2ID bulletin states "The Home Office line remains the same. No compulsion (as the Home Office defines it) was going to be applied until almost everyone had 'volunteered' and then it was only a matter of rounding up a minority of resisters and marginalised people.

The Home Office's idea of "voluntary" is not the same as yours and mine. Since 2004 the scheme was (and it still is) to proceed by "designating" one-by-one under the Identity Cards Act 2006 other documents issued by official bodies -- in the first place passports. Once a document has been designated, you won't be able to apply for one without also applying to be entered, for life, on the national identity register. If you don't agree to be registered it won't be that you are refused (say) a passport; you'd have voluntarily decided not to apply. There's no compulsion to have a passport. It is useful for travelling. But you aren't compelled to travel. Or (say) to drive. Or to work as a security guard. Or with children. Or in healthcare. To get parole from prison. To practice as a lawyer. ... Any official licence, registration certificate or permit can be designated, and -- in the home office's skewed logic -- handing control of your identity to the Home Office's Identity and Passport Service will still be entirely voluntary".

Until recently, airside workers at Britain’s airports were to ‘voluntarily’ enrol for ID passes, without which they wouldn’t get very far in their careers, that is until the unions made a stink about it and that is what we all must do, all the way down the line on this crucial issue.

The BBC (the British Bullshit Corporation as I prefer to call it), has engaged in yet more dis-information with the announcement that “Some 3,500 UK citizens have already applied for the cards”, implying that it must be OK, with eager participants lining up. Not true. The regulations that specify the content and manner of application have not yet even been approved by parliament! This spins the probable reality of the story that the UK Identity and Passport Service’s website has invited visitors to “register your interest in identity cards and the National Identity Service” - simply that - and that’s not ‘applying’ as the BBC would have you believe. This is all psy-ops by stealth. Even if 3,500 genuine invitations were received and there weren’t any facetious ones, (and there probably were) this completely dwarfs the number of people that have signed up to NO2ID registering their opposition to the scheme.

Following the government’s partial stand down on airside workers’ requirement to register on the ID scheme as a condition of work it has now turned its attention to youngsters saying that possession of an ID card will act as proof of age, an increasingly necessary requirement for those wanting to buy alcohol etc. Manchester’s pilot scheme is to be expanded with residents able to apply for an ID card before the end of this year. This will then be rolled out across the north west with applications available early next year.

The government faces more embarassment as it has been revealed by one of the unsuccessful bidders for the new hi-tech passports that a director of the winning company is one of Gordon Brown’s senior mandarins!

A London-wide NO2ID activist network has been established that will heighten awareness of the ID card scheme across the capital. The network hopes to raise the profile of ID cards in people’s minds and will make a presence at public events, street fairs, pop concerts etc. The first event is to take place on Saturday 11th July, where members will hold a training session on how to engage the public’s awareness. Later this month on Thursday 30th, Ladbroke Grove will host a Magicians against ID cards event in support of NO2ID.

Visit http://www.no2id.net/

Who are the Taliban and al Qaeda really working for?

2009-07-03T08:32:00.002Z

When Obama and Brown engage in the tired old rhetoric of setting up a new offensive to combat and defeat the Taliban or al Qaeda, you can be sure that the opposite is true. Both groups are the raison d’être for US (and British) troops to be in Afghanistan and Iraq in the first place, not because they need to be defeated, but because they provide a ‘legitimate’ reason for continued western military occupancy in economically and geo-politically important areas.

But it’s the covert machinations employed to try to ensure that continued occupancy that is so frightful as political commentator Paul Watson and ex-US Navy senior intelligence officer Wayne Madsen, have recently pointed out. http://www.prisonplanet.com/al-qaeda-are-pawns-of-the-us-military-industrial-complex.html

The above link forms a valuable lesson in learning how governments use those who are portrayed to us as ‘the enemy’, to fight for them in order to foster the very insurgency they say must be fought, thereby prolonging the conflict in order to achieve an ongoing military and political presence by proxy on foreign soil. In Afghanistan, for instance, that continued presence protects western political and military-industrial hegemony with its interests in the oil pipelines that cross the country as well as maintaining continuing control the poppy trade, the proceeds from which go towards more black ops and illegitimate wars.

Latest from NO2ID

2009-06-29T18:30:00.003Z

Comments made in connection with each news item are personal observations and not necessarily those of NO2ID.

Rumours that the new Home Secretary, Alan Johnson is to ‘review the ID scheme’ have been siezed upon as an opportunity to halt the monster, although Johnson himself denies such rumours. The Identity Cards Act 2006 was never comprehensive and left out a lot of the mechanics of how the scheme would work in its entirety. Now those details are to be furnished in a list of regulations which are longer than the original bill itself. Debate on the first batch of regulations are due to take place next month. It is an opportunity in which MPs could and should object in order to stall the juggernaut and this is the time to get in touch with your MP and point this out to them. It is these regulations that put flesh and bones on the scheme and give a close insight into the real horrors which lurk within: the sheer amount of private data that you will have to disclose to the Home Office about yourself; the detail showing how many people will find themselves forced into the ID Card scheme in order to ‘apply’ for some other government document or service; draconian penalties for those who do not wish to comply; the numbers of government departments, law enforcement and other agencies that will have access to your information, with no record kept after 12 months of to whom that information was disseminated.

Sheffield City Council has reaffirmed its existing motion against ID cards. It criticises the Manchester pilot scheme, saying that Sheffield would not participate in any similar one. It also slams the trend of fingerprinting people visiting nightclubs and certain pubs, fingerprinting in schools and Automatic Number Plate Recognition systems. Let’s hope they don’t cop out of continued opposition, or get bought off by government!

The House of Lords Constitution Committee has criticised government in their failure to adopt important recommendations embodied in their 'Surveillance: Citizens and the State' report that would have put in place safeguards to ensure proper use of data processing and surveillance.

According to Statewatch the body that monitors civil liberties in Europe, the Stockholm Programme, which will establish the creation of a unified EU-wide information grid, will be adopted this autumn. It says that this will unleash a digital tsunami with in-depth data on every EU citizen that can be shared across member-country borders.

The Information Commissioner’s Office has warned that data collection and storage should be kept to a minimum. The more information held the greater the chances of losing it and the greater chance of contravening the Data Protection Act. The ICO pointed out that in a survey, 85% of people in the UK avoid giving out personal information whenever possible, that number having grown in recent years.

Lord Steyn, a former law lord has lashed out at the ID card scheme saying it should be abandoned as it creates a gross invasion of personal privacy and will do nothing to combat crime, terrorism, illegal immigration and the whole plethora of other problems that the government insists it will. In fact it will lessen our security.

Ian Watmore, former government CIO has said that Government Gateway reports should be published. These currently confidential reports lay out the progress, or otherwise, of highly sensitive government IT projects. Their publication should allow MPs and others to keep track and accountability of these projects.

An Oxford father has refused, point blank, to give permission to have his daughter fingerprinted at school. He rightly fears that this is just one more step towards a Big Brother state!

New 9/11 Whistleblower

2009-06-24T15:13:00.005Z

An ex- US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) employee and videographer, Kurt Sonnenfeld, has gone public with crucial inside information on the immediate aftermath of 9/11.

Hounded ever since by government insiders and spooks, Sonnenfeld’s life has become a misery.

He was instructed by FEMA to spend one month filming Ground Zero immediately after the 9/11 attacks to gather video evidence that could be used in a subsequent investigation into the events of that day. Of course, that investigation never took place, nor could it as the hands of inner government complicity would have become all too apparent. The 29 tapes that Sonnenfeld took during this one month period in which he was allowed unbridled access to Ground Zero, were therefore kept in his possession and, to those insiders, are walking dynamite and as Sonnenfeld describes, are full of anomalies that raise all manner of questions as to what happened on that day and immediately throw into dispute the whitewash story that emerged from the official, behind-doors enquiry.

In an interview with Voltaire.net, the now exiled Sonnenfeld tells his story and not only reveals what he exposed during that month at Ground Zero, but also blows the lid on a number of other operations he was involved in while with FEMA.

The following link http://www.prisonplanet.com/911-fema-videographer-at-ground-zero-goes-public.html gives access to the entirety of that interview which has been posted on infowars.com and provides further vital evidence to the mountain already in existence that 9/11 was an inside job.

NightJack silenced

2009-06-18T12:53:00.004Z

Another dangerous trend is emerging following the denunciation of blogger NightJack by the Times newspaper. NightJack’s Orwell Prize award-winning blog was that of a candid police officer who publicly, but anonymously, aired what went on within the Metropolitan Police force.

With the demise of good and honest mainstream journalism now having to tread a path between what is deemed to be politically-correct and what makes newspapers sell, it is wholly refreshing to find a re-emergence of the old values of investigative journalism and honest comment appearing in blogs, especially at at time of international mass-corruption in just about every area of the political and economic arena. NightJack, or Detective Constable Richard Horton who was the man behind the keyboard, blogged anonymously and at no time did anything illegal, indeed his blog even brought in award-money which was subsequently donated by him to the Police Benevolent Fund.

But his candidness was just too much for the Times newspaper and the Met.

It isn’t the first time commentators or whistleblowers have been demonised by the mainstream media. Recently the nurse, Margaret Haywood, went undercover for the BBC regarding her concern for the abuse of patients. Strictly she was compromising patients’ confidentiality, but when the cause was clearly with their best interests in mind, such action must be applauded. But that didn’t prevent her from losing her job.

This craven mentality of being expected to not step out of line even when wrongs need to be brought to the public's attention, is wholly unsatisfactory. As human beings, concerned for the wellbeing of others we can’t and shouldn’t stay silent when something very wrong is going on. I can’t vouch for NighJack’s blog, not ever having seen it and now never likely to since it has been taken down, but according to many others who had, his heartfelt and honest opinions and comment of injustices known to be taking place, have every right to be aired. After all, these are the sorts of things you might discuss among friends down the pub, but given the platform of the worldwide web a much wider audience can be alerted to them.

Just take this week, in the aftermath of the supposedly rigged Iranian elections. With a dictatorship intent on not allowing the world to see the self-interest and determination of the mullahs and the Ahmadinejad regime - which acts in Western interests as a devil they can taunt for their own political ends - it’s left to the people, thanks to the power of modern technology, to relay the on-the-ground reality to the rest of the world. Without our own open lines of communication, we might as well be living in the Dark Ages - and of course, that’s the way our ultimate masters would like to see us.

With the disenfranchisement of NightJack’s blog, others who might share similar opinions or wish to air serious malfunctions and abuses within the police force or in whatever area of work they are engaged, will now think twice before blogging, or not blog at all.

Meanwhile the Times newspaper, itself a bastion of politically-correct controlled thought, run by the very same cabal that run of our everyday lives, now seems to stand as arbiter and executioner over free and alternative speech.

Just out of interest, I wonder how many of the paper’s ranks are Common Purpose members, that insidious fifth column group whose task as ‘future leaders’ is ultimately to implement the wishes of our control freaks, the Rockerfellers, Rothschilds, royalty etc. and all those below who work for them?

The Super Surveillance State

2009-06-11T15:03:00.005Z

Yesterday’s Daily Telegraph reported on the EU plans to ‘enhance’ pan-European ‘security’. As we have come to expect by now, proposals to achieve this end would have received wholehearted support from the Nazi Party.

Under the guise of the Stockholm programme, July 15 will see the final proposals for the EU’s internal security plan. These directives will override national sovereign legislation, bringing a taste of dictatorial life under our Euro superstate. Jacques Barrot, the European justice and security commissioner has stated that the aim was to "develop a domestic security strategy for the EU", historically a role which would be left to individual nation states.

But civil rights leaders and right-minded people see this as a surveillance superstate. Tony Bunyan, of the European Civil Liberties Network (ECLN) warned that "An increasingly sophisticated internal and external security apparatus is developing under the auspices of the EU," "In five or 10 years time when we have the surveillance and database state people will look back and ask, 'what were you doing in 2009 to stop this happening?"

Precisely. While this government is behaving like the proverbial wet rag with Brown posturing for continued power, ministers disappearing right, left and centre and cabinet shuffles every other week, the media spends most of its time using the upheaval as a useful smokescreen to divert people’s attention away from the vitally crucial issues that directly threaten our futures, while a fascist surveillance state is being assembled behind closed doors, largely evading mainstream news coverage.

Law enforcement and public security agencies will be sharing DNA records and fingerprint databases, storing them for new electronic EU ID cards. Surveillance footage and that gathered from the internet will be amassed, along with satellite surveillance, automated entry/exit border biometric readers and risk profiling systems. This will be the new Europe, all built upon the phony 'war on terror'. But, of course, now we are the terrorists!

EU officials have openly admitted to the Daily Telegraph that these measures will be highly controversial, so will need to be contained (ie camouflaged) within the Lisbon Treaty, now only awaiting Ireland’s ratification in the Autumn (they should be so lucky to even get to vote!). The Treaty already has built into it a secretive new Standing Committee known internally as COSI, which is designed to co-ordinate security policy across borders involving trans-European agencies such as Europol, the Frontex borders agency, the European Gendarmerie and Brussels-based intel-sharing Joint Situation Centre or Sitcen.

Just what sort of a nightmare are we headed towards, unless we stir up total opposition to this super-Orwellian scenario. And we must!

The Control Grid Cometh

2009-06-09T14:56:00.003Z

“Awesome. I can't wait to have every move tracked like the Truman show...and beaten/arrested if i step out of line. Sweet!”
Armand Tamzarian, London,

“Who said this? ‘An evil exists that threatens every man, woman, and child of this great nation. We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland.’
Was it Barack Obama? Gordon Brown? George W Bush? No. It was Adolf Hitler, when proposing the Gestapo to the German people.”
Bob, Burnley, United Kingdom

“Forget 1984. The truth is more like V For Vendetta, an underrated example of a totalitarian police state. The police are fast becoming a law unto themselves.”
Lauren, Chester, Cheshire

“George Orwell was a bloody Optimist!”
Ken Bardell, Doncaster, United Kingdom

“And still you don't believe that we live in a Police State in all but name? Do you seriously think that the next government will repeal any of Zanu-NuLabour's legislation?”
Adrian Ryan, Donegal, Ireland

“Just goes to show that if we are fooled into giving the police state a free hand then absolute power will corrupt absolutely.”
Pontus, San Jose, USA

“How silly of me! I thought I lived in a democracy and not a police state. Obviously I'm wrong.”
Rowan, London,

“Are there no limits to the fantasies these people indulge in? Next they'll be wanting micro chips implanted into newborn babies to monitor everybodys' movements from cradle to the grave. Not only utterly disgusting, but utterly horrific!”
Ian Dickson, Brighton, UK

“What was the point of winning WWII if we are going to live in a police state anyways?”
Keith S, Winnipeg, Canada

“Utterly disgusting. The police have lost all respect of the British public and are in grave danger of provoking a serious backlash.”
HC, Kabul,

“What is the difference between the British government and a communist government?”
Phil, Nottingham,

“I credit this government with many failures, amongst them is the proliferation of a surveillance society. My advice to those who think this is a good idea, read George Orwell's "1984", then comment.”
Phil, Epsom, England

Some of the replies to an article in the Sunday Times regarding a British police force study of Chinese-style surveillance tactics which they believe would come in useful for the 2012 London Olympics. Goodies included in their ‘security’ considerations are miniature microphones installed in taxis to monitor passengers’ conversations, and athletes, visitors and journalists to have tiny microchips carried in their tickets.

A 44-page report compiled by the police states that there are “lessons to be learnt” from China’s use of digital surveillance, but then goes on to warn that “The fine balance between the use of technology to support security requirements and individual rights to privacy will be an open debate in the UK for 2012.” I suggest that that open debate should have taken place a long time ago and that with suggestions like these being openly considered that fine balance has already been breached.

If the Olympics are such a threat to national security, then why hold them at all? The whole event has become so politicised that it goes entirely against the true spirit of sport. But, of course, it doesn’t pose a real threat at all. It is a perceived one. One that has been manufactured by a group of people whose real intention behind all of these intrusive security measures is not to anticipate an al Qaeda strike, but to incarcerate us, for we are the perceived enemy now, the thronging masses that must be controlled. You’ve only got to read their policy documents to know that that is their real modus operandi.

But it’s good to see people waking up to this nightmare and so many replies calling in unison for a stop to this dangerous nonsense. Many people’s perception of this country these days has gone beyond the title of ‘nanny state’ to that of ‘fascist state’. I believe that a large part of Labour’s defeat in the recent elections is not so much about the expenses scandal, which the mainstream media would have you believe, but as much, if not more, based on a collective unease in the country in the way this government has, during its term of office, increasingly turned Britain into a police state, rubbishing our rights, privacy and freedoms. That’s not to say that the Conservatives will be any better. Our governments are controlled from above, and their entrance into office, either this year or next, will only signify a handing over of the baton in the ongoing race to set up a total control grid in which we will find ourselves entrapped. That's if we don’t take action to expose the real game play and try to stop such a likely probability.

Latest from NO2ID

2009-06-05T14:28:00.003Z

Comments made in connection with each news item are personal observations and not necessarily those of NO2ID.

Some may regard the departure of Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, with an air of relief, taking some of the pressure off the ID scheme. No way. This has been government dictat for many a year, each year seeing a stepping up of the process which will culminate in every UK citizen having to possess an ID card - or so they hope. Home Office sectretaries come and go but the aim remains. As far back as the Thatcher years, Peter Lilley MP recalls it as being regarded “as the remedy for all our ills from crime to shortage of kidney donors”. Under the direction of executives of the Identity and Passport Service and the Transformational Government team in the Cabinet Office, Home Secretaries receive their cues in no uncertain terms. Real policy change from the top of government is required but that, I’m afraid, is already being steered from even higher up. It’s those above - the real movers and shakers - that need to be exposed to make transparent the whole modus operandi of our perceived enslavement.

“There are more than 82 million terrorist hiding in Germany. You are one of them!” To graphically illustrate the potential truth of that statement, German film maker Alexander Lehmann has released a video on YouTube on the whole topic of data retention and how it affects all of us. It can be seen at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=570WQqye8_Q and succinctly sums up in one-and-a-half minutes how the state perceives us as 'potential terrorists'.

Southampton University Students’ Union Council have passed an anti-ID card motion with 87% in favour. Like several similar local government council resolutions which also oppose the principle of the National Identity Scheme, they pledge not co-operate in such a scheme unless required to do so by law. Unfortunately, they need to go the whole hog and defy the law or certainly challenge it in my opinion, otherwise the government can sneak through binding legislation willy-nilly and have us all acquiescing to their wishes as they please. Stronger non-compliance and challenge is essential.

The government has included an enabling power in the Policing and Crime Bill which will allow it to regulate the retention or destruction of DNA on the database. This effectively circumvents any parliamentary debate on this highly crucial issue, which, in the words of Baroness Harris of Richmond were “..matters (that) should not be dealt with by secondary legislation, especially as the DNA profiles of people not convicted of any offence could be held up to 12 years. It is imperative that Parliament scrutinises this scheme and ensures that, if amendments need to be made, they will be. That is impossible under this proposal, which should be removed from the Bill”.

Since my last NO2ID update, the introduction of ID cards for airport airside workers has been slowed down. Now only new staff will be required to carry them. As far as the Home Office is concerned, this was always the case. Really? Do you trust a word they say?

And can you trust the custodians of our data? Two Glasgow council workers were apprehended while snooping into the core government database of the Identity Card scheme to see if they could dredge up any interesting celebrity secrets. The database contains the personal details of 85 million UK citizens and will be the foundation of the national ID scheme.

In a few month’s time a national network of cameras and computers will become operational and be automatically logging onto car number plates . All part of the ever-watchful eye of the state peering into our every move, every day.

Latest from NO2ID

2009-06-02T13:49:00.006Z

Comments made in connection with each news item are personal observations and not necessarily those of NO2ID.

The introduction of ID cards by stealth is about to meet its first hurdle as government intends to make ID cards for airside airport workers compulsory. The scheme is to commence with Manchester Airport followed by London City Airport. Failure to comply would result in workers losing their jobs. By way of foisting cards on airside workers, four new instruments under the Identity Cards Act 2006 have recently been published, one of which will carry the requirement that when a worker applies for a certain designated document in connection with his or her work, they must also, at the same time, make an application to be entered onto the National Identity Register and apply for an ID card. Non-compliance would likely mean the loss of their job. The British Airline Pilots’ Association (BALPA) is in fierce opposition to the mandatory imposition of ID cards, which, initially were to be rolled out on a voluntary basis, with six to one against. BALPA intends to fight the introduction of this legislation with every lawful means at its disposal.

Let this be a warning to all of us and let us all be united in opposing, what will become, the blanket imposition of ID cards.

UK security manufacturer TSSI has even expressed doubts as to the value of airside ID cards and what the real benefits are to the general public. Precisely. They are not designed to protect the public but as an instrument of state control, pure and simple.

NorthLink Ferries who operate services between mainland Scotland and Orkney now require photo ID for all those above the age of 16 before they can board one of their ferries. Reasons given to a member of NO2ID who questioned the need for such ID was that they were sailing into international waters which is clearly absurd. He was then told that it was for security and safety purposes, then later informed it was because of the size of the vessel - again clearly nonsense as vessels of greater size than those of NorthLink Ferries’ fleet have presently no such requirement.

I carry photo ID for my senior citizen’s free bus pass, but that is different, for you are proving your visual identity in order to gain a concession. To have to show photo ID to merely to travel across a short stretch of domestic water, when having bought a ticket, is plainly preposterous. What precedent is there for such legislation. When was an Orkney ferry last subject to a terrorist attack? And in any case how does photo ID mitigate against such possibilities. It doesn’t. And again it’s not meant to. The Orkney experience is a prelude to what, I fear, will become standard operating procedure in this country if this government has its way, and it’s not part of EU legislation, this is something purely hatched by the movers and shakers that ultimately form political direction in this country and it can only be described as Big Brother oppression. If this thought train is allowed to continue, I’ll have show photographic evidence every time I board an Isle of Wight ferry, then photo ID will be built into every train ticket you buy, photo ID required at the supermarket checkout etc etc etc. It musn’t be allowed to start as this ends up being the slippery slope into state incarceration!

It's Bilderberg time again

2009-05-15T18:40:00.004Z

Bilderberg gets under way, this year’s meeting taking place amid formidable security at the Nafsika Astir Palace Hotel in Vouliagmeni, Greece.

The main focus will be on the global economy and what steps the meeting intends to make next in this wholly orchestrated crisis.

As always, most government representatives are attending this behind-the-scenes meeting illegally under the terms of their respective country’s laws. The presence of representatives of the US government at Bilderberg such as US Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, completely violates the Logan Act which forbids US citizens to convene and negotiate with members of foreign governments without express authorisation from their own government. But what are laws, the Constitution or the Bill of Rights to them - worthless bits of paper!

We have already learned that Obama will come under pressure to get Congress to sign on to the International Criminal Court, which, once ratified, would allow the Court to reign supreme over the US Congress and its Supreme Court. Another step towards globalism.

Meanwhile, Guardian reporter Charlie Skelton has got rather more than the paper or himself bargained for I suspect. In what might well have been a debunking jaunt for Skelton, who is, after all a comedy writer, his probing of Bilderberg has brought him face to face with the lion’s den. Ever since his arrival in Greece, his every move has been tracked and traced and he has got embroiled in many face to face confrontations with the police. Hopefully this escapade might wake up a few geo-politically slumbering minds at the Guardian and foster further investigation in a more serious light. That is until, of course, the dead hand of the censorious state catches up with them. Just how many of their ranks will then dare to put their necks on the line and defy the D-notices?

Another item on this year's agenda, according to Bilderberg investigator Daniel Estulin, will be that “One of their concerns is addressing and neutralizing the anti-Lisbon treaty movement called “Libertas” led by Declan Ganley. One of the Bilderberger planned moves is to use a whispering campaign in the US media suggesting that Ganley is being funded by arms dealers in the US linked to the US military.”

The gradual exposing of Bilderberg after five decades of its existence, is now been challenged in higher circles. A Dutch Member of Parliament, Harry van Bommel, has formally petitioned Prime Minister Jan-Peter Balkenende and his European Affairs Minister Frans Timmermans over their involvement with this secretive assembly of some of western Europe’s most influential people. And it’s thanks to those indefatible crusaders for transparency and justice, Paul Joseph Watson and his blog and articles by Daniel Estulin that have brought Bilderberg to the attention of senior politicians like van Bommel.

Dutch journalist, Jurriaan Maessen, records that van Bommel wrote in his petition that “From the leaked agenda we learn that there will be discussed how to deal with the anti-Lisbon movement ‘Libertas’ through a slander campaign against its leader Declan Ganley. It remains a serious setback for the elite, not just the European elite, that the treaty has still not been ratified”, Van Bommel explains. “They wish for a more powerful European Union, even it is realised through undemocratic games. Considering the regularly attendance of our royal house and ministers, I have asked Prime Minister Balkenende and Minister for European Affairs Timmermans to have the political participants withstand such a slander campaign.”

He than follows up with this list of questions for Balkenende and Timmermans:

1 Are you aware that from May 14 to 17 2009 in Vouliagmeni, Greece, the Bilderberg conference is gathering?

2 Is it correct that Queen Beatrix will attend?

3 Are there members of the cabinet who will participate in the conference? If so, which members?

4 Is there a consensus in the cabinet on the participation of this conference or is this left to individual members? Is there deliberation between the Prime Minister and the queen in regards to participation?

5 Will you make public the items that will be discussed as well as a list of the participants? If not, why not?

6 Is it correct that the Lisbon-treaty will be prominent on the agenda of this Bilderberg-conference?

7 Are you familiar with the report that speaks of the planned discrediting of anti-Lisbon movement ‘Libertas’ with the help of a slander campaign against its leader Declan Ganley? Are you willing to request of Queen Beatrix or political participants from the Netherlands to withstand any such slander campaign?

Britain approaches top spot in the Orwellian League

2009-05-13T10:52:00.004Z

In a study undertaken by CryptoHippie, compiling information from different organizations such as the Electronic Privacy Information Center, Reporters Without Borders, Freedom House, the Ludwig von Mises Institute and The Heritage Foundation, Britain was ranked 5th out of a total of 52 countries in its adoption of police state measures to track and trace its citizens. The US was close behind in 6th place.

“In an Electronic Police State, every surveillance camera recording, every e-mail you send, every Internet site you surf, every post you make, every check you write, every credit card swipe, every cell phone ping… are all criminal evidence, and they are held in searchable databases, for a long, long time,” the report states. “Whoever holds this evidence can make you look very, very bad whenever they care enough to do so. You can be prosecuted whenever they feel like it – the evidence is already in their database,” the report continues. “Perhaps you trust that your ruler will only use his evidence archives to hurt bad people. Will you also trust his successor? Do you also trust all of his subordinates, every government worker and every policeman?”

“If some leader behaves badly, will you really stand up to oppose him or her? Would you still do it if he had all the e-mails you sent when you were depressed? Or if she has records of every porn site you’ve ever surfed? Or if he knows every phone call you’ve ever made? Or if she knows everyone you’ve ever sent money to?” the report asks.

“This system hasn’t yet reached its full shape, but all of the basics are in place and it is not far from complete in some places,”.

The seventeen factors we included in these rankings are:

Daily Documents
Requirement of state-issued identity documents and registration.

Border Issues
Inspections at borders, searching computers, demanding decryption of data.

Financial Tracking
State’s ability to search and record all financial transactions: Checks, credit card use, wires, etc.

Gag Orders
Criminal penalties if you tell someone the state is searching their records.

Anti-Crypto Laws
Outlawing or restricting cryptography.

Constitutional Protection
A lack of constitutional protections for the individual, or the overriding of such protections.

Data Storage Ability
The ability of the state to store the data they gather.

Data Search Ability
The ability to search the data they gather.

ISP Data Retention
States forcing Internet Service Providers to save detailed records of all their customers’ Internet usage

Telephone Data Retention
States forcing telephone companies to record and save records of all their customers’ telephone usage.

Cell Phone Records
States forcing cellular telephone companies to record and save records of all their customers’ usage.

Medical records
States demanding records from all medical service providers and retaining the same.

Enforcement Ability
The state’s ability to use overwhelming force (exemplified by SWAT Teams) to seize anyone they want, whenever they want.

Habeus Corpus
Lack of habeus corpus – the right not to be held in jail without prompt due process. Or, the overriding of such protections.

Police-Intel Barrier
The lack of a barrier between police organizations and intelligence organizations. Or, the overriding of such barriers.

Covert Hacking
State operatives removing – or adding! – digital evidence to/from private computers covertly. Covert hacking can make anyone appear as any kind of criminal desired.

Loose Warrants
Warrants issued without careful examination of police statements and other justifications
by a truly independent judge.

Top of the list comes China - the great example upon which our movers and shakers model their plans for this country, the US and elsewhere - followed by North Korea, Belarus and Russia with Britain and the US next in line. The Philippines was the least engaged in this Orwellian nightmare, while other European countries enjoy lesser state prying.

Latest from NO2ID

2009-05-12T15:40:00.002Z

Although the news has been making much of the Home Office’s plans to have high street retailers issue biometric data for those wishing to renew their passports starting with Manchester, the reality is somewhat different. Neither a scheme nor a specification has been arrived at and talks are still in progress between the prospective participants and the government. Retailers would be mad to invest in the equipment while the scheme is still undefined. Yet again, lots of media and Home Office hype over something that few people want. Let’s hope retailers shy away from the whole idea.

Yet the government is determined to press ahead with its plans for a total database state and the interception and retaining of telephone calls, emails and texts is still to go ahead. The Home Office has recently launched proposals for the Intercept Modernisation Programme in which the government wants ISPs and telecommunications companies to store details on all UK phone calls, emails and web activity to allow public authorities to have access to records on demand. Some newspaper reports have suggested that DNA records of the innocent may be destroyed en-masse. Far from it. The innocent will still have their DNA records retained for six years. Dr Helen Wallace, Director of GeneWatch said: "This is a long time for innocent people to wait to have their records wiped, DNA profiles can be used to track an individual or their relatives. Where are the weighty reasons that the European Court demanded to justify retention of this data?" GeneWatch has also noticed that even the doubling of the DNA database in recent years has not created an equivalent increase in the number of crimes detected.

Another false sense of achievement has been thwarted following the mis-reporting of a statement by David Blunkett. Although the mainstream media seemed to report his change of heart while addressing and InfoSec (don’t you just love the Orwellian sound) security conference, what he was actually alluding to was the physical nature of the ID. He was actually rejecting the idea of a separate piece of plastic and suggesting the use of the passport instead, but that wouldn’t take the form of the conventional passport, it would me more along the lines of - yes - a plastic one. Hardly a change of heart!

The Home Office continually tries to obscure the real cost of the whole ID scheme. A recent report shows increased costs of £160 million in just six months on top of the £250 million already spent. But what it conveniently ignores is the cost to businesses and us - the former for the outlay in investing in the biometric recording equipment required in high street shops and the latter in the £30 or so we have to stump up for the privilege of giving away all of our personal details! They also fudge their real identity by re-branding the ‘National Identity Scheme’ the ‘National Identity Service’ as if the government is really trying to help us, not incarcerate us as is the true nature of the game.

High Street biometrics

2009-05-06T12:19:00.002Z

Becoming increasingly embarassed by the mounting costs of implementing the ID card scheme, that pathetically useless Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith - whose only credentials are the ability to mindlessly invoke repressive legislation at the behest of her controlling masters with unremitting efficiency - is to announce today the passing of the responsibilty for the gathering of biometrics from a national network of public enrolment centres to the private sector.

Now chemists, post offices and photographic shops are to undertake the government’s dirty business with Smith lacing her words in such a way as to imply it as a commercially attractive proposition for such high street chains because of the need for anyone wishing to update their passport being forced to visit them in order to get their necessary biometric data recorded. "While private companies will clearly benefit from the increased footfall from offering this service, their customers will benefit from being able to quickly provide their biometrics while they are out doing their shopping," said Smith.

Just how low can they go!

Having put American radio host Michael Savage on the list of those banned from entering the UK which was published by the Home Office yesterday, Smith may get her come-uppance as Savage is considering taking legal action against her for placing him on a no-entry list along with known terrorists, racist groups and ‘violent skinheads’. In Smith’s words - or those of her puppeteer - “someone who has fallen into the category of fomenting hatred, of such extreme views and expressing them in such a way that it is actually likely to cause inter-community tension or even violence if that person were allowed into the country.”

Savage’s claim to notoriety is his fervent advocacy of patriotic traditional values - borders, language and culture. Although I have never listened to his show as it is not even syndicated in this country - which is hardly surprising as our national radio is largely deplorable, controlled by government dictat disallowing any real alternative debate - the banning of free speech, whether or not it might upset certain people, is the mark of political control akin to that of a Soviet Commissar which rather nicely sums up my impression of Mrs Smith.

The swine behind the Swine Fever

2009-04-30T12:12:00.003Z

The World Health Organisation has now lifted Swine Flu to level 5 on their Richter scale, one level below a full-blown pandemic. Although cases have been diagnosed in countries worldwide including the UK, where further outbreaks have been identified in the midlands and south west of England, as yet it has claimed few lives except in its place of origin, Mexico. One casualty was a small boy who died in Houston yesterday, but he had entered the US, already very ill.

The deaths it has claimed so far seem very race-specific, virtually all Hispanic.

On Monday a piece written by Kurt Nimmo back in 2007 and referencing researcher Jerome Corsi comments, had this to say and I believe it is very relevant to this current epidemic giving a broader picture of what is going on behind the scenes

“The new International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza was designed to supersede an earlier November 2005 Homeland Security report that called for a U.S. national strategy that would be coordinated by the Departments of Homeland Security, Health and Agriculture.”

In other words, any U.S. response to an avian flu pandemic would be directed under WHO, WTO, U.N. and NAFTA directives. Congress and U.S. agencies would be cut out of the picture. “The U.N.-WHO-WTO-NAFTA plan advanced by SPP features a prominent role for the U.N. system influenza coordinator as a central international director in the case of a North American avian flu or pandemic influenza outbreak,” Corsi adds.

“Dr. David Nabarro, WHO executive director of sustainable development and health environments, was appointed the first U.N. system influenza coordinator. In 2005, Nabarro said during a press conference that his number one priority was to prepare for the H5N1 virus, known as the avian flu. Nabarro played into the global fear that an epidemic was inevitable.

“I’m not, at the moment at liberty to give you a prediction on numbers, but I just want to stress, that, let’s say, the range of deaths could be anything from 5 to 150 million,” said Nabarro. On March 8, 2006, during a U.N. press conference Nabarro predicted an outbreak of the H5N1 virus would “reach the Americas within the next six to 12 months.”

On Monday, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon stoked the fear of a global flu pandemic. He said the Mexican flu outbreak is the “first test” of the “pandemic preparedness work undertaken by the international community over the past three years.” Ban Ki-moon said if “we are indeed facing a pandemic, we need to demonstrate global solidarity. In our interconnected world, no nation can deal with threats of such dimension on its own.”

For Ki-moon and the global elite, “global solidarity” in “our interconnected world” translates into yet another push for world government. Ki-moon’s dire warning falls on the heels of the G20 summit where plans were announced for implementing the creation of a new global currency to replace the U.S. dollar’s role as the world reserve currency. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and others repeatedly called for “global governance” and a “New World Order.”

The current flu pandemic hype serves as punctuation mark between the G20 held in London and the upcoming one to be held in Italy in June. “The G20 summit has agreed to try to kick start stalled Doha trade liberalization talks at the next G8 meeting,” Reuters reported on April 2. So-called “trade liberalization” is code for the neoliberal plan to “privatize” public and private industries around the world, impose “flexibilization” of labor markets (create massive unemployment), “deregulate” consumer and financial markets, and foster foreign buyouts, layoffs, wage cuts, transient employment, higher prices, and potentially destabilizing capital flows.

As noted by the Eagle Forum in October, 2007, the SPP’s North American Plan for Avian and Pandemic Influenza “is not only about combating a flu epidemic but is far-reaching in seeking control over U.S. citizens and public policy during an epidemic.” The Plan would give authority to international bureaucrats “beyond the health sector to include a coordinated approach to critical infrastructure protection,” including “border and transportation issues.”

On April 26, Infowars covered the Department of Defense’s “Implementation Plan for Pandemic Influenza” that proposes nothing less than the militarization of health care, military augmentation of civilian law enforcement, and the mass vaccination of the population as directed by the government.

Ki-moon, the United Nations, and the globalists, with the participation of the globalist-dominated corporate media and the ruling elite in Mexico, are hyping the flu outbreak as a possible pandemic in order to sell us their scheme for world government.
It is an ongoing process.

Attention by astute observers is turning to the fact as to whether or not the virus intended as such. “Advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool,” states the PNAC document, ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses’ of September 2000, the same document that stated “...The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor?” and what followed was 9/11, the Patriot Acts and everything else that went with it to change, entirely, the lives of Americans.

Race or genetically-specific viruses are nothing new and have now reached a high level of sophistication. In 2006, Armed Forces Journal, a mouthpiece for the military-industrial complex, carried a military strategy plan written by retired Major Ralph Peters which called for “ethnic cleansing” to be instituted in the Middle East so that the region could easily be dominated by the joint interests of Israel and the United States.

So, given Corsi’s view that one of the reasons for the epidemic origins being Mexico could be that this is also intended as a dry run under the new Security and Prosperity Partnership which will completely sideline the US government and Congress by mobilising a response to the epidemic under the new trans-continental SPP and world organisations such as the WHO - another step towards regional and global governance.

Another interesting fact emerged in today’s ‘What Doctor’s Don’t Tell You’ (WDDTY) bulletin which runs as follows.

“It is almost three years since we faced the hysteria of an avian flu epidemic, when governments bought billions of dollars of Tamiflu – the same anti-viral now being promoted to combat a supposed swine flu pandemic. The shelf life of Tamiflu also happens to be three years.

“The World Health Organization has, at the time of writing, increased its threat level to five, which means governments can activate their pandemic plans – and start handing out Tamiflu drugs. (But just how effective will this be in combatting this new strain of virus?)

“This is extremely convenient for governments that would have very soon have to dispose of billions of dollars of Tamiflu stock, which they bought to counter avian flu, or H5N1. The US government ordered 20 million doses, costing $2bn, in October, 2005, and around that time the UK government ordered 14.6 million doses. Tamiflu’s manufacturer, Roche, has confirmed that the shelf life of its anti-viral is three years.

"England’s chief medical officer Sir Liam Donaldson has said that the UK is “well prepared” to counter swine flu – but only because it was well prepared to counter an avian flu pandemic that never happened.

“The other worry is when, or if, medicine comes up with a specific anti-viral for swine flu. The last time they did – when we had the last swine flu scare in 1976 - health officials rushed through a vaccination programme that resulted in 1 out of 100,000 vaccinated Americans developing Guillain-Barre paralysis. The US government paid out $93 million in compensation.

“Those of us who quaked in fear from the expected SARS epidemic and shook from the anticipated avian flu pandemic may feel they’ve been here before. Despite the dire warnings, at the time of writing just 2,600 cases of swine flu have been confirmed or suspected around the world , and there have been 160 deaths, (and mostly Hispanic) and not all of these may turn out to be caused by swine flu. More people die on UK roads every month.”

One thing seems sure though, this is a designer virus, most likely originating from a DoD lab somewhere and it is aptly named ‘Swine Flu’ for the true orchestrators of its being are, no doubt, none other than the real swine out there, the movers and shaker Illuminati who never desist from crushing humanity at every turn.

NWO machinations beginning to unravel

2009-04-29T15:21:00.002Z

It’s good to know that taxpayers’ money is being wasted right, left and centre. Following a £100 million investigation into the 7/7 London bombers, senior security officials have had to concede, finally, that it is unlikely anyone will be brought to justice. The court hearing involving the alleged suspects, hasn’t convinced the jury and Waheed Ali, Mohammed Shakil, and Sadeer Saleem, following two trials, have all been acquitted.

But, of course, the whole thing was a fantasy in the first place. The official story of 7/7 is littered with inconsistencies and glaring question marks which have never been publicy addressed by an independent review panel. What is unofficially clear is that the men were used as scapegoats, set up by the intelligence services for something they hadn’t done as a cover for the real perpetrators, the back room MI5 ops working under orders from their manipulative masters.

In fact, the Met has ended up with egg on its face, again, as they fail to explain why they didn’t thwart the supposed actions of the men by interceding earlier when they say they had ‘prior knowledge’ of the attack and those supposedly involved.

It's shambolic and just goes to show the massive amounts of time and money wasted, not to mention the 52 who were needlessly killed, because of the political manipulation of a hidden group of psychopaths that want to rule the world and try to achieve that goal by creating staged terror attacks in order to further restrict on our way of life under their planned regime.

The whole thing, from the staged banking collapse, anthropomorphic global warming to the swine flu epidemic, 9/11 and 7/7, all carry with them the distinct hallmark of inside jobs each having a distinct goal of forming a new world order of control and domination. It’s become so transparent and obvious that I believe their plans in the eyes of a growing number of the population are beginning to unravel and are heading for imminent derailment. Indeed, let’s hope so!

Latest from NO2ID

2009-04-28T17:54:00.002Z

A recent survey has found that 37% of the British population feel more frightened than they used to. ‘Institutionally-driven fear’ is believed to be responsible for 1 in 7 people’s anxiety disorders. Everything from the global, artificially-produced, banking collapse to global warming scares, swine fever, fears of unemployment and terrorism to being visibly reminded that you are being watched by CCTV cameras while surveillance monitors are now being introduced on buses (a whole new fleet of them on the Isle of Wight, repeatedly flashing up your face among the passengers) are all creating anxiety. Of course, this is what the globalists want - fearful cowering masses that will acquiesce to their wishes through that fear. It’s also good for their drug companies who make mountains out of sedatives. But to those in the know, it’s water off a ducks back as an increasingly large number of people can see the gameplay. It’s far more reassuring to see the enemy in full face than be left in the dark, confused and ignorant.

The retention of communication data such as emails that was to be introduced into the Data Retention (EC Directive) Regulations 2009 as a primary piece of legislation, has now been sneaked into the bill as secondary legislation. This leaves things in rather a grey state of affairs and hasn’t eradicated this totally unecessary intrusion into our personal affairs.

A NO2ID lawyer, Paul Kauffman has published a letter in the Law Society’s weekly journal, the Law Gazette in response to an article which claimed that lawyers are going to be first in adopting the ID infrastructure. Kauffman says in his letter that because of the concerns and unpopularity of ID card legislation, lawyers should also be in the front line in resisting it and are ideally placed to do so. A plea is going out to those in the legal profession to join forces with NO2ID to do just that.

Schoolchildren travelling by bus to school will now be tracked by GPS technology. Denbighshire County Council, authors of the scheme say “the system is actually secure. There’s no information on the cards that the pupils will be given themselves”, but then goes on to say “that it is all held on a database and it’s governed by data protection”. Little assurance there then having only narrowly staved off an attempt to circumnavigate the Data Protection Act by proposed measures in the Coroner’s and Justice Bill recently. It just means that the state can track and trace your child at will.

Lord West, the Security Minister has confirmed to officials that they are considering installing technology enabling on-demand wiretapping of all communications for the benefit of security services.

The Audit Commission has criticised the poor level of data quality in the NHS. Their recently-published report ‘Figures You Can Trust: Data Quality in the NHS’ states that there has been little improvement since their last report in 2004.

The UK Border Agency is to start sharing fingerprint data with the US, Canada and Australia. In addition the UKBA also expects to be able to track 95% of all airline passengers movements by the end of next year. Their e-borders system has already produced 920 arrests, but that’s out of a total of 10,000 innocent people who must have been harassed by the process.

More police heavy-handedness

2009-04-21T16:24:00.001Z

While I’m still hot under the collar over the conduct of our police and the ever-more fascist-like behaviour that they are adopting - or have been told to adopt - more news of police misconduct comes our way. A park society chairman has been charged under the UK Counter Terrorism Act of 2008 for filming a police SUV driving erractically down a north London park footpath, despite the fact that, by law, police should proceed on foot in such territory. Mr Sleath, the unfortunate park warden, wanted to record the breach of conduct as evidence which could be presented to senior officers. But, it seems, the police can do what they like, flaunting the established law while behaving wildly under the one-legislation-fits-all guise of the Counter Terrorism Act. The language of the Act seems to be deliberately ambiguous so that photographing police officers could be interpreted as being illegal full stop if the police want to put a certain slant on it, despite reassurances from PC Alan Cousins of the Metropolitan Police Film Unit that journalists taking photographs of officers would not be impeded by this legislation.

This is plainly disgusting. Law-enforcement in this country is placing itself within a legalistic, hermetically-sealed safe house where, as a result of wholly concocted theories about potential terrorism, the police can seemingly do what they like and behave like a bunch of Rambos. Of course our pathetic and spiritually-bereft little jobsworth of a Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, just hides within this fantasy land carrying out orders as she is told and will do nothing to curb these excesses which effect each and every one of us.

My name's Al Kayda, I'm just a Tourist!

2009-04-17T09:54:00.001Z

“During a recent visit to London I had a nasty incident, which killed interest in any further trips to this city. As I was taking pictures of double-decker buses with my son, we were approached by two policemen. First, we were told that it is forbidden to take pictures of anything in conjunction with transport. Then our names, passport numbers and London hotel address were noted. After that we were forced to delete all pictures that included any transport - even pictures of the new underground station in Vauxhall, which is a modern sculpture! These deletions were not only enforced destruction of private property, but an infringement of our privacy.

I understand the need for some sensitivity in an era of terrorism, but isn’t it naive to think terrorism can be prevented by terrorising tourists?

Klaus Matzka
Vienna, Austria”

A letter to the Guardian newspaper from a rightfully disgruntled tourist after a recent visit to London, a place he will never visit again.

This just goes to show the frightening face of fascism at work in this country and is particularly evident in London the capital of world infamy and a city I have little or no desire to visit again either. The police have been set up to act like an armed mafia, whose activities wholly discredit their rank. It is about time those among their ranks stopped behaving like programmed robots and question the why’s and wherefore’s of what they are being asked to do. Either that or leave the force and get a more sane job somewhere else. After all, the police are only undertaking their master’s bidding and although some of their ranks engaged in this type of work - making ridiculous demands of innocent people under the guise of a phony terrorism ruse - may feel themselves to be superior in some obscene way, they are as much a victim of this outrageous inquisition as the rest of us.

The sooner they realise that the better.

Another exorcism?

2009-04-14T09:21:00.003Z

Just before the Easter break, Met Police Assistant Commissioner and anti-terror boss, Bob Quick, made an seeming indiscretion by openly exposing to public view a secret security document displaying details of a strategy, codenamed ‘Pathway’, for breaking an alleged terror cell, supposedly linked to al Qaeda, in Manchester.

Somehow, this has all the hallmarks of a deliberate whistleblowing exercise on the part of Quick and although the mainstream media cast it off as yet another bit of sloppiness by a senior public figure, I beg to differ. For someone like Quick, embedded in an organisation where discretion is paramount, to carry a highly restricted document in full view of journalists’ cameras is rather akin to leaving your flies open while engaging in an audience with the Queen. It just doesn’t happen.

I believe this is an exorcising of what could have been another false flag terror event and Quick’s actions, knowing that the text of the document would be caught on camera by the media and hit the headlines, would require the police to disrupt their plans, resulting in the ‘bringing forward’ of their operation to intervene in the gangs activities, by which time the deadly deed - a possible bomb attack on Manchester Airport over Easter - may have already been allowed to happen.

It has now transpired that the men involved were self-employed security delivery staff working for Newcastle-based Sky Interserve UK Limited and had occasion to make deliveries to secure areas within Manchester Airport. They had all received clearance from the Security Industry Authority, itself having recently being ridiculed for allowing 5,000 illegal immigrants working as guards. I smell a rat somewhere.

Once again, the men’s profiles make them seemingly unlikely suspects to engage in such a terror plot and although the Pakistani ISI allege that the men have links to the group, Lashkar-e-Taiba, or Army of the Righteous who were supposed to have been involved in the recent Mumbai attacks and the Lahore cricket tragedy - themselves highly suspicious and smacking of inside jobs - the whole thing seems to be highly contrived and yet just another incident of a group of rather straightforward average Joe’s being unwittingly conscripited into engaging in our security services’ politically-motivated dirty work campaign.

Although history may never reveal the real truth, I maintain that we may have to be eternally grateful to Bob Quick’s ‘indiscretion’ as not being indiscrete at all, but helping to keep us on the right side of a very thin and dangerous line by obliquely exposing inside plans to unleash more false flag terror on our society upon which our government and their ruling masters can use to enforce more restrictions on our lives and expand their surveillance state.

Bail-out or lock-out?

2009-04-09T10:30:00.003Z

We are daily reminded by the Obama administration of the vast sums of money that are being concocted to ‘stimulate’ the American economy and at the same time be used to invest in social programmes, education, housing, health and social security.

But the reality is going to be quite different. The way in which the bail-out moneys are being deployed spells large not the stimulation of the economy but the total stultification of it.

Warning signs soon emerged after Obama’s election as president when he immediately took steps to surround himself with Wall Street cronies. Clearly, representatives for the leading financial institutions are ultimately in control in the White House and that bodes ill for the American people.

In this month’s Nexus magazine, Michel Chossudovsky of the Centre for Globalization in Montreal, Canada, clearly and precisely illustrates the stark truth of the intended game play and how the current financial crisis has been carefully designed so that the sole benefactors are the central banks, defence contractors and oil conglomerates, in other words the controlling élite.

In the final days of the Bush administration the full, and publicly undisclosed cost of the bank rescue programme was estimated at a colossal $8.5 trillion or just about 60% of the gross federal debt of $14.078 trillion. Since then Obama has added another $750 billion.

That $8.5 trillion has come from the Federal Reserve, the Treasury, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Federal Housing Authority. The Treasury’s contribution is classed as government expenditure and must be met through taxation and the shedding of its public debt. But can the US government achieve this?

The current budget deficit is the highest in US history, while interest rates are at their lowest. This means that US-denominated government bonds and Treasury bills are stymied. Who in their right mind would now want to invest in US government debt, itself enormous and offering barely any interest?

Without income from US denominated debt instruments, how does the Obama administration hope to combat the budget deficit and therefore roll out a public spending programme? It can’t. The only way the budget deficit can be met is by drastically reducing public services and selling them off to the private sector - that’s those same organisations that have been the favoured beneficiaries of the bail-out money! This is nothing other than a corporate takeover, or privatisation of the US by stealth, a puppet government manipulated by banks and corporations - corporate fascism.

Irony

Chossudovsky points out that the bitter irony of the whole scam is that “the recipients of the bailout under Bush and Obama’s $750 billion aid to financial institutions are the creditors of the federal government. The Wall Street banks are the brokers and underwriters of the US public debt; although they only hold a portion of the debt, they nevertheless trade in US dollar denominated public debt instruments worldwide. They act as creditors of the US state. They evaluate the creditworthiness of the US government. They rank the public debt through Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s. They control the US Treasury, the Federal Reserve Board (wholly owned by the banks and as much federal as Federal Express) and the US Congress. They oversee and dictate fiscal and monetary policy, ensuring that the state acts in their interest”.

The US puppet government is not governing for the benefit of the people but for that of the banks by the banks. The government is in part financing its own indebtedness, the money granted to the banks is financed by those very same banks in a vicious cycle and is forever beholden to them, much in the same way as so many third world countries are beholden to those same banks through IMF loans.

With that power, the banks can dictate the terms. They can, as they do all the time in those same third world countries, dictate the privatisation of public services and take over of public infrastructure - roads, sewerage, water facilities etc etc, and impose the fiscal responsibility of the ‘government’. Obama can talk all he likes about the appropriation of funds into public services, the truth is the federal government does not control monetary policy. Period!

The black hole

Of the trillions sanctioned in bail-outs at the banks’ behest, following the deliberately engineered implosion of the financial system principally through the derivatives scam, little or none will find its way back to the hard-pressed ordinary working man and woman. The money is being accumulated by the banks and transfered into hedge funds which in turn are channelled into the acquisition of real assets, infrastructure, other financial institutions - in fact a gradual accumulation of not only the US’s assets but those of the world - while robbing individual's wealth through a plethora of new planned taxes like the global carbon tax, the stealing of pension funds etc etc.

This is nothing more than outright financial theft on a grand and global scale and the implications for Americans and those around the world are terrifying. Mass bankruptcies, wholesale unemployment, food shortages and deprivation on a massive scale as the common wealth is hoovered up by these iniquitous banking institutions, themselves run by the élite.

The only solution to stop this wholesale looting in its tracks is the need for a rapid awareness among all as to what is going on, then holding to account and bringing to justice these ‘élite’ robber barons and their vile scheme, the complete disestablishment of banks’ powers over governments and the re-establishment of government by the people for the people, with a banking system based on tangible assets - not a fiat system - for the benefit of re-building vibrant economies to the common good.

Until that goal is acheived we will all fall into penury with the global banking élite offering us their one and only solution, acquiescence to their corporate, fascist agenda and the new dark age that will follow under their dictatorship.

Clutching at straws

2009-04-07T11:25:00.004Z

Those in control are clearly getting edgy over the emerging awareness among the general public that 7/7 had all the hallmarks of an inside job. Don’t forget that most of the legislation being rolled out by the Home Office involving our being tracked and traced everywhere we go, rests upon the supposed events of that day and it is paramount in the eyes of our controllers that the those events remain, in our minds, as genuine terrorist attacks.

The day after 7/7, Peter Power of Visor Consultants shocked us all in his declaration to the BBC that his company had been engaged in an identical attack scenario concurrent and identical to the targets used by the bombers which seemed to verify the fact, when taken with all of the other highly questionable evidence over the events of that day, that 7/7, like 9/11, was staged under the cloak of an ‘exercise'.

Now, three-and-a-half years later, Power - no doubt under duress by the authorities - has come forward to make a formal detraction of any link between his company’s engagement in the drill and the actual events of the day.

The statement, reproduced in its entirety below, strikes anyone who has studied 7/7 and has estimated the unbelievably incredible co-incidence of the the drill scenario and the actual events of the day - calculated at something like 10 with 41 zeroes after it - as wholly disingenuous and because of its ‘clutching at straws’ nature, only seems to add support that the two were linked, one being the cover for the other - one of the oldest ruses used in false flag terror.

Judge for yourselves.

Here is Peter Power’s statement in full:

“There has been much nonsense written about why my company ran an exercise on 7 July 2005 that had very close parallels to the real thing that day. Since then I have made several attempts to add my own comments to numerous sites that seem to get increasingly excited about their own conspiracy theories and in the process exclude any rational debate. It seems those who occupy the world of finding conspiracy theories to replace just about any coincidence, do not want to have any dialogue with those offering a different view, but I have not yet given up hope. I am therefore hoping, perhaps naively, that someone might like to read an honest and factual account about a particular exercise my company ran in London three years ago.

Unfortunately, the BBC had postponed in 2008 a programme in their ‘conspiracy files’ series that would have done this. Our client three years ago agreed to be named in the BBC programme since the attitude of the producer and his team was very balanced (several conspiracy theorists were also invited to take part). We even allowed our complete exercise material to be made available to the BBC. Regrettably broadcasting in 2008 might have jeopardised an ongoing court case, so they had little choice about postponing it to 2009.

Early in 2005 Reed Elsevier, an organisation specialising in information and publishing that employs 1,000 people in and around London, asked us to help them prepare an effective crisis management plan and rehearse it before sign-off. Several draft scenarios were drawn up and the crisis team themselves set the exercise date and time: 9.00am on 7 July.

The test was planned as a table-top walk through for about six people (the CM team) in a lecture room with all injects simulated. Everything was on MS PowerPoint. The location of their Central London office near to Chancery Lane was chosen as one test site. With many staff travelling to work via the London underground system, the chosen exercise simulated incendiary devices on three trains, very similar to a real IRA attack in 1992, as well as other events.

As there had been eighteen terrorist bomb attacks on tube trains prior to 2005, choosing the London Underground was logical rather than just prescient. With this in mind it was hardly surprising that Deutsche Bank had run a similar exercise a few days before and, prior to that, a multi-agency (and much publicised) exercise code-named Osiris II had simulated a terrorist attack at Bank tube station. Moreover, I had also taken part in a BBC Panorama programme in 2004 as a panellist alongside Michael Portillo MP et al, in an unscripted debate (we had no idea at all what the scenario was to be?) on how London might once again, deal with terrorist attacks, only this time it was fictional (created entirely by the BBC).

In short, some of the research for our exercise had already been done. The scenario developed for our client even started by using fictitious news items from the Panorama programme then, as with any walk through exercise, events unfolded solely on a screen as dictated by the facilitator without any external injects or actions beyond the exercise room. Also factored into the scenario was to be an above ground fictitious bomb exploding not far from the head office of the protected Jewish Chronicle magazine where for exercise purposes, our imagined terrorists would have been aware that commuters would now be walking to work (past a building already considered a target) as some tube stations would have been closed.

Of just eight nearby tube stations that fell within possible exercise scope, three were chosen that, by coincidence, were involved in the awful drama that actually took place on 7 July 2005. A level of scenario validation that on this occasion, we could have done without.

An exercise that turns into the real thing is not that unusual. For example, in January 2003, thirty people were injured when a tube train derailed and hit a wall at speed. At the same time, the City of London Police were running an exercise for their central casualty bureau where the team quickly abandoned their plans and swung into action to cope with the real thing.

For a surprising number of people such coincidents cannot be accepted as such. There just has to be a conspiracy behind them, despite the obvious point that painstaking research will always identify probable above possible scenarios. By the way, the only reason I was asked to speak on TV news that day, when there was still much confusion about the real tragedies, was to encourage more organisations to thoroughly plan their own exercises knowing the threat of terrorism is and remains, very real. One tragic consequence being Islam, a great Abrahamic, monotheistic faith (along with Judaism and Christianity), has undeservedly become vilified by some people”.

Peter Power
Visor Consultants

Latest from NO2ID

2009-04-03T18:06:00.003Z

Although clause 152 of the Coroner’s & Justice Bill has been put behind bars for the time being, continual vigilance is paramount in trying to head off any legislation that further erodes our privacy and rights to freedom of speech from becoming established on the statute books. NO2ID highlight the current campaigns we must concentrate on:

Taking the NO2ID pledge not to comply in disclosing any personal information in relation to the National Identity Register and ID Cards.

Informing our GPs that we do not wish them to participate in ‘the spine’ or Summary Care Record (SCR) scheme which could breach patient confidentiality and allow personal data to be leaked to other organisations outside the NHS or the National Database.

Urging parents to ensure that their children’s personal details are ‘shielded’ on the ContactPoint database.

Ensuring those who have been charged but not convicted of a crime to contact their chief constable to ensure that their DNA, fingerprints and police records be destroyed citing the European Court of Human Rights recent ruling in the Marper case that retention was unlawful.

Constant resistance to these measures is absolutely essential, otherwise they will form a permanent part of the architecture of our incarceration within a police state.

Another piece of semi-transparent legislation has been defeated in the House of Lords. Clause 48 of the Border Citizenship and Immigration Bill would have removed our passport-free zone. If the legislation were to be passed it would require citizens of England, Scotland and Wales to carry passports with them when visiting the Republic of Ireland, the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man.

In Germany opposition has come to the fore over ‘disproportionate’ proposals to record the country’s entire, telephone, mobile, email and Internet usage. The ruling stated that “The court is of the opinion that data retention violates the fundamental right to privacy. It is not necessary in a democratic society. The individual does not provoke the interference but can be intimidated by the risks of abuse and the feeling of being under surveillance [...] The directive [on data retention] does not respect the principle of proportionality guaranteed in Article 8 ECHR, which is why it is invalid."

But knowing the ardent desire for a total database world that our collective governments are being engaged to set up by their ‘élite’ handlers, continual opposition to their plans to implement such legislation might always bring with it the spectre of another false flag event on such a devasting scale (al Qaeda being the excuse again) that they could then use it as a means of forcing these initiatives through on the usual basis of ‘keeping us safe in future’. Don't fall for that one!

PS. My prediction of a possible false flag episode taking place in the cloak of the partial surveillance blackout in the City of Westminster didn’t happen, although the intent of that mysterious armoured vehicle containing police uniforms has never been declared. Yet to identify and broadcast on the web such possible scenarios in which such an inside ‘terror attack’ could take place helps to keep people alert to the kinds of things our masters stage and our very declaration may, in some ‘butterfly effect’ way, help to exorcise such plans.

A Common Purpose?

2009-03-31T12:14:00.003Z

In a recent Edge TV exposé, retired naval commander, Brian Gerrish spoke of the insidious infiltration of Common Purpose (CP) into nearly all avenues of government and industry. I reported on CP some time ago and since then its tentacles of power have been extending. Cloaked in the altruistic clothing of a charity ‘empowering people and communities’, it is really anything but. In reality CP is an elitist pro-EU political organisation which is usurping the democratic framework and sovereignty of this country while at the same time threatening personal free will.

To save you time digging back through my archives, I have brought my original 2007 blog forward and included some further comments on this secretive 'charity', which are ever more relevant to current political trends in this country.

I was originally alerted to Common Purpose, back in 2007, by an article written by David Icke, but before reading his article in full, I first went to Common Purposes' website to get my own first impression on what it was all about. I was confronted by a lot of convoluted prose, but the best I could ascertain from their mission statement was that they run courses for various age groups and people of varying degrees of managerial responsibilty to help them understand the world in which they live and help make society and/or their organisation more efficient. Good aims you might suppose on the surface of it, but very light on specifics the way most advertising is. That begs the question - just how do they intend participants to achieve these goals and ultimately, whose goals are they?

The title ‘Common Purpose’ may sound altruistic - conjuring up a structured way of bettering society, working together as communities or within organisations with more transparency, honesty and accountability all for a common good. And it is this altruistic message that will appeal to many ambitious younger people in junior management with their lifetime stretching in front of them. They feel they can be part of a team that can improve our lot in a world distraught with famine, war, duplicity and evil. So far so good, or is it?

But dig deeper, as Icke did, and you will find out something that is not stated on their website. Common Purpose’s Chief Executive is Julia Middleton who just happens to be Head of Personnel Selection in the office of the Deputy Prime Minister! We are also told that DEMOS, the political think tank that strongly influenced Tony Blair during his administration and is now advising parties across the political spectrum, is closely involved with Common Purpose. This then provides an immediate link between political direction and the appointing and grooming of those who are considered to be specially selected and 'politically correct' future leaders, hardly the work of a 'charity' I would have thought! Given this no small coincidence that a direct conduit runs from central government to CP and the real nature of the beast comes sharply into focus. Any altruism must surely be heavily tainted by government and the puppeteers that run it.

It is clear that CP is aimed at people in senior positions in politics, education, policing, local government, business, health and the media - it is estimated that possibly 1,000 senior employees in the BBC are members - and because of this it immediately becomes apparent that any 'common purpose' is the reserve of those in these senior decision-making positions. All members of CP, the 'Inner Party' members to take an Orwellian parallel, are given a politically-charged set of values which they must adhere to in the execution of their work and those values and directives are then passed down to us, the 'Outer Party' members who are clearly meant to comply.

Given this government’s long legacy of depriving us of our liberties, building up the police state and control grid, then CP appears to be just another part of that armoury but with its connections to government policy covertly hidden as a semi-secretive 'charity', it is not immediately obvious that this is intended as another tool in achieving a state-sponsored control down through the ranks. Indeed, according to DEMOS, charities in future, are to become politicised and act as maid servants to government doctrine.

Common Purpose seems to adopting all of the hallmarks of Illuminati's Tavistock Institute modus operandi that other manipulator of social behaviour.

Consider this. John Rawlings Rees, one of Tavistock's founders once said this: 'Public life, politics and industry should all ... be within our sphere of influence (the Institute's and the Illuminati they represent)... If we are to infiltrate the professional and social activities of other people I think we must imitate the Totalitarians and organize some kind of fifth column activity!'

'We must aim to make it permeate every educational activity in our national life ... We have made a useful attack upon a number of professions. The two easiest of them naturally are the teaching profession and the Church: the two most difficult are law and medicine.'

As if to underline CP's hidden agenda, here's one experience (with acknowledgement to David Icke's newsletter.

Brian Gerrish at http://www.eutruth.org.uk discovered Common Purpose when he was involved with a group in Plymouth in the west of England helping people find jobs and one of their projects was repairing wooden boats. He said they had lots of public support and backing from the local authorities and everything was going fine. But then it suddenly changed and the council support was withdrawn. When they tried to continue alone, he said that within a short time key people were being threatened:

'When we started to explore why we were being threatened we were absolutely staggered to find a very strange organisation called Common Purpose operating in the city. And we were absolutely amazed that there were so many people involved but they were not declaring themselves ...

'[Common Purpose] was operating throughout the structure of the city, in the city council, in the government offices, in the police, in the judiciary. Essentially we discovered what is effectively, at best, a quasi secret society which doesn't declare itself to ordinary people.'

Further research has led Gerrish to establish that Common Purpose is recruiting and training leaders to be loyal to the objectives of the organisation and the European Union and preparing the governing structure for what it calls the 'post-democratic society' after nations are replaced by regions in the European Union. 'They are learning to rule without regard to democracy, and will bring the EU police state home to every one of us', Gerrish says. Common Purpose 'graduates' are increasingly everywhere.

When the organisation was given an award in 2005 by one of it clients, Newcastle University in the North East of England, it was revealed that among its graduates in that area were: Michael Craik, Northumbria Police Chief Constable; Andrew Dixon, Executive Director of the Arts Council England, North East; Glyn Evans, City Centre Chaplain; Chris Francis, Centre Manager of the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust; Anne Marshall, Chief Officer of Age Concern; Anthony Sargent, General Director of The Sage Gateshead; Miriam Harte, Director of Beamish Museum; and Sue Underwood, Chief Executive of NEMLAC (the North East Museums, Libraries and Archives Council). Brian Gerrish has found them to be throughout the government structure with more than £100 million of taxpayers money spent on Common Purpose courses for state employees. It has members in the National Health Service, BBC, police, legal profession, religion, local councils, the Civil Service, government ministries,! Parliament and Regional Development Agencies.'

With a network of CP members occupying a large cross section of senior positions in every town and city in Britain, we now see, in place, a control grid of un-elected intermediaries who are acting as a conduit for the flow of state dictat to we, the common people, while our role, at the bottom of the pile, is to snoop on our fellow citizens' dustbins or pry on them to see if they acting suspiciously and not in accordance with that received dictat.

To view Edge TV's Interview with Gerrish go to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtzhMvutuvU

Not the old CCTV blackout MO again?

2009-03-30T15:35:00.005Z

The first demonstrations, in what will be a week of demonstrating against the G20 summit, passed off without any significant incident last Saturday, although one policeman did say that this ‘was a dry run’ and that the real action would take place this week. Just shows the way their mindset is being programmed!

Supporting the contention that all will not be so peaceful this week, comes the news that many of the City of Westminster’s CCTV cameras will be out of action this during the summit due to a newly installed CCTV network “not fully meeting the resolution standards required". Well, well, how strangely co-incidental on a crucial week when thousands are going to be parading within the very areas that those dysfunctional cameras patrol! I smell a rat.

CCTV cameras weren’t working when Lady Di was assassinated in the Pont d’Alma tunnel in Paris. CCTV cameras weren’t supposed to be working at Stockwell tube station when Charles de Menenzes was assassinated and likewise when the No 30 bus blew up on 7/7. Are the authorities afraid of the danger that footage might be released of police officers behaving in an over-zealous or provocative manner during the G20 demos that would prove state harrassment of what should be peaceful protests? Or might it be something more sinister?

Westminster City Council delivered an urgent note to Geoff Hoon strongly stating that on a week when the streets would be filled with protestors and traffic management would be paramount, the DfT should waive the shutdown for the duration of the talks. Their unavailability will prevent officials from being able to have full visibility on the motorcades to the summit. Might there be a covert assassination attempt planned by the cabal on one or more of the summit attendees that subsequent analysis of CCTV footage might betray?

A source at the council said "Frankly, it couldn't have come at a worse time,". These are not just parking enforcement cameras, they're for public order and we've got the G20 world leaders coming. This is a complete disaster."

It might well be!

Latest from NO2ID

2009-03-23T18:31:00.006Z

First some encouraging news. After a great deal of outcry, the controversial clause 152 has been removed from the Coroner’s and Justice Bill. As reported in my last NO2ID blog, its retention would have allowed the unmitigated sharing of all of our personal data, not only among government departments and agencies, but also by the private sector and across national boundaries. Many MPs were overwhelmed with letters and emails from their constituents and it became the most briefed-against clause in the whole bill.

But there is no room for complacency. The next few weeks will see the presentation of the Borders, Citizenship & Immigration Bill with its measures for further data sharing; The Policing & Crime Bill involving the garnering of DNA and biometric data and Phase II of NHS Summary Care Records - the sharing of medical records without our consent. And then there's the initial roll-out of ContactPoint, the gathering and sharing on a whole range of personal details about your children. This is an ongoing battle requiring constant vigilance and challenges. But trying to be vigilant is being made difficult by a government intent on avoiding disclosure of what is actually in commissioned reports on their datasharing initiatives.

Just to demonstrate the arrogant way in which the government views public consultation on ID cards a public ‘debate’ was held at Westminster Hall on 11th March, attended by Meg Hillier, the ID Cards minister and MP Mark Todd who, at the outset of the ‘debate’ made it clear that there would be none on the principles of ID Cards or their effect on civil liberties. Hillier then went on to disingenuously say that 70% of the cost “will be the cost of implementing secure passports with fingerprints, something that we are doing to meet international requirements.” The truth of the matter is that there are no international requirements!

The database frenzy continues with bee-keepers being asked to enrol onto a national database. If the take up is not adequate, then it will become compulsory. This accompanies the National Equine Database and a forthcoming database for sheep and I don't just mean us!

In addition to the above, today’s Guardian newspaper published the findings of the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust sponsored review, ‘Database State’ prepared by the Foundation for Information Policy Research, into the plethora of databases that our government is rolling out. In the report's estimation, only 6 out of 46 data-gathering systems that the government is currently engaged in should be given a ‘green light’, on the grounds of being effective, proportionate, necessary and established - with a legal basis to guarantee against privacy intrusions. A further 29 were given an amber light, meaning that they pose problems and could be illegal, while 11 schemes should be scrapped altogether or significantly re-designed, these including the DNA database and ContactPoint.

The report estimates that £19bn a year is being spent on database IT with a further £105bn earmarked for the next five years. This is a colossal sum and money, which it appears, is being wasted on intrusive systems that, more often than not, don’t work. Even Whitehall admits that only 30% of public-sector IT projects are successful, a shocking admission.

Crime prevention and improved public sector services are usually cited as the main advantages of this personal information matrix, which judging by their intrusiveness, unreliability and sheer cost, completely destroys that argument. What is evident, in my view, is that the pressure to roll out these schemes is supra-governmental - that it is the controlling élite that are calling the shots - while our niaive, gullible and bought-and-paid-for politicians - under orders - are stumbling about, blindly rolling out this electronic surveillance control grid, without any oversight, accountability or consultation with the general public. No-one in power has the guts to question or oppose these wholly outrageous public surveillance, big brother initiatives. There needs to be an all-party concensus in government to put a halt to any further measures and assess the whole paraphenalia for the useful bits and cast aside the rest of it, while in the process making real steps to ensure individuals' rights to privacy and confidentiality.

Ross Anderson, a Cambridge University professor said that Britain is now the most invasive surveillance state and the worst at protecting privacy in the whole western democracy. Anderson went on the say "Britain's database state has become a financial, ethical and administrative disaster, which is penalising some of the most vulnerable [in] society. It also wastes billions of pounds a year and often damages service delivery rather than improving it." He went on to say that "There must be urgent and radical change in the public-sector database culture so that the state remains our servant, not our master ... we have to develop systems that put people first."

I fear that in the scheme of things, Britain has been earmarked as the beta test ground for the 'model' police state that will eventually become the blue print for other countries worldwide, which will be made to follow this Orwellian example.

Below is my response from local Conservative MP Andrew Turner to my email regarding my concern over Clause 152 of the Coroner's and Justice Bill.

His comments concur with mine over the clause and the way in which it was surreptitiously hidden away in the bill, hoping that it would get overlooked by prying eyes. But, of course, once wearing the cloak of power, the Tories will be put up to similar tricks by their controlling masters, so his missive cuts little ice with me, unless his sentiments are from the heart and not just Tory rhetoric.

Still being deceived by Obama?

2009-03-20T09:34:00.004Z

For those of you who are still in the midst of a messianic orgasm over the appointment of Barak Obama as US president, you might like to start thinking again. As I stated on the eve of his election, his office would bring none of the promises he made and indeed would see be a continuation and indeed, an acceleration of the Bush regime. As documented in ‘The Obama Deception’ the latest in-depth documentary to come out of the Prison Planet stable, Alex Jones and others clearly catalogue the plethora of ‘U’-turns he has made on his pre-presidential rhetoric.

WorldNetDaily lists Obama’s pre-election promises which have already been broken during the nine weeks or so he has been in power.

Promise: 'Sunlight Before Signing' "When there is a bill that ends up on my desk as the president, you the public will have five days to look online and find out what's in it before I sign it" he promised in his Manchester, New Hampshire speech in 2007.

Reality: His first bill, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Restoration Act, was signed into power just two days after its passage. Bill No2, expanding State Children's Health Insurance Program got just three days. Next, on February 17 he signed a 1,000-page $787 billion stimulus with just one day’s grace - hardly democratic for such a giant package!

Promise: Capital gains tax elimination for small businesses Only weeks before his election Obama advisers Austan Goolsbee and Jason Furman told the Wall Street Journal that Obama planned tax cuts that included "the elimination of capital gains taxes for small businesses and start-ups."

Reality: People who invest in small businesses have only been allowed to exclude 50 percent of that gain from capital gains taxes. While Obama's $787 billion economic-stimulus package reduces that tax liability – raising the exclusion to 75 percent – it does not eliminate it.

Promise: No jobs for lobbyists “I am in this race to tell the corporate lobbyists that their days of setting the agenda in Washington are over. I have done more than any other candidate in this race to take on lobbyists — and won. They have not funded my campaign, they will not run my White House, and they will not drown out the voices of the American people when I am president” he declared in a speech given in Des Moines, Iowa in November 2007.

Reality: His nominees for office since coming to power have included William J Lynn, under secretary at the Department of Defense and lobbyist for Raytheon, William Corr deputy secretary for the Department of Health and Human Services and anti-tobacco lobbyist for the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, Timothy Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury who immediately appointed a fist full of lobbyists, like his chief of staff, Mark Patterson a top lobbyist at Goldman Sachs; George Mitchell, Middle East Envoy, top lobbyist for the Saudi royal family; Leon Panetta, head of the CIA, king of Wall Street lobbyists; Tom Daschle, head of Health and Human Services, lobbyist for healthcare firms.

Promise: Bring home troops in 16 months His campaign website proclaimed that he would "remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months." by May 20, 2010 - giving him a decisive edge over Hillary Clinton.

Reality: On February 27 this had become "Let me say this as plainly as I can: By Aug. 31, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end." Then it was declared that as part of a "new era of American leadership," he also said he would leave behind a residual force of 35,000 to 50,000 troops and remove all U.S. soldiers from Iraq by Dec. 31, 2011 – the same deadline the Bush administration negotiated with the Iraqi government last year in its Status of Forces Agreement. But some combat units would remain in Iraq beyond his declared August 2010 withdrawal. Rather than returning home, they would simply face reassignment as "advisory training brigades."

Promise; Transparency On January 21 his administration released a memo “My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government. Government should be transparent. Transparency promotes accountability and provides information for citizens about what their Government is doing.”

Reality: The 1,027-page American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was hurried through, not allowing lawmakers enough time to read the weighty document and the online version could not be keyword searched. It had not been made clear that many of his nominees had defaulted on tax payments and journalists in briefings have been carefully picked in a system that is clearly eluding transparency. And then there’s the opaqueness over Obama’s citizenship.

Promise: Executive Signing Statements During his campaign, Obama criticised Bush for the habit of attaching ‘signing statements’ to bills that had been passed by congress in order to add further interpretation to them. Obama even went so far as to issue a memorandum negating those that had been issued by Bush and not to follow them without consultation with the Justice Department first.

Reality: Then shortly after the issuance of that memo, Obama attached a signing statement to the $410 billion government spending bill which effectively modified and by-passed dozens of statutes in the bill.

Like Bush, Obama is not in control and is merely a front man for a wicked and grossly outrageous cabal, headed by the banking ‘Illuminati’ who are intent on using the US as the battering ram for world domination while destroying the republic in the process.

On Wednesday the Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act was passed and heralds the establishment of mandatory national service - serving the state - with the altruistic overlays of strengthening the ‘social fabric’ of the nation. Section 120 of the bill also discusses the “Youth Engagement Zone Program” and states that “service learning” will be “a mandatory part of the curriculum in all of the secondary schools served by the local educational agency.” In addition the Senate is also considering a further piece of legislation known as the ‘Serve America Act’, all highly socialistic initiatives that could easily have come from the Nazi party in the 1930s.

Taken in tandem with the unmitigated bowing of congress to the banking cartel who are ripping off the nation and tax payers to the tune of trillions and who are clearly running Obama and the US government and you have the perfect definition of a fascist state.

With recent news bringing with it further examples of what could easily parallel Germany in the 30’s - New York considering implementing martial law to clean up policing on the streets - the demonisation and imprisonment of citizens who show allegiance to libertarians such as congressman Ron Paul, people who carry copies of, or who cite, the US constitution or fly the US flag upside down in recognition of the country’s fallen status, the surveillance and arrest of news reporters and the wholesale evesdropping on US citizens emails and phone calls - the list goes on and on - and it’s no wonder that over two dozen state sovereignty bills are now in the process of making the rounds in their respective state legislatures to distance themselves from the Feds!

It seems ironic that after a decades-long fight for the coloured population of America to emerge from slavery and gain acceptance and equality with whites, that it should be on the watch of the first coloured US president that the enslavement of the entire US population is being enacted!

I thoroughly recommend that you view ‘The Obama Deception’ and come to your own conclusions visit http://www.prisonplanet.com/

A eugenics programme in all but name

2009-03-10T12:52:00.007Z

If the financial meltdown in the US - as well as the rest of the globe - wasn’t bad enough, that other arm of the ‘cabal’s’ enslavement juggernaut, the covert eugenics programme, is well under way with the Feds now intent on criminalising organic farming and denying Americans a healthy diet.

Using the same MO as Codex Alimentarius, the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 is being introduced for ‘safety reasons’. The bill’s preface reads: “To establish the Food Safety Administration within the Department of Health and Human Services to protect the public health by preventing food-borne illness, ensuring the safety of food, improving research on contaminants leading to food-borne illness, and improving security of food from intentional contamination, and for other purposes”. Total deceit!

This is a major step forward in having the ‘cabal’ control what US citizens eat, namely mass produced, lifeless, irradiated, GM-infested crap. The absence of essential minerals and vitamins in the mass-produced, irradiated rubbish being lined up as the legal diet for Americans, will further denigrate their largely less than healthy state of being, by not providing people with the essential ingredients they require to maintain a robust immune system. The inevitable increase (not decrease as the bill would posit) of resulting illnesses will only lead to everyone being drawn onboard the drug cartel’s allopathic ‘remedies’ band-wagon which in turn will only hasten degenerative health, increasing the mortality rate among younger people and fulfilling the covert eugenics programme.

The essence of the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 (HR875, S425) which is massive in content (they’re always big and convoluted so that no-one gets time to read them, but will, like the bailout bill, be forced through congress under the duress), is as follows.

It:

- Legally binds state agriculture depts to enforcing federal guidelines effectively taking away the states power to do anything other than being food police for the federal dept.

- Effectively criminalizes organic farming but doesn’t actually use the word organic.

- Effects anyone growing food even if they are not selling it but consuming it.

- Effects anyone producing meat of any kind including wild game.

- Legislation is so broad based that every aspect of growing or producing food can be made illegal. There are no specifics which is bizarre considering how long the legislation is.

- Section 103 is almost entirely about the administrative aspect of the legislation. It will allow the appointing of officials from the factory farming corporations and lobbyists and classify them as experts and allow them to determine and interpret the legislation. Who do you think they are going to side with?

- Section 206 defines what will be considered a food production facility and what will be enforced up all food production facilities. The wording is so broad based that a backyard gardener could be fined and more.

- Section 207 requires that the state’s agriculture dept act as the food police and enforce the federal requirements. This takes away the states power and is in violation of the 10th amendment.

Non-compliance in this murderous plot is essential!

Latest from NO2ID

2009-03-06T16:04:00.002Z

Commentary on each of these news items is my own and not that of the NO2ID group’s latest newsletter.

With the Coroners and Justice Bill currently being debated in Parliament, one of the greatest threats to our personal privacy is at stake and is embodied in Clause 152 which, if passed, would allow the unmitigated sharing of all of our personal data, not only among government departments and agencies, but also by the private sector and across national boundaries. This proposed legislation will completely destroy the Data Protection Act and must be stopped. The prospect is appalling and I urge everyone reading this to contact their MP and/or write to their newspaper alerting others to this nightmarish prospect. Such proposed legislation, rarely, if ever, gets reported on mainstream TV news channels and by the time you eventually hear of it yet another loss to your personal rights and freedoms has been enacted and it’s too late!

Privacy International have communicated their concerns over Clause 152 to Jack Straw saying that “This new power is wothout precedent and carries significant implications for data protection and for the rights of individuals”.

The Convention on Modern Liberty held a conference in London at the end of last month which brought together civil liberties groups and others concerned over the abuse to our personal rights in the UK. Among the speakers were author Philip Pullman who said "A nation whose laws express fear and suspicion cannot sustain delight for very long; joy does not flourish in the garden of anxiety". Also present was the eminent lawyer Lord Bingham summed up the conference proceedings by saying "A candle may today be lit or re-lit in Britain, which we may fervently hope shall never be put out."

We stand at a very dangerous crossroads. To allow any further inroads into our liberties will herald our incarceration into a dark Orwellian police state. I would urge readers to watch Michael Radford’s film ‘Nineteen Eighty Four’ and try to imagine a future like the one portrayed in the movie, adjusting the setting to that of the first decade of the 21st century. That prospect is a lot nearer that you think and will become reality if we don’t try to stop it!

More local councils pass anti-ID motions. Worcester County Council and Wyre Forest Council have joined the ranks of local government opposed to co-operating with the national identity card scheme - but only if such opposition wasn't unlawful. The sentiments are good, but non-compliance will be regarded unlawful if the government has its way, I suspect. That leaves it to us to become non-compliant which would no doubt face us with a jail sentence. But, if like the opposition to Thatcher’s council tax, we all made a sufficiently large enough stink, government would have a problem.

In another privacy-busting ploy, suggestion is being made to parents of independent schools to have their child ‘shielded’. ‘Sheilding’, which is part of government’s new ContactPoint database is viewed by many to be more of an endangerment to children than a protecting measure which is its officially stated aim. Containing a whole range of a child’s personal details, the system could easily be abused and allow those details to be accessed by the wrong type of people. Again, security is being touted as the driving reason for parents to engage their children into the scheme, whereas the complete opposite is more likely. It’s all about having us all fully accounted for in every aspect of our lives by state and corporate interests from cradle to grave.

Disregard can work both ways

2009-03-02T13:42:00.003Z

In today’s Guardian, Charlie Brooker, in a rightfully pissed-off mood, bares his dismay over our politicians and their seeming dismissal of us, their electorate. Following last week’s declaration by Man-of-Straw Jack, that no release would be made of records pertaining to cabinet discussions over the decision to send our troops into Iraq, Brooker says he reached his snapping point declaring “Straw and his pals figured they knew best, even though it turned out they didn't and - oops! - hundreds of thousands of lives were lost as a result. Remember the footage of that screaming little boy with his limbs blown off? Maybe not. Maybe you felt a shiver of guilt when you saw that; guilt that you hadn't personally done enough to prevent it; should've shouted louder, marched further. Or maybe it stunned you into numbness. Because what was the point in protesting any more? These people do what they want.

“They do what they want, these people, and you and I are cut out of the conversation. I'm sure they're dimly aware we still exist. They must spot us occasionally, through the window, jumping up and down in the cold with our funny placards . . . although come to think of it, they can't even see us through the window, since they banned peaceful protest within a mile of Parliament.”

Very true. The words from the lips of cabinet ministers, more often than not, are laced with double-speak, spin and complete disingenuity. What they promise today, they make a ‘U’-turn on tomorrow and then feebly attempt to appease us, amidst the financial turmoil, with postures like the mock disgust from Brown and Prescott last week that ‘Fred the Shred’ Goodwin should not retain his grossly obscene pension in light of the devastation he brought upon RBS, when the top echelons of government have been privy to this banking scam all the time.

But as Brooker suggests in the title of his piece “To politicians, we're little more than meaningless blobs on a monitor”, the same could be said of our politicians - when viewed from the next tier up in the grand control pyramid - by the controlling élite.

Politicians come and go, they’re dispensible, just another level of pawns in the game, so in a way Brown et al are just passing on that total lack of regard that is endemic in the higher orders of the grand pile. The contempt and indifference originates with that controlling cabal and permeates downwards, eventually dehumanising us all. Their preferred interface with us mere mortals is via CCTV cameras and electronic databases, we are little more than chips on a circuit board, a means to an end and when that end is achieved, also dispensible.

This cold and total disregard, treating us little better than tagged sheep, while leading us into total financial collapse, dispossession of our rights and our property in many cases, will inevitably lead to backlash. That final straw is only around the corner and with its arrival the wrath of UK and that of many other nations worldwide will erupt and that’s precisely what the controlling élite want and something their dutiful law-enforcement agencies have been preparing for, the ability to incarcerate us all, locking us into a global police state then allowing those at the top of the pile to practice their disregard for us all on a grand scale.

However, our most effective response to that final straw must not be through violence, but through peaceful non-compliance. In that way we are not playing into their hands but forming a cordon of co-ordinated resistance and a determination not to be treated like trash. Non-violent ingenuity and resourcefulness are what is needed - not brute force - in the coming crisis and that Dunkirk spirit of human interdependence, sharing and co-ordinated mutual support and the adoption of a higher spiritually, will deny them their game plan.

If our politicians and their masters regard us all as little more than blobs on a monitor, we too can quite rightly adopt a similar attitude in reverse and quietly resist their attempts to deny us our rights as human beings and treating us like cattle to the slaughter.

Rail travel and Big Brother

2009-02-23T11:01:00.002Z

In the strict regulation of our lives it seems the railways may be taking a leading role. Being a functional socialist ideal - the mass transit of the populous on a highly regulated basis - we’ve already witnessed Big Brother encroachment through CCTV on trains and stations as standard, restrictions on photography on railway property (although this has never been clarified, one camp believing that the extra eyes and ears of railway enthusiasts help the British Transport Police in their job of vigilance, while another camp, no doubt engendered by officialdom, believes it has a ‘terrorist’ potential), the use of electronic ticket barriers at the city mainline stations that are also being introduced as a means of denying the general public a short cut in getting from one side of the railway to another (eg Sheffield and soon York and many others). Add to this the introduction of smart card schemes like Oyster Card, capable of tracing and tracking your every journey and you have the makings of highly regulated control of the system’s users. Unlike private transport (until satellite tracking becomes standard in every car), public transport and particularly rail, is tailor-made for such BB oversight.

One might also add the proliferation - particularly on South West Trains - of command-like announcements, continually reminding us to buy a ticket before we get on ‘one of our trains’, not to mention the endlessly repeated ‘mind the gap between the train and the platform edge when alighting the train’ and ‘please remember to take all of your belongings with you when you leave the train’, ‘please tell a member of staff if you see anything suspicious’, ‘please keep all items with you at all times’ and lest we forget, ‘CCTV is in operation on this train’, the ‘for your safety and comfort’ bit now deleted putting the onus on us all being potential miscreants.

On the surface of it, these announcements are wholly unecessary, stating the obvious and making a mockery of common sense. But covertly, they are all part of conditioning an unthinking public into robotically accepting commands. On stopping trains where a whole plethora of these are often repeated, I feel like telling the bloody bitch to ‘shut up’. Yet others seem unaware or just oblivious to it. That’s worrying.

The use of automatic ticket barriers at large through stations, particularly outside London, seem to me to be a total waste of money and when used as an obstruction to the general public who merely wish to get from one side of the station to the other, a gross inconvenience. The main reason cited for the introduction is revenue protection, but at stations like York where the bulk of travellers are going medium to long distance to a wide variety of destinations using a wide variety of ticket types many of which aren’t recognised by the machine and whose gates are too narrow to accommodate the large amounts of luggage people on long-distance journeys tend to carry, (unlike, say London Bridge which caters for commuters, most of which use standard season tickets from a narrow range of destinations in commuter-land), they become a definite hindrance and anyway revenue protection is usually conducted on the trains and the station barriers need to be manned to allow people with luggage to pass though the manual gates! As Alan Williams pointed out in the latest edition of Modern Railways, anyone wanting to bunk the system and chance the on-board ticket inspections can do so by purchasing a ticket to the first port of call that the train is making. No, it’s about getting people to conform, conditioning them to electronic barrier checks and adopting an impersonal sheep-like herding principal. Airports are masters of the art.

The innocent days of rail travel are coming to an end as the whole system, particularly in the South East, is beginning to succumb to state-imposed authority and political correctness, which is, of course, a form of fascism.

And on a appropriate note this email from Peter Tatchell just arrived in my inbox

Taking Liberties - Last few days

The marvellous, extraordinary Taking Liberties exhibition at the British Library in London ends this coming Sunday, I March.

Unmissable!

It tells the story of the heroic struggle for freedom and social justice in Britain, from the Magna Carta to the present day. It shows that all our liberties and rights were fought for and won by the blood, sweat and tears of millions of ordinary people.

It reminds us to defend the freedoms that previous generations gained, so that we can continue enjoying them and hand them on to generations yet to come.

This is more important than ever, as the Labour government continues the biggest peace-time assault on civil liberties since the era of the French revolution: 28 days detention without charge, restrictions on protests near parliament, indefinite house arrest without trial for terrorist suspects, ID cards, mass interception of private emails and phone calls without warrants, CCTV surveillance and tracking of the movement of individuals and vehicles, and the seizure of terror suspects assets without them being allowed to know why they are suspected or the evidence against them - and with no right of appeal to an open court or jury.

Man-made global warming - a consensus?

2009-02-13T10:11:00.003Z

What do the banking crisis, the war on terror and man-made global warming all have in common? Well, they are all deliberately contrived and they are all inextricably linked.

The first has been contrived as a means of imploding worldwide economies to usher in a centralised banking and regulatory control system, giving the ‘cabal’, as I term them - those unelected central Illuminati figures who have and continue to control all aspects of our lives - unbridled financial power over the world and it is a real threat.

The second has also been contrived to fabricate a continually perceived enemy that can be used as a means to invade strategically important countries to the ‘cabal’ like Iraq and Afghanistan and in the process deprive us of our liberties and encase us in a ‘prison-like’ state of global centralised control and surveillance ‘for our own safety’ against such radical groups as al Qaeda, who are merely a mercenery force employed by the CIA to do their dirty work by proxy. This is a threat only in as much as our governments wish to make it so.

The third and final ‘threat’ is also wholly contrived and is based entirely on fallacy and fabricated science with an aim of levying a global tax on carbon emissions and provide vast profits out of the trading of carbon credits for the benefit of the ‘cabal’. But this threat of man-made or anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is non-existant.

All three are part of one driving aim, the centralising of power among those élite and so are inextricably linked although, to many, may look like quite separate concerns.

Growing dissent
But questions are now being continually raised as the world is slowly waking up to the fact that these ‘threats’, if taken at face value, seem to leave a lot of questions unanswered from the reckless and quite extraordinary behaviour of banks and financial institutions in the last decade or so, to the inconsistencies and downright implausible official versions of seminal events like 9/11 and 7/7 and the war on terror. And now there is a growing censensus among leading scientists that directly challenges that other so-called consensus on man-made global warming.

Here are some telling quotes taken at random from the delegates at the recent 2008 International Conference on Climate Change, but which the media at large ignores:

“As far as the science (on man-made global warming) being ‘settled’, I think that is an obscenity. The fact is the science is being distorted by people who are not scientists” Dr Paul Reiter, The Pasteur Institute, Paris.

“This conference demonstrates that the (scientific) debate in not over. The climate is not being influenced by carbon dioxide”. UN IPCC scientist Vincent Gray of New Zealand.

“The 2000-year (temperature) trend is not flat, so a warming period is not unprecedented” Climate researcher Dr Craig Loehle, formerly of the Department of Energy Laboratories.

“There are lots of sceptics out there, all over the US and the rest of the world. (Global warming) has been over-hyped tremendously; most of the climate change we have seen is largely natural. I think we are brainwashing our children terribly” Dr William Gray, meteorologist and hurricane expert.

“There is no evidence that that CO2 has ever driven or will ever drive world temperatures and climate change. The consequence of that is worrying about CO2 is irrelevant. Our prediction is that world temperatures will continue to decline until 2014 and probably continue to decline after that.” UK astrophysicist Piers Corbyn.

“There are thousands of scientists around the world that say this issue is not settled. The climate is not being influenced by carbon dioxide”. Meteorologist Art Horn.

“The fluctuations in Earth’s temperature are caused by astronomical phenomena. The combined effect of all greenhouse gases, albedo changes and other Earthly changes account for no more than 3°C of the changes during transitions between ice ages and inter galacial” Physics professor emeritus Dr Howard Hayden of the University of Connecticut.

According to an article by Marc Moran in the latest edition of Nexus magazine - from which the above quotes were given - the oft-repeated notion that there is a ‘consensus’ of hundreds or even thousands of scientists affiliated in agreement to the UN IPCC statements on climate change just does not hold up to scrutiny.

The mere title, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, seems to say it all. It’s governmental doctrine, it’s politicised with a political end in mind - global carbon taxation - and as such the spectre of man-made global warming is baloney! (See elsewhere on this blog for an in-depth analysis on the man-made global warming myth.)

Let’s hope that this groundswell of dissent grows and highlights equally eloquently, the similar orchestrated fraud being committed concurrently in banking, the war on terror and the mainstream media (largely run by the same global crime cabal syndicate) who routinely deflect such dissenting views and open debate on these subjects and that the dots are all joined together and a bigger, true, picture realised by all.

Banking Blame

2009-02-11T13:34:00.004Z

The pathetic public spectacle of the bankers on trial sickenly braced our TV screens yesterday. Former bosses of HBOS and RBS were grilled by the government’s Treasury Select Committee in which they made token apologies to a country pretty well pissed off by the seemingly reckless activities of over-paid and opportunistic chief banking executives. Chairman of the committee, John McFall heard admissions from the four that
• They did not have any formal banking qualifications.
• Hornby was still being paid £60,000 a month to work as a consultant for HBOS.
• McKillop did not fully understand some of the complex financial instruments his bank was using.

McFall also noted a hint of arrogance in their later responses to questioning.

No satisfactory answer was given as to why they had taken such reckless decisions, losing each bank vast sums of money.

I would suggest the reason why no answers were forthcoming was because they were put up to it by a higher order, that hidden banking cabal that is so intent on deliberately creating a giant financial chasm from which they can consolidate and build a new global banking dynasty on the back of a desired global governance, bleeding the world’s economies dry in the process. This isn’t the story of four rather foolish and reckless executives, it’s the story of four well-paid patsy’s whose embarrassment today is a mere bagatelle in a game of corporate manipulation in which they have been used as key players. Far from falling from the heady heights of massive bonuses into penal servitude - which should be their fair punishment - they will, no doubt, find comfortable seats in high places for deeds done on behalf of their masters while we the tax-payers foot the bill for their banks bailouts!

All the more important that we get confirmation of what was really going on behind senior banking executive office and boardroom doors over the last decade or so.

One such whistleblower, Paul Moore, has courageously and rightfully revealed that his sacking back in 2005 followed his warning then that HBOS was engaging in aggressive sales practices which threatened its stability. This is a severe embarrassment for the then head of HBOS, Sir James Crosby, who today resigned as deputy chairman of the Financial Services Authority but who acted as advisor to Gordon Brown. As Sir Michael Fallon, a member of the treasury committee currently probing the banking crisis, said on BBC’s Today programme “Moore's claims went to the heart of the mistakes made by Britain's top bankers”.

Indeed they do and the more the select committee can unearth the dirtier the linen will become.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. But just how much further will Fallon and his colleagues be allowed to wander into the restricted territory of the banking cabal’s private life? Not very far my guess would be, otherwise the knowledge that men like Crosby were actively encouraged to engage in the destabilisation of banks like HBOS through reckless and unjudicious practices and with others of his ilk being engaged in similar activities in other banks, would begin to bring down the whole pack of cards. This in turn would expose this conspiracy which has been formulated deep within the central banking/Illuminati cabal to create a financial collapse from which a new, centralised global banking conglomerate can emerge - just the sort of institution that politicians have been increasingly calling for, as they have been told to, in recent months. That would bring us to the root cause of this crisis and everything that is meant to subtend from it.

Latest from NO2ID

2009-02-09T16:43:00.002Z

In its second reading in the House of Commons on 26th January Henry Bellingham (Conservative) made a very apt statement about the proposed Coroners and Justice Bill "The Bill contains some good ladders, but it has one appalling snake - it is a 50-ft python - in the form of the data protection proposals ... the proposals are very worrying, because they would undermine the whole essence of the data protection legislation." Precisely! As I pointed out in the last NO2ID update, this legislation wholly undermines any protection we may have under the Data Protection Act. See www.no2id.net/datasharing

Response following NO2ID’s request to ensure as many constituents urged their MPs to challenge the dreadful proposals embodied in the Coroners and Justice Bill has been very effective in bringing to the fore the iniquities of what this bill proposes. David Howarth (Lib Dem) wishes to have the bill struck off because of its enabling power to have any government department obtain personal information however it wishes. Dominic Grieve (Con), the new Shadow Secretary for Justice decried the unbridled data sharing that would result from the bill’s passing and demanded removal of the damning clause 152. The Chair of the Joint Committe on Human Rights, Andrew Dismore (Lab) also viewed the contentious clauses 151-154 with serious concern.

But even if the contentious parts of bill are defeated, this is only one of many others that seek to introduce such sweeping powers. The upcoming Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Bill and the Communications Data and the Interception Modernisation Programme, which are all set to violate our rights of privacy, have to be challenged. This battle will be ongoing and will require endless vigilance and challenge if we are to have the slightest hope of retaining respect and due privacy as citizens.

Privacy concerns have also been highlighted in a document recently published by Privacy International. In their report they illustrate the ways in which these powers could be used "Data on students' course attendance and library borrowing passed to immigration and security services in bulk; Information from party conference registrations passed on from police to government departments and electoral commission; Census data passed to government departments".

With the government’s plans for the ID Scheme proving problematic the Home Office is still intent on rolling out ID cards in several ‘beacon’ areas this year. Manchester is one of those locations and is being set up to ensure things run smoothly. Wishful thinking on the government’s part. As yet there is still no card reading equipment and all the while the general public are becoming increasingly hostile to the scheme. We must keep up the fight and kill this enormity before it kills us!

What Cheney really meant in his statement the other day.

2009-02-05T12:46:00.004Z

“The ultimate threat to the country” is “a 9/11-type event where we are armed with something much more dangerous than an airline ticket, a box cutter, the support of NORAD, the Pentagon and al CIAda - a nuclear weapon or a biological agent of some kind (we have a number of options on the table) that is deployed in the middle of an American city.

“That’s the one that would involve the deaths of perhaps hundreds of thousands of people, the one that the Pentagon and intelligence agencies would have to take much time planning and keep under wraps, and the ones you have to spend a hell of a lot of time guarding against,” he said.

“I think there’s a high probability that we’ll stage such a strike. Whether or not we’ll need to pull it off depends whether or not Obama - under our direction - can keep the American people under continual surveillance and control through increasingly tough legislation, suspension of the Bill of Rights (whatever those were) and all liberties and by keeping these policies in place we might just get to suspending all government-sponsored, mass-casualty false flag ops like 9/11 in the future. But then we’ll probably stage them anyway."

Snowed in?

2009-02-03T13:53:00.003Z

Snow continues to dominate the headlines making a welcome diversion from Obama and the global financial crisis. Best to take our crises in order!

The widespread disruption caused, what by any measure, would have been pretty typical winter conditions a few decades ago, demonstrates the rather spineless state in which our society finds itself today.

No buses in London yesterday, schools closed across the country, no bin collections etc etc, as officials agree that snow on the roads could cause buses to slide into gutters and endanger lives. The country seems to be full of hi-vi-vested individuals standing around shying away from potential dangers as HSE rule books advise against taking risk, suggesting that to stay indoors is the safer option.

Clearly the world is becoming to scary a place as social psychologists have, through the media, made us fearful of it and the consequences. I see this as just part of a conditioning process to have us all live in a state of fearfulness. ‘Stay at home’, ‘Don’t travel unless it’s absolutely necessary’, ‘Don’t send the kids to school as they might not be able to get home again’.

During the winter of 1963 in the uplands of north west County Durham, the conditions we are witnessing now would have been regarded as an average winter day, while school buses would have run, albeit a bit delayed, despite the conditions with us ‘scholars’ helping to push the them out of snow drifts when necessary. I clearly recall all the boys in my year having to dig a trench just to the physics building at the bottom of the playground for our 'physie' lessons where the there was no heating. We sat there in heavy overcoats and scarves and just got on with things. At lunchtime we would go the local railway station and see heavy steam-hauled freight trains battle through the snow amid driving winds and blizzards. It was a challenge and we were all exhilarated by it. I remember my feet being continuously numb from cold from seven in the morning to the early hours of the following morning when the warmth of the bedclothes finally thawed them out. No central heating then just draughty coal fires.

Only when the drifts reached impossible heights did the buses stop running and then it was a case of bed down in the school gym, or for us more hardy souls, make the seven mile journey home on foot clambering over abandoned vehicles buried beneath the drifts and having the unique enjoyment of seeing the surrounding landscape from a newly elevated vantage point.

Such individualism and resourcefulness would be frowned upon today and actively discouraged as we are all expected to follow HSE’s guidelines and state ‘advice’ by remaining ‘safe’ in our homes.

And this is the way the state wants you, a dutiful ‘citizen’ following rules and regulations like watching the gap between the train and the platform edge or nor forgetting to take your luggage with you when leave it. Self-expression and initiative are not encouraged, only obedience to state dictat and political correctness.

So when the credit crunch turns into empty supermarket shelves, widespread poverty and deprivation, our movers and shakers having worn our nerves to be bone with stress and anxiety and deprived us of our spirit of self-sufficiency and survival, will we be expected, like sheep, to welcome with open arms their new world order, that dark prison they’ve got planned for our ‘own good and well-being’.

Or we will awake from this robotic mind-controlled state and start to think again for ourselves and cast aside the obstacles and those politically correct direction signs which are leading us completely down the wrong road.

Blair out, Stephenson in

2009-01-28T16:25:00.004Z

They eat ’em up and spit ’em out. That’s senior civil servants, politicians and high profile police commissioners who are on the front line in the service of the ultimate controlling cabal. Following the departure of Sir Ian Blair, whose reputation was severly tarnished in the public eye and that of the Met itself, because of the duplicitous things that had been asked of him, particularly in reference to the phony war on terror - Charles de Menezes and all that - his replacement, Sir Paul Stephenson, the officer responsible for the recent arrest of Damian Green, will no doubt become the new punch bag. His appointment has been greeted with mixed emotions, the official Met Police blog site viewing it with apprehension. No doubt his appointment will bring more government micro-management of the force. It’s pretty plain to see that there’s growing dissatisfaction within the police force and particularly the Met, in the way that real issues seems to be brushed under the carpet and politicised regulation becomes more and more evident.

When we are fast approaching a time when the police force are going to be in the front line against Disgruntled UK plc as financial chaos strikes, I hope that many in the ranks of the force get up and walk out, particularly if they are asked to perform unpleasant duties in controlling a pissed-off duped general public that has been sold down the river by the central banking cabal.

In the States, I get the impression that law enforcement today has more in common with the Wild West. Recruits for the burgeoning ranks of the police force seem to be elected on their lower-than-average IQ and former criminal credentials and well they might in a country that has built hundreds of FEMA camps whose future inmates look like being average American citizens.

The National Emergency Centers Act or HR 645, a new bill just introduced to Congress, mandates the establishment of “national emergency centers” to be located on military installations for the purpose of to providing “temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster,” according to the bill.

There is every prospect that these powers will be put into use as I can clearly see a day, not far from now, when the current financial crisis finally causes the complete collapse of the American economy - not to mention our own and many others - and when mass riots on US streets will make those already witnessed in Iceland and Greece, look like a tea party.

With the US military to help them, many batallions already in position and waiting, I just wonder how many of their ranks might abandon their official duties and join the rebels. It’s that kind of commitment and protest we need if we are to fight this monster.

Put that camera down!

To support the notion that the police are to be given sweeping powers over us in future, the news today tells us that photographing the police in Britain is to become illegal.

Just what might this immunity from the photographic forays by the general public provide? An attempt to avoid accountability should a member of the public see an officer behaving outside the law; have the police now risen to such an ascendant position that they cannot be convicted of any wrong-doing and are entirely above any law?

Only recently, as Paul Watson at infowars.com reminds us, “film-maker Darren Pollard was clearing up flood debris from his front garden when he noticed the police harassing a youth opposite his house. Darren retrieved his camera and began filming the officers. After noticing Pollard, the officers approached and then tried to claim that it was illegal to film them. After being informed by their superior that it was not illegal to film police, the officers left the scene”.

According to the British Journal of Photography, the Counter-Terrorism Act, due to become law on February 16 and in which this directive is embedded, says that this legislation “allows for the arrest and imprisonment of anyone who takes pictures of officers ‘likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism’.”

Who decides what constitutes an act of pre-meditated terrorism? Anything might on the whim of the officer in the viewfinder. Police are now to become immune to photographic accountability while we, the general public, are endlessly photographed by CCTV and other types of surveillance cameras, dozens, if not hundreds, of times every day. The state is becoming omnipresent, we are merely the guilty-until-proven-innocent-immediately-to-be-potentially-guilty-again serfs of that state. Already press photographers have been approached and often detained for photographing police officers.

And what about plain clothes officers or those that are covertly employed in dressing up as protestors to initiate unrest in otherwise peaceful public demonstrations as has been uncovered on many occasions in the past? Where is public redress if using photographic or video evidence in the event of such an instance, withdrawn.

Once the police existed to serve and protect us. Like everything else these days morals and social decency are being deliberately turned on their head and now it is we who must serve the police state without any argument.

That other virus

2009-01-26T16:04:00.003Z

Suffering as I am at the moment from a seasonal virus, I am reminded of that perennial virus that affects all decent human life 24/7. That’s the virus of the so-called élite, who have, for millennia, controlled our lives and blunted our spirituality to such an extent that we live our lives at an infintessimal fraction of our true potential.

Those 13 or so Illuminati families, whose roots can be traced back thousands of years, have historically taken it upon themselves, for what ever ‘divine’ reason, to be our self-appointed masters. They have caused untold suffering over that timescale, manipulating human kind in all manner of devious ways, setting race against race, inculcating us with religious beliefs that have for centuries been the cause of so much conflict among the common people. They continue to this day to dominate us in every sphere of our lives via their control of the media, banking, health, education etc etc.

That very same Illuminati have purposefully engineered the current global financial crisis - a mega virus - that will very soon bring us all to our heels, the antedote for which they will prescribe as a global financial system, a central world bank and common digital currency and all of the associated parephanalia - global legal system, global army overseeing a globally micro-chipped population run on fascist lines - the New World Order. The term ‘New World Order’, oft derided by the mainstream media as a term coined by conspiracy theorists, is now been bandied around on a daily basis by our politicians, Gordon Brown being the latest to give those words an emergent reality.

The New World Order antedote is rather like the flu jab your GP would have you take, laced with toxins and in the long run compromising your natural immune system.

The real answer in both scenarios is self-preservation. Fighting the seasonal flu requires a healthily maintained body aided by a spiritually-enlightened, stress-free and energetic mind. To fight the New World Order requires a similarly orientated mindset, one which can see through all of the orchestrated crap that we are daily fed, becoming our real selves and not the apology of homo sapiens we have become, dumbed-down, desperate ant-like creatures, racing manically in every direction at the behest of our masters.

It’s time to wake up and stop accepting their phony antedotes, say no to their ‘solutions’ and engage in an active, but peaceful programme on non-compliance. We’ve got to get out of this box, break free from their snares and rise to a higher plane, fighting off this giant virus for once and all otherwise we shall end up being permanently hospitalised!

Latest from NO2ID

2009-01-23T18:22:00.003Z

The Data Protection Act - could be anything but. The UK Ministry of Justice has performed a coup. It is to allow the Data Protection Act to lose its ‘protection’ by allowing any government department to obtain and use information in any way it likes.

The New Coroners and Justice Bill has hidden within it a clause (cl.152) which amends the current Data Protection Act and will allow ministers to make ‘Information Sharing Orders’. NO2ID say that "This can alter any Act of Parliament and cancel all confidentiality in order to use information obtained for one purpose to be used for another".

I have written to my MP on this most crucial of matters and I urge everyone reading this who believes in personal privacy and abhors the rampant intrusion of authorities to pry into our private lives, to do the same. In your own words please ask your MP to familiarise him or herself with Part 8 (clauses 151-154) of the Coroners and Justice Act and challenge the seemingly covert introduction of these enabling powers which will effect all of us tremendously. The Bill is due its second reading this coming Monday (26th). Time is of the essence!

The latest YouGov poll in the 18th January edtion of the Sunday Times shows that there is enormous opposition to these new powers with 65% believing that they give the government too much power, with only a mere 19% thinking not. This is clearly a circumvention of democracy and a sneaky way of bringing into force a Big Brother state where every bureaucrat can pry willy nilly into our lives without our knowledge.

From cradle to grave we are conditioned into reacting in the way the state and those élite above the state wish us to. Now children can experience the joys and get conditioned to security checkpoints with the new Playmobil TSA (Transportation Security Adminstration) Security Checkpoint toy. Ironically, according to one user who posted a comment on the toy on the Amazon website "I was a little disappointed when I first bought this item, because the functionality is limited. My 5 year old son pointed out that the passenger's shoes cannot be removed. Then, we placed a deadly fingernail file underneath the passenger's scarf, and neither the detector doorway nor the security wand picked it up. My son said 'that's the worst security ever!'"

Your life in their hands?

2009-01-15T16:40:00.001Z

My suspicions of the NHS grow daily in respect of their ‘care and maintenance’ of our general health. Called in for my annual diabetes check up, I was informed by the doctor that since the last one my HbA1C level had risen slightly. That measurement taken from a blood sample detemines what the average glucose level in the blood stream has been over the last 8-12 weeks, the average life span of a red blood cell. Red blood cells are made of the molecule haemoglobin. Glucose will adhere to the haemoglobin to make glycosylated haemoglobin called haemoglobin A1C - or HbA1C and the more glucose in the blood the higher the HbA1C count.

When I tried to explain that I regularly make blood sugar tests the doctor’s retort was that they are largely worthless and really aren’t worth bothering with suggesting that I forget them. I found this new piece of ‘advice’ astonishing and contrary to that which has been given me in the past. The regular readings I have obtained over the last six months actually concur with the HbA1C reading he gave me, a bit higher than a year ago. I would have thought that continuing to monitor my blood sugar levels on a regular, every-other-day basis was helpful in gaining an overall picture of my glucose levels albeit done on a hand-held monitor and not in a lab with more hi-tech equipment. His remark gave me the impression that patient participation in determining their health monitoring seems to be rather frowned upon, the implication given that it should be the sole responsibility of a state physician.

Once again, slightly higher than recommended (by whom I wonder - drug company-funded research?) cholesterol levels were cited with a recommendation that I revert to the intake of statin drugs in order to lower them, not to mention getting a flu jab and another innoculation which would mitigate against bacterial growth in the gut (whatever’s wrong with Aloe Vera? It’s done miracles for me!).

What actually goes into vaccines is highly questionable and countless independent research articles have found toxic elements which are not in the patients best interests. With a good immune system - which I currently enjoy to which a prolonged illness-free period over the last year seem to be testament to - why should I compromise that good health with some vaccine containing toxins and which will, in time, only compromise my body’s natural defences?

As of present I have managed to escape these three ‘recommendations’ as a patient’s right to have some say in his personal well-being, after all, I don’t have a personal death wish!
It seems, though, that that choice is soon going to be taken away from us, especially with the tightening grip of Codex Alimentarius and a physician’s approval for every useful dosage of a natural vitamin pill we might wish to take.

I am aware that my HbA1C level needs to be reduced a bit and I will aim to do that largely through natural homeopathic means supported with a slightly higher dosage of the prescribed allopathic drug, Metformin, along with the continuance of a healthy diet - which I admit I sometimes deviate very slightly from - and plenty of exercise.

It is my body, of which the maintenance of its good health is in my best interests, and does not form part of a state-owned inventory, wholly under its dictate.

Most people bow before the altar of their local GP viewing him as some sort of sage who will fix things. I think rather differently. Although probably well-meaning in pursuing their life’s ambition, GPs are nevertheless largely tools of a state run by an élite who regard us as cattle and an NHS system that props up that élite-owned multi-billion dollar industry, big pharma. Hardly an impartial environment in which to work, especially as many of the guidelines followed by GPs are authored by scientists funded by those very same allopathic drug cartels. Rarely, do I ever see, in a doctor’s waiting room, posters displaying the virtues of a healthy diet or the advantages of natural products like Hemp or Aloe Vera, just some of the vital ingredients that might reduce the number of incumbents in those waiting rooms. Instead you find scare posters showing viruses as man-eating monsters and instructions to ‘get the jab’, and while the queues in the chemists seem to get longer and longer, people don’t look any healthier, in fact quite the reverse. they are becoming increasingly obese and sluggish.

So I will continue to take my GPs advice with a pinch of salt and research everything he tells me in order to get a second opinion from someone outside of the ‘industry’. Question everything, don’t believe ‘officialdom’ willy-nilly, do your homework and your own research, forming an opinion over a broad concensus and, above all, live a healthy lifestyle, something which I have not always done in the past but through experience would now strongly recommend to everyone.

Latest from NO2ID

2009-01-09T14:25:00.003Z

In a context of growing unease and opposition to ID Cards and the ongoing escalation in the harvesting of people’s personal information by government and non-government agencies, the hunt is on for an advertising agency to ‘sell’ the idea of ID Cards no doubt using all of the hype, spin and misinformation at their disposal - advertising agencies stock in trade. NO2ID’s latest poll shows that the opposition to government data-trafficking is 2 to 1.

Another County Council has voted against ID Cards. Surrey County Council has voted against them by 44 votes to 20, with just 2 abstentions, pledging that it would not participate in the scheme unless made to do so by law. Of course it will come to that, but the message from council members is quite clear. Stephen Cooksey of the County Council put his feelings on record by saying that "The motion may appear to be a small step of defiance against unacceptable government intrusion into our private lives but many other local authorities throughout the country have already taken action and together send an important message to the central government that local government values the freedom of individuals and their right to privacy; values its relationship with the citizens that it serves and will do everything possible to prevent that relationship being undermined."

Manchester, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Stockton-on-Tees, Leeds, Plymouth, Coventry and London are all to get a taste of a surreal but not too far distant future as the Kali Theatre Company take their latest creation on the road. ‘Another Paradise’ is set in the context of a society in which ID Cards are mandatory and citizens can only be validated by their digital ID in a National Identity Database. I hope that more authors, playwrights and dramatists stage these kinds of scenarios in an accurate and convincing light as they can be powerful tools in illustrating the harsh realities that such legislature will bring and counter the cloud-cuckoo hype that an eventually-appointed advertising agency will no doubt have to devise into promoting ID Cards.

For further information on NO2ID’s activities or to join, go to www.no2id.net

The other way

2009-01-08T14:45:00.002Z

VAT cuts haven’t worked and lowering interest rates aren’t going to either as the Bank of England today desperately cut its base rate yet again, this time to 1.5%, the lowest ever in its history. With this growing realisation, talk is now centering on - yes - increasing the money supply, just the way the Bank of England’s progeny, the Federal Reserve Bank, is doing. This is both desperatism and yet another clear indication that those at the very top really do wish to have us all enter the mire of the mother of all depressions in order to hoover up the useful bits and attain more centralised control in the process.

Ironically, in the US, Executive Order 11110 of June 4, 1963 signed by President Kennedy and still legally binding (although - for obvious reasons for those running the Fed - was barely put into practice before it was scotched) would hold a key to liberation from the dead weight of the Bernanke cartel.

EO 11110 gave powers to the US government to issue its own currency backed by hard silver held by the Treasury Department. $4 billion worth of United States Notes, as they were known, were actually brought into circulation, briefly, in the 60s as a result, having the great distinction of being debt-free and interest-free. Under this system and by ousting the debt-laden Federal Reserve money system and its controlling central banker's stranglehold over the US, the current national debt would never have reached its present level. But life is never that honest and easy when it is controlled in perpetuity by a bunch of power-hungry psychopaths! Now, instead, in the US and elsewhere in the world, we will all be burdened under a mountain of debt with banknotes worth less than the paper they are printed on, devaluation, a massive tax burden for Joe Public who, at the end of the day, has to pay for it all and quite likely, hyper-inflation not to mention all of the baggage that comes with it like high unemployment, food shortages etc.

In the US those executive powers still remain on the statute books and could be used to re-establish an alternative government-created currency, backed with tangible assets as a means of getting out of the current horrific financial mess that the Fed has been creating since 1913, and re-build the American economy - although not before dismantling some of the global apparatus that has also hastened the country’s economic decline. Of course they don’t want you to know that and if Obama or anyone in Congress tried, they would end up like Kennedy - on a mortuary slab!

New World Order - confirmed

2008-12-09T16:39:00.003Z

Today the Financial Times of London carried a lead story entitled ‘And now for a world government’.

Is the author of the piece, Gideon Rachman, baring the enemy’s fists on their behalf? Whatever, the fight is about to commence and you can tell this when the cabal are publicly admitting to it.

In his article he cites the assertion made by Strobe Talbott, one of Obama’s advisors, in 1992 that “In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.” He also points to the words of Jacques Attali, advisor to Nicholas Sarkozy that “Global governance is just a euphemism for global government.”

Rachman goes on to say that he believes that the EU is a blueprint for that global one-world state.

But his words that “International governance tends to be effective, only when it is anti-democratic,”...“In general, the Union (EU) has progressed fastest when far-reaching deals have been agreed by technocrats and politicians – and then pushed through without direct reference to the voters,” gives me the distinct impression that he is batting for the globalists and not on our behalf, suggesting, as he does openly, that the road to that end goal is best achieved through dictatorial powers!

When such an influential newspaper of record starts to publish such admissions you can bet that the cards are on the table.

Now it’s over to us to make our retaliatory move if we care about democracy, freedom and liberty.

Latest from NO2ID

2008-12-05T12:34:00.005Z

Hidden away in new legislation proposed within the Queen’s Speech this week is the appalling, but not unforseen, unbridled increase in data sharing.

In the depths of the Coroners and Justice Bill - the way controversial pieces of legislation are always quietly levered in - are measures to exercise sharing of data without Parliamentary debate. These powers follow the Thomas/Walport Data Sharing Review paper which recommended "that where there is a genuine case for removing or modifying an existing legal barrier to data sharing, a new statutory fast-track procedure should be created".

Jack Straw went on to say that this will "simplify the data protection framework and remove any unnecessary obstacles to data sharing".

As NO2ID states this would “allow the government effectively to set aside not just the Data Protection Act and data protection principles when it suits, but the much more fundamental protections of Articles 6 and 8 of the ECHR/HRA, of common law confidentiality and of ultra vires.

This goes far beyond data protection into administrative and constitutional law. Rather than protecting our personal information as it should, the government is cutting away safeguards for its own data-trafficking convenience. This bill as it stands smashes the rule of law and builds the database state in its place. We need to do everything we can to stop these powers being passed otherwise it really could mean the end of privacy as we know it."

These powers will completely strip away our data protection rights for the sake of fast tracking procedures that, until now, have contained checks and balances to protect ordinary, innocent people. At a stroke it will introduce a no-holes-barred database surveillance state.

Following the European Court of Human Rights ruling that the retention of the DNA records of innocents, or those who have been convicted of minor offences be outlawed, last night’s BBC News piece on the subject ended on a unhelpful counter note implicating that the continued retention of all DNA records might be beneficial, without which the conviction of Ipswich mass murderer Steve Wright, might not have been possible had not his DNA been retained on the database following a minor theft many years previously. Staffordshire’s Chief Constable was also expressing concerns that the court’s rulings would take away an important tool available to the police.

And that's the basis of the argument always dangled in front of us when yet more of our rights and privacy is being stripped away - the convenience in apprehending crime and terrorism. So our rights of Habeus Corpus are replaced with those of Napoleonic law - everyone is potentially guilty until innocence is proven. And the reason for all of this? The perceived threat from a world of lawless individuals, terrorists and organised crime. Yes, such threats always lurk somewhere in any society, but the most dangerous elements of it, today, seem to lie within our own governments, the executors of that unseen hand, the New World Order cabal whose sole aim is to incarcerate us all.

Police powers are getting totally out of control, aided and abetted with the affirmative nod and a wink from government. Initiatives such as those contained within the Coroners and Justice Bill must be opposed and curtailed.

Still on the subject, only yesterday came the news that musicians and performers in London will soon be required to complete and hand over an eight page form in which they must detail all of their personal information and ethnicity. Failure to comply could well mean the loss of their licence and therefore livlihood.

Then in Wednesday's Mail Online comes the news that state officials are to be empowered to demand an individual's identity at any time - yet another goody announced in the Queen's speech, the debate of which was conveniently over-shadowed by the furore over Damian Green's warrantless arrest. (Connect the dots together and could the Green debacle have also been used as a shield to deflect debate on the controversial legislation in the speech?)

The compulsory need to show one's ID is usually reserved for times of war and were last used when Britain was fighting Germany. Who is the enemy this time? Us!

Project Camelot

2008-12-03T16:25:00.005Z

Michael St Clair

One of the St Clair family that can trace its roots far back in time, Michael St Clair was born in Switzerland, served in the Swiss Army then, later, went into banking where he picked up a great deal of knowledge on economies and financial investment.

Having lived in the almost fairytale-like Chillon Castle beside Lake Geneva, Michael St Clair, more recently, moved to Florida. He is the author of several books, most notably ‘Zen of Stars’ a novel set in several dimensions, which St Clair says has a tendency to change people’s consciousness as they read it, saying that it an almost impossible book to describe. The essence of the book combines the subject matter of four earlier ones, condensing and combining elements on astrology and planetary alignments - a subject which fascinated St Clair from an early age - Earth changes, future trends in politics, diplomacy, society, economics, science and so on.

Goodbye 'Real World'

Following his employment in banking St Clair decided to leave the ‘Real World’ - the hard, deterministic one - and involve himself in the world of the occult, not as it is popularly regarded, but as an involvement in ‘hidden’ matters, in fact what will become understood science in future. The world that he is currently immersing himself in is that which can be explained in the words of quantum physics, but St Clair argues that to more properly understand it you have to ‘live in it’. This requires the expansion of the psychic mind as opposed to everyday linear thought processes and it is this expansion of our psychic concsiousness that he believes will embrace a much greater number of people on Earth in the coming years as planetary alignments begin to allow an opening up of the discrete senses.

Coming changes

St Clair is in no doubt, as so many of us are now, that the immediately forthcoming years will see great upheaval here on Earth, both geo-politically and geo-magnetically as a newly emergent planetary alignment influences itself upon our world and our minds, one which should bring heightened spiritual awareness to much of mankind. He believes that the seemingly irrational and catastrophic course that our current economic and political world is now facing is largely the result of the interaction of alien grey and reptilian races with many of our political and Illuminati communities, urging them to attain a position of dominance, to control our world with a central bank and financial system, world army and judicial system, creating a hi-tech serfdom, none of which is in any way in our best interests, but the quest for which will result in tumultuous wars and conflict.

With our world due to change in drastic ways, geo-magnetic disturbances will also cause a dramatic rise in earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes etc. creating widespread havoc, St Clair adds to this the great transformation that will effect our consciousness through the new astronomical dimensional alignment - potentially a tremendous awakening for man, but not something that everyone, he believes, will be able to handle, with the often in-built human trait of resisting change, bringing with it riotous behaviour among many human beings. St Clair envisages a dramatic loss of life resulting from these geo-magnetically generated disasters, maybe halving the world population.

Zones of Radiance

What will be paramount will be enough people with newly heightened awareness and possessing specialised skills to lead the remaining souls on earth in setting up, what St Clair calls, ‘Zones of Radiance’, small clusters of communities worldwide that communicate with each other either telepathically - with their newly heightened awareness - or by a sophisticated form if Internet. These communities would return to the values of living close to mother earth but retain and further develop advanced technologies for peaceful purposes from generating free energy to working with nature in a wholly complementary way.

At present, St Clair reckons that there are only a mere handful of people worldwide that could carry forward such a survival project at present. Although that number is expanding, the vast majority of the Earth’s population are living in total ignorance of true reality and are totally devoid of the spiritual foresight necessary to engage in this forward thinking.

St Clair admits he, personally, has no blueprint in his own life for the way forward at present other than his concept of the ‘Zones of Radiance’ and allying enough like-minded souls to come on board. With a heightened inner-awareness, he believes that it’s going to be a matter of feeling one's way forward by instinct and implicate guidance and that there is no formula for the journey ahead, no checklist, other than the vision the ‘Zones of Radiance’ scenario implies.

Conclusion

Personally, I find St Clair’s claim that the Earth, as a living organism, may well benefit from the sloughing off of, maybe, 50% of its current population, as a necessary means to 're-balance' the planet a bit disquieting and could be construed as a comment from the mainstream Illuminati agenda. The question is, are a large section of ordinary people on this planet creating the disharmony we witness today, or are they so dumbed-down as to be a burden to the well-being of our Earth as St Clair might be implying? We must remember just who dumbed them down in the first place, a relatively small group in world society who I and others see as being the main root cause of disharmony on this planet - the so-called Illuminati and their entourage, those who St Clair maintains are being covertly controlled by the reptilians and the clone greys.

If great geo-magnetically-caused upheavals are to engulf our world in the next few years, then the collateral loss of half the Earth’s population may well be unavoidable, but St Clair’s vision of a select few who survive and go on to build a new world of heightened spirituality and awareness, rather smacks of the priviledge some human beings may have over others.

I do believe though, that it is incumbent on us all to improve our ways, realise the way we are being entrapped by out Illuminati masters, discard materialism, expand our love to all and heighten our awareness of infinite reality, the process of which we hope will be naturally enhanced by coming planetary alignments.

The spectre of things to come?

2008-11-26T18:43:00.003Z

Largely unreported in British mainstream media, riots have broken out in Iceland while the country teeters on the edge of bankruptcy. Having built up its economy on the back of the engineered global banking scam, the after-effects of that scam are becoming ever clearer in the eyes of the general public. What is happening in Iceland, where about a third of the country’s population are in serious danger of losing their homes and life savings, will soon emerge elsewhere around the western world, particularly in the US as the man in the street becomes savvy to the gross manipulations of the central banks in deliberately bankrupting economies and buying up their remnants on the cheap.

A banner hung from a government building read “Iceland for Sale: $2,100,000,000”. This is the amount that the country will receive from the IMF, that infamous global bank that has incarcerated so many third world countries in impossible debt, only to gradually buy up their infrastructure as collateral against that unpaid debt and Iceland will become yet another wholly-owned subsidiary of the élite.

This morning, the BBC finally got round to reporting the amazing increase in gun purchases in the US, particularly in Texas. Revolution is just around the corner in that country and will soon manifest itself once the love affair in Obama’s ‘change’ policies evaporate and prove to be just more of the empty rhetoric from the ongoing élite-backed Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton (now that Hillary is Obama’s Secretary of State) regime.

This perception is backed up by renowned Russian political analysist, Igor Panarin, who predicts that the US may well fragment as some state legislatures are beginning to call for a complete break from the union. The dollar is soon to crash, as we have long since known, as it becomes an empty and worthless currency, and Panarin believes that China or Russia or a coalition of the two countries may provide a replacement the US as a new world market regulator. Seeming to be on the ascendant side, of course he would say that, but it is obvious that this economic upheaval is a prelude to centralised banking control on a global basis and all the rest of the centralised baggage that comes with it.

So expect bloodshed on the streets of the US next year as armed private citizens battle it out with FEMA SWAT teams, US troops, Obama’s newly formed squads of social snoopers etc etc. As the heads of the British police forces have been warned to prepare for civil unrest in this country, what Iceland is currently witnessing may well be repeated on the streets of Britain as a similar fate befalls us and Brown’s so-called economic rescue package becomes the damp squib it is bound to be, leaving us and the nation massively indebted to the banks and destitute.

I suspect that next year will be a time for us all to take to the streets in protest of the iniquities that are being enacted by the élite in front of our eyes and which are becoming more transparent as each day goes by.

Project Camelot

2008-11-26T15:33:00.005Z

Bill Holden

Engaged as a Loadmaster and Flight Steward in US Air Force Special Missions, Bill Holden led an interesting career and became privy to certain aspects of top secret projects being conducted by the US government. Not only did this involve the back-engineering of their technologies to which the military had become acquainted, but also direct liaison with extraterrestrial beings.

President Kennedy’s revelation

His first interesting encounter came aboard Air Force One in 1963 while employed as one of the onboard stewards accompanying President Kennedy to Berlin on the eve of his famous ‘Ich bin ein Berliner’ speech. During the flight, Holden had picked up a couple of German newspapers, the headlines of which reported on a UFO sighting over an autobahn the previous day. While fetching Kennedy a glass of fruit juice, Holden left one of the papers beside it. Kennedy asked Holden what he thought of the report and he replied that his upbringing had taught him to believe that there must be other intelligent lifeforms out there and that he believed the reports to be credible. To Holden’s surprise Kennedy replied “You're right, young man”.

Holden’s ‘Top Hat’ clearance vowed him to secrecy and not to disclose any conversation he might overhear while aboard any presidential flight. To attain this clearance Holden had been subjected to and Extensive Background Investigation (EBI) to assess his suitability for maintenence of such secrecy. For years Holden had never disclosed Kennedy’s response.

First encounter

While based at Zweibruken in Germany, Holden had the opportunity to fly in one of the new F-104 Starfighters. Being just about the fastest aircraft around at that time, they were soon to find out that their capability would be outmatched when Holden spotted another craft close by. When they hit the afterburners in an attempt to pursue the craft, it advanced away from them at tremendous speed, belying the fact that it could be of terrestrial origin. Back at base after reporting the sight they were told in no uncertain terms to forget about it, they hadn’t seen anything, and tell no-one of the incident. But what they had witnessed bore a very close resemblance to the craft in the reported autobahn sighting.

Holden was always amazed at the reluctance of US newspapers and media to report saucer sightings. He recalls the front page headlines in the British Fylde Evening Gazette at the time he spoke at a UFO Conference in Blackpool, proclaiming a major UFO sighting in north west England. They even went on to augment it with a special full page report!

Special missions

Holden's career entailed participation in special missions from time to time which required signing a 20-year non-disclosure agreement with stiff penalties should he break its conditions. One such assignment involved Holden going to Andrews AFB to collect and accompany a party of high ranking military officials in a series of visits to highly restricted locations. Their first port of call being Wright Patterson AFB in Ohio, long associated with the dissemination of alien artifacts and technology.

From there they flew to Cheyenne Mountain, home to NORAD HQ with its vast underground network and waited aboard the aircraft while the top brass entourage were given a guided tour. Then it was off White Sands in New Mexico. Normally told to remain on the aircraft while the top brass went about their business, on this occasion he was asked to accompany the party on board a bus with blacked out windows which took them to the ‘blue hangar’, a highly restricted facility. Holden and colleagues were allowed to disembark with the officials and it was here that he witnessed two ‘grey’ aliens and one of their craft parked in a box canyon. They were about 5 feet in height, wearing one-piece coveralls and Holden remarked on the fact of how gracefully they moved.

On a later mission, Holden was asked to accompany yet another, different, high ranking group. The destinations, at first, mirrored those of the previous mission, but then the C118 in which they were being flown headed to the west coast landing in Los Angeles. The following morning they embarked for Hickham AFB in Hawaii. A little after 0700 hrs the following day they were taken to a beach on the west coast of Hawaii for a breakfast when they witnessed a most incredible sight as a saucer craft suddenly emerged from the ocean and began to perform a whole series of incredible manoevers in front of their group, then disappearing almost instantaneously. It soon returned as suddenly as it had departed entering the water without causing the slightest disturbance to the water. This phenomenon, of course, is explained by the craft’s surrounding force field which effectively leaves it out of contact with the sea.

Although Holden believes the craft to be one of alien origin, he is now well aware that many sightings today are of our own back-engineered versions.

CE5

In the summer of 1971, Holden found himself stationed at Patrick AFB, Coco Beach in Florida. One Friday afternoon Holden went fishing beside the Indian River. Emphasising that he doesn’t indulge in any form of drugs or alcohol, one moment he was leaning back against a palm tree and the next he found himself inside an alien craft lying on what appeared to be a pedestal table surrounded by three ETs. The message they imparted telepathically to Holden was unmistakable. Tell them to stop destroying Mother Earth and get them to learn to love one another. Reach for a higher mental level in harmony with all around. Holden maintains that he has now received this direct and unequivocal message from the ETs twice. At no time during this experience did Holden feel intimidated or frightened, but felt privileged to be a part of such an important liaison.

He later realised that he had received an implant while on board the craft, but refuses to have it removed as he believes it is a crucial link between him and the ETs which he hopes will result in a further meeting one day.

Machu Picchu

While stationed at Howard AFB in Panama, Holden was sent on a further trip to the Nazca Plain in Peru. A team of astronauts returning to Earth from a mission had noticed some hieroglyphics on the plains in Peru which the Air Force wished to have recorded on film. The hieroglyphics comprised of a monkey glyph and a large humanoid-looking figure, clearly of extreme vintage. While there, a further part of their mission was to visit the ancient city of Machu Picchu at Cuzco where they saw the equally ancient cave drawings of helmeted figures and flying craft. To finish they visited a building in Lima which housed 20,000 to 25,000 year-old skeletons. Holden related all of this ancient evidence of ante-diluvian civilisation and alien visitations to what is cryptically described in the Old Testament joining the dots together and linking homo sapien’s origins to those beings from other planet. These missions seemed to have a special purpose, initially to test the reactions of certain chosen personnel to the revelation of this information, perhaps as a means to preempt the response of society in general to greater universal disclosure of such knowledge of other extraterrestrial life forms and our origins.

Desert party

In 1977 Holden had further personal experiences of extraterrestrial flying craft out in the Mojave desert, close to Edwards AFB, where, apart from flying craft engaging in incredibly amazing manoevers, he witnessed what only could be described as a massive mother craft in the night sky, the size of a football field. The fields generated by the craft caused Holden’s skin to acquire a shade akin to sunburn, but which, after a few days, gradually dissipated.

Holden is of no doubt that a secret pact had been signed, back in the early ’50s between the extraterrestrials and the US government. Other understandings he holds support the testimony of Col Philip J Corso of Air Materiel Command’s Foreign Technology Desk who was actively engaged in disseminating items of recovered alien technology from saucer crashes - apparently caused by our radar which played havoc with their guidance systems - and handed them out to industry to back-engineer, resulting in night vision, fibre optics, integrated circuits and a whole host of other technologies which are now either commonplace in our every day lives or hidden from the public in the form of esoteric anti-gravity propulsion systems being manufactured and tested today, in Holden’s view, by such companies as Lockheed and probably many others.

Classified conference

In 1995 Holden was invited to a highly restricted conference, organised, interestingly enough, by the Rockefeller Foundation, for which he had to change his identity and fly to northern California where he was taken to a location known as the Alisai Ranch. Here he, two KGB officers, a Lt Colonel and several others including the father of the man who had owned the ranch outside of Roswell (presumably Mac Brazel, where the famous July 1947 alien craft crash had taken place) examined some of the items recovered from the crash - ones that had been kept out of the reach of the Army Air Force recovery team. The almost identical similarity between the hieroglyphics on some of the I-beam struts with those of Phoenician Sanskrit were very telling, clearly indicating the seeding of mankind’s early written languages from those of the alien visitors to this planet and their involvement in our development.

Going public

Since retiring from the Air Force, Holden went on to run his own real estate business, but once beyond his 20 year commitment to silence, he felt it high time to take his story on the road, giving talks and the interview with Project Camelot. He feels it is of the greatest importance to let the world know that we are not alone by any means and that we are the living evidence of genetic creation by an off-world intelligence, whose technologies far exceed our own. Since going public, only once has Holden been warned off speaking of such subjects. An encounter with the stereotypical ‘men-in-black’ took place in his home on one occasion, to which Holden stood his ground using his First Amendment rights as ammunition. No such warnings have come his way since.

Conclusion

Of Holden’s whole story the most fundamentally important message for us all is that which was telepathically imparted to him by the greys while aboard their craft in Florida. Their warning about the way we conduct our lives though wars, greed and despoilation of our planet is paramount and Holden is not, by any means, the only recipient of this message by our alien ‘watchers’, so many others have been similarly warned, even though that message would be more properly aimed at the so-called élite that run this planet and pose the greatest threat to mankind.

His awareness has come not only from other-worldly intelligences but, also, from our own race. It seems apparent that the missions he engaged in where also aimed at judging human reaction to being confronted with extraterrestrials, their technology and those ancient artifacts that bear witness of extraterrestrial association with this planet, and ourselves, for millenia. Holden admits that he feels no fear or any threat to his belief systems from what he has witnessed and learned, indeed one can infer a strenthening of his spirit and a much heightened awareness.

It is this through listening and understanding the profound depth of Holden’s experiences that we must all aspire to open our minds to a much greater awareness than that of our everyday mortal toil, deliberately shielded as we are from higher belief, and liberate ourselves from this hell in which we are imprisoned by the propaganda of our worldly jailors and masters. We must use use the message of Bill Holden and others who have been chosen to be conduits of the truth, to increase our knowledge and awareness, break free and become our own free masters, for without that we will perish as our extraterrestrial ‘watchers’ fear.

Project Camelot

2008-11-17T19:13:00.005Z

Project Camelot was founded as a worldwide platform for whistle-blowers. At a time in society when secrecy is more endemic than ever among those in intelligence, industrial and government communities, it is vital that those ‘in the know’, despite their vow to secrecy, divulge their knowledge in an attempt to help liberate mankind and bring to justice those who are denying us that most vital information about us as a species and revealing those enacting this secrecy that are hell-bent on enslaving our lives.

The project’s focus of attention so far has been on such topics as:
• extraterrestrial visitation and contact
• time travel
• mind control
• classified advanced technology
• free energy
• possible coming earth changes
• revealing plans that exist to control the human race
and has featured individuals who have been privy to certain restricted information in these fields, either through top secret clearance in some government or allied agency, or ‘divined’ through hyper-sensory encounters with alien beings.

As a result, Project Camelot hopes:
• To establish ‘safety in numbers’ and unite these disparate factions under an umbrella of protection for activists and ‘whistleblowers’ who may have concerns for the safety of themselves and their loved ones.
• To provide a tribute to all activists in paradigm-challenging fields who have worked for the benefit of humanity... and who have suffered or been silenced for speaking the truth.

Over the next year I intend to disseminate information from some of the more notable interviews with these whistle-blowers that the project has recorded in recent times and draw a commonality and concensus over what is being kept hidden from the public domain.

Ralph Ring

Retired from military service in 1954, Ralph Ring had inwardly always been a conscientious objector and didn’t believe in killing. While stationed in Guam, he didn’t care for the fights that would habitually break out every night in bars between members of the different services and instead would go scuba diving where he became entranced by the subaqueous world. Although he continually asked for postings to engineering divisions within the military, he was always posted to heavy weapons divisions and so emerged from the services without many technical skills.

His love of diving encouraged him to set up a scuba diving business in California following up in the R&D division of a diving manufacturing company. Being a rather risky business, Ralph’s wife persuaded him to take a land job and he joined a lab tech team at Advanced Kinetics, a company engaged in government contract research.

His first job was to study the behaviour of electron particles as they were passed through a magnetic field with the specific instruction to photograph the passage of a single electron that was not deflected by the field. This was an impossible task and was ultimately costing the taxpayer a lot of money in time and materials with no tangible or worthwhile result. Ring decided to employ his heightened sense of rationality and deep understanding of nature, over the task at home by setting up his own rig using pulsed energy to release the electron flow. This simple intuition was successful as, sure enough, the electrons travelled in a straight line without being deflected.

Another group at Advanced Kinetics were levitating steel balls with an electromagnetic coil, but found that the coils would burn out after a short period of time. Again, it was all government-funded work that was employing brute force instead or harnessing the natural laws of nature to achieve the desired results while costing the taxpayer dearly and providing no result. Again, Ring went home and decided to achieve the desired effect by simply using sound frequencies. After finally achieving the right frequency the ball levitated continuously.

With this successful experimentation under his belt he took these findings to his boss, who, to his surprise, showed no interest at all, insisting that their current methods of experimentation be adhered to. The fact was, that they had no intention of achieving their goals. As long as the government funding poured in it was just a case of maintaining the status quo. (This fruitless research rather reminded me of the efforts that are continuously expended on finding the cause and cures of cancer, when a great wealth of succesful treatment already exists having being pioneered by such people as Royal Raymond Rife, Dr Max Gerson and others). This forced Ring to leave the company.

Later a chance encounter with someone who was actually interested with what Ring had been doing, introduced him to a group of like-minded people who were regularly attending a group called ‘Understanding’ led by a man called Daniel Fry who was involved with UFO technology.

Once with this group Ring was soon introduced to Otis Carr who he found fascinating. Carr had developed a craft that could levitate, deriving its energy by simply plucking and utilising the ever-present energy in the air all around us, in the same way as Nicola Tesla had done with his electric car and the Wardenclyffe transmitter, intended to provide the wireless transmission of free electrical energy to all and sundry. But Carr was a wanted man and had been continually hounded by intelligence agents under orders to bury this technology. Yet Carr perservered and Ring joined him in his experimentation.

When he and Ring took their technology to General Motors, they threw it out in much the same way as JP Morgan had totally discounted Tesla’s wireless transmission of free energy. There’s no money in it, therefore it can’t be controlled by the élite whose sole intention is to have us all beholden to them.

Ring describes his experience aboard the levitating craft that Carr had developed. About 45 feet in diameter, the craft had on board a crystal ball device - effectively a synergistic biofeedback mechanism - which displayed the entire colour spectrum. The crew collectively concentrated their minds on one specific colour in that spectrum - aquamarine. This colour corresponded to a point some ten miles distant from their current position on the ground which they reached almost instantaneously.

This was an experience that Ring would never forget. Once at their destination, Carr instructed the disembarked occupants of the craft to pick up any objects lying around on the ground and stuff them in their pockets. They then returned, instantaneously to their point of origin, but with no memory of having been anywhere, yet when they emptied their pockets they found proof, the objects they had collected 10 miles away. Only in later recall did any vague memory of having been at their destination site emerge, but then only as a dream-like recollection.

Like so many before him, Carr was eventually hunted down by government agents, the craft and other devices destroyed and his work terminated. These were well-known technologies in Illuminati circles but clearly something we mortals should not be meddling with. Free energy would effectively liberate us from their total control of our lives.

Carr regarded Ring as the next in line to pass forward this technology to his successors, for they all believe that man must pursue and adopt these free energy devices for peaceful purposes and for man’s and his planet’s benefit if we are to survive and prosper, despite the odds.

Obaminess rules!

2008-11-05T13:48:00.003Z

And so, predictably, amid hails of adulation from the suckered masses, Obama has become 44th US president. The usual display of American-bred hysteria was on view, some believing Obama to be to be the saviour, others the panacea to all of America’s current woes.

In some ways I can understand the euphoria and it only underlines a collective grief among Americans over White House policy and the wholly dysfunctional state of the country right now.

In a much more moderated way, I watched Tony Blair’s entrance to number 10 with hope and relief after years of Thatcherism. In Gordon Brown’s, appearance on Desert Island Discs, just before the election of New Labour, he imparted a message of justice and fairness, one which even had me posting a cheque of support to Labour Party HQ! How times change and how naievety falsely colours one’s understandings of the world. I have moved on since then, and what an eye-opener it has been. Since Blair’s inauguration, what had gone before under Thatcher seems tame in retrospect. Within the span of his premiership, great swathes of our freedoms were plunged into jeopardy, a fledgling police state established and an illegal war engaged upon, not to mention all of the lies, spin and deceit.

Similar hopes among the American electorate will soon evaporate too, as Obama’s policies (or more accurately, those policies demanded of him by those above) will appear as nothing more than a continuum of the Bush legacy. Paul Watson of infowars.com lists those policies which Obama has already publicly aired, but which seemingly missed the radar of his idolators:

- The creation of a “civilian national security force” that is “just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the U.S. military to enforce his carbon tax scheme and the total regulation and control of the American middle class.

- Intent to bomb Pakistan under the guise of pursuing terrorists, continuing a Bush administration policy of violating the sovereignty of foreign nations.

- The guarantee to “bankrupt” coal power plants, costing millions of American jobs and skyrocketing energy prices.

- Unbridled implementation and expansion of the banker bailout that is hated by the majority of American citizens yet was vigorously promoted by both Obama and McCain. Doling out taxpayer’s money to Wall Street, causing rampant inflation, a lowering in living standards and the destruction of the dollar.

- A rhetorical support of the second amendment of an individual’s right to bear arms has been contradicted through his support of local gun ban laws, including his endorsement of a state ban on the sale and possession of handguns in Illinois.

- Grandstanding on the notion that he supports environmentalism with his climate change rhetoric, but his intention to extend biofuel subsidies will only accelerate price food costs that have already risen 75 per cent since 2002, causing economic distress and rioting in such countries as Haiti, Egypt, and Somalia, as well as deforestation on a massive scale.

How many times must we go through this repetitive scenario of unfulfilled promises from the new incumbents and their ongoing continuance of the already established policy of a preceding ‘opposition’, before we realise that election manifestos are pure bull, staged to capture our attention and swing our votes to endorse the already chosen party giving the appearance that ‘democracy’ is alive and well. It doesn’t exist. America’s future has already been formulated by think-tanks and secret committees and all possible resulting scenarios run through powerful super-computers while the most desirous outcome to those in control has already been chosen, for their understanding of the collective human psyche has become a fine art.

Both here and in the US, the two party system has become a sham. It is two sides of the same coin - identical. As long as we continue to elect the wrong horse every time and make no attempt to understand the real game play at work and disenfranchise both sides of that same coin, we will continue to be led down the road that the movers and shakers what us follow into a brief twilight and then eventual oblivion, for their plans for our future - which can easily be verified from their very own policy documents - are in sharp contrast to those we would hope for.

Monday 13 October 2008

2008-10-13T12:18:00.007Z

Latest from NO2ID

Despite the current economic turmoil, the government is still pressing ahead with the Communications Data Bill which will be referred to in next month’s Queen’s speech. Allowing the government to monitor our every phone call, email, text and every bit of surfing we engage in, the data will be stored and analysed, perhaps kept for decades. Short of government sponsored CCTV in our homes, we will be surveilled 24/7. If one links to that RFID plans on tagging all of our purchases including clothing, the gates are open to usher in the total Big Brother state with privacy a thing of the past. We will all be regarded as potential threats to the state built on the back of the ruse that the measures are being introduced to combat crime and terrorism, both of which have been overblown, particularly the latter which is largely fantasy. Any misdemeanor, either intentional or not will allow close scrutiny by officialdom of the finer points of our lives, our activities, persuations and much else. Personal profiles will be assembled based on our web surfing preferences and blogs - such as this one - be taken into account and used as evidence of my disagreement or construed as potential non-compliance with these draconian elements of government policy. As a Guardian article last week pointed out “Would a protester at the Kingsnorth power station feel quite so confident in facing the police if she knew that the minute she was arrested, the police could find out that she'd just spent a week looking at abortion on the web? Would a rebel politician stand up against the prime minister if he knew security services had access to the 100 text messages a week he exchanged with a woman who wasn't his wife? It isn't just the certainty that such data would be used against people that is a deterrent, it's the fear. As the realisation of this power grew, we would gradually start living in the prison of our minds”.

The Tories have announced that once elected they would replace the government's current ContactPoint scheme, a system that holds data on all children in England, with a cut down version which would only concentrate on children seen as ‘vulnerable’, ie. those in care, on the child protection register or with backgrounds of domestic violence. This less invasive approach may be seen as a potential vote-winner, but once in power I would expect a ‘U’-turn as an empowered Tory party is brought into line with Big Brother policies.

Instructions of how to hack into Oyster cards has been published on the web. This follows news in an earlier ‘Latest from NO2ID’ that Dutch academics had highlighted the weaknesses and vulnerabilies of Oyster cards. Now details of those weaknesses have been published online. This not only involves the Oyster card but also other smart cards based on Mifare Classic technology. The manufacturer of Mifare, NXP and the Dutch government have tried to prevent disclosure of the academics’ findings, but a Dutch judge rejected their opposition and allowed it to be published. At the same time Henryk Plötz, a PhD student at Humboldt University in Berlin published a master thesis of how to employ the algorithm used in the Mifare cards. Armed with this now commonly available knowledge, anyone with time and the will can hack into these cards, making them a risky proposition for their holders, but necessarily highlighting the vulnerability of these hi-tech devices, now widely in use, and their potential for mass fraud.

In a similar vain the techies have been busy informing us how to create a back up copy of our own ID chip or use a modified chip to create a fake passport that will not be detected by some passport reading devices.

Other hi-tech ID technology is also proving inefficient. Facial scanning currently being trialled at Manchester airport, is causing a number of headaches with the technology breaking down on a daily basis and failing to detect incidents of ‘tailgating’, where two people go though on one passport. The technology had also been rejecting 30 per cent of travellers, but after making adjustments to try and eliminate the problem, the false acceptance rate rose!

All of this goes to prove that assurances that ID cards, both national and of local nature, do little, if anything, to add security to our identities, in fact quite the reverse and in pursuing and implementing these technologies, government policy is opening up a whole can of worms and endangering each and everyone of us both to the ravages of being tracked and traced and also in having our identities either misinterpreted or stolen.

Friday 26 September 2008

2008-09-26T18:34:00.005Z

Yesterday, Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith unveiled the controversial ID Card. In what is being seen as the softly, softly introduction of this grossly invasive piece of legislation, the BBC put a positive light on it interviewing gullible youngsters on the street who generally spoke in favour of them. The only voice of dissent was Phil Booth of NO2ID whose limited time span in the news piece only allowed commentary on the government’s appalling record of data loss, implying how that could impact on this scheme.

Non-EU foreign nationals will be carrying the cards from this November onwards, while staff in highly secure environments - like airports - will be required to carry them from next year, and applicants for new passports will require an ID card from 2011 onwards. Thankfully mine isn’t due for renewal until 2014 but who knows what might happen before then! Phil Booth of NO2ID has cited the mandatory need for an ID card for non-EU foreign nationals as starting at the easy end with a group of people who have most to lose if they don’t comply - either they have one or they’re out!

Airport workers revolt over next year’s proposed introduction of ID cards. Airport workers and the TUC are fiercely opposed to their members carrying ID cards telling government that they are being treated like guinea pigs in a scheme that so many are opposed to and has very doubtful, if not negative, benefits. The British Airline Pilots Association said that it would be prepared to mount a legal challenge on human and employment rights grounds if the government sought to make them compulsory for their members.

Meg Miller, a Labour under-secretary at the Home Office has suggested that people as young as 14 should get ID cards, two years younger than the current age limit. Miller was addressing a meeting of tobacconists and convenience store owners and stated that the government was keen to implement such a move as quickly as possible. “There isn’t a way to unpick this scheme, (once implemented) quite rightly because it is invaluable" she bragged. With the Tories’ current rhetoric of scrapping the ID card scheme (more of an election gimmick than reality, I suspect) Labour would be keen to have this scheme in place before the next general election.

Anger has arisen over the collection and storage of car journey data by civil liberties campaigners. Once collected the information would be held on a database for five years. Some 10 million journeys a day are being currently recorded using automatic number plate recognition (APNR), but plans are already under way to raise that figure to 50 million.

Friday 12 September 2008

2008-09-12T08:24:00.003Z

The race to use advanced technology to compile databases on us is wholly self-defeating. The government’s latest plaything - the ContactPoint database - has been delayed for three months due to technical difficulties. Originally due to be launched last April and receiving a further hold up to its revised launch next month, ContactPoint, which holds the details of every child in England and Wales, will be delayed by another three months because of fears arising from the HMRC child benefits data loss in November of last year. In the words of Professor Ross Anderson of the University of Cambridge “The public sector wastes huge amounts of money (taxpayers’ money) on software that doesn’t work. The most likely explanation is that they can’t get ContactPoint to work”.

The ogre of undefined menaces lurking around every corner is being used under another Orwellian-sounding piece of nonsense being created by the EU - Statewatch. Designed to make us all feel safe from these menaces, Statewatch seeks to garner as much information as possible about each individual across the EU by using un-fettered powers in its attainment, an operation which it, unsensitively refers to, as a ‘digital tsunami’ for the benefit of law enforcement and security agencies - certainly not for our benefit!

Another flaw has been identified with fingerprinting technology. A frequent air traveller was recently refused entry to New Zealand, until she eventually proved her identity to immigration officials, as her fingerprint scans did not match those on the database. An official stated that this quite often happens on long-haul flights where the passenger has been subject to cabin pressurisation for a long period of time in that pressurisation alters the fingertip geometry beyond the tolerance of biometric measurements!

If you think the retention of your personal data is safe the think again. German companies are engaging in the illegal trading of millions of sets of personal data drawn from the official registration system. The revelation has only come after the story was picked up in the press and officials had to admit to the fraud. Intermediaries who hold the data on behalf of town halls - and eventually - a centralised database, have used the selling on of personal data for commercial gain, a pretty predictable state of affairs when private corporations are allowed to be the ‘custodians’ of our profiles!

In France, the Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL) and the Office of the French Information Commissioner forced the government to publish a secret decree which authorised the creation of a highly intrusive database on French nationals. Clearly created under the hand of that infidel of the NWO, Nicholas Sarkozy, the register codenamed ‘Edvige’ would list everyone over the age of 13 who had been active in politics, trade unions, has a significant role in business, the media, entertainment or social and religious institutions - in fact a list of, quite possibly, 20 million people, who, as the authorities perceive them, would be likely to breach public order. Since they maintain that so many people’s personal profiles are readily available on Internet forums such as Facebook, it’s OK to amass information this way. (Of course, that was probably one of the covert ideas behind Facebook and other social forums of its ilk). Although officialdom has tried to dismiss outcry follwing the revelation of this vast data-mining exercise, saying that it is just a higher-tech version of the current Renseignements Généraux (RG), Michel Pezet, a former member of the CNIL said “The Edvige database has no place in democracy... The electronic Bastille is upon us”.

The retention of innocent people’s DNA records are still being found. A Tory MP who was fingerprinted after the murder of his 80-year old uncle, but who was proved innocent has stated that he has become a victim of Labour’s ‘Big Brother’ policies. Well, don’t be vindictive, they’ll become your party’s policies after the next general election!

Friday 29 August 2008

2008-08-29T17:56:00.006Z

The Latest from NO2ID

The cost of the national census is being used as an excuse to use data-mining and sharing as a substitute it seems. The New Local Government Network’s (NLGN) report ‘Local Counts’ suggests that “£500 million could be wasted on the next census”. Just how many millions are being wasted on the vast data grid that is being created. The traditional census ensured privacy, their suggestion won’t.

Whenever talk of DNA databases arises the standard response from officialdom is that ‘if you’ve done nothing wrong, you’ve got nothing to worry about’. Then why are DNA records of some 40,000 innocent children and one million innocent Britons continue to be held by the police, implying that they are criminals?

98% of Britain’s electoral officers have aired their opposition to junk mail companies having the ability to purchase names and addresses from the electoral register. Although provision is given on the annual voter registration form to disallow your name from being sold to direct marketing companies, the option box isn’t obvious and I must admit that I failed to check it before sending back my latest form. Again, like the petty fines being imposed on citizens dropping litter or using the wrong dustbin, this is just another intrusive and seedy way for local government to raise revenue.

With protection being the emotive reason, a flagship database intended to protect every child in the country will be used by police to hunt for evidence. Having used the Victoria Climbié case as a reason to push forward with the ContactPoint scheme, the database will list information on the children’s parents, their GPs, schools and social support workers. But latest information reveals that the police, council staff, head teachers, doctors and care workers will all have access to these records to search for any evidence of criminality or wrongdoing - presumably as trivial as putting your waste in the wrong bin or photographing your child in public and becoming listed as a ‘potential paedophile’!

The company responsible for having recently lost a memory stick containing the records of 84,000 prisoners, is a key contractor in the government’s controversial ID card scheme. The company, PA Consulting, has been paid almost £100 million over three years, that’s £1000 per day. How re-assuring!

The introduction of Youth ID Cards is to be delayed until 2011, a year later than originally envisaged. Although they are supposed to be only voluntary at first, they will be necessary to open a bank account or take out a student loan, so there’s going to be a pretty captive audience!

The tally of lost personal data by Whitehall has risen to 4 million items in just one year.

Government IT projects are usually a shambles. Apart from taking much longer to initiate, they usually end up costing far more than originally budgeted and invariably break down. The new NHS database goes one further in that it could also breach human rights!

Another black mark for the NHS has come in the form of dumping their old computers in Ghana, where hard drives are being mined of our personal information, while the health aspects of melting down the useful parts is being totally ignored, killing young children who are employed in the activity.

Friday 15 August 2008

2008-08-16T09:51:00.003Z

Latest from NO2ID

The e-passport is a worldwide standard developed by the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) following pressure from the US and each passport carries an embedded chip holding data about the holder. Two years ago Adam Laurie, a security expert, worked with NO2ID to demonstrate how easy it was for others, with the right kit, to read the data on the chip without even taking it from its envelope. It has now been revealed that fake chips could easily be implanted onto a legitimate passport. Following the news of the 3,000 blank passports that were stolen from the back of a van last month, e-passports at present offer no security or are no guarantee to preventing illegal immigrants and the scope for abuse is enormous.

Awareness is key to educating the public about the dangers of centralised databases containing all manner of information on citizens. A good way of doing this is though the media of a novel and author Jeffrey Deaver has done just this in his latest book ‘The Broken Window’. The threat of government databases is the basis if his story, revealing through NYPD forensic consultant Lincoln Rhyme and his detective partner how they go after a psychotic mastermind who uses data-mining to hunt down his victims and implicate complete innocents. Their research reveals the enormity of the Big Brother state and how the use of this data-mining can be used by homicidal maniacs. A true allegory of our times.

New wider data retention regulations have been published by the government as a proposal to mandate a law requiring all ISP’s to retain all user's email, text and Internet records. This vastly extends existing legislation that applied to non-Internet data only. If passed these laws could be on the statute books by next March. In parallel with this is the so-called ‘Snooper’s Charter’ (as I reported last Wednesday’s blog) which would allow a whole spectrum of public bodies, including everyone from councils to health authorities, the powers to tap this retained data and, essentially, ‘snoop’ on the public at large.

Meanwhile in Northern Ireland plans to roll out 640,000 free travel passes are being described as an ID card by stealth. John Welford, a Scottish pensioner who is against what these bus passes and their Scottish equivalents could become, has warned of the dangers. In 2005 Scottish MP’s rejected a national ID card. Welford believes that the bus passes issued to the most vulnerable section of society - pensioners - are a way around this non-compliance by the Scottish parliament.

Opposition to the outright introduction of ID cards can be easily got round by introducing them in a gradual, almost covert way. Starting out as benefit cards, they can allow free travel for the elderly. But once the cards are in place and holders get used to carrying them their use can later be extended and modified to include chips which, by use of a reader, can be used to track and trace people’s movements. As time progresses their capabilities can be enhanced, drip by drip, until they eventually become mandatory among all age groups, bear more and more personal information and then come with a requirement that they must be carried at all times. Then you’ve introduced your national ID card through the back door! Might this be an alternative method should opposition to their outright introduction become an insurmountable obstruction to the government?

Also in Scotland a controversial ID scheme involving some 8,000 school children from some eight secondary schools is to be introduced. The children involved in this pilot scheme will be fingerprinted so that they can be tracked by teachers, although the proposed plans have come under fire from parents who fear of misuse of adequate controls of who could have access to the fingerprint data.

A Dutch Security Researcher, Joroen van Beek, from the University of Amsterdam, has recently shown how he could get a ‘cloned and manipulated’ passport chip to be recognised by any reader thus allowing a fraudulant user to gain access into a country. This was all done without changing the passport chip itself! He could take a writable RFID chip, load it with personal data, then hash that data and make a self-signed certificate using the same parameters of a legitimate passport signature so that it would pass muster at immigration control. He even went on to show how he could become his own passport-issuing country!

Van Beek then went on to take the passport of a 16 month-old British boy, put it on a £40 smart card reader, punch a code into his computer and retrieve all the information on that card. Of course, this isn’t supposed to happen because of the powerful encryption used. But thanks to Adam Laurie, a renowned computer expert, he worked out how to crack the encryption code some 18 months ago. This information allowed Mr van Beek to then go on and clone the young British boy’s data chip onto another chip, launch a piece of software called ‘Golden Reader Tool’ (the International Civil Aviation Organisation standard kit for checking biometric passports) and the cloned chip is then flagged up as authentic!

But it only gets better.

On his computer, Mr van Beek alters the cloned chip and removes the image of the child, the Times photographer Michael Crabtree’s son, Thomas, and replaces it with the image of Osama bin Laden. He does the same with the passport of my partner, Suzanne Hallam, installing the image of Hiba Darghmeh, a Palestinian suicide bomber instead. And, if the chips had contained other biometric data, such as fingerprints or iris scans, he could have changed those too.

At first, Golden Reader refuses to authenticate the new, altered chips. A digital key signature, a certificate of authenticity, has been changed, and the reader is concerned. But Mr van Beek falls back on the work of Peter Gutmann, from Auckland University, New Zealand, who found a way to programme another key signature into the chip. The ICAO’s reader software now accepts both chips as genuine. (TimesOnLine 8 August 2008).

Monday 4 August 2008

2008-08-04T18:04:00.003Z

Latest from NO2ID

The Human Genetics Commission has suggested that there should be a harmonisation of approach towards the retention of people’s DNA on a central database. Currently, in Scotland, innocent people’s DNA records are removed from the database and the Commission favours that that rule be adopted also in England and Wales.

The annual report from the Information Commissioner’s Office has commented that any moves by government to construct a central database of all telephone and Internet communications should only come after the fullest possible debate with the public. The proposal constitutes excessive surveillance in the Commissioner’s view and is a ‘step too far for the British way of life’.

Singer/songwriter, James Neilson Graham has just released a single lamenting Britain’s loss of liberty and privacy. The song, ‘Oh What a Liberty’ takes a satirical approach to the issues of CCTV and ID cards.

Last Wednesday Britain unveiled stricter visa rules which will require students from India and other non-European countries to provide their fingerprints and proof that they have enough money to support themselves while in Britain.

More ID checks are on the way for residents of Northern Ireland who wish to travel to other parts of the UK.

Air passengers flying from UK airports will face compulsory fingerprinting from next year. This will involve fingerprinting both at the security and departure gates. The Home Office then plans to introduce the same measures at all seaports and Channel Tunnel rail links. The usual excuse is given; to enable the police and security services to compare the fingerprints with those of wanted criminals and terrorists, thus we must all be implicated. The use of fingerprinting is said to allow the mixing of both domestic and foreign passengers in airside departure lounges and shopping malls. As well as being fingerprinted and photographed like criminals, the retail chains in the airside shopping malls will then benefit commercially by enticing domestic as well as international passengers to their stores, including the BAA-owned duty-free shops.

Wi-fi provider blocks out political websites in London

While the mainstream news media crow loudly about censorship in China and about the severe restrictions that Chinese surfers face with many international free-speech websites blocked, it comes with some predictability that similar restrictions are now beginning to appear in Britain.

The unbridled Internet has been a tremendous source of alternative, uncensored news, a means to find out what is really going on in the world without being kept in the dark with the politicised, sanitised and propagandised version of events we get from the proprietory sources where strict editorial control is exercised from above.

Paul Joseph Watson of infowars.com was startled and dismayed to find that while using the wi-fi facilities in St Pancras station in London, he was unable to get onto his own websites or indeed those of almost every non-mainstream news media source. This wasn’t a technical malfunction, this was deliberate censorship aka China!

What is happening in the St Pancras and neighbouring Kings Cross station areas is going to be coming to your home via your Internet provider before very long.

It is the duty of every citizen that believes in an open, fair and just society, where one is entitled to hear political views of every hue in order to obtain a fair and balanced picture of world events, to complain bitterly to the Home Office.

Information posted on the infowars website is based solely on fact, deriving its information from all manner of news sources, both mainstream and independent and from official government documents, FOIA material, reliable insiders, congressmen and women, scientists, historians, economists etc etc - amassing a vast resource of in-depth research material that is vital to any student of geopolitical affairs; information that should be the right of any and every citizen as his or her resource - among others - to help construct in their minds a truer picture of the world in which we live. To deny us this right is utterly despicable. What right have the media moguls and those ‘Illuminati’ in whose hands they operate, to dictate to us what we should or shouldn’t know. As a free spirit, human being and inhabitant of this planet, I have as every much right to know what they know and to have the ability and opportunity to pass on my political opinions based on such information for others to consider or reject as they see fit.

To deny us access to these vital forums, the British, Chinese and those governments of an ever-growing number of other countries around the world are re-enacting a mission in the same evil spirit as Goebbels' burning of the books in Nazi Germany when the works of such luminaries as Albert Einstein, Sigmund Freud, André Gide, Franz Kafka, Thomas Mann, Marcel Proust, Emile Zola and HD Wells were deemed unacceptable to the state and the German people and therefore confined to ashes.

Let not history repeat itself!

Monday 21 July 2008

2008-07-21T18:00:00.006Z

Latest from NO2ID

The recently published ‘Data Sharing Review’ by the Information Commissioner and Mark Walport of the Wellcome Trust has seriously neglected to recognise the enormity of the database state. The only acknowledgment it makes is in its annexe which states “A recurring theme among members of the public was the disparity in power between the citizen and the state in relation to data sharing.” "It was said that the citizen has no choice but to use public (or publicly administrated) services, but equally had no choice or say over how their personal information is used once it was in the public sector" The report then goes on to say that the removal or modification of legal barriers to data sharing should be instigated, presumably letting everybody poke their noses into our private lives. They just don’t seem to care about our rights or privacy!

The Italian government’s plan to fingerprint gypsies in a so-called move to combat crime, has been heavily criticised as being ‘racist’. Quite probably expecting this reaction, the government has now suggested that everyone be fingerprinted to eliminate such criticisms. How convenient!

A Home Office initiative to coerce youngsters into accepting ID cards hasn’t quite produced the response the government might have hoped for. The web site invites youths to engage in dialog with the Home Office over ID Cards by asking them what they think of them. Many of the replies have indicated just what they think... "We don't want the ID Card", "Number of The Beast", "What could 4.4Bn of taxpayers money be better spent on?", "Carrying on the Stalinist security state dream", "Creepy".

The German government insists that ID fingerprinting will not be compulsory when the new electronic ID cards are introduced in 2010 after widespread criticism and controversy over the originally planned compulsory need for it. Presently there are quite widely differing schemes in use or in the process of implementation throughout the EU. Spanish plans are to have its ID cards associated with a central database in which full biometric data of all citizens, including fingerprints, are stored. In Britain there are, rightly, grave misgivings over the use of a central database.

Airport operators have written an open letter of complaint to the Home Secretary about plans to issue some 200,000 airport workers with ID cards. They maintain that they will have no tangible advantage. The cost of implementing the scheme is reckoned to be more than £4 billion. The authors make the contention that in proposing this scheme the “UK aviation industry is being used for political purposes on a project which has questionable public support”.

With ministers wanting to relax elements of the Data Protection Act in order to cross match our personal data from different sources, there has come serious concern that the end result could be very misleading and dangerous. Data held by different bodies is collected specifically for an individual purpose and if government were to try and assemble it from lots of disparate sources in an attempt to create a more comprehensive picture of us, that assembled picture could be rather like making up a jigsaw and joining the wrong pieces together. With trust in government’s ability to handle data securely currently at an all time low, any attempt to trust it with data from multiple sources is quite frightening.

ID cards chief, James Hall, has admitted that the ID cards database will not be secure. Following a plethora of secure data breaches over the last year, Hall suggests that we should be concerned about the security of our personal data held by government. His statement that the IPS’ scheme will, however, be robust and secure, holds little credence.

Following Transport for London’s requirement that children using the network must carry Oyster Photocards serious questions have been raised about the amount of information TfL is gathering on its younger customers. Parents and the Information Commissioner have asked TfL why it is doing this. Of course, if you want to ensure your child’s privacy while travelling in London, make sure they pay cash, that way they will be issued with a standard anonymous Oyster card.

Saturday 5 July 2008

2008-07-04T18:24:00.004Z

Latest from NO2ID

A peaceful protest resulted in the arrest of nine NO2ID campaigners at an invitation-only Home Office public consultation recently on ID cards. This is yet another kick in the face for freedom of speech and the ability of law-abiding citizens to raise valid questions about government policy. Those arrested included a mother with her 4-year-old child and a retired academic, hardly security threat material unless you consider any criticism of government policy as a security threat, which this government obviously does. If an honest opportunity, such as this so-called public consultation, is being made unavailable to those who are worried about compulsory identity cards and the setting up of a vast nationwide database of all citizens, then the only recourse left to us is that of non-compliance in governments plans and that is a course of action we MUST take. But how many will just acquiesce using the weak excuse of ‘I have nothing to hide’ as their defence? With that attitude you have everything to lose!

Government ID Card propaganda in Austria matches the euphorics displayed by the people of that country at the time of Hitler’s Anschluss. Their advertising banner shows people jumping for joy and almost wetting themselves in anticipation of their ID scheme with the slogan ‘get yourself activated’. I hope that Austrian citizens behave rather differently in reality and tell the government where to stuff their ID scheme, otherwise, in reflection of those events in 1938, we could justifiably ask the question ‘has nothing being learned?’

Meanwhile in Britain the slogan ‘Everyone’s Unique’ is being used to sell the same iniquitous scheme. Let’s hope everyone is collectively unique in turning their backs on this shameful legislation.

The National Health Service is considering opening up the availabilty of patients’ healthcare records to a much wider audience outside of the NHS itself. This could include social care bodies, voluntary and private sector organisations, pharmacy, dental and optical services - in fact almost everybody. Wouldn’t it be a lot easier if the government issued us all with sandwich boards listing all of our vital statistics and have us wear them every time we went out on the streets?

A fast track scheme for ‘trusted travellers’ is to be instigated by the Home Office for those who travel regularly between the US and the UK. Fingerprint and facial recognition technology would be employed to prevent regular business travellers from having to queue in airport terminals

Although the Scottish government has made it clear that it does not intend to use ID cards, having one will make life a lot less difficult for many and it is predicted that by 2011 many in Scotland will use the card as their main form of identification - so that’s as good as making it compulsory!

The FBI’s The National Security Analysis Center (NSAC) has been denied an $11 million appropriation by the US House Science and Technology Committee to continue to work on a massive database of the government's records of nearly all American citizens. This STASI-like database was to have been used to predict would-be ‘terrorists’ without any more than a ‘hunch-like’ reason, eliminating any hope of due process by those who be might implicated thus. I’m sure this is only a temporary set back for NWO operatives and if the scheme isn’t taking place under cover elsewhere it will probably rear into existence in some other form before long.

The Mod and HMRC have been highly criticised for their recent data losses by the Information Comissioner’s Office. This will undoubtedly open the doors for placing every local and central government officer under Orwellian control.

According to an article in The Economist British citizens seem largely happy to trade in their freedoms and liberties. Large numbers of organisations seem to be following the government’s lead in using technology to do their own surveillance, whipped up by a constant barrage of news stories and statistics that impound terror, crime and fraud threats, and the public at large seem prepared to accept these largely contrived stories and willingly allow a surveillance grid grow up around them. I wonder if they will still be happy with this arrangement when these same organisations pinpoint them as a threat?

Here's what The Economist found:

The last days of Internet freedom?

2008-06-27T18:09:00.003Z

Over the last two or three decades the quality of television programming has been undoubtedly dumbed down with hours of no-brainer demi-entertainment, no real political or intellectual debate (remember the Brain’s Trust and other programmes of its ilk?) and watered down documentaries that concentrate, more often, on annoying and distracting visual effects rather than on incisive content. On top of that, the BBC continues to be largely the mouthpiece of the government, carrying little independent in-depth analysis of current affairs and geo-political events, portraying matters in accordance with government dogma - and to add insult to injury, we have to pay a license fee for the privilege.

We are all liable to pay that license fee, or tax, if we own a TV or computer enabled to receive live streaming broadcasts, regardless of whether we own a TV or not. The National TV Licensing Office has a known habit of disbelieving those who say they don’t possess one and harasses them accordingly. The proceeds from the license ‘tax’ are passed on to the BBC, despite the fact that in the Wireless Telegraphy Act there is no mandate that the corporation is to be the legal recipient of, what currently amounts to be, an annual £3.2 billion income. The arrangement between the government and the BBC has always been conducted out on a ‘nod and wink’ basis rather emphasising the fact that the BBC is just another government department - the Department of Propaganda!

But, in the words of a well-known talk show host, I digress.

By comparison the Internet is an open forum for debate and learning and a treasure trove of information - once you have negotiated the dodgy stuff - providing a true democratic platform for all and sundry and a means to voice one’s personally held beliefs without been censored.

But things are about to change. This golden egg is about to be snatched away from us and frankly I’m rather amazed it hasn’t happened before now.

Since the inception of the Internet, open sources of news and information have been awakening the minds of many millions, on an exponential scale, to the horrendous conspiracies that are being enacted by our ‘leaders’, bankers, corporations, indeed many of those who run our daily lives. At the same time newspaper readership, TV viewership - and thus advertising revenue - has been in steady decline as millions have turned to the Internet for alternative news sources, learning and entertainment. This worries the movers and shakers, because it is offering an alternative platform for the masses, empowering us to create an independent network of knowledge which is out of the controlling clutches of those manipulative few.

What they have gained though - and this is a very worrying aspect of the equation - is the ‘hard-wiring’ of a good percentage of the population into a global ‘neural network’ brought about through our constantly-connected computers to a hub of global servers, which through consolidation and government control can become the ideal way to control us and our lives in our very homes! Soon-to-be-imposed statutory changes by the global élite on the way it is run will make the Internet we know and love today become a very different environment.

Let’s look at some of those planned developments, that are being seriously discussed and in the early stages of implementation.

Charging by the byte Until now, everyone using the Internet pays an access fee to their Internet Service Providers (ISP) that hardly varies whether you’re still on dial-up and only check your email once a day or whether you’re broadband connected and downloading hours of films, many of which can be free of charge. Now three ISPs, Time Warner Cable, Comcast and AT&T are actively considering everything from charging their users for exceeding a pre-set bandwidth quota to deliberately slowing downloads speeds for those so-called bandwidth hogs. There’s obviously big money to be made here and while the Disneys and NBCs of this world are actively encouraging online viewing, then the money will just keep rolling in. One could argue that the Internet is really replacing TV and that in a few year’s time conventional television will become obsolete, yet we are still saddled with a TV licence fee we are duty bound to pay even if we don’t have one.

Pay as you go Bell Canada and TELUS employees have officially confirmed a plan to be introduced by 2012 that will reduce Internet access.

"Bell Canada and TELUS (formerly owned by Verizon) employees officially confirm that by 2012 ISP's all over the globe will reduce Internet access to a TV-like subscription model, only offering access to a small standard amount of commercial sites and require extra fees for every other site you visit. These 'other' sites would then lose all their exposure and eventually shut down, resulting in what could be seen as the end of the Internet," according to a report posted on the ‘I Power’ website.

In addition to this, Bill Gates and others are already considering a charge for every email sent. The pretext for this ‘tax’ is to cut down the spam, but it will be non-discretionary and will really hit those independent organisations and movements, exercising freedom of speech, that post newsletters by email to a large database. They won’t be able to afford it.

It is expected that this email taxing will be brought in gradually, slowly pricing out the small guys and giving preferential treatment to those large corporations who can pay.

Internet2 A concerted move to price people out of the conventional Internet while running down the old servers, making it more unreliable and slow, will coerce users over to a new all-singing and all-dancing Internet2.

Internet2 has been around for quite a long time. It was developed over a decade ago as a new, improved version of the original Internet - or ARPANET - the university-linked prototype to today’s Internet1. Being the preserve of a relative handful of privileged people, it is extremely fast - the whole Matrix movie could be downloaded in 30 seconds or less.

It is suggested that the old Internet (Internet1) will continue to exist, but as a mass-marketing tool and surveillance network to pry on the less well-moneyed and privileged. The Nation magazine reported two years ago that "Verizon, Comcast, Bell South and other communications giants are developing strategies that would track and store information on our every move in cyberspace in a vast data-collection and marketing system, the scope of which could rival the National Security Agency. According to white papers now being circulated in the cable, telephone and telecommunications industries, those with the deepest pockets - corporations, special-interest groups and major advertisers - would get preferred treatment. Content from these providers would have first priority on our computer and television screens, while information seen as undesirable, such as peer-to-peer communications, could be relegated to a slow lane or simply shut out."

Internet2, on the other hand, with its far superior performance, will be highly regulated and censored, bringing it into line with conventional mainstream TV - everything will be government controlled and material vetted with ‘undesirable’ political content and free speech being either outright banned or relegated to the slow lane of a disintegrating Internet1.

Demonising the Internet Almost every day we are reminded that the Internet can be a dangerous place, a breeding ground for paedophilia, terrorism and porn. Paul Joseph Watson of Infowars gives us a glimpse of what is going on behind the scenes and why mass-media demonisation of the current Internet is making way for the enactment of strict controls.

Time magazine reported last year that researchers funded by the federal government want to shut down the internet and start over, citing the fact that at the moment there are loopholes in the system whereby users cannot be tracked and traced all the time.
The projects echo moves we have previously reported on to clamp down on internet neutrality and even to designate a new form of the internet known as Internet2.
In a display of bi-partisanship, there have recently been calls for all out mandatory ISP snooping on all US citizens by both Democrats and Republicans alike.
The White House's own recently de-classified strategy for "winning the war on terror" targets Internet conspiracy theories as a recruiting ground for terrorists and threatens to "diminish" their influence.
The Pentagon recently announced its effort to infiltrate the Internet and propagandize for the war on terror.
In a speech last October, Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff identified the web as a "terror training camp," through which "disaffected people living in the United States" are developing "radical ideologies and potentially violent skills." His solution is "intelligence fusion centers," staffed by Homeland Security personnel which will go into operation next year.
The U.S. Government wants to force bloggers and online grassroots activists to register and regularly report their activities to Congress. Criminal charges including a possible jail term of up to one year could be the punishment for non-compliance.
A landmark legal case on behalf of the Recording Industry Association of America and other global trade organizations seeks to criminalize all Internet file sharing of any kind as copyright infringement, effectively shutting down the world wide web - and their argument is supported by the U.S. government.
A landmark legal ruling in Sydney goes further than ever before in setting the trap door for the destruction of the Internet as we know it and the end of alternative news websites and blogs by creating the precedent that simply linking to other websites is breach of copyright and piracy.
The European Union, led by former Stalinist and potential future British Prime Minister John Reid, has also vowed to shut down "terrorists" who use the Internet to spread propaganda.
The EU data retention bill, passed last year after much controversy and with implementation tabled for late 2007, obliges telephone operators and internet service providers to store information on who called who and who emailed who for at least six months. Under this law, investigators in any EU country, and most bizarrely even in the US, can access EU citizens' data on phone calls, SMS messages, emails and instant messaging services.
The EU also recently proposed legislation that would prevent users from uploading any form of video without a license.
The US government is also funding research into social networking sites and how to gather and store personal data published on them, according to the New Scientist magazine. "At the same time, US lawmakers are attempting to force the social networking sites themselves to control the amount and kind of information that people, particularly children, can put on the sites."

Control and restrictions The Recording Industry Association of America has routinely harassed people who they have identified as having downloaded music files on their PC, whether obtained legally or not, by issuing fines under, what they claim to be, copyright infringement. The Internet is one giant network of hyperlinks to all manner of sites and in this grey area of copyright infringment, there is the potential for companies to cause havoc by suing individuals for breaking copyright laws. Court cases that rule in favour of organisations that claim breach of copyright are only preparing the way for more stringent control of the Internet by government, imposing rules on those running websites and dictating what can or cannot be posted. Blogs such as this could be shut down by Google because of the controversial political issues that are raised in its columns, stifling open debate and the right for individuals to put forward their point of view or merely educate, relay information and warn others of what really goes on behind the mainstream media headlines.

The purported risk of online credit card fraud would naturally lead to mandatory ruling that one's personal biometric information be provided as a user logs on to the Internet. The risk of identity fraud through online biometrics poses real threats. As I reported in the latest NO2ID news last Friday, Ross Anderson, professor of security engineering at Cambridge University correctly pointed out that one’s personal biometrics cannot be changed once a security breach has been made, like changing your PIN number if the security of your credit card is compromised. Your personal biometrics are a permanent part of you.

Conclusion As the Nation magazine pointed out over two years ago: "The nation's largest telephone and cable companies are crafting an alarming set of strategies that would transform the free, open and nondiscriminatory Internet of today to a privately run and branded service that would charge a fee for virtually everything we do online."

So enjoy the Internet while you can. In a few years time you may well be surfing a ‘net’ that is as restrictive as the current Chinese model, where all content is adjudicated by the state and real information and news may become increasingly hard to find.

Friday 20 June 2008

2008-06-20T12:05:00.005Z

Latest from NO2ID

Technology will save us all That’s what Gordon Brown believes! In his address to the Institute of Public Policy Research recently he tried to communicate that there was support for the ID Scheme. Clearly, he's living on another planet. To re-inforce this impression he went on to say "in fact it starts from a recognition of the importance of something which is fundamental to the rights of the individual: the right to have your identity protected and secure". The collation of 50 pieces of personal information (as sanctioned by Schedule 1 of the ID Cards Act) to be held by the state and shared among other agencies is a protection of individual rights and security? Crap! He goes on "I believe that the new plan for the ID card scheme announced by the Home Secretary in March included important steps in the direction of the 'principle of data minimization' which the Committee recommends". 50 items of information which need to be continually updated as an individual’s personal circumstances change - which they do all the time! Unbelievable!

In Sweden, websites opposing a new law introduced by parliament to allow the military radio service to monitor all telecommunications in and out of the country have received more hits than that of Euro 2008. Amid uproar among the public, civil liberties groups, lawyers, IT specialists, the journalists' union and even members of parliament, the country’s leading newspaper, Dagens Nyheter, commented "It will now be legal to eavesdrop and spy on people who are not under any kind of suspicion. We're not talking about Yemen, North Korea or the former GDR here, but about Sweden."

In true mind-control fashion, Gordon Brown is continuing to press ahead with ID Cards, CCTV and the DNA database despite grave concerns about the National Identity Register, the doubtful effectiveness of CCTV surveillance as aired by senior police officers and the presence of over 1 million innocent people’s DNA on the national database.

ID Cards could be used to spy on people That is the warning from a group of MPs. The powerful Home Affairs Select Committee warned of ‘function creep’ in that the cards could be used to track people. The government’s ability to safeguard sensitive information is totally lacking as almost every week stories of missing data abound. Already the committee has called upon government to minimise the amount of information it gathers on each individual, particularly following the loss of 25 million personal details by HM Revenue & Customs last year.

The use of Linux software in London’s Oyster Card payment system has been denounced by free-software advocate Richard Stallman. Online payments cannot be made anonymously, so anyone paying for their Oyster Card top-up online is effectively allowing their transaction and travel details to be monitored by the government. "Each Oyster card has a unique ID, which it transmits when it is used," said Stallman, "So, if you make the mistake of connecting the card with your name, then Big Brother knows exactly when and where you enter the Tube system and where you leave. For the surveillance-mad government of the UK, this is like a dream come true." Stillman suggests paying for top-ups by cash. That’s OK until we become a cashless society!

Biometric identities are rife for stealing by the Mafia according to Ross Anderson, professor of security engineering at Cambridge University. Anderson explained “There is a fundamental security engineering problem with biometrics as opposed to the cryptographic keys in your chip and pin card. ID card Biometric identity cards could be less secure as your details, such as fingerprints, cannot be changed if they are stolen. Once your biometrics become compromised, you cannot revoke them. It is not practical to do eye or finger transplants. Once you start using biometrics on a very wide scale, for all sorts of everyday transactions, the Mafia will also have your biometrics. You do not know which shops are owned by the Mafia but if you end up having to put your fingerprint on the glass every time that you buy a can of Coke, sooner or later the Mafia will have the biometrics of millions of people.” For 'Mafia' also read 'government'.

The Home Office Crime Reduction website was hacked into by cybercriminals to host an Italian phishing website last Monday. Jacques Erasmus, head of malware research at Prevx, said that "This is very embarrassing for the Home Office, having the Crime Reduction website hacked by cybercriminals is a bit like having a mugger hiding in the local police station nicking people's wallets when they come in".

Would you trust government with your top 50 vital statistics - NEVER!

Monday 9 June 2008

2008-06-09T17:49:00.004Z

Latest news from NO2ID

The originally titled Identification, Referral and Tracking (IRT) system in the UK has now been given the less intrusive title of Information, Sharing and Assessment (ISA), but its intrusiveness is in no way diminished. Local councils up and down the country are now using the newly-titled system to share information with public sector bodies including the police, fire service, education chiefs, social workers and housing staff. Despite many local councils’ stated opposition to ID cards it seems their willingness to dispense and share citizens personal details is forthcoming and does little to protect private individuals personal right to know who knows what about them.

The Cambridge Branch of the University and College Union (UCU) - Britain’s largest academic trade union - has accepted a proposal at its annual congress in Manchester, held at the end of last month, to unanimously oppose the introduction of ID cards. The union has affiliated itself to the NO2ID Campaign.

Britain has signed up to a pilot EU cross-border electronic identity scheme which, although, not mandatory at this stage, will run for three years and receive £7.9m funding from the EU. The pilot scheme called ‘STORK’ will "enable EU citizens to prove their identity and use national electronic identity systems (passwords, ID cards, PIN codes and others) throughout the EU". It will not replace current members states’ national systems but ‘align and link’ them. People are being coerced into their use with the Commission emphasising their benefits: "throughout the EU, some 30 million national eID cards are used by citizens to access a variety of public services such as claiming social security and unemployment benefits or filing tax returns". Through "its size and momentum", the project will "overrun traditional barriers and encourage the mutual acceptance of other countries' electronic identities ". Perhaps a more accurate acronym for the scheme would have been STALK.

‘Freedom not Fear’ demonstrations have been gathering apace in Germany in protest against telecommunications data retention which is currently becoming a highly contested subject in the country. The organisers are keen to spread their message about the growing rise of the surveillance state to other countries in Europe.

Fingerprint scanning at two nursery schools has been criticised by a children’s rights group. They rightly claim that subjecting young children to such routines will make them regard finger scanning as a part of life.

Scotland’s controversial microchipped entitlement cards are to be reviewed by ministers following a successful campaign by civil liberties groups who claim that the plastic swipe cards bear an uncanny resemblance to the scheme the Home Office is proposing for the National Identity Register. The current entitlement card could be easily expanded to include all manner of personal data and it is feared that it may be used as a ‘back door’ to a full ID card.

Under the headline of ‘A picture of something chillingly Orwellian’, Scotland’s Daily Herald ran a piece last month on the dangers of our entering a Big Brother state along the lines of Orwell’s 1984. While altruistic reasons are always given for an ever-increasingly large dossier of our private profiles - 'efficient service delivery’, ‘keeping us safe’, ‘avoiding duplication’ etc. - the dangers of such initiatives are rapidly out-growing any benefits. Data losses and theft are commonplace and demonstrate the dangers of centralised databases and the retention of highly personal information. With the current drawing up of the Communications Data Bill in which Home Office officials are seriously suggesting that all of our emails, texts and phone calls are kept on a database, it's bad news for citizens when government departments routinely abuse that privilege, either deliberately or accidentally. The quality of information gleaned from these databases and surveillance techniques can produce a lot of ‘false positives’ and by putting too much faith into the stored data, innocent people could be wrongly accused. On the commercial side, Tesco’s Clubcard and those of other major stores, are enabling retailers to assemble a frighteningly predictive profile of their users. So it isn’t just the government spying on you, it’s also commerce. There are already hundreds of sites selling medical histories and other sensitive data to any interested party, which may sometimes explain why you were refused insurance or a mortgage.

The latest Identity & Passport Service cost report has thrown more uncertainty on the implementation of the scheme on financial grounds. It seems that the IPS is hoping that the private sector might take on the establishment and running of interview centres - which so far haven’t caught one fraudster - together with their biometric ID card enrolment capabilities.

The War on Health

2008-06-04T17:38:00.003Z

The evidence of covert mass genocide, particularly in the US is becoming more and more plainer by the day. I reported on New York State passing legislation that imposes the mandatory vaccination of all children just the other day, but that is just the tip of the iceberg. It’s not just forced vaccines, 96% of which are known to be manufactured with all manner of toxins see: http://www.rense.com/general32/thru.htm but a whole assault arsenal including chemtrails, GM foods, cancer-inducing agents etc. all of which are being waged against vast numbers of the population worldwide with one end result in mind - drastic population reduction.

On the Alex Jones Show yesterday, astounding revelations of the degree to which this genocide is being waged was made plain by former commanding general of the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command, Major General Albert Stubblebine III and his wife, psychiatrist and founder of the Natural Solutions Foundation, Rima E. Laibow. http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/ What they had to say made very uncomfortable listening.

Part of their website - connecting the dots - illustrates the various fronts on which a concerted assault on our health and lives is being made.

Deadly vaccines We are constantly urged to be vaccinated against all sorts of terrors. Britain’s NHS displays posters of flu bugs as flesh eating monsters with headlines such as ‘if you knew about the flu virus, you’d take the jab’. If you knew what was in the vaccines - aluminium hydroxide, monosodium glutamate as well as mercury and a whole cocktail of other stuff - you would soon come to a more informed conclusion as to which was the greater evil. After all, our immune system is nature’s way of combating flu and a host of other viruses and one of the best ways to maintain an effective immune system is through healthy living and a healthy diet. Taking vaccines not only puts your health at risk, but compromises the immune system. And by being vaccinated on an annual basis - as your GP is always ready to insist - you just increase the likelihood of suffering the consequences of those toxic additives which accumulate in the body resulting in disabling diseases such as Alzheimers and all manner of cancers.

Crop spraying In California, the Environmental Protection Agency (which is anything but) have decided to spray a cancer-inducing chemical across the San Francisco Bay Area to combat a so-called pest, the threat from which is not even confirmed to exist. That pest is supposed to be the Light Brown Apple Moth, yet no evidence exists to suggest that this moth threatens crops or plant species. But it is the portrayed spectre of such menaces on our livelihoods - real or imagined - that acts as the excuse for governments to impose their deadly will on us. Elsewhere in the world crop spraying is a common practice, but little or no account is taken of the collateral effects on we humans who may be in its vicinity.

Drugs It is well documented that iatrogenic diseases - those which are caused by medical treatment - and allopathic medicines, or prescription drugs, are the number one killers in the US and many other parts of the western world. Many people find themselves prescribed manufactured drugs for all sorts of ailments - very often petty or contrived - many of which are of little or no benefit and very often of serious dis-benefit to the patient. Many are inadequately tested and the side effects from the various combinations of drug cocktails prescribed is hardly researched. Psychiatric drugs are known to have profound effects upon a person’s personality and many become addicted to them. In most cases their use is wholly unnecessary while the symptoms prompting their prescription are better treated homeopathically or by other non-harmful and natural ways. Yet the more drugs that are prescribed, the richer the drug companies become and pressure is constantly brought to bear on health authorities and doctors to reach for the prescription pad at the earliest opportunity. Often illnesses themselves are caused by our being goaded into unhealthy lifestyles by large sister corporations, and this in turn engenders the dispensation of more allopathic treatment, further funding the drug business in a vile and vicious cycle of cause and effect.

GMOs A further assault on our well-being comes from genetically modified organisms. In the US the labelling of GM foods is outlawed, carefully covering up any links which may lead back to their effects on the population. Drugs produced through recombitant DNA techniques, GM foods which have an unknown long-term effect upon those that continually eat them, hormones given to animals and people which have been made by shooting high energy ‘bullets’ into DNA to make it better serve commercial purposes which make the recipients sick, the effects of the transfer of genetically modified DNA in foods we eat and their effect on modifying our own DNA and producing proteins that have never existed on this planet before, are all frightful examples of what is tantamount to covert genocide. The amazing upsurge of obesity in the population may well be a result of such activities. Yet GM crops are promoted as one of the panaceas to the world’s food shortage, yet research has shown that GM crops very often provide lower crop yields than conventional crops.

Poisoned food As well as the effects of GM ingredients in our food, come the plethora of artificially-produced additives, colourants and preservatives that may give products a longer shelf life, a more appealing look or provide the food with addictive properties, yet all of this impresses upon our wellbeing in a grossly negative way. Our water is being contaminated with fluoride, a known toxin, which finds its way into most of our foodstuffs that come into contact with it. Toothpaste tubes carry messages extolling the virtues of added fluoride as a means to combat tooth decay, yet this message is a proven lie.

Codex Alimentarius Despite it being sold to us as ‘consumer protection’ and it being voluntary in nature, it is anything but. Codex is a blueprint for drug company dominance in health care. By effectively criminalising the use of thousands of natural health remedies whose benefits have been known for centuries by branding them as dangerous, they are forcing us into dependence on allopathic medicines whose virtues, as we have seen, are largely non-existent and most often dangerous.

Chemtrails For decades this phenomenon has been creating debate as to it ulterior motive. Large trails literally littering the skies, particularly in the US, had been dismissed by the authorities as vapour trails, yet their characteristics seem anything but. Just what form of covert bio-warfare might be going on here?

Forbidden cancer treatments Cancer is big business. Over the past few decades we have seen, what was once a rare disease, sky rocket where we expect to see one child in every two born after 2000 to get cancer, with one in every 3 adults becoming similarly afflicted. Largely the result of environmental factors: pesticides, fungicides, injected viruses like the MKV 40 virus in Polio and other vaccines, synthetic additives, mould contamination, industrial toxins, synthetic hormones in food or as medicine, heavy metals, etc. Proven cures for cancer have been known for the last century or more but the safe and effective therapies offered by people such as Royal Raymond Rife and Dr Max Gerson have been rubbished by conventional medicine and the drug companies that wag their tails. Simply put, the cancer industry is a mega-earner for the drug companies, making vast amounts of money out of treatments that do more to exacerbate the cancer and weaken the immune system thereby leading to more money-making drug treatment. Money laundering cancer research institutes that pretend to do research on the disease, while emotively fleecing the general public for donations towards their disingenuous programmes also make mega bucks out of the condition. It’s also a useful killer and covert form of genocide.

Conclusion Clearly such abuse and disregard for our health suggests an ulterior motive. Profit is high on the agenda, but not the only reason. These strategies and policies are consistent with Henry Kissinger’s now public 1972 secret assessment for President Nixon that the first consideration of America’s foreign policy needs to be depopulation. In fact this policy extends right across the world and is the stated claim of many of the Illuminati, with needless and avoidable famine in third world countries and the covert introduction immune system debilitators such as AIDS where clear evidence exists that such viruses have been developed knowingly by government military laboratories for introduction into vaccination programmes. Again, all part of a concerted genocide programme aimed at culling large numbers of the world’s population. It seems now, however, that that programme is gathering apace and becoming a threat to first world countries. We must be aware of what is in store for us and do everything we can to safeguard our health and well-being so that we can remain alive, stand up to these criminals and save our species from a vast culling.